Effects of earthworms on microbial community structure, functionality and soil properties in soil cover treatments for mine tailings rehabilitation

IF 3.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 ECOLOGY European Journal of Soil Biology Pub Date : 2024-02-26 DOI:10.1016/j.ejsobi.2024.103603
Sara Pelaez-Sanchez , Olaf Schmidt , Jan Frouz , Kateřina Čápová , Ronan Courtney
{"title":"Effects of earthworms on microbial community structure, functionality and soil properties in soil cover treatments for mine tailings rehabilitation","authors":"Sara Pelaez-Sanchez ,&nbsp;Olaf Schmidt ,&nbsp;Jan Frouz ,&nbsp;Kateřina Čápová ,&nbsp;Ronan Courtney","doi":"10.1016/j.ejsobi.2024.103603","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>While earthworm inoculation is viewed as a promising strategy to accelerate soil formation and ecosystem development in post-mining substrates, limited studies are field-based and focus on the influence of earthworms on microbial communities. This study investigated the effects of earthworm inoculations on soil microbial catabolic profiles, microbial community structure and physical properties. Large (1 m<sup>3</sup>) macrocosms were filled with 60–80 cm mine tailings and 40 cm of organic-rich engineered soil (SOM 8.5 g/kg) and inoculated treatments of: (1) without earthworms (Tc), (2) with one endogeic species (<em>Allolobophora chlorotica</em>) (T<sub>1</sub>), 5.8 g/m<sup>2</sup>, (3) with a mix of anecic species <em>Lumbricus</em> sp., <em>Lumbricus friendi</em> and <em>Lumbricus terrestris</em> (T<sub>2</sub>), 10.5 g/m<sup>2</sup> (4) with two species of two ecological groups, the endogeic <em>A. chlorotica</em> and the epigeic <em>Lumbricus rubellus</em> (T<sub>3</sub>), 4.0 g/m<sup>2</sup>. Earthworm survival was not evaluated due to the large container size and logistics. After six months, soil catabolic profile (MicroResp™), community structure (PLFA and NLFA), and soil physicochemical properties were analysed. MicroResp™ showed that multiple substrate-induced respiration (9.2 μg CO<sub>2</sub>–C g<sup>−1</sup> soil h<sup>−1</sup>) and microbial biomass (1.5 mg/kg soil) were higher in the treatment with endogeic and epigeic worms. The decomposition rate (k) of 0.1 was also higher than treatments with no earthworms. Water holding capacity, bulk density, aggregate stability and labile carbon showed no significant difference over time and among treatments. Overall, earthworm inoculation positively influenced microbial respiration. These findings showing the role of earthworms on microbial activity and community structure in soil covers have significant implications for management of ecosystem processes and sustainability in post-mining sites. However, the study also highlights the need for extended monitoring periods under natural field conditions to fully comprehend the complex interactions between earthworm ecological groups and microbial functionality.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12057,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Soil Biology","volume":"120 ","pages":"Article 103603"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1164556324000098/pdfft?md5=ac4b04c086275b5276a67f4e0213ae6d&pid=1-s2.0-S1164556324000098-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Soil Biology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1164556324000098","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While earthworm inoculation is viewed as a promising strategy to accelerate soil formation and ecosystem development in post-mining substrates, limited studies are field-based and focus on the influence of earthworms on microbial communities. This study investigated the effects of earthworm inoculations on soil microbial catabolic profiles, microbial community structure and physical properties. Large (1 m3) macrocosms were filled with 60–80 cm mine tailings and 40 cm of organic-rich engineered