Climate change projections for building energy simulation studies: a CORDEX-based methodological approach to manage uncertainties

IF 4.8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Climatic Change Pub Date : 2024-02-26 DOI:10.1007/s10584-024-03710-9
Tanea Coronato, Pablo G. Zaninelli, Rita Abalone, Andrea F. Carril
{"title":"Climate change projections for building energy simulation studies: a CORDEX-based methodological approach to manage uncertainties","authors":"Tanea Coronato, Pablo G. Zaninelli, Rita Abalone, Andrea F. Carril","doi":"10.1007/s10584-024-03710-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We propose a comprehensive methodological approach to address uncertainties in building energy simulation (BES) studies within a climate change context. Drawing upon expertise from the climate community, our approach aims to improve the reliability of climate-dependent BES for sustainable building design studies. The methodology focuses on creating weather files that accurately retain the climate variability from CORDEX high-frequency climate data, and performing multiple BES (conducted with climatologies from various climate models and emissions scenarios) while removing the climate models biases. The robustness of the results is assessed through statistical analysis, and an uncertainty range is attributed to future energy demand estimations. This approach is illustrated using a representative prototype of a social house located in central-eastern Argentina. The evaluation specifically focuses on assessing the influence of climate change projections on cooling and heating energy demand. We systematically assessed uncertainties related to climate scenarios, seasonality, and building design sensitivity. Our exercise highlight that uncertainty levels rise with higher emissions scenarios. Within our case study, the cooling (heating) energy demand exhibits substantial variations, ranging from 27-37 (303-330) MJ/m² in a moderate emissions context to 51-70 (266-326) MJ/m² in a high emissions scenario. Notably, improvements in building efficiency correlate with reduced uncertainty and, in the context of higher emissions, the projected energy demand can range between 24-37 (201-243) MJ/m². Finally, a discussion is provided on the added value of the proposed methodology compared to solely utilizing a single climate projection file in BES, when uncertainties within climate projections remain unassessed.</p>","PeriodicalId":10372,"journal":{"name":"Climatic Change","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Climatic Change","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-024-03710-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We propose a comprehensive methodological approach to address uncertainties in building energy simulation (BES) studies within a climate change context. Drawing upon expertise from the climate community, our approach aims to improve the reliability of climate-dependent BES for sustainable building design studies. The methodology focuses on creating weather files that accurately retain the climate variability from CORDEX high-frequency climate data, and performing multiple BES (conducted with climatologies from various climate models and emissions scenarios) while removing the climate models biases. The robustness of the results is assessed through statistical analysis, and an uncertainty range is attributed to future energy demand estimations. This approach is illustrated using a representative prototype of a social house located in central-eastern Argentina. The evaluation specifically focuses on assessing the influence of climate change projections on cooling and heating energy demand. We systematically assessed uncertainties related to climate scenarios, seasonality, and building design sensitivity. Our exercise highlight that uncertainty levels rise with higher emissions scenarios. Within our case study, the cooling (heating) energy demand exhibits substantial variations, ranging from 27-37 (303-330) MJ/m² in a moderate emissions context to 51-70 (266-326) MJ/m² in a high emissions scenario. Notably, improvements in building efficiency correlate with reduced uncertainty and, in the context of higher emissions, the projected energy demand can range between 24-37 (201-243) MJ/m². Finally, a discussion is provided on the added value of the proposed methodology compared to solely utilizing a single climate projection file in BES, when uncertainties within climate projections remain unassessed.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于建筑节能模拟研究的气候变化预测:基于 CORDEX 的不确定性管理方法
我们提出了一种全面的方法论,以解决气候变化背景下建筑能耗模拟(BES)研究中的不确定性问题。借鉴气候界的专业知识,我们的方法旨在提高可持续建筑设计研究中与气候相关的 BES 的可靠性。该方法的重点是创建能够准确保留 CORDEX 高频气候数据中气候变异性的天气文件,并在消除气候模型偏差的同时执行多个 BES(使用各种气候模型和排放情景的气候学进行)。通过统计分析对结果的稳健性进行评估,并对未来能源需求估算的不确定性范围进行归因。使用位于阿根廷中东部的具有代表性的社会住宅原型对该方法进行了说明。评估的具体重点是评估气候变化预测对制冷和供暖能源需求的影响。我们系统地评估了与气候情景、季节性和建筑设计敏感性相关的不确定性。我们的工作突出表明,不确定性水平随着排放情景的增加而上升。在我们的案例研究中,制冷(供暖)能源需求变化很大,从中度排放情况下的 27-37 (303-330)兆焦耳/平方米到高排放情况下的 51-70 (266-326)兆焦耳/平方米不等。值得注意的是,建筑效率的提高与不确定性的降低相关联,在高排放情况下,预计能源需求范围在 24-37 (201-243) 兆焦耳/平方米之间。最后,讨论了在气候预测的不确定性仍未得到评估的情况下,与在 BES 中仅使用单一气候预测文件相比,所提议方法的附加值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Climatic Change
Climatic Change 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
4.20%
发文量
180
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: Climatic Change is dedicated to the totality of the problem of climatic variability and change - its descriptions, causes, implications and interactions among these. The purpose of the journal is to provide a means of exchange among those working in different disciplines on problems related to climatic variations. This means that authors have an opportunity to communicate the essence of their studies to people in other climate-related disciplines and to interested non-disciplinarians, as well as to report on research in which the originality is in the combinations of (not necessarily original) work from several disciplines. The journal also includes vigorous editorial and book review sections.
期刊最新文献
Natural resource management and green technological innovation impact on health risks and social development: Evidence from advanced economies Green industrial policy for climate action in the basic materials industry Amplification of compound hot-dry extremes and associated population exposure over East Africa Raising the bar: What determines the ambition level of corporate climate targets? A 561-yr (1461-2022 CE) summer temperature reconstruction for Mid-Atlantic-Northeast USA shows connections to volcanic forcing and atmospheric circulation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1