首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques最新文献

英文 中文
Is Liver Venous Deprivation Ready to Replace Portal Vein Embolization? 肝静脉剥夺准备好取代门静脉栓塞了吗?
IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-03-25 DOI: 10.1177/10926429261437235
Salvatore Gruttadauria, Duilio Pagano, Sergio Li Petri, Fabrizio di Francesco, Pasquale Bonsignore, Sergio Calamia, Alessandro Tropea, Ivan Vella, Caterina Accardo, Irene Vitale, Federica Chimenti, Roberto Miraglia

Portal vein embolization (PVE) is the standard strategy to increase future liver remnant (FLR) before major hepatectomy, but its limitations-variable hypertrophy, slower kinetics, and clinically relevant dropout from insufficient FLR growth or tumor progression-have accelerated interest in alternative approaches. Liver venous deprivation (LVD), combining portal inflow deprivation with ipsilateral hepatic venous outflow occlusion, has a strong physiological rationale: It may intensify regenerative signaling and reduce compensatory collateralization within the embolized liver, thereby promoting faster FLR increase. Emerging observational evidence and multicenter experiences suggest that dual-vein strategies can shorten time to adequate FLR and may improve the probability of timely resection in selected high-risk candidates, without a clear safety penalty when performed in experienced centers. However, current data are heterogeneous in patient selection, technique, and endpoints; volumetric hypertrophy does not always translate into functional gain, particularly in injured or cholestatic livers. Therefore, LVD is not yet ready to universally replace PVE, but it is increasingly reasonable as a first-line alternative in carefully selected patients, ideally supported by multidisciplinary selection, standardized reporting, and functional FLR assessment. Ongoing randomized trials and harmonized outcome definitions will be decisive to establish whether LVD should become the new reference or remain a complementary option.

门静脉栓塞(PVE)是肝大切除术前增加未来肝残余(FLR)的标准策略,但其局限性-可变肥厚,较慢的动力学,以及临床相关的FLR生长不足或肿瘤进展导致的退出-加速了人们对替代方法的兴趣。肝静脉剥夺(LVD)将门静脉流入剥夺与同侧肝静脉流出阻断相结合,具有很强的生理基础:它可以增强再生信号,减少栓塞肝脏内的代偿侧支,从而促进FLR更快增加。新出现的观察证据和多中心经验表明,双静脉策略可以缩短达到足够FLR的时间,并可能提高选定高风险患者及时切除的概率,在经验丰富的中心实施时没有明确的安全惩罚。然而,目前的数据在患者选择、技术和终点方面存在异质性;体积肥大并不总是转化为功能增加,特别是在受损或胆汁淤积的肝脏。因此,LVD尚未准备好普遍取代PVE,但在精心挑选的患者中,LVD作为一线替代方案越来越合理,理想情况下,多学科选择、标准化报告和功能性FLR评估支持。正在进行的随机试验和统一的结果定义将是确定LVD是否应该成为新的参考或仍然是一个补充选择的决定性因素。
{"title":"Is Liver Venous Deprivation Ready to Replace Portal Vein Embolization?","authors":"Salvatore Gruttadauria, Duilio Pagano, Sergio Li Petri, Fabrizio di Francesco, Pasquale Bonsignore, Sergio Calamia, Alessandro Tropea, Ivan Vella, Caterina Accardo, Irene Vitale, Federica Chimenti, Roberto Miraglia","doi":"10.1177/10926429261437235","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10926429261437235","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Portal vein embolization (PVE) is the standard strategy to increase future liver remnant (FLR) before major hepatectomy, but its limitations-variable hypertrophy, slower kinetics, and clinically relevant dropout from insufficient FLR growth or tumor progression-have accelerated interest in alternative approaches. Liver venous deprivation (LVD), combining portal inflow deprivation with ipsilateral hepatic venous outflow occlusion, has a strong physiological rationale: It may intensify regenerative signaling and reduce compensatory collateralization within the embolized liver, thereby promoting faster FLR increase. Emerging observational evidence and multicenter experiences suggest that dual-vein strategies can shorten time to adequate FLR and may improve the probability of timely resection in selected high-risk candidates, without a clear safety penalty when performed in experienced centers. However, current data are heterogeneous in patient selection, technique, and endpoints; volumetric hypertrophy does not always translate into functional gain, particularly in injured or cholestatic livers. Therefore, LVD is not yet ready to universally replace PVE, but it is increasingly reasonable as a first-line alternative in carefully selected patients, ideally supported by multidisciplinary selection, standardized reporting, and functional FLR assessment. Ongoing randomized trials and harmonized outcome definitions will be decisive to establish whether LVD should become the new reference or remain a complementary option.</p>","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":" ","pages":"10926429261437235"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2026-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147516384","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Letter: Erector Spinae Plane Block May Facilitate Earlier Return to Daily Activities after Open Inguinal Hernia Repair: Preliminary Findings. 信:竖脊肌平面阻滞可促进开放式腹股沟疝修补术后早期恢复日常活动:初步发现。
IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-03-25 DOI: 10.1177/10926429261438354
Tolga Karaçay, Başak Altıparmak, Efsane Karcı Şınga, Kaan Mircalı, Melike Korkmaz Toker
{"title":"<i>Letter:</i> Erector Spinae Plane Block May Facilitate Earlier Return to Daily Activities after Open Inguinal Hernia Repair: Preliminary Findings.","authors":"Tolga Karaçay, Başak Altıparmak, Efsane Karcı Şınga, Kaan Mircalı, Melike Korkmaz Toker","doi":"10.1177/10926429261438354","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10926429261438354","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":" ","pages":"10926429261438354"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2026-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147516447","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Impact of Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification System on Surgical Technique and Training in Japan: Insights from an Eight-Year Survey. 内镜手术技能鉴定制度对日本外科技术和培训的影响:来自八年调查的见解。
IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-03-25 DOI: 10.1177/10926429261438097
Shota Eguchi, Yoshio Nagahisa, Kenji Yamaguchi, Yukio Inamura, Michio Okabe, Toshihiko Masui

Background: The Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification System (ESSQS), established by the Japanese Society for Endoscopic Surgery, provides a centralized video-based framework for certifying advanced laparoscopic surgeons. Its impact on surgical practice and education in inguinal hernia repair has not been fully clarified.

Methods: Between 2016 and 2023, a nationwide questionnaire combining multiple-choice and open-ended items was distributed to all surgeons certified in endoscopic hernia repair under ESSQS. Of 120 eligible surgeons, 103 (85.8%) responded. Data included surgical techniques, dissection methods, mesh selection, fixation practices, and video submissions required for certification. Trends were analyzed across early (2016-2019) and late (2020-2023) cohorts.

