Four-dimensional flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance aortic cross-sectional pressure changes and their associations with flow patterns in health and ascending thoracic aortic aneurysm.

IF 4.2 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-24 DOI:10.1016/j.jocmr.2024.101030
Kevin Bouaou, Thomas Dietenbeck, Gilles Soulat, Ioannis Bargiotas, Sophia Houriez-Gombaud-Saintonge, Alain De Cesare, Umit Gencer, Alain Giron, Elena Jiménez, Emmanuel Messas, Didier Lucor, Emilie Bollache, Elie Mousseaux, Nadjia Kachenoura
{"title":"Four-dimensional flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance aortic cross-sectional pressure changes and their associations with flow patterns in health and ascending thoracic aortic aneurysm.","authors":"Kevin Bouaou, Thomas Dietenbeck, Gilles Soulat, Ioannis Bargiotas, Sophia Houriez-Gombaud-Saintonge, Alain De Cesare, Umit Gencer, Alain Giron, Elena Jiménez, Emmanuel Messas, Didier Lucor, Emilie Bollache, Elie Mousseaux, Nadjia Kachenoura","doi":"10.1016/j.jocmr.2024.101030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ascending thoracic aortic aneurysm (ATAA) is a silent and threatening dilation of the ascending aorta (AscAo). Maximal aortic diameter which is currently used for ATAA patients management and surgery planning has been shown to inadequately characterize risk of dissection in a large proportion of patients. Our aim was to propose a comprehensive quantitative evaluation of aortic morphology and pressure-flow-wall associations from four-dimensional (4D) flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) data in healthy aging and in patients with ATAA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We studied 17 ATAA patients (64.7 ± 14.3 years, 5 females) along with 17 age- and sex-matched healthy controls (59.7 ± 13.3 years, 5 females) and 13 younger healthy subjects (33.5 ± 11.1 years, 4 females). All subjects underwent a CMR exam, including 4D flow and three-dimensional anatomical images of the aorta. This latter dataset was used for aortic morphology measurements, including AscAo maximal diameter (iD<sub>MAX</sub>) and volume, indexed to body surface area. 4D flow MRI data were used to estimate 1) cross-sectional local AscAo spatial (∆P<sub>S</sub>) and temporal (∆P<sub>T</sub>) pressure changes as well as the distance (∆D<sub>PS</sub>) and time duration (∆T<sub>PT</sub>) between local pressure peaks, 2) AscAo maximal wall shear stress (WSS<sub>MAX</sub>) at peak systole, and 3) AscAo flow vorticity amplitude (V<sub>MAX</sub>), duration (V<sub>FWHM</sub>), and eccentricity (V<sub>ECC</sub>).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Consistency of flow and pressure indices was demonstrated through their significant associations with AscAo iD<sub>MAX</sub> (WSS<sub>MAX</sub>:r = -0.49, p < 0.001; V<sub>ECC</sub>:r = -0.29, p = 0.045; V<sub>FWHM</sub>:r = 0.48, p < 0.001; ∆D<sub>PS</sub>:r = 0.37, p = 0.010; ∆T<sub>PT</sub>:r = -0.52, p < 0.001) and indexed volume (WSS<sub>MAX</sub>:r = -0.63, V<sub>ECC</sub>:r = -0.51, V<sub>FWHM</sub>:r = 0.53, ∆D<sub>PS</sub>:r = 0.54, ∆T<sub>PT</sub>:r = -0.63, p < 0.001 for all). Intra-AscAo cross-sectional pressure difference, ∆P<sub>S</sub>, was significantly and positively associated with both V<sub>MAX</sub> (r = 0.55, p = 0.002) and WSS<sub>MAX</sub> (r = 0.59, p < 0.001) in the 30 healthy subjects (48.3 ± 18.0 years). Associations remained significant after adjustment for iD<sub>MAX</sub>, age, and systolic blood pressure. Superimposition of ATAA patients to normal aging trends between ∆P<sub>S</sub> and WSS<sub>MAX</sub> as well as V<sub>MAX</sub> allowed identifying patients with substantially high pressure differences concomitant with AscAo dilation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Local variations in pressures within ascending aortic cross-sections derived from 4D flow MRI were associated with flow changes, as quantified by vorticity, and with stress exerted by blood on the aortic wall, as quantified by wall shear stress. Such flow-wall and pressure interactions might help for the identification of at-risk patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":15221,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10950879/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocmr.2024.101030","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Ascending thoracic aortic aneurysm (ATAA) is a silent and threatening dilation of the ascending aorta (AscAo). Maximal aortic diameter which is currently used for ATAA patients management and surgery planning has been shown to inadequately characterize risk of dissection in a large proportion of patients. Our aim was to propose a comprehensive quantitative evaluation of aortic morphology and pressure-flow-wall associations from four-dimensional (4D) flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) data in healthy aging and in patients with ATAA.