soil (SOM 8.5 g/kg) and inoculated treatments of: (1) without earthworms (Tc), (2) with one endogeic species (Allolobophora chlorotica) (T1), 5.8 g/m2, (3) with a mix of anecic species Lumbricus sp., Lumbricus friendi and Lumbricus terrestris (T2), 10.5 g/m2 (4) with two species of two ecological groups, the endogeic A. chlorotica and the epigeic Lumbricus rubellus (T3), 4.0 g/m2. Earthworm survival was not evaluated due to the large container size and logistics. After six months, soil catabolic profile (MicroResp™), community structure (PLFA and NLFA), and soil physicochemical properties were analysed. MicroResp™ showed that multiple substrate-induced respiration (9.2 μg CO2–C g−1 soil h−1) and microbial biomass (1.5 mg/kg soil) were higher in the treatment with endogeic and epigeic worms. The decomposition rate (k) of 0.1 was also higher than treatments with no earthworms. Water holding capacity, bulk density, aggregate stability and labile carbon showed no significant difference over time and among treatments. Overall, earthworm inoculation positively influenced microbial respiration. These findings showing the role of earthworms on microbial activity and community structure in soil covers have significant implications for management of ecosystem processes and sustainability in post-mining sites. However, the study also highlights the need for extended monitoring periods under natural field conditions to fully comprehend the complex interactions between earthworm ecological groups and microbial functionality.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
蚯蚓对矿山尾矿修复土壤覆盖处理中微生物群落结构、功能和土壤性质的影响
虽然蚯蚓接种被认为是在采矿后基质中加速土壤形成和生态系统发展的一种有前途的策略,但基于实地的研究有限,而且研究重点是蚯蚓对微生物群落的影响。本研究调查了蚯蚓接种对土壤微生物分解剖面、微生物群落结构和物理特性的影响。在大型(1 立方米)巨型容器中装入 60-80 厘米的矿山尾矿和 40 厘米的富含有机质的工程土壤(SOM 8.5 克/千克),接种处理包括(1) 不接种蚯蚓(Tc);(2) 接种一种内生蚯蚓(Allolobophora chlorotica)(T1),5.8 克/平方米;(3) 接种一种外生蚯蚓(Lumbricus sp.、Lumbricus friendi 和 Lumbricus terrestris)(T2),10.5 克/平方米;(4) 接种两种内生蚯蚓(A. chlorotica)和一种外生蚯蚓(Lumbricus rubellus)(T3),4.0 克/平方米。由于容器体积大和物流问题,没有对蚯蚓的存活率进行评估。6 个月后,对土壤分解剖面(MicroResp™)、群落结构(PLFA 和 NLFA)和土壤理化性质进行了分析。MicroResp™ 显示,内生和外生蠕虫处理的土壤多基质诱导呼吸(9.2 μg CO2-C g-1 soil h-1)和微生物生物量(1.5 mg/kg soil)更高。0.1 的分解率(k)也高于无蚯蚓的处理。持水量、容重、团聚稳定性和易变碳在不同时期和不同处理之间没有显著差异。总体而言,蚯蚓接种对微生物呼吸有积极影响。这些研究结果表明了蚯蚓对土壤覆盖层中微生物活动和群落结构的作用,对采矿后场地的生态系统过程管理和可持续性具有重要意义。不过,这项研究也强调了在自然野外条件下延长监测期的必要性,以便充分了解蚯蚓生态群和微生物功能之间复杂的相互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Soil Biology
European Journal of Soil Biology 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
27 days
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Soil Biology covers all aspects of soil biology which deal with microbial and faunal ecology and activity in soils, as well as natural ecosystems or biomes connected to ecological interests: biodiversity, biological conservation, adaptation, impact of global changes on soil biodiversity and ecosystem functioning and effects and fate of pollutants as influenced by soil organisms. Different levels in ecosystem structure are taken into account: individuals, populations, communities and ecosystems themselves. At each level, different disciplinary approaches are welcomed: molecular biology, genetics, ecophysiology, ecology, biogeography and landscape ecology.
期刊最新文献
In-depth insights into carbohydrate-active enzyme genes regarding the disparities in soil organic carbon after 12-year rotational cropping system field study Nutrient supply enhances positive priming of soil organic C under straw amendment and accelerates the incorporation of straw-derived C into organic C pool in paddy soils Dynamics of nitrogen mineralization and nitrogen cycling functional genes in response to soil pore size distribution Soil microbial resistance and resilience to drought under organic and conventional farming Plantation conversion of Eucalyptus promotes soil microbial necromass C accumulation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1