Results: The surgical techniques used in the certification examination were transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (TAPP) (n = 99) and totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (n = 4). Gauze-assisted dissection became standard (>80% adoption). Use of L-sized mesh increased significantly in the late cohort compared with the early cohort (56.0% vs 85.7%; P = .00175), reflecting progressive standardization. Median video duration was 63 minutes, and the median number of cases before certification was approximately 100. Mesh fixation methods remained stable, with a median of 5-6 tacks per case.

Conclusions: The ESSQS has contributed to the standardization of surgical education and practice in Japan, particularly in TAPP hernia repair, and this framework-rarely seen in Western qualification systems-underscores the importance of structured evaluation in advancing both technical proficiency and educational quality. This study was approved by our Institutional Review Board (Approval No. 4763) and the Medical Ethics Committee of Kurashiki Central Hospital.

背景:内镜手术技能鉴定系统(ESSQS)由日本内镜外科学会建立,为认证高级腹腔镜外科医生提供了一个集中的基于视频的框架。它对腹股沟疝修补术的手术实践和教育的影响尚未完全阐明。方法:在2016年至2023年期间,向所有在ESSQS下获得内窥镜疝修补认证的外科医生发放一份全国性问卷,问卷内容为多项选择和开放式项目。在120名符合条件的外科医生中,103名(85.8%)回应。数据包括手术技术、解剖方法、补片选择、固定方法和认证所需的视频提交。分析了早期(2016-2019)和晚期(2020-2023)队列的趋势。结果:经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术(TAPP) (n = 99)和全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术(n = 4)被用于鉴定检查。纱布辅助解剖成为标准(bbb80 %采用率)。与早期队列相比,晚期队列中l尺寸网片的使用显著增加(56.0% vs 85.7%; P = 0.00175),反映了标准化的进展。视频时长中位数为63分钟,认证前病例数中位数约为100例。网片固定方法保持稳定,平均每例5-6针。结论:ESSQS对日本外科教育和实践的标准化做出了贡献,特别是在TAPP疝修补方面,这一框架在西方资格体系中很少见到,强调了结构化评估在提高技术熟练程度和教育质量方面的重要性。本研究得到了我们的机构审查委员会(批准号4763)和Kurashiki中心医院医学伦理委员会的批准。
{"title":"Impact of Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification System on Surgical Technique and Training in Japan: Insights from an Eight-Year Survey.","authors":"Shota Eguchi, Yoshio Nagahisa, Kenji Yamaguchi, Yukio Inamura, Michio Okabe, Toshihiko Masui","doi":"10.1177/10926429261438097","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10926429261438097","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification System (ESSQS), established by the Japanese Society for Endoscopic Surgery, provides a centralized video-based framework for certifying advanced laparoscopic surgeons. Its impact on surgical practice and education in inguinal hernia repair has not been fully clarified.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between 2016 and 2023, a nationwide questionnaire combining multiple-choice and open-ended items was distributed to all surgeons certified in endoscopic hernia repair under ESSQS. Of 120 eligible surgeons, 103 (85.8%) responded. Data included surgical techniques, dissection methods, mesh selection, fixation practices, and video submissions required for certification. Trends were analyzed across early (2016-2019) and late (2020-2023) cohorts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The surgical techniques used in the certification examination were transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (TAPP) (<i>n</i> = 99) and totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (<i>n</i> = 4). Gauze-assisted dissection became standard (>80% adoption). Use of L-sized mesh increased significantly in the late cohort compared with the early cohort (56.0% vs 85.7%; <i>P</i> = .00175), reflecting progressive standardization. Median video duration was 63 minutes, and the median number of cases before certification was approximately 100. Mesh fixation methods remained stable, with a median of 5-6 tacks per case.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The ESSQS has contributed to the standardization of surgical education and practice in Japan, particularly in TAPP hernia repair, and this framework-rarely seen in Western qualification systems-underscores the importance of structured evaluation in advancing both technical proficiency and educational quality. This study was approved by our Institutional Review Board (Approval No. 4763) and the Medical Ethics Committee of Kurashiki Central Hospital.</p>","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":" ","pages":"10926429261438097"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2026-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147516400","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
First Case of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in a Patient with Situs Inversus Totalis in Ethiopia. 埃塞俄比亚第一例完全性倒位患者腹腔镜胆囊切除术。
IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-03-23 DOI: 10.1177/10926429261431198
Emma Mulet, Tatek Atile, Tsion Mekasha, Bekan Eshetu, Solomon Ayalewu, Tadese Gonfa, Olivier Béatrix, Marie-Cécile Blanchet, Nehemia I Kassa, Abel B Mitiku, Thomas Efeson, Tolera Kebede Alemu, Segni Bekele

Situs inversus totalis (SIT) is a rare genetic condition that presents a significant challenge for laparoscopic surgery because of its mirror-image anatomy. While reported globally, this is the first documented case of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) for symptomatic cholelithiasis in a patient with SIT in Ethiopia. A 43-year-old female with known SIT presented to the hospital with a 5-year history of dyspepsia and left upper quadrant abdominal pain. Ultrasound confirmed cholelithiasis. After a thorough preoperative workup to rule out associated syndromes, she underwent elective LC. A modified trocar placement and the "French" patient position were utilized to accommodate the anatomical reversal and facilitate the procedure for a right-handed surgical team. LC is a feasible and safe procedure for patients with SIT, even in settings where laparoscopy is emerging. The French position can simplify the procedure by minimizing the cognitive and technical load for the surgeon, avoiding the need for a complete mirror-image setup. This case underscores the potential for expanding advanced minimally invasive techniques in Ethiopia through collaborative education and training.

