Humanitarian principles and humanitarian disarmament: An operator's perspective

IF 0.6 4区 社会学 Q2 LAW International Review of the Red Cross Pub Date : 2024-02-26 DOI:10.1017/s1816383124000055
Josephine Dresner, Riccardo Labianco
{"title":"Humanitarian principles and humanitarian disarmament: An operator's perspective","authors":"Josephine Dresner, Riccardo Labianco","doi":"10.1017/s1816383124000055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Conceptually rooted in the efforts to ban indiscriminate weapons and both their immediate and long-term effects, humanitarian mine action and humanitarian disarmament operations have developed significantly since 1988, when the United Nations first took on work on mine action operations for the protection and benefit of local communities. A large part of those operations has been carried out by humanitarian disarmament NGOs such as the Mines Advisory Group (MAG), one of the first organizations to be established on this issue. Drawing on MAG's experience and perspective, this article explores how the humanitarian principles apply to humanitarian disarmament operations. The aim of the article is to show that as an operator on the humanitarian–development nexus, MAG considers the four humanitarian principles as a critical and necessary part of its reference framework due to the influence of the humanitarian disarmament framework, even when operating in the development space. All in all, the case of humanitarian disarmament and MAG's experience are good examples to illustrate where the humanitarian horizon is extended because of long-terms serious needs, and that humanitarian principles remain essential to keep the focus on the needs of affected populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":46925,"journal":{"name":"International Review of the Red Cross","volume":"2014 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of the Red Cross","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1816383124000055","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Conceptually rooted in the efforts to ban indiscriminate weapons and both their immediate and long-term effects, humanitarian mine action and humanitarian disarmament operations have developed significantly since 1988, when the United Nations first took on work on mine action operations for the protection and benefit of local communities. A large part of those operations has been carried out by humanitarian disarmament NGOs such as the Mines Advisory Group (MAG), one of the first organizations to be established on this issue. Drawing on MAG's experience and perspective, this article explores how the humanitarian principles apply to humanitarian disarmament operations. The aim of the article is to show that as an operator on the humanitarian–development nexus, MAG considers the four humanitarian principles as a critical and necessary part of its reference framework due to the influence of the humanitarian disarmament framework, even when operating in the development space. All in all, the case of humanitarian disarmament and MAG's experience are good examples to illustrate where the humanitarian horizon is extended because of long-terms serious needs, and that humanitarian principles remain essential to keep the focus on the needs of affected populations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人道主义原则和人道主义裁军:操作者的视角
从概念上讲,人道主义排雷行动和人道主义裁军行动植根于禁止滥杀滥伤武器及其直接和长期影响的努力,自1988年联合国首次开展保护和造福当地社区的排雷行动工作以来,人道主义排雷行动和人道主义裁军行动有了长足的发展。这些行动的很大一部分是由人道主义裁军非政府组织开展的,如地雷咨询小组(MAG),它是最早就此问题成立的组织之一。本文以地雷咨询小组的经验和观点为基础,探讨了人道主义原则如何适用于人道主义解除武装行动。文章的目的是要表明,作为人道主义与发展关系中的一个行动者,军法署署长认为,由于人道主义裁军框架的影响,人道主义四项原则是其参考框架的一个关键和必要的组成部分,即使在发展领域开展行动时也是如此。总之,人道主义裁军的情况和咨询小组的经验是很好的例子,说明由于长期的严重需求,人道主义的范围扩大了,人道主义原则对于继续关注受影响人口的需求仍然至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
28.60%
发文量
92
期刊最新文献
Interview with Nils Melzer: Director of the Department of Law, Policy and Humanitarian Diplomacy, International Committee of the Red Cross Navigating legal frontiers: Climate change, environmental protection and armed conflict Beyond retribution: Individual reparations for IHL violations as peace facilitators “When you have to shoot, shoot!” Rethinking the right to life of combatants during armed conflicts Of date palms and dialogue: Enhancing the protection of the natural environment under international humanitarian law and Islamic law
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1