A Multidisciplinary Minimally Invasive Approach Is Necessary for the Contemporary Management of Esophageal Diverticula.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-26 DOI:10.1089/lap.2023.0491
Ryan C Broderick, Graham J Spurzem, Estella Y Huang, Bryan J Sandler, Garth R Jacobsen, Robert A Weisman, Mark W Onaitis, Philip A Weissbrod, Santiago Horgan
{"title":"A Multidisciplinary Minimally Invasive Approach Is Necessary for the Contemporary Management of Esophageal Diverticula.","authors":"Ryan C Broderick, Graham J Spurzem, Estella Y Huang, Bryan J Sandler, Garth R Jacobsen, Robert A Weisman, Mark W Onaitis, Philip A Weissbrod, Santiago Horgan","doi":"10.1089/lap.2023.0491","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Esophageal diverticula were traditionally treated with open surgery, which is associated with significant morbidity and mortality rates. Management has shifted to minimally invasive approaches with several advantages. We examine outcomes in patients with esophageal diverticula treated with minimally invasive techniques by a multidisciplinary surgical team at a single center. <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b> A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database was performed for patients who underwent minimally invasive surgery for esophageal diverticula at our institution from June 2010 to December 2022. Primary outcomes were 30-day morbidity and mortality rates. Secondary outcomes were symptom resolution, length of stay (LOS), readmission, and need for reintervention. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 28 patients were identified. Twelve patients had pharyngeal diverticula, 7 patients had midesophageal diverticula, and 9 patients had epiphrenic diverticula. Thirty-day morbidity and readmission rates were 10.7% (3 patients), 1 pharyngeal (sepsis), 1 midesophageal (refractory nausea), and 1 epiphrenic (poor oral intake). There were no esophageal leaks. Average LOS was 2.3 days, with the pharyngeal group experiencing a significantly shorter LOS (1.3 days versus 3.4 days for midesophageal, <i>P</i> < .01 versus 2.8 days for epiphrenic, <i>P</i> < .05). Symptom resolution after initial operation was 78.6%. Reintervention rate was 17.9%, and symptom resolution after reintervention was 100%. There were no mortalities. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> This study demonstrates that esophageal diverticula can be repaired safely and efficiently when performed by a multidisciplinary team utilizing advanced minimally invasive endoscopic and robotic surgical techniques. We advocate for the management of this rare condition at a high-volume center with extensive experience in foregut surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2023.0491","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Esophageal diverticula were traditionally treated with open surgery, which is associated with significant morbidity and mortality rates. Management has shifted to minimally invasive approaches with several advantages. We examine outcomes in patients with esophageal diverticula treated with minimally invasive techniques by a multidisciplinary surgical team at a single center. Materials and Methods: A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database was performed for patients who underwent minimally invasive surgery for esophageal diverticula at our institution from June 2010 to December 2022. Primary outcomes were 30-day morbidity and mortality rates. Secondary outcomes were symptom resolution, length of stay (LOS), readmission, and need for reintervention. Results: A total of 28 patients were identified. Twelve patients had pharyngeal diverticula, 7 patients had midesophageal diverticula, and 9 patients had epiphrenic diverticula. Thirty-day morbidity and readmission rates were 10.7% (3 patients), 1 pharyngeal (sepsis), 1 midesophageal (refractory nausea), and 1 epiphrenic (poor oral intake). There were no esophageal leaks. Average LOS was 2.3 days, with the pharyngeal group experiencing a significantly shorter LOS (1.3 days versus 3.4 days for midesophageal, P < .01 versus 2.8 days for epiphrenic, P < .05). Symptom resolution after initial operation was 78.6%. Reintervention rate was 17.9%, and symptom resolution after reintervention was 100%. There were no mortalities. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that esophageal diverticula can be repaired safely and efficiently when performed by a multidisciplinary team utilizing advanced minimally invasive endoscopic and robotic surgical techniques. We advocate for the management of this rare condition at a high-volume center with extensive experience in foregut surgery.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
当代食管憩室治疗必须采用多学科微创方法。
背景:食管憩室传统上采用开腹手术治疗,这种手术的发病率和死亡率都很高。现在的治疗方法已转向具有多种优势的微创方法。我们研究了一个中心的多学科手术团队采用微创技术治疗食管憩室患者的效果。材料和方法:我们对 2010 年 6 月至 2022 年 12 月期间在本院接受微创手术治疗食管憩室的患者进行了回顾性分析。主要结果是 30 天的发病率和死亡率。次要结果是症状缓解率、住院时间(LOS)、再入院率和再次介入治疗的需求。结果:共发现 28 名患者。其中 12 名患者患有咽憩室,7 名患者患有副食管憩室,9 名患者患有虹膜上憩室。30 天的发病率和再入院率为 10.7%(3 名患者),其中 1 名是咽部患者(败血症),1 名是食管侧憩室患者(难治性恶心),1 名是虹膜憩室患者(口腔摄入不良)。没有发生食管漏。平均 LOS 为 2.3 天,咽部组的 LOS 明显更短(1.3 天对 3.4 天,P P 结论:这项研究表明,食管憩室可由多学科团队利用先进的微创内窥镜和机器人手术技术进行安全有效的修复。我们提倡在具有丰富前肠手术经验的大容量中心治疗这种罕见病症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
163
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques (JLAST) is the leading international peer-reviewed journal for practicing surgeons who want to keep up with the latest thinking and advanced surgical technologies in laparoscopy, endoscopy, NOTES, and robotics. The Journal is ideally suited to surgeons who are early adopters of new technology and techniques. Recognizing that many new technologies and techniques have significant overlap with several surgical specialties, JLAST is the first journal to focus on these topics both in general and pediatric surgery, and includes other surgical subspecialties such as: urology, gynecologic surgery, thoracic surgery, and more.
期刊最新文献
The Effect of External Distractions on Simulated Laparoscopic Performance. Commentary: Innovations in the Management of Lung Cancer. Early Versus Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy, after Percutaneous Gall Bladder Drainage, for Grade II Acute Cholecystitis TG18 in Patients with Concomitant Cardiopulmonary Disease. Initial Experience with Disposable Single-Use Cholangioscope During Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration. Telescopic Dissection as a Cost-Effective Alternative to Balloon Trocar for Preperitoneal Dissection in Total Extraperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1