完全性倒位(SIT)是一种罕见的遗传性疾病,由于其镜像解剖结构,对腹腔镜手术提出了重大挑战。虽然在全球范围内都有报道,但这是埃塞俄比亚第一例有记录的SIT患者行腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗症状性胆石症的病例。43岁女性,已知SIT, 5年消化不良病史,左上腹腹痛。超声证实胆石症。在彻底的术前检查以排除相关综合征后,她接受了选择性LC。改良套管针放置和“法式”患者体位被用于适应解剖逆转,并为右撇子手术组的手术提供便利。对于SIT患者来说,LC是一种可行且安全的手术,即使在腹腔镜手术出现的情况下也是如此。法式体位可以通过减少外科医生的认知和技术负担来简化手术,避免需要完整的镜像设置。这个案例强调了通过合作教育和培训在埃塞俄比亚推广先进微创技术的潜力。
{"title":"First Case of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in a Patient with Situs Inversus Totalis in Ethiopia.","authors":"Emma Mulet, Tatek Atile, Tsion Mekasha, Bekan Eshetu, Solomon Ayalewu, Tadese Gonfa, Olivier Béatrix, Marie-Cécile Blanchet, Nehemia I Kassa, Abel B Mitiku, Thomas Efeson, Tolera Kebede Alemu, Segni Bekele","doi":"10.1177/10926429261431198","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10926429261431198","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Situs inversus totalis (SIT) is a rare genetic condition that presents a significant challenge for laparoscopic surgery because of its mirror-image anatomy. While reported globally, this is the first documented case of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) for symptomatic cholelithiasis in a patient with SIT in Ethiopia. A 43-year-old female with known SIT presented to the hospital with a 5-year history of dyspepsia and left upper quadrant abdominal pain. Ultrasound confirmed cholelithiasis. After a thorough preoperative workup to rule out associated syndromes, she underwent elective LC. A modified trocar placement and the \"French\" patient position were utilized to accommodate the anatomical reversal and facilitate the procedure for a right-handed surgical team. LC is a feasible and safe procedure for patients with SIT, even in settings where laparoscopy is emerging. The French position can simplify the procedure by minimizing the cognitive and technical load for the surgeon, avoiding the need for a complete mirror-image setup. This case underscores the potential for expanding advanced minimally invasive techniques in Ethiopia through collaborative education and training.</p>","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":" ","pages":"10926429261431198"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2026-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147500524","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Reduced Nursing Burden and Enhanced Recovery: Gasless Single-Port Transumbilical Extracorporeal Laparoscopic-Assisted Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Appendectomy in Children. 减轻护理负担,促进康复:儿童无气腹单孔经脐体外腹腔镜辅助阑尾切除术与传统腹腔镜阑尾切除术的比较。
IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-03-23 DOI: 10.1177/10926429261434122
Hao Yin, Jianwei Wan, Jiandong Lu, Liying Cui, Ping Zheng, Zhihua Hong

Background: Laparoscopic appendectomy represents the standard of care for pediatric acute appendicitis. However, conventional techniques utilizing CO2 pneumoperitoneum introduce physiological disturbances that may increase postoperative care requirements. The gasless single-port transumbilical extracorporeal approach (gasless-TULAA) eliminates pneumoperitoneum-related complications, yet its impact on nursing workload and recovery dynamics remains systematically unexamined in pediatric populations.

Objective: To compare the effects of gasless-TULAA versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy (CLA) on postoperative nursing burden and recovery outcomes in pediatric patients.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted involving 266 pediatric patients with uncomplicated acute appendicitis at a single tertiary center between January 2022 and March 2025. Patients were allocated to either gasless-TULAA (n = 101) or CLA (n = 165). The primary endpoints were the frequency of postoperative nursing interventions and time to first ambulation and bowel function recovery. Secondary outcomes included postoperative pain scores, complication rates, length of hospital stay, direct hospitalization costs, and cosmetic satisfaction.

Results: The gasless-TULAA group demonstrated significantly reduced nursing interventions (mean 2.17 ± 2.10 versus 2.74 ± 1.93, P = .029), shorter time to first ambulation (7.72 ± 1.20 hours versus 11.69 ± 2.06 hours, P < .001), and faster bowel recovery (10.30 ± 4.03 hours versus 11.64 ± 5.08 hours, P = .025). Postoperative pain scores were lower (median Numeric Rating Scale score 2 versus 3, P = .002), costs were reduced (944.41 ± 254.11 USD versus 1032.77 ± 223.34 USD, P = .004), and cosmesis satisfaction was higher (9.05 ± 0.73 versus 8.00 ± 0.92, P < .001). Complication rates did not differ (9.8% versus 10.2%, P = .902).

Conclusion: Gasless-TULAA significantly reduces nursing burden and accelerates recovery compared with CLA, without compromising safety, supporting its integration to optimize perioperative care efficiency in pediatric surgery.

背景:腹腔镜阑尾切除术是儿童急性阑尾炎的标准治疗方法。然而,利用CO2气腹的传统技术引入生理干扰,可能增加术后护理要求。无气单孔经脐体外入路(无气tulaa)消除了气腹相关并发症,但其对护理工作量和恢复动态的影响在儿科人群中仍未得到系统的研究。目的:比较无气tulaa与传统腹腔镜阑尾切除术(CLA)对儿科患者术后护理负担和恢复情况的影响。方法:对2022年1月至2025年3月在某三级医疗中心就诊的266例无并发症急性阑尾炎患儿进行回顾性队列研究。患者被分配到无气体tulaa (n = 101)或CLA (n = 165)。主要终点是术后护理干预的频率、第一次下床和肠功能恢复的时间。次要结局包括术后疼痛评分、并发症发生率、住院时间、直接住院费用和美容满意度。结果:无气tulaa组护理干预明显减少(平均2.17±2.10比2.74±1.93,P = 0.029),首次下床时间缩短(7.72±1.20小时比11.69±2.06小时,P < 0.001),肠道恢复更快(10.30±4.03小时比11.64±5.08小时,P = 0.025)。术后疼痛评分较低(数值评定量表中位数得分2比3,P = 0.002),成本降低(944.41±254.11美元比1032.77±223.34美元,P = 0.004),美容满意度较高(9.05±0.73比8.00±0.92,P < 0.001)。并发症发生率无差异(9.8% vs 10.2%, P = .902)。结论:与CLA相比,Gasless-TULAA可显著减轻护理负担,加速康复,且不影响安全性,支持其集成以优化儿科外科围手术期护理效率。
{"title":"Reduced Nursing Burden and Enhanced Recovery: Gasless Single-Port Transumbilical Extracorporeal Laparoscopic-Assisted Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Appendectomy in Children.","authors":"Hao Yin, Jianwei Wan, Jiandong Lu, Liying Cui, Ping Zheng, Zhihua Hong","doi":"10.1177/10926429261434122","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10926429261434122","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Laparoscopic appendectomy represents the standard of care for pediatric acute appendicitis. However, conventional techniques utilizing CO<sub>2</sub> pneumoperitoneum introduce physiological disturbances that may increase postoperative care requirements. The gasless single-port transumbilical extracorporeal approach (gasless-TULAA) eliminates pneumoperitoneum-related complications, yet its impact on nursing workload and recovery dynamics remains systematically unexamined in pediatric populations.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the effects of gasless-TULAA versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy (CLA) on postoperative nursing burden and recovery outcomes in pediatric patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted involving 266 pediatric patients with uncomplicated acute appendicitis at a single tertiary center between January 2022 and March 2025. Patients were allocated to either gasless-TULAA (<i>n</i> = 101) or CLA (<i>n</i> = 165). The primary endpoints were the frequency of postoperative nursing interventions and time to first ambulation and bowel function recovery. Secondary outcomes included postoperative pain scores, complication rates, length of hospital stay, direct hospitalization costs, and cosmetic satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The gasless-TULAA group demonstrated significantly reduced nursing interventions (mean 2.17 ± 2.10 versus 2.74 ± 1.93, <i>P</i> = .029), shorter time to first ambulation (7.72 ± 1.20 hours versus 11.69 ± 2.06 hours, <i>P</i> < .001), and faster bowel recovery (10.30 ± 4.03 hours versus 11.64 ± 5.08 hours, <i>P</i> = .025). Postoperative pain scores were lower (median Numeric Rating Scale score 2 versus 3, <i>P</i> = .002), costs were reduced (944.41 ± 254.11 USD versus 1032.77 ± 223.34 USD, <i>P</i> = .004), and cosmesis satisfaction was higher (9.05 ± 0.73 versus 8.00 ± 0.92, <i>P</i> < .001). Complication rates did not differ (9.8% versus 10.2%, <i>P</i> = .902).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Gasless-TULAA significantly reduces nursing burden and accelerates recovery compared with CLA, without compromising safety, supporting its integration to optimize perioperative care efficiency in pediatric surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":" ","pages":"10926429261434122"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2026-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147505323","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Image-Guided Robotic-Assisted Waterjet Ablation of Prostate (Aquablation) Versus Convective Water Vapor Thermal Therapy (Rezūm) in Patients with Prostate Volume Less than 80 Grams. 图像引导机器人辅助前列腺水射流消融(Aquablation)与对流水蒸气热疗法(Rezūm)在前列腺体积小于80克患者中的应用。
IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-03-23 DOI: 10.1177/10926429261434787
Dolev Perez, Ariel Mamber, Michael Pasherstnik, Dmitry Koulikov, Ala Eddin Natsheh, Ofer Z Shenfeld, Ilan Z Kafka, Yehuda Warszawer, Andres Malinger, Boris Chertin

