{"title":"Effect of selective enrichment storage temperature and duration time on the detection of Salmonella in food","authors":"Lijun Hu, Guodong Zhang","doi":"10.1093/jaoacint/qsae014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background For pathogen detection in food, there are occasions where samples cannot be processed immediately after selective enrichment or need to be reexamined days/weeks later for confirmation or retest. Objective This study aimed to investigate the effect of different prolonged period of storage of selective enrichments of food at 4 ± 2 °C and room temperature (20—22 °C) on the detection and isolation of Salmonella. Methods This study included two experiments involving 34 types of foods to compare the effect of 4 ± 2 °C and room temperature storage on the detection of Salmonella in 204 selective enrichments [Rappaport-Vassiliadis (RV) and Tetrathionate (TT) broths] during a 42-day storage (Experiment I); and to monitor the survival of Salmonella in 300 selective enrichments (RV and TT) with different pre-enrichment broths [Lactose broth (LB) or Buffered peptone water broth (BPW)], stored at 4 °C for 60 days (Experiment II). All the samples were subjected to Salmonella analysis following FDA BAM method. Results During multiple samplings, the positive detection rate for Salmonella remained consistent through Day 42 after selective enrichment, irrespective of Salmonella serotype, storage temperature, pre-enrichment broth, or selective enrichment broth in both Experiment I and II. However, on Day 60 sampling in Experiment II, seven previously positive results turned to negatives. This data indicated that storage of RV and TT enrichments at 4 ± 2 °C or room temperature for up to 42 days after selective enrichment did not compromise the detection of Salmonella in the tested food categories, regardless of Salmonella serotypes and the broths used for pre-enrichment and selective enrichment. Conclusion At least for the specific food types studied in this experiment, the recovery of Salmonella from selective enrichments could be postponed for a limited period of time (e.g., < 42 days) if needed without adversely affecting the test results. However, the delayed analysis of TT and RV enrichments does pose a risk of reduced detection sensitivity, as evidenced by the seven negative results on Day 60 compared to previous positives. We do not recommend or endorse delaying the analysis of TT and RV enrichments. Highlights In the food matrices investigated in this experiment, the plating and isolation of Salmonella from selective TT and RV enrichments stored at 4 ± 2 °C or room temperature could be deferred for a period (up to 42 days) without any negative effect on the test results, if necessary.","PeriodicalId":15003,"journal":{"name":"Journal of AOAC International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of AOAC International","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jaoacint/qsae014","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background For pathogen detection in food, there are occasions where samples cannot be processed immediately after selective enrichment or need to be reexamined days/weeks later for confirmation or retest. Objective This study aimed to investigate the effect of different prolonged period of storage of selective enrichments of food at 4 ± 2 °C and room temperature (20—22 °C) on the detection and isolation of Salmonella. Methods This study included two experiments involving 34 types of foods to compare the effect of 4 ± 2 °C and room temperature storage on the detection of Salmonella in 204 selective enrichments [Rappaport-Vassiliadis (RV) and Tetrathionate (TT) broths] during a 42-day storage (Experiment I); and to monitor the survival of Salmonella in 300 selective enrichments (RV and TT) with different pre-enrichment broths [Lactose broth (LB) or Buffered peptone water broth (BPW)], stored at 4 °C for 60 days (Experiment II). All the samples were subjected to Salmonella analysis following FDA BAM method. Results During multiple samplings, the positive detection rate for Salmonella remained consistent through Day 42 after selective enrichment, irrespective of Salmonella serotype, storage temperature, pre-enrichment broth, or selective enrichment broth in both Experiment I and II. However, on Day 60 sampling in Experiment II, seven previously positive results turned to negatives. This data indicated that storage of RV and TT enrichments at 4 ± 2 °C or room temperature for up to 42 days after selective enrichment did not compromise the detection of Salmonella in the tested food categories, regardless of Salmonella serotypes and the broths used for pre-enrichment and selective enrichment. Conclusion At least for the specific food types studied in this experiment, the recovery of Salmonella from selective enrichments could be postponed for a limited period of time (e.g., < 42 days) if needed without adversely affecting the test results. However, the delayed analysis of TT and RV enrichments does pose a risk of reduced detection sensitivity, as evidenced by the seven negative results on Day 60 compared to previous positives. We do not recommend or endorse delaying the analysis of TT and RV enrichments. Highlights In the food matrices investigated in this experiment, the plating and isolation of Salmonella from selective TT and RV enrichments stored at 4 ± 2 °C or room temperature could be deferred for a period (up to 42 days) without any negative effect on the test results, if necessary.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of AOAC INTERNATIONAL publishes the latest in basic and applied research in analytical sciences related to foods, drugs, agriculture, the environment, and more. The Journal is the method researchers'' forum for exchanging information and keeping informed of new technology and techniques pertinent to regulatory agencies and regulated industries.