“When you have to shoot, shoot!” Rethinking the right to life of combatants during armed conflicts

IF 0.6 4区 社会学 Q2 LAW International Review of the Red Cross Pub Date : 2024-04-29 DOI:10.1017/s181638312400016x
Ido Rosenzweig
{"title":"“When you have to shoot, shoot!” Rethinking the right to life of combatants during armed conflicts","authors":"Ido Rosenzweig","doi":"10.1017/s181638312400016x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Does targeting combatants really provide a military advantage during an armed conflict? The limitations on the use of force against civilians and means and methods of warfare are well developed under contemporary international humanitarian law (IHL), but the issue of targetability of adversary combatants remains underdeveloped. This paper builds on contemporary developments in international human rights law and moral just war theory to offer a revised <span>lex ferenda</span> look at the basic principles of IHL through the internalization of the value of the lives of combatants. It is argued that such a reading of IHL would allow for a rejection of the automatic necessity of targeting combatants, and hence give due consideration to the value of life of combatants (both adversary combatants and own combatants) in the evaluation of the use of force during armed conflicts, including through reduced military advantage, force protection, and adjusted proportionality analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":46925,"journal":{"name":"International Review of the Red Cross","volume":"106 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of the Red Cross","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s181638312400016x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Does targeting combatants really provide a military advantage during an armed conflict? The limitations on the use of force against civilians and means and methods of warfare are well developed under contemporary international humanitarian law (IHL), but the issue of targetability of adversary combatants remains underdeveloped. This paper builds on contemporary developments in international human rights law and moral just war theory to offer a revised lex ferenda look at the basic principles of IHL through the internalization of the value of the lives of combatants. It is argued that such a reading of IHL would allow for a rejection of the automatic necessity of targeting combatants, and hence give due consideration to the value of life of combatants (both adversary combatants and own combatants) in the evaluation of the use of force during armed conflicts, including through reduced military advantage, force protection, and adjusted proportionality analysis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
"该开枪时就开枪!"反思武装冲突中战斗人员的生命权
在武装冲突中,以战斗人员为目标真的会带来军事优势吗?在当代国际人道法(IHL)中,对平民使用武力以及战争手段和方法的限制已经得到了很好的发展,但以敌方战斗人员为目标的问题仍未得到充分发展。本文以国际人权法和道义正义战争理论的当代发展为基础,通过对战斗人员生命价值的内在化,对国际人道法的基本原则进行了拟议法的修订。本文认为,对国际人道主义法的这种解读将允许摒弃自动以战斗人员为目标的必要性,从而在评估武装冲突期间使用武力时适当考虑战斗人员(包括敌方战斗人员和己方战斗人员)的生命价值,包括通过降低军事优势、武力保护和调整相称性分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
28.60%
发文量
92
期刊最新文献
Interview with Nils Melzer: Director of the Department of Law, Policy and Humanitarian Diplomacy, International Committee of the Red Cross Navigating legal frontiers: Climate change, environmental protection and armed conflict Beyond retribution: Individual reparations for IHL violations as peace facilitators “When you have to shoot, shoot!” Rethinking the right to life of combatants during armed conflicts Of date palms and dialogue: Enhancing the protection of the natural environment under international humanitarian law and Islamic law
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1