Purpose: Aquablation and Rezūm are established minimally invasive surgical therapies for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) in men with moderate-sized prostates. However, direct real-world data comparing outcomes of these techniques in prostates <80 g remain limited. This study aimed to evaluate and contextualize perioperative and functional outcomes of Aquablation and Rezūm in a prospective, nonrandomized cohort.

Methods: We conducted a prospective, nonrandomized comparative cohort study between 2023 and 2025 at a single tertiary center. Treatment allocation was based on the patient's informed preference following standardized counseling. Men with moderate-to-severe lower urinary tract symptoms and prostate volume <80 g were included. Outcomes included the International Prostate Symptom Score, quality of life (QoL), irritative symptoms, urinary continence, sexual function, perioperative parameters, complications, and retreatment. Between-group comparisons were exploratory and interpreted descriptively due to baseline differences.

Results: A total of 428 patients were analyzed, including 324 who underwent Aquablation and 104 who underwent Rezūm. Baseline characteristics differed between groups, with Aquablation patients being older and having larger prostates and higher comorbidity burden. Both procedures resulted in significant and durable improvements in lower urinary tract symptoms and QoL. Aquablation demonstrated numerically greater symptom improvement and faster reduction in irritative symptoms, while Rezūm was associated with shorter operative time and same-day discharge. Erectile and ejaculatory function were largely preserved in both cohorts. Perioperative complication and retreatment rates were low and comparable.

Conclusion: In this real-world, nonrandomized cohort, both Aquablation and Rezūm provided meaningful and durable symptom relief with preservation of sexual function in men with prostates <80 g. Given baseline imbalances and patient-preference-based allocation, outcomes should be interpreted as descriptive of real-world performance rather than as definitive comparative superiority. These findings support both modalities as effective minimally invasive options, with treatment selection guided by patient characteristics, expectations, and resource considerations.

目的:水溶消融术和Rezūm是治疗男性中度前列腺增生的微创手术治疗方法。然而,比较这些技术在前列腺中的结果的直接现实数据方法:我们在一个单一的三级中心进行了一项2023年至2025年的前瞻性、非随机比较队列研究。治疗方案的分配是基于患者在标准化咨询后的知情偏好。结果:共分析了428例患者,其中324例接受了水消融治疗,104例接受了Rezūm治疗。基线特征在两组之间有所不同,水合消融术患者年龄较大,前列腺较大,合并症负担较高。两种方法均能显著且持久地改善下尿路症状和生活质量。水消融在数值上表现出更大的症状改善和更快的刺激性症状减轻,而Rezūm与更短的手术时间和当日出院相关。两组患者的勃起和射精功能基本保持不变。围手术期并发症和再治疗率低且具有可比性。结论:在这个真实世界的非随机队列中,水消融和Rezūm都能在保留前列腺男性性功能的情况下提供有意义和持久的症状缓解
{"title":"Image-Guided Robotic-Assisted Waterjet Ablation of Prostate (Aquablation) Versus Convective Water Vapor Thermal Therapy (Rezūm) in Patients with Prostate Volume Less than 80 Grams.","authors":"Dolev Perez, Ariel Mamber, Michael Pasherstnik, Dmitry Koulikov, Ala Eddin Natsheh, Ofer Z Shenfeld, Ilan Z Kafka, Yehuda Warszawer, Andres Malinger, Boris Chertin","doi":"10.1177/10926429261434787","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10926429261434787","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Aquablation and Rezūm are established minimally invasive surgical therapies for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) in men with moderate-sized prostates. However, direct real-world data comparing outcomes of these techniques in prostates <80 g remain limited. This study aimed to evaluate and contextualize perioperative and functional outcomes of Aquablation and Rezūm in a prospective, nonrandomized cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective, nonrandomized comparative cohort study between 2023 and 2025 at a single tertiary center. Treatment allocation was based on the patient's informed preference following standardized counseling. Men with moderate-to-severe lower urinary tract symptoms and prostate volume <80 g were included. Outcomes included the International Prostate Symptom Score, quality of life (QoL), irritative symptoms, urinary continence, sexual function, perioperative parameters, complications, and retreatment. Between-group comparisons were exploratory and interpreted descriptively due to baseline differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 428 patients were analyzed, including 324 who underwent Aquablation and 104 who underwent Rezūm. Baseline characteristics differed between groups, with Aquablation patients being older and having larger prostates and higher comorbidity burden. Both procedures resulted in significant and durable improvements in lower urinary tract symptoms and QoL. Aquablation demonstrated numerically greater symptom improvement and faster reduction in irritative symptoms, while Rezūm was associated with shorter operative time and same-day discharge. Erectile and ejaculatory function were largely preserved in both cohorts. Perioperative complication and retreatment rates were low and comparable.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this real-world, nonrandomized cohort, both Aquablation and Rezūm provided meaningful and durable symptom relief with preservation of sexual function in men with prostates <80 g. Given baseline imbalances and patient-preference-based allocation, outcomes should be interpreted as descriptive of real-world performance rather than as definitive comparative superiority. These findings support both modalities as effective minimally invasive options, with treatment selection guided by patient characteristics, expectations, and resource considerations.</p>","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":" ","pages":"10926429261434787"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2026-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147500479","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Laparoscopic Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh Repair for Non-Midline Incisional Hernias: A Single-Center Clinical Study. 腹腔镜腹膜内补片修复非中线切口疝:单中心临床研究。
IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-03-23 DOI: 10.1177/10926429261433140
Xiangcheng Wang, Shenlan Li, Changjin Cui, Bo Li

