Mitral valve orifice area predicts outcome after biventricular repair in patients with hypoplastic left ventricles.

IF 4.2 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-23 DOI:10.1016/j.jocmr.2024.101029
David Liddle, Addison Gearhart, Lynn A Sleeper, Minmin Lu, Eric Feins, David N Schidlow, Sunil Ghelani, Andrew J Powell, Sitaram Emani, Rebecca S Beroukhim
{"title":"Mitral valve orifice area predicts outcome after biventricular repair in patients with hypoplastic left ventricles.","authors":"David Liddle, Addison Gearhart, Lynn A Sleeper, Minmin Lu, Eric Feins, David N Schidlow, Sunil Ghelani, Andrew J Powell, Sitaram Emani, Rebecca S Beroukhim","doi":"10.1016/j.jocmr.2024.101029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Identification of risk factors for biventricular (BiV) repair in children with hypoplastic left ventricles (HLV) has been challenging. We sought to identify preoperative cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) predictors of outcome in patients with HLVs who underwent BiV repair, with a focus on the mitral valve (MV).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Single-center retrospective analysis of preoperative CMRs on patients with HLV (≤50 mL/m<sup>2</sup>) and no endocardial fibroelastosis who underwent BiV repair from 2005-2022. CMR measurements included MV orifice area in diastole. The primary composite outcome included time to death, transplant, BiV takedown, heart failure admission, left atrial decompression, or unexpected reoperation; and the secondary outcome included more than or equal to moderate mitral stenosis and/or regurgitation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median follow-up was 0.7 (interquartile range 0.1, 2.2) years. Of 122 patients [59 atrioventricular canal (AVC) and 63 non-AVC] age 3 ± 2.8 years at the time of BiV repair, freedom from the primary outcome at 2 years was 53% for AVC and 69% for non-AVC (log rank p = 0.12), and freedom from the secondary outcome at 2 years was 49% for AVC and 79% for non-AVC (log rank p < 0.01). Independent predictors of primary outcome for AVC patients included MV orifice area z-score <-2 and transitional AVC; for non-AVC patients, predictors included MV orifice area z-score <-2, abnormal MV anatomy, and conal-septal ventricular septal defect. Independent predictors of secondary outcome for AVC patients included older age at surgery, transitional AVC, and transposition of the great arteries.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In children with HLV, low MV orifice area and pre-existing MV pathology are risk factors for adverse outcome after BiV repair.</p>","PeriodicalId":15221,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10965470/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocmr.2024.101029","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Identification of risk factors for biventricular (BiV) repair in children with hypoplastic left ventricles (HLV) has been challenging. We sought to identify preoperative cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) predictors of outcome in patients with HLVs who underwent BiV repair, with a focus on the mitral valve (MV).

Methods: Single-center retrospective analysis of preoperative CMRs on patients with HLV (≤50 mL/m2) and no endocardial fibroelastosis who underwent BiV repair from 2005-2022. CMR measurements included MV orifice area in diastole. The primary composite outcome included time to death, transplant, BiV takedown, heart failure admission, left atrial decompression, or unexpected reoperation; and the secondary outcome included more than or equal to moderate mitral stenosis and/or regurgitation.

Results: Median follow-up was 0.7 (interquartile range 0.1, 2.2) years. Of 122 patients [59 atrioventricular canal (AVC) and 63 non-AVC] age 3 ± 2.8 years at the time of BiV repair, freedom from the primary outcome at 2 years was 53% for AVC and 69% for non-AVC (log rank p = 0.12), and freedom from the secondary outcome at 2 years was 49% for AVC and 79% for non-AVC (log rank p < 0.01). Independent predictors of primary outcome for AVC patients included MV orifice area z-score <-2 and transitional AVC; for non-AVC patients, predictors included MV orifice area z-score <-2, abnormal MV anatomy, and conal-septal ventricular septal defect. Independent predictors of secondary outcome for AVC patients included older age at surgery, transitional AVC, and transposition of the great arteries.

Conclusion: In children with HLV, low MV orifice area and pre-existing MV pathology are risk factors for adverse outcome after BiV repair.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
二尖瓣口面积可预测左心室发育不全患者双心室修复术后的效果
背景:鉴定左心室发育不全(HLV)儿童双心室(BiV)修复术的风险因素一直是一项挑战。我们试图确定接受双室修复术的 HLV 患者术前心血管磁共振(CMR)预测结果的因素,重点是二尖瓣(MV):单中心回顾性分析 2005-2022 年间接受 BiV 修复术的 HLV(≤50ml/m2)和无心内膜纤维增生症患者的术前 CMR。CMR 测量包括舒张期中流孔面积。主要复合结果包括死亡、移植、BiV撕裂、心衰入院、左房减压或意外再次手术的时间;次要结果包括≥中度二尖瓣狭窄和/或反流:中位随访时间为 0.7(IQR 0.1,2.2)年。122名患者中(48%为房室管(AVC),52%为非AVC),BiV修复时年龄为(3 ± 2.8)岁,2年后AVC患者无主要结果的比例为53%,非AVC患者为69%(对数秩p=0.12),2年后AVC患者无次要结果的比例为49%,非AVC患者为79%(对数秩p):在HLV患儿中,低中流道孔面积和先前存在的中流道病变是导致BiV修复术后不良预后的风险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
61
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (JCMR) publishes high-quality articles on all aspects of basic, translational and clinical research on the design, development, manufacture, and evaluation of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) methods applied to the cardiovascular system. Topical areas include, but are not limited to: New applications of magnetic resonance to improve the diagnostic strategies, risk stratification, characterization and management of diseases affecting the cardiovascular system. New methods to enhance or accelerate image acquisition and data analysis. Results of multicenter, or larger single-center studies that provide insight into the utility of CMR. Basic biological perceptions derived by CMR methods.
期刊最新文献
Design and Rationale of MYOFLAME-19 RCT: MYOcardial protection to reduce inFLAMmatory heart disease due to COVID-19 Infection using CMR Endpoints. Association Between Subclinical Right Ventricular Alterations and Aerobic Exercise Capacity in Type 2 Diabetes. Biventricular longitudinal strain analysis using CMR feature-tracking: prognostic value in Eisenmenger syndrome. Interstitial Fibrosis and Arrhythmic Mitral Valve Prolapse: Unravelling Sex-Based Differences. Safety of dobutamine stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients with prior coronary artery bypass grafting.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1