Methods: We studied 17 ATAA patients (64.7 ± 14.3 years, 5 females) along with 17 age- and sex-matched healthy controls (59.7 ± 13.3 years, 5 females) and 13 younger healthy subjects (33.5 ± 11.1 years, 4 females). All subjects underwent a CMR exam, including 4D flow and three-dimensional anatomical images of the aorta. This latter dataset was used for aortic morphology measurements, including AscAo maximal diameter (iDMAX) and volume, indexed to body surface area. 4D flow MRI data were used to estimate 1) cross-sectional local AscAo spatial (∆PS) and temporal (∆PT) pressure changes as well as the distance (∆DPS) and time duration (∆TPT) between local pressure peaks, 2) AscAo maximal wall shear stress (WSSMAX) at peak systole, and 3) AscAo flow vorticity amplitude (VMAX), duration (VFWHM), and eccentricity (VECC).

Results: Consistency of flow and pressure indices was demonstrated through their significant associations with AscAo iDMAX (WSSMAX:r = -0.49, p < 0.001; VECC:r = -0.29, p = 0.045; VFWHM:r = 0.48, p < 0.001; ∆DPS:r = 0.37, p = 0.010; ∆TPT:r = -0.52, p < 0.001) and indexed volume (WSSMAX:r = -0.63, VECC:r = -0.51, VFWHM:r = 0.53, ∆DPS:r = 0.54, ∆TPT:r = -0.63, p < 0.001 for all). Intra-AscAo cross-sectional pressure difference, ∆PS, was significantly and positively associated with both VMAX (r = 0.55, p = 0.002) and WSSMAX (r = 0.59, p < 0.001) in the 30 healthy subjects (48.3 ± 18.0 years). Associations remained significant after adjustment for iDMAX, age, and systolic blood pressure. Superimposition of ATAA patients to normal aging trends between ∆PS and WSSMAX as well as VMAX allowed identifying patients with substantially high pressure differences concomitant with AscAo dilation.

Conclusion: Local variations in pressures within ascending aortic cross-sections derived from 4D flow MRI were associated with flow changes, as quantified by vorticity, and with stress exerted by blood on the aortic wall, as quantified by wall shear stress. Such flow-wall and pressure interactions might help for the identification of at-risk patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
4D 流磁共振成像主动脉横截面压力变化及其与健康和动脉瘤血流模式的关联。
背景:升胸主动脉瘤(ATAA)是升主动脉(AscAo)的一种无声且具有威胁性的扩张。目前用于 ATAA 患者管理和手术规划的最大主动脉直径已被证明不能充分表征大部分患者的夹层风险。我们的目的是通过四维血流磁共振成像数据,对健康老年人和 ATAA 患者的主动脉形态和压力-血流-壁关系进行全面的定量评估:我们研究了17名ATAA患者(64.7±14.3岁,5名女性)、17名年龄和性别匹配的健康对照者(59.7±13.3岁,5名女性)和13名年轻的健康受试者(33.5±11.1岁,4名女性)。所有受试者都接受了磁共振成像检查,包括主动脉的四维血流和三维解剖图像。后一种数据集用于主动脉形态测量,包括AscAo最大直径(iDMAX)和体积,并与体表面积挂钩。四维血流 MRI 数据用于估算:1)横截面局部 AscAo 空间(∆PS)和时间(∆PT)压力变化以及局部压力峰值之间的距离(∆DPS)和持续时间(∆TPT);2)收缩高峰时 AscAo 最大壁剪应力(WSSMAX);3)AscAo 血流涡度振幅(VMAX)、持续时间(VFWHM)和偏心率(VECC):结果:流量和压力指数与 AscAo iDMAX 的显著相关性证明了流量和压力指数的一致性(WSSMAX:r=-0.49,pECC:r=-0.29,p=0.045;VFWHM:r=0.48,pPS:r=0.37,p=0.010;∆TPT:r=-0.52,pMAX:r=-0.63,VECC:r=-0.51,VFWHM:r=0.53,∆DPS:r=0.54,∆TPT:r=-0.63,pS,与 VMAX(r=0.55,p=0.002)和 WSSMAX(r=0.59,pMAX,年龄和收缩压)均显著正相关。将 ATAA 患者与 ∆PS 和 WSSMAX 以及 VMAX 之间的正常衰老趋势叠加,可以识别出在 AscAo 扩张的同时压力差异很大的患者:四维血流磁共振成像得出的升主动脉横截面内的局部压力变化与血流变化(通过涡度量化)以及血液对主动脉壁施加的应力(通过壁剪应力量化)相关。这种流壁和压力的相互作用可能有助于识别高危患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
61
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (JCMR) publishes high-quality articles on all aspects of basic, translational and clinical research on the design, development, manufacture, and evaluation of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) methods applied to the cardiovascular system. Topical areas include, but are not limited to: New applications of magnetic resonance to improve the diagnostic strategies, risk stratification, characterization and management of diseases affecting the cardiovascular system. New methods to enhance or accelerate image acquisition and data analysis. Results of multicenter, or larger single-center studies that provide insight into the utility of CMR. Basic biological perceptions derived by CMR methods.
期刊最新文献
Design and Rationale of MYOFLAME-19 RCT: MYOcardial protection to reduce inFLAMmatory heart disease due to COVID-19 Infection using CMR Endpoints. Association Between Subclinical Right Ventricular Alterations and Aerobic Exercise Capacity in Type 2 Diabetes. Biventricular longitudinal strain analysis using CMR feature-tracking: prognostic value in Eisenmenger syndrome. Interstitial Fibrosis and Arrhythmic Mitral Valve Prolapse: Unravelling Sex-Based Differences. Safety of dobutamine stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients with prior coronary artery bypass grafting.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1