Purpose: Non-midline incisional hernias are technically challenging abdominal wall defects, and evidence of laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) in this setting is limited. This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic IPOM for non-midline incisional hernias and assessed the impact of different defect closure techniques on perioperative outcomes.

Methods: This single-center retrospective study included patients who underwent laparoscopic IPOM repair for non-midline incisional hernias between September 2019 and June 2025. Demographics, body mass index, comorbidities, hernia classification, defect size and area, closure technique, operative time, blood loss, postoperative length of stay, 24-hour pain scores, complications, and recurrence were recorded. Comparisons among the closure groups were performed using the Kruskal-Wallis test.

Results: A total of 43 patients were included. The mean defect area was 57.15 ± 53.12 cm2, operative time was 133.51 ± 40.68 minutes, intraoperative blood loss was 20.65 ± 11.42 mL, and postoperative hospital stay was 5.79 ± 2.45 days. Overall complication rate was 7.0%, including 1 case each of chronic pain, seroma, and ileus, and recurrence occurred in 1 patient. Barbed suture, hernia needle, and combined closure techniques were used in 10, 16, and 17 patients, respectively. The combined group had larger defects and longer operative times, whereas blood loss, hospital stay, and 24-hour pain scores were comparable among the groups.

Conclusions: Laparoscopic IPOM is a safe and effective option for non-midline incisional hernias, achieving low complication and recurrence rates. A combined closure technique is suitable for larger defects, increasing operative time without worsening early perioperative outcomes.

目的:非中线切口疝在技术上是具有挑战性的腹壁缺陷,腹腔镜腹腔内补片(IPOM)在这种情况下的证据是有限的。本研究评估了腹腔镜IPOM治疗非中线切口疝的安全性和有效性,并评估了不同的缺陷闭合技术对围手术期结果的影响。方法:这项单中心回顾性研究包括2019年9月至2025年6月期间接受腹腔镜IPOM修复非中线切口疝的患者。记录人口统计学、体重指数、合并症、疝分类、缺损大小和面积、闭合技术、手术时间、出血量、术后住院时间、24小时疼痛评分、并发症和复发情况。封闭组间的比较采用Kruskal-Wallis检验。结果:共纳入43例患者。平均缺损面积57.15±53.12 cm2,手术时间133.51±40.68 min,术中出血量20.65±11.42 mL,术后住院时间5.79±2.45 d。总并发症发生率为7.0%,其中慢性疼痛、血清肿、肠梗阻各1例,复发1例。采用倒钩缝合、疝针缝合和联合缝合技术分别为10例、16例和17例。联合组有更大的缺陷和更长的手术时间,而出血量、住院时间和24小时疼痛评分在两组之间是相当的。结论:腹腔镜IPOM治疗非中线切口疝安全有效,并发症低,复发率低。联合缝合技术适用于较大的缺损,增加手术时间而不恶化早期围手术期预后。
{"title":"Laparoscopic Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh Repair for Non-Midline Incisional Hernias: A Single-Center Clinical Study.","authors":"Xiangcheng Wang, Shenlan Li, Changjin Cui, Bo Li","doi":"10.1177/10926429261433140","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10926429261433140","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Non-midline incisional hernias are technically challenging abdominal wall defects, and evidence of laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) in this setting is limited. This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic IPOM for non-midline incisional hernias and assessed the impact of different defect closure techniques on perioperative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center retrospective study included patients who underwent laparoscopic IPOM repair for non-midline incisional hernias between September 2019 and June 2025. Demographics, body mass index, comorbidities, hernia classification, defect size and area, closure technique, operative time, blood loss, postoperative length of stay, 24-hour pain scores, complications, and recurrence were recorded. Comparisons among the closure groups were performed using the Kruskal-Wallis test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 43 patients were included. The mean defect area was 57.15 ± 53.12 cm<sup>2</sup>, operative time was 133.51 ± 40.68 minutes, intraoperative blood loss was 20.65 ± 11.42 mL, and postoperative hospital stay was 5.79 ± 2.45 days. Overall complication rate was 7.0%, including 1 case each of chronic pain, seroma, and ileus, and recurrence occurred in 1 patient. Barbed suture, hernia needle, and combined closure techniques were used in 10, 16, and 17 patients, respectively. The combined group had larger defects and longer operative times, whereas blood loss, hospital stay, and 24-hour pain scores were comparable among the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Laparoscopic IPOM is a safe and effective option for non-midline incisional hernias, achieving low complication and recurrence rates. A combined closure technique is suitable for larger defects, increasing operative time without worsening early perioperative outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":" ","pages":"10926429261433140"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2026-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147505330","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between Da Vinci Robot-Assisted and Laparoscopic Intersphincteric Resection for Ultra-Low Rectal Cancer. 达芬奇机器人辅助与腹腔镜下超低位直肠癌括约肌间切除术的临床效果比较。
IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-03-23 DOI: 10.1177/10926429261435555
ChangZhong Fang, Jiming Lian, Nanhui Yu, Shuang Liu

