Determinants of COVID-19 Infection Among Employees of an Italian Financial Institution.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-02-22 DOI:10.23749/mdl.v115i1.14690
Roberta De Vito, Martina Menzio, Pierluigi Laqua, Stefano Castellari, Alberto Colognese, Giulia Collatuzzo, Dario Russignaga, Paolo Boffetta
{"title":"Determinants of COVID-19 Infection Among Employees of an Italian Financial Institution.","authors":"Roberta De Vito, Martina Menzio, Pierluigi Laqua, Stefano Castellari, Alberto Colognese, Giulia Collatuzzo, Dario Russignaga, Paolo Boffetta","doi":"10.23749/mdl.v115i1.14690","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Understanding the trend of the severe acute respiratory syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is becoming crucial. Previous studies focused on predicting COVID-19 trends, but few papers have considered models for disease estimation and progression based on large real-world data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used de-identified data from 60,938 employees of a major financial institution in Italy with daily COVID-19 status information between 31 March 2020 and 31 August 2021. We consider six statuses: (i) concluded case, (ii) confirmed case, (iii) close contact, (iv) possible-probable contact, (v) possible contact, and (vi) no-COVID-19 or infection. We conducted a logistic regression to assess the odds ratio (OR) of transition to confirmed COVID-19 case at each time point. We also fitted a general model for disease progression via the multi-state transition probability model at each time point, with lags of 7 and 15 days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Employment in a branch versus in a central office was the strongest predictor of case or contact status, while no association was detected with gender or age. The geographic prevalence of possible-probable contacts and close contacts was predictive of the subsequent risk of confirmed cases. The status with the highest probability of becoming a confirmed case was concluded case (12%) in April 2020, possible-probable contact (16%) in November 2020, and close contact (4%) in August 2021. The model based on transition probabilities predicted well the rate of confirmed cases observed 7 or 15 days later.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Data from industry-based surveillance systems may effectively predict the risk of subsequent infection.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10915679/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23749/mdl.v115i1.14690","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Understanding the trend of the severe acute respiratory syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is becoming crucial. Previous studies focused on predicting COVID-19 trends, but few papers have considered models for disease estimation and progression based on large real-world data.

Methods: We used de-identified data from 60,938 employees of a major financial institution in Italy with daily COVID-19 status information between 31 March 2020 and 31 August 2021. We consider six statuses: (i) concluded case, (ii) confirmed case, (iii) close contact, (iv) possible-probable contact, (v) possible contact, and (vi) no-COVID-19 or infection. We conducted a logistic regression to assess the odds ratio (OR) of transition to confirmed COVID-19 case at each time point. We also fitted a general model for disease progression via the multi-state transition probability model at each time point, with lags of 7 and 15 days.

Results: Employment in a branch versus in a central office was the strongest predictor of case or contact status, while no association was detected with gender or age. The geographic prevalence of possible-probable contacts and close contacts was predictive of the subsequent risk of confirmed cases. The status with the highest probability of becoming a confirmed case was concluded case (12%) in April 2020, possible-probable contact (16%) in November 2020, and close contact (4%) in August 2021. The model based on transition probabilities predicted well the rate of confirmed cases observed 7 or 15 days later.

Conclusion: Data from industry-based surveillance systems may effectively predict the risk of subsequent infection.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
意大利金融机构员工感染 COVID-19 的决定因素。
背景:了解严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)的发展趋势变得至关重要。以前的研究侧重于预测 COVID-19 的趋势,但很少有论文考虑基于大量真实世界数据的疾病估计和进展模型:我们使用了意大利一家大型金融机构 60938 名员工的去身份化数据,这些数据包含 2020 年 3 月 31 日至 2021 年 8 月 31 日期间的每日 COVID-19 状态信息。我们考虑了六种状态:(i) 结案病例,(ii) 确诊病例,(iii) 密切接触者,(iv) 可能-可能接触者,(v) 可能接触者,(vi) 无 COVID-19 或感染者。我们进行了逻辑回归,以评估每个时间点转为 COVID-19 确诊病例的几率比(OR)。我们还在每个时间点通过多态转换概率模型拟合了疾病进展的一般模型,滞后期分别为 7 天和 15 天:结果:在分支机构和中央办公室工作是预测病例或接触者状况的最有力因素,而与性别或年龄没有关联。可能的接触者和密切接触者的地域分布可预测随后确诊病例的风险。成为确诊病例概率最高的状态是 2020 年 4 月的已确诊病例(12%)、2020 年 11 月的可能接触者(16%)和 2021 年 8 月的密切接触者(4%)。基于过渡概率的模型很好地预测了 7 天或 15 天后观察到的确诊病例率:基于行业监测系统的数据可有效预测后续感染风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1