Exploring the therapeutic role of early heparin administration in ARDS management: a MIMIC-IV database analysis

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Journal of Intensive Care Pub Date : 2024-02-26 DOI:10.1186/s40560-024-00723-5
Ling-Xi Xiao, De Liang Zhu, Juan Chen, Jing Lv, Mei-Jun Liu, Xue Dai, Dao-Xin Wang, Wang Deng
{"title":"Exploring the therapeutic role of early heparin administration in ARDS management: a MIMIC-IV database analysis","authors":"Ling-Xi Xiao, De Liang Zhu, Juan Chen, Jing Lv, Mei-Jun Liu, Xue Dai, Dao-Xin Wang, Wang Deng","doi":"10.1186/s40560-024-00723-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a severe respiratory condition characterized by a high mortality rate, the management of which relies on supportive care and a profound understanding of its pathophysiology. Heparin, with its anticoagulant and potential anti-inflammatory properties, offers a new therapeutic opportunity for the treatment of ARDS. In this retrospective cohort study, we examined the MIMIC-IV database for ARDS patients who received prophylactic heparin within the first 72 h of ICU admission. Employing propensity score matching and inverse probability weighting (IPW) analysis, we evaluated the impact of early heparin use on patient outcomes, focusing on mortality rates. Patients who received prophylactic heparin had a significantly lower in-hospital mortality rate compared to those who did not (13.55% vs 17.93%, HR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.54–0.93, P = 0.012). This result remained significant after propensity score matching (12.75% vs 17.93%, HR = 0.65, 95% CI 0.47–0.90, P = 0.010). Analysis using five different statistical models indicated that early use of heparin significantly reduced the in-hospital mortality rate, with HR = 0.669 (95% CI 0.487–0.919, P = 0.013) in the doubly robust model without balanced covariates; HR = 0.705 (95% CI 0.515–0.965, P = 0.029) with all covariates considered; HR = 0.660 (95% CI 0.491–0.888, P = 0.006) in the propensity score (IPW) model; HR = 0.650 (95% CI 0.470–0.900, P = 0.010) in the propensity score matching model; and HR = 0.706 (95% CI 0.536–0.930, P = 0.013) in the multivariate Cox regression model. Secondary outcomes indicated that heparin use was also associated with reduced mortality rates at 60 days, and 90 days. This research highlights that early prophylactic administration of heparin may substantially lower mortality in ARDS patients. These findings underscore the potential of heparin as a key component in the management of ARDS, offering a new perspective and novel strategies for clinical treatment.","PeriodicalId":16123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intensive Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-024-00723-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a severe respiratory condition characterized by a high mortality rate, the management of which relies on supportive care and a profound understanding of its pathophysiology. Heparin, with its anticoagulant and potential anti-inflammatory properties, offers a new therapeutic opportunity for the treatment of ARDS. In this retrospective cohort study, we examined the MIMIC-IV database for ARDS patients who received prophylactic heparin within the first 72 h of ICU admission. Employing propensity score matching and inverse probability weighting (IPW) analysis, we evaluated the impact of early heparin use on patient outcomes, focusing on mortality rates. Patients who received prophylactic heparin had a significantly lower in-hospital mortality rate compared to those who did not (13.55% vs 17.93%, HR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.54–0.93, P = 0.012). This result remained significant after propensity score matching (12.75% vs 17.93%, HR = 0.65, 95% CI 0.47–0.90, P = 0.010). Analysis using five different statistical models indicated that early use of heparin significantly reduced the in-hospital mortality rate, with HR = 0.669 (95% CI 0.487–0.919, P = 0.013) in the doubly robust model without balanced covariates; HR = 0.705 (95% CI 0.515–0.965, P = 0.029) with all covariates considered; HR = 0.660 (95% CI 0.491–0.888, P = 0.006) in the propensity score (IPW) model; HR = 0.650 (95% CI 0.470–0.900, P = 0.010) in the propensity score matching model; and HR = 0.706 (95% CI 0.536–0.930, P = 0.013) in the multivariate Cox regression model. Secondary outcomes indicated that heparin use was also associated with reduced mortality rates at 60 days, and 90 days. This research highlights that early prophylactic administration of heparin may substantially lower mortality in ARDS patients. These findings underscore the potential of heparin as a key component in the management of ARDS, offering a new perspective and novel strategies for clinical treatment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索早期肝素给药在 ARDS 管理中的治疗作用:MIMIC-IV 数据库分析
急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)是一种严重的呼吸系统疾病,死亡率很高,其治疗依赖于支持性护理和对其病理生理学的深刻理解。肝素具有抗凝和潜在的抗炎特性,为治疗 ARDS 提供了新的治疗机会。在这项回顾性队列研究中,我们研究了 MIMIC-IV 数据库中入院后 72 小时内接受预防性肝素治疗的 ARDS 患者。通过倾向评分匹配和反概率加权(IPW)分析,我们评估了早期使用肝素对患者预后的影响,重点关注死亡率。与未接受预防性肝素治疗的患者相比,接受预防性肝素治疗的患者院内死亡率明显降低(13.55% vs 17.93%,HR = 0.71,95% CI:0.54-0.93,P = 0.012)。这一结果在倾向得分匹配后仍有意义(12.75% vs 17.93%,HR = 0.65,95% CI 0.47-0.90,P = 0.010)。使用五种不同统计模型进行的分析表明,早期使用肝素可显著降低院内死亡率,在不考虑平衡协变量的双重稳健模型中,HR = 0.669 (95% CI 0.487-0.919, P = 0.013);在考虑所有协变量的双重稳健模型中,HR = 0.705 (95% CI 0.515-0.965, P = 0. 029)。029);在倾向得分(IPW)模型中,HR = 0.660(95% CI 0.491-0.888,P = 0.006);在倾向得分匹配模型中,HR = 0.650(95% CI 0.470-0.900,P = 0.010);在多变量 Cox 回归模型中,HR = 0.706(95% CI 0.536-0.930,P = 0.013)。次要结果显示,肝素的使用也与60天和90天死亡率的降低有关。这项研究强调,早期预防性使用肝素可大大降低 ARDS 患者的死亡率。这些发现强调了肝素作为治疗 ARDS 的关键成分的潜力,为临床治疗提供了新的视角和新的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Intensive Care
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine-Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
1.40%
发文量
51
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: "Journal of Intensive Care" is an open access journal dedicated to the comprehensive coverage of intensive care medicine, providing a platform for the latest research and clinical insights in this critical field. The journal covers a wide range of topics, including intensive and critical care, trauma and surgical intensive care, pediatric intensive care, acute and emergency medicine, perioperative medicine, resuscitation, infection control, and organ dysfunction. Recognizing the importance of cultural diversity in healthcare practices, "Journal of Intensive Care" also encourages submissions that explore and discuss the cultural aspects of intensive care, aiming to promote a more inclusive and culturally sensitive approach to patient care. By fostering a global exchange of knowledge and expertise, the journal contributes to the continuous improvement of intensive care practices worldwide.
期刊最新文献
Clinical characteristics and short-term outcomes of patients with critical acute pulmonary embolism requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: from the COMMAND VTE Registry-2. Increased national critical care demands were associated with a higher mortality of intubated COVID-19 patients in Japan: a retrospective observational study. Current status of bacteriophage therapy for severe bacterial infections. Height status matters for risk of mortality in critically ill children. Hemorrhages and risk factors in patients undergoing thromboprophylaxis in a respiratory critical care unit: a secondary data analysis of a cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1