Preserving anal function in ultra-low rectal cancer surgery remains challenging in terms of technique and perioperative management. With advancements in minimally invasive techniques, Da Vinci robot-assisted intersphincteric resection (ISR) has been increasingly utilized, yet its clinical benefits remain unclear. This retrospective cohort study included 142 patients who underwent ISR at the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University from January 2019 to December 2024, divided into the robot-assisted ISR (RoISR) group (n = 71) and the laparoscopic ISR (LaISR) group (n = 71). Perioperative outcomes, postoperative complications, pain scores (numerical rating scale [NRS]), Wexner scores, quality of life (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal [FACT-C] scale), and long-term survival outcomes were compared. Results showed that RoISR had a longer operative time (220.27 ± 32.21 versus 179.63 ± 23.88 minutes, P < .001) but earlier time to first flatus (1.77 ± 1.50 versus 2.32 ± 1.67 days, P = .041) and shorter hospital stay (8.25 ± 3.38 versus 9.77 ± 4.63 days, P = .027), with comparable blood loss and costs. The 30-day complication rate was lower in the RoISR group (7.04% versus 19.72%, P = .027), including reduced anastomotic complications (1.41% versus 5.63%) and bleeding (0% versus 4.23%). NRS pain scores were lower in the RoISR group at 12 hours (3.56 ± 0.84 versus 4.79 ± 1.11, P < .001), 24 hours (1.90 ± 0.85 versus 2.35 ± 1.02, P = .05), and 48 hours (1.07 ± 0.87 versus 1.61 ± 0.80, P < .001). Wexner scores showed greater improvement in the RoISR group at 3 months (9.49 ± 2.26 versus 10.45 ± 2.10, P = .01) and 6 months (7.18 ± 1.88 versus 7.94 ± 1.96, P = .02). Emotional functioning on the FACT-C scale was significantly better in the RoISR group (P = .028). Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated no significant differences in overall survival or recurrence-free survival (RFS) between groups. In conclusion, RoISR offers advantages in perioperative recovery, reduced complications, and improved aspects of quality of life, with long-term survival outcomes comparable to LaISR.

在超低位直肠癌手术中保留肛门功能在技术和围手术期管理方面仍然具有挑战性。随着微创技术的进步,达芬奇机器人辅助的括约肌间切除术(ISR)越来越多地得到应用,但其临床益处尚不清楚。本回顾性队列研究纳入2019年1月至2024年12月在中南大学湘雅第二医院行ISR的142例患者,分为机器人辅助ISR组(n = 71)和腹腔镜ISR组(n = 71)。比较围手术期结局、术后并发症、疼痛评分(数值评定量表[NRS])、Wexner评分、生活质量(肿瘤治疗-结直肠功能评估量表[FACT-C])和长期生存结局。结果显示,RoISR手术时间较长(220.27±32.21分钟比179.63±23.88分钟,P < 0.001),首次排气时间较早(1.77±1.50天比2.32±1.67天,P = 0.041),住院时间较短(8.25±3.38天比9.77±4.63天,P = 0.027),出血量和费用相当。RoISR组30天并发症发生率较低(7.04%比19.72%,P = 0.027),包括吻合口并发症(1.41%比5.63%)和出血(0%比4.23%)。RoISR组的NRS疼痛评分在12小时(3.56±0.84比4.79±1.11,P < 0.001)、24小时(1.90±0.85比2.35±1.02,P = 0.05)和48小时(1.07±0.87比1.61±0.80,P < 0.001)均较低。RoISR组的Wexner评分在3个月(9.49±2.26比10.45±2.10,P = 0.01)和6个月(7.18±1.88比7.94±1.96,P = 0.02)时有较大改善。RoISR组在FACT-C量表上的情绪功能显著优于RoISR组(P = 0.028)。Kaplan-Meier分析显示,两组患者的总生存期和无复发生存期(RFS)无显著差异。总之,RoISR在围手术期恢复、减少并发症和改善生活质量方面具有优势,其长期生存结果与LaISR相当。
{"title":"Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between Da Vinci Robot-Assisted and Laparoscopic Intersphincteric Resection for Ultra-Low Rectal Cancer.","authors":"ChangZhong Fang, Jiming Lian, Nanhui Yu, Shuang Liu","doi":"10.1177/10926429261435555","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10926429261435555","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Preserving anal function in ultra-low rectal cancer surgery remains challenging in terms of technique and perioperative management. With advancements in minimally invasive techniques, Da Vinci robot-assisted intersphincteric resection (ISR) has been increasingly utilized, yet its clinical benefits remain unclear. This retrospective cohort study included 142 patients who underwent ISR at the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University from January 2019 to December 2024, divided into the robot-assisted ISR (RoISR) group (<i>n</i> = 71) and the laparoscopic ISR (LaISR) group (<i>n</i> = 71). Perioperative outcomes, postoperative complications, pain scores (numerical rating scale [NRS]), Wexner scores, quality of life (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal [FACT-C] scale), and long-term survival outcomes were compared. Results showed that RoISR had a longer operative time (220.27 ± 32.21 versus 179.63 ± 23.88 minutes, <i>P</i> < .001) but earlier time to first flatus (1.77 ± 1.50 versus 2.32 ± 1.67 days, <i>P</i> = .041) and shorter hospital stay (8.25 ± 3.38 versus 9.77 ± 4.63 days, <i>P</i> = .027), with comparable blood loss and costs. The 30-day complication rate was lower in the RoISR group (7.04% versus 19.72%, <i>P</i> = .027), including reduced anastomotic complications (1.41% versus 5.63%) and bleeding (0% versus 4.23%). NRS pain scores were lower in the RoISR group at 12 hours (3.56 ± 0.84 versus 4.79 ± 1.11, <i>P</i> < .001), 24 hours (1.90 ± 0.85 versus 2.35 ± 1.02, <i>P</i> = .05), and 48 hours (1.07 ± 0.87 versus 1.61 ± 0.80, <i>P</i> < .001). Wexner scores showed greater improvement in the RoISR group at 3 months (9.49 ± 2.26 versus 10.45 ± 2.10, <i>P</i> = .01) and 6 months (7.18 ± 1.88 versus 7.94 ± 1.96, <i>P</i> = .02). Emotional functioning on the FACT-C scale was significantly better in the RoISR group (<i>P</i> = .028). Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated no significant differences in overall survival or recurrence-free survival (RFS) between groups. In conclusion, RoISR offers advantages in perioperative recovery, reduced complications, and improved aspects of quality of life, with long-term survival outcomes comparable to LaISR.</p>","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":" ","pages":"10926429261435555"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2026-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147500542","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Laparoscopic Bile Duct Exploration: How We Do It? A 5-Year-Experience Report. 腹腔镜胆管探查:我们该如何做?5年经验报告。
IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-03-18 DOI: 10.1177/10926429261428490
Adolfo Cuendis-Velazquez, Roberto Punin-Neira, Sabrina Rivera-Mata, Maria Fernanda Lopez-Godínez, Jessica Betancourt-Ferreyra, Roberto Ramirez-Nava, Jose Martín Hernández-Márquez, Alejandra Nuñez-Venzor, Mario Trejo-Ávila, Mucio Moreno-Portillo

Background: Cholelithiasis is a very common pathology in the world, with Mexico being one of the countries with the highest prevalence, affecting approximately 27% of the female population. It is also known that the coexistence of cholelithiasis and choledocholithiasis occurs in approximately 15% of cases, in which case a simultaneous surgical approach is possible: cholecystectomy and biliary tract exploration. Furthermore, it is reported that approximately 10% of patients with choledocholithiasis present as "difficult stone," in which the endoscopic approach is ineffective, making a surgical approach necessary. Therefore, surgery is essential in cases when the biliary tract needs to be explored. Hence, the purpose of this study is to demonstrate our experience with the minimally invasive surgical approach for choledocholithiasis using transductal bile duct exploration.

