Patient Flow and Reutilization of Crisis Services Within 30 Days in a Comprehensive Crisis System.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Psychiatric services Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-27 DOI:10.1176/appi.ps.20230232
Milos Tomovic, Margaret E Balfour, Ted Cho, Nishanth Prathap, Gevork Harootunian, Raihana Mehreen, Andrey Ostrovsky, Matthew L Goldman
{"title":"Patient Flow and Reutilization of Crisis Services Within 30 Days in a Comprehensive Crisis System.","authors":"Milos Tomovic, Margaret E Balfour, Ted Cho, Nishanth Prathap, Gevork Harootunian, Raihana Mehreen, Andrey Ostrovsky, Matthew L Goldman","doi":"10.1176/appi.ps.20230232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Crisis services are undergoing an unprecedented expansion in the United States, but research is lacking on crisis system design. This study describes how individuals flow through a well-established crisis system and examines factors associated with reutilization of such services.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study used Medicaid claims to construct episodes describing the flow of individuals through mobile crisis, specialized crisis facility, emergency department, and inpatient services. Claims data were merged with electronic health record (EHR) data for the subset of individuals receiving care at a crisis response center. A generalized estimating equation was used to calculate adjusted odds ratios for demographic, clinical, and operational factors associated with reutilization of services within 30 days of an episode's end point.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 41,026 episodes, most (57.4%) began with mobile crisis services or a specialized crisis facility rather than the emergency department. Of the subset (N=9,202 episodes) with merged EHR data, most episodes (63.3%) were not followed by reutilization. Factors associated with increased odds of 30-day reutilization included Black race, homelessness, stimulant use, psychosis, and episodes beginning with mobile crisis services or ending with inpatient care. Decreased odds were associated with depression, trauma, and involuntary legal status. Most (59.3%) episodes beginning with an involuntary legal status ended with a voluntary status.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Crisis systems can serve a large proportion of individuals experiencing psychiatric emergencies and divert them from more restrictive and costly levels of care. Understanding demographic, clinical, and operational factors associated with 30-day reutilization may aid in the design and implementation of crisis systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":20878,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric services","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatric services","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.20230232","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Crisis services are undergoing an unprecedented expansion in the United States, but research is lacking on crisis system design. This study describes how individuals flow through a well-established crisis system and examines factors associated with reutilization of such services.

Methods: This cross-sectional study used Medicaid claims to construct episodes describing the flow of individuals through mobile crisis, specialized crisis facility, emergency department, and inpatient services. Claims data were merged with electronic health record (EHR) data for the subset of individuals receiving care at a crisis response center. A generalized estimating equation was used to calculate adjusted odds ratios for demographic, clinical, and operational factors associated with reutilization of services within 30 days of an episode's end point.

Results: Of 41,026 episodes, most (57.4%) began with mobile crisis services or a specialized crisis facility rather than the emergency department. Of the subset (N=9,202 episodes) with merged EHR data, most episodes (63.3%) were not followed by reutilization. Factors associated with increased odds of 30-day reutilization included Black race, homelessness, stimulant use, psychosis, and episodes beginning with mobile crisis services or ending with inpatient care. Decreased odds were associated with depression, trauma, and involuntary legal status. Most (59.3%) episodes beginning with an involuntary legal status ended with a voluntary status.

Conclusions: Crisis systems can serve a large proportion of individuals experiencing psychiatric emergencies and divert them from more restrictive and costly levels of care. Understanding demographic, clinical, and operational factors associated with 30-day reutilization may aid in the design and implementation of crisis systems.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
综合危机系统中 30 天内危机服务的患者流量和再利用情况。
目的:危机服务在美国正经历着前所未有的扩张,但却缺乏对危机系统设计的研究。本研究描述了个人如何流经一个完善的危机系统,并探讨了与再次利用此类服务相关的因素:这项横断面研究使用医疗补助(Medicaid)报销单来构建病程,描述个人通过移动危机系统、专业危机设施、急诊科和住院服务的流程。针对在危机应对中心接受治疗的患者子集,将索赔数据与电子健康记录(EHR)数据合并。使用广义估计方程来计算与病程终点后 30 天内再次使用服务相关的人口、临床和操作因素的调整几率比:在 41,026 次事件中,大部分(57.4%)都是通过移动危机服务或专门的危机处理机构而非急诊科开始的。在合并了电子病历数据的子集(9202 个病例)中,大多数病例(63.3%)没有再次使用。与 30 天内再次使用的几率增加相关的因素包括:黑人、无家可归者、使用兴奋剂、精神病以及以移动危机服务开始或以住院治疗结束的病例。而抑郁、精神创伤和非自愿法律地位则会降低再次使用的几率。大多数(59.3%)以非自愿法律身份开始的事件以自愿身份结束:结论:危机系统可以为很大一部分经历过精神病紧急情况的人提供服务,并将他们从限制性更强、成本更高的治疗中分流出来。了解与 30 天重复使用相关的人口、临床和操作因素有助于危机系统的设计和实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychiatric services
Psychiatric services 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
7.90%
发文量
295
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Psychiatric Services, established in 1950, is published monthly by the American Psychiatric Association. The peer-reviewed journal features research reports on issues related to the delivery of mental health services, especially for people with serious mental illness in community-based treatment programs. Long known as an interdisciplinary journal, Psychiatric Services recognizes that provision of high-quality care involves collaboration among a variety of professionals, frequently working as a team. Authors of research reports published in the journal include psychiatrists, psychologists, pharmacists, nurses, social workers, drug and alcohol treatment counselors, economists, policy analysts, and professionals in related systems such as criminal justice and welfare systems. In the mental health field, the current focus on patient-centered, recovery-oriented care and on dissemination of evidence-based practices is transforming service delivery systems at all levels. Research published in Psychiatric Services contributes to this transformation.
期刊最新文献
Clinic-Level Predictors of Psychotherapy Dosage in the Military Health System. Factor Structure, Reliability, and Construct Validity of the Wellness Inventory. Understanding Involuntary Hospitalization Applications Submitted to an Urban Police Department. Changes in Mental Health Services Use Under the ACA in One State: Role of Mental Health Provider Shortages. Association of Inpatient Occupational Therapy Utilization With Reduced Risk for Psychiatric Readmission Among Veterans.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1