Reflections on 3 Years of Innovation: Recognizing the Need for Innovation Beyond the Clinical Care Pathway.

Shoshana H Bardach, Amanda N Perry, Evan T Cavanaugh, Albert G Mulley
{"title":"Reflections on 3 Years of Innovation: Recognizing the Need for Innovation Beyond the Clinical Care Pathway.","authors":"Shoshana H Bardach, Amanda N Perry, Evan T Cavanaugh, Albert G Mulley","doi":"10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Susan and Richard Levy Healthcare Delivery Incubator is designed to bring about rapid, sustainable, scalable, and transformational health care redesign. All 10 projects in the initial 3 cohorts of teams embraced the Incubator process-forming diverse teams and following a design-thinking informed curriculum-and each successfully implemented improvements or innovations by the end of their project. The purpose of this article is to identify the key features of teams' work that may help account for projects' success. For the 10 projects completed, findings from debrief interviews and staff observations were examined to identify processes key to project's success. Analysis highlighted cross-project learnings that indicate nonclinical aspects of care delivery that play a critical role in project innovation success. Innovating health care delivery requires considering social and political determinants of health. The Incubator's process and structures enable teams to identify and respond to a broad range of health determinants.</p>","PeriodicalId":101338,"journal":{"name":"American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality","volume":" ","pages":"55-58"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000164","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Susan and Richard Levy Healthcare Delivery Incubator is designed to bring about rapid, sustainable, scalable, and transformational health care redesign. All 10 projects in the initial 3 cohorts of teams embraced the Incubator process-forming diverse teams and following a design-thinking informed curriculum-and each successfully implemented improvements or innovations by the end of their project. The purpose of this article is to identify the key features of teams' work that may help account for projects' success. For the 10 projects completed, findings from debrief interviews and staff observations were examined to identify processes key to project's success. Analysis highlighted cross-project learnings that indicate nonclinical aspects of care delivery that play a critical role in project innovation success. Innovating health care delivery requires considering social and political determinants of health. The Incubator's process and structures enable teams to identify and respond to a broad range of health determinants.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对 3 年创新的反思:认识到临床护理途径之外的创新需求。
苏珊和理查德-李维医疗保健服务孵化器旨在实现快速、可持续、可扩展和变革性的医疗保健重新设计。在最初的三批团队中,所有 10 个项目都采用了孵化器的流程--组建不同的团队并遵循设计思维的课程--每个团队都在项目结束时成功实施了改进或创新。本文的目的是找出团队工作的主要特点,这可能有助于解释项目成功的原因。对于已完成的 10 个项目,我们对汇报访谈和员工观察的结果进行了研究,以确定项目成功的关键过程。分析强调了跨项目的经验教训,这些经验教训表明,医疗服务的非临床方面对项目创新的成功起着至关重要的作用。创新医疗服务需要考虑健康的社会和政治决定因素。孵化器的流程和结构使团队能够识别和应对广泛的健康决定因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Lack of Standardized Coding Limits Accuracy of Electronic Clinical Quality Measure for Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis. Six-Year Retrospective Look at the Effects of Institutional Quality Improvement Efforts to Reduce CAUTIs. Complications of Ambulatory Procedures: Prevalence and Hospital Outpatient Department Variation. From Data to Improvement: Social Mechanisms as a Key to Understanding Dashboard Adoption. A Checklist to Improve Acute Stroke Evaluation and Treatment in the Emergency Department.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1