Methods: Between January 2020 and May 2025, 29 consecutive patients underwent minimally invasive biliary tract exploration surgery at our hospital; from these, 26 cases were included. Information regarding the demographics of patients, comorbidities, number of previous endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatographys (ERCPs) before surgery, preoperative diagnostic workup, therapeutic interventions, details of minimally invasive transductal bile duct exploration, and postoperative outcomes, including morbidity and mortality, was recorded retrospectively.

Results: We recorded 29 patients who underwent bile duct exploration; from these, 26 patients with choledocholithiasis were operated on with minimally invasive transductal bile duct exploration (TD-BDE) (22 laparoscopic, 4 robotic). Women represented 65.3% of the cases. The median age was 54 years (range 31-87). The median operative time was 181 minutes (range 75-310) and bleeding 125 mL (range 10-350); 21 cases (80.7%) include cholecystectomy in the same procedure. Oral intake was started in the first 48 hours. A bile leak occurred in 1 case (3.8%). There was 1 patient who needed a new ERCP 2 years after surgery because of bile duct stenosis. None of the patients required re-intervention. No mortality was recorded. The maximum follow-up was 36 months (range 1-36).

Conclusions: TD-BDE is a therapeutical option for choledocholithiasis, especially for "difficult stone" cases, with low morbidity and mortality. Furthermore, the benefits of minimally invasive approaches, either laparoscopic or robotic, seem to be feasible and safe; and also ERAS programs can be established considering the multidisciplinary approach of patients.

背景:胆石症在世界上是一种非常常见的病理,墨西哥是患病率最高的国家之一,影响了大约27%的女性人口。我们也知道,大约15%的病例同时存在胆石症和胆总管结石症,在这种情况下,可以同时进行手术:胆囊切除术和胆道探查。此外,据报道,大约10%的胆总管结石患者表现为“难治性结石”,其中内窥镜入路无效,需要手术入路。因此,当胆道需要探查时,手术是必要的。因此,本研究的目的是展示我们使用经转导胆管探查的微创手术方法治疗胆总管结石的经验。方法:2020年1月至2025年5月,29例患者连续在我院行微创胆道探查手术;其中包括26例。回顾性记录患者的人口统计学信息、合并症、术前内镜逆行胆管胰管造影(ercp)次数、术前诊断检查、治疗干预、微创胆管转导探查细节和术后结果(包括发病率和死亡率)。结果:29例患者行胆管探查;其中,26例胆总管结石患者行微创胆管转导探查术(TD-BDE)(22例腹腔镜手术,4例机器人手术)。妇女占65.3%。中位年龄为54岁(范围31-87岁)。中位手术时间为181分钟(范围75-310),出血125 mL(范围10-350);21例(80.7%)同时行胆囊切除术。在最初48小时内开始口服。发生胆漏1例(3.8%)。有1例患者术后2年因胆管狭窄需要新的ERCP。没有患者需要再次干预。无死亡记录。最长随访时间为36个月(范围1-36)。结论:TD-BDE是胆总管结石的一种治疗选择,特别是对于“难治性结石”病例,发病率和死亡率低。此外,微创方法的好处,无论是腹腔镜还是机器人,似乎是可行和安全的;也可以建立ERAS项目,考虑到患者的多学科方法。
{"title":"Laparoscopic Bile Duct Exploration: How We Do It? A 5-Year-Experience Report.","authors":"Adolfo Cuendis-Velazquez, Roberto Punin-Neira, Sabrina Rivera-Mata, Maria Fernanda Lopez-Godínez, Jessica Betancourt-Ferreyra, Roberto Ramirez-Nava, Jose Martín Hernández-Márquez, Alejandra Nuñez-Venzor, Mario Trejo-Ávila, Mucio Moreno-Portillo","doi":"10.1177/10926429261428490","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10926429261428490","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cholelithiasis is a very common pathology in the world, with Mexico being one of the countries with the highest prevalence, affecting approximately 27% of the female population. It is also known that the coexistence of cholelithiasis and choledocholithiasis occurs in approximately 15% of cases, in which case a simultaneous surgical approach is possible: cholecystectomy and biliary tract exploration. Furthermore, it is reported that approximately 10% of patients with choledocholithiasis present as \"difficult stone,\" in which the endoscopic approach is ineffective, making a surgical approach necessary. Therefore, surgery is essential in cases when the biliary tract needs to be explored. Hence, the purpose of this study is to demonstrate our experience with the minimally invasive surgical approach for choledocholithiasis using transductal bile duct exploration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between January 2020 and May 2025, 29 consecutive patients underwent minimally invasive biliary tract exploration surgery at our hospital; from these, 26 cases were included. Information regarding the demographics of patients, comorbidities, number of previous endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatographys (ERCPs) before surgery, preoperative diagnostic workup, therapeutic interventions, details of minimally invasive transductal bile duct exploration, and postoperative outcomes, including morbidity and mortality, was recorded retrospectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We recorded 29 patients who underwent bile duct exploration; from these, 26 patients with choledocholithiasis were operated on with minimally invasive transductal bile duct exploration (TD-BDE) (22 laparoscopic, 4 robotic). Women represented 65.3% of the cases. The median age was 54 years (range 31-87). The median operative time was 181 minutes (range 75-310) and bleeding 125 mL (range 10-350); 21 cases (80.7%) include cholecystectomy in the same procedure. Oral intake was started in the first 48 hours. A bile leak occurred in 1 case (3.8%). There was 1 patient who needed a new ERCP 2 years after surgery because of bile duct stenosis. None of the patients required re-intervention. No mortality was recorded. The maximum follow-up was 36 months (range 1-36).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TD-BDE is a therapeutical option for choledocholithiasis, especially for \"difficult stone\" cases, with low morbidity and mortality. Furthermore, the benefits of minimally invasive approaches, either laparoscopic or robotic, seem to be feasible and safe; and also ERAS programs can be established considering the multidisciplinary approach of patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":" ","pages":"10926429261428490"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2026-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147482114","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Complete Mesocolic Excision Versus D2 Lymphadenectomy for Right Colon Cancer: A Bayesian Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials Assessing Surgical and Perioperative Outcomes. 结肠系膜完全切除与D2淋巴结切除术治疗右结肠癌:评估手术和围手术期结果的随机试验贝叶斯荟萃分析
IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-03-17 DOI: 10.1177/10926429261432594
Bernardo Fontel Pompeu, Lucas Monteiro Delgado, Gabriel Leal Barone, Giovanna Barbaroto Pilon, Giulia Luiza Garcia, Patricia Viana, Claudia Theis, Sergio Mazzola Poli de Figueiredo, Fernanda Bellotti Formiga

Introduction: Complete mesocolic excision (CME) may increase lymph node retrieval and provide a more complete oncologic excision compared with D2 dissection, although its perioperative safety remains uncertain. This systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis compared clinical and operative outcomes between CME and D2 in right colectomy.

Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central were searched through November 2025. Randomized controlled trials comparing CME with D2 were included. Frequentist analyses used random-effects models with DerSimonian-Laird estimation. Bayesian random-effects models applied weakly informative priors (binary outcomes: log[RR] ∼ N(0, 1.52), τ ∼ Half-Normal(0.5); blood loss: μ ∼ N(0, 1002), τ ∼ Half-Normal(100); lymph node yield: μ ∼ N(0, 62), and τ ∼ Half-Normal(3)). Heterogeneity was assessed using I2 and Cochran's Q. Analyses were conducted in R (v4.4.2) with bayesmeta.

Results: Three randomized trials (1378 patients; CME 678, D2 700) met inclusion criteria. CME resulted in higher lymph node harvest (MD + 3.9; 95% CI: 2.8 to 5.0; P < .001) and longer operative time (MD + 11.6 minutes; 95% CI: 6.6 to 16.7; P < .001). No significant differences were found in blood loss, overall complications, severe complications, intraoperative complications, conversion, or 30-day mortality. Bayesian modeling provided very strong evidence for increased nodal yield (P[CME > D2] = 99.1%) and hemostatic equivalence (P[equivalent ± 50 mL] = 95.9%), with a modest probability favoring fewer severe complications (P[RR < 1] = 82.9%).

Conclusion: CME offers superior oncologic radicality, reflected by higher lymph node retrieval, while maintaining perioperative outcomes equivalent to D2. Bayesian evidence reinforces CME as an effective and safe surgical strategy for right-sided colon cancer.

与D2夹层相比,全肠系膜切除(CME)可能增加淋巴结回收,提供更完整的肿瘤切除,尽管其围手术期安全性尚不确定。本系统综述和贝叶斯荟萃分析比较了CME和D2在右结肠切除术中的临床和手术结果。方法:检索至2025年11月的PubMed、EMBASE和Cochrane Central。纳入比较CME与D2的随机对照试验。频率分析使用随机效应模型和dersimonan - laird估计。贝叶斯随机效应模型应用弱信息先验(二元结果:log[RR] ~ N(0,1.52), τ ~半正态(0.5);失血量:μ ~ N(0,1002), τ ~半正常(100);淋巴结产率:μ ~ N(0,62)和τ ~半正常(3))。采用I2和Cochran’s q评估异质性,采用bayesmeta在R (v4.4.2)中进行分析。结果:三个随机试验(1378例患者;CME 678例,D2 700例)符合纳入标准。CME导致更高的淋巴结收获(MD + 3.9; 95% CI: 2.8至5.0;P < 0.001)和更长的手术时间(MD + 11.6分钟;95% CI: 6.6至16.7;P < 0.001)。出血量、总并发症、严重并发症、术中并发症、转换或30天死亡率均无显著差异。贝叶斯模型提供了非常有力的证据,证明结节产率(P[CME > D2] = 99.1%)和止血等效性(P[equivalent±50 mL] = 95.9%)增加,严重并发症减少的可能性不大(P[RR < 1] = 82.9%)。结论:CME提供了优越的肿瘤根治性,反映在更高的淋巴结回收上,同时维持了与D2相当的围手术期结果。贝叶斯证据强化了CME作为右侧结肠癌有效和安全的手术策略。
{"title":"Complete Mesocolic Excision Versus D2 Lymphadenectomy for Right Colon Cancer: A Bayesian Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials Assessing Surgical and Perioperative Outcomes.","authors":"Bernardo Fontel Pompeu, Lucas Monteiro Delgado, Gabriel Leal Barone, Giovanna Barbaroto Pilon, Giulia Luiza Garcia, Patricia Viana, Claudia Theis, Sergio Mazzola Poli de Figueiredo, Fernanda Bellotti Formiga","doi":"10.1177/10926429261432594","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10926429261432594","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Complete mesocolic excision (CME) may increase lymph node retrieval and provide a more complete oncologic excision compared with D2 dissection, although its perioperative safety remains uncertain. This systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis compared clinical and operative outcomes between CME and D2 in right colectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central were searched through November 2025. Randomized controlled trials comparing CME with D2 were included. Frequentist analyses used random-effects models with DerSimonian-Laird estimation. Bayesian random-effects models applied weakly informative priors (binary outcomes: log[RR] ∼ N(0, 1.5<sup>2</sup>), τ ∼ Half-Normal(0.5); blood loss: μ ∼ N(0, 100<sup>2</sup>), τ ∼ Half-Normal(100); lymph node yield: μ ∼ N(0, 6<sup>2</sup>), and τ ∼ Half-Normal(3)). Heterogeneity was assessed using <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> and Cochran's Q. Analyses were conducted in R (v4.4.2) with bayesmeta.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three randomized trials (1378 patients; CME 678, D2 700) met inclusion criteria. CME resulted in higher lymph node harvest (MD + 3.9; 95% CI: 2.8 to 5.0; <i>P</i> < .001) and longer operative time (MD + 11.6 minutes; 95% CI: 6.6 to 16.7; <i>P</i> < .001). No significant differences were found in blood loss, overall complications, severe complications, intraoperative complications, conversion, or 30-day mortality. Bayesian modeling provided very strong evidence for increased nodal yield (P[CME > D2] = 99.1%) and hemostatic equivalence (P[equivalent ± 50 mL] = 95.9%), with a modest probability favoring fewer severe complications (P[RR < 1] = 82.9%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CME offers superior oncologic radicality, reflected by higher lymph node retrieval, while maintaining perioperative outcomes equivalent to D2. Bayesian evidence reinforces CME as an effective and safe surgical strategy for right-sided colon cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":" ","pages":"10926429261432594"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2026-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147500484","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1