Neo-institutionalism in supply chain management: from supply chain susceptibility to supply chain resilience

IF 3.5 Q2 MANAGEMENT Management Research Review Pub Date : 2024-02-28 DOI:10.1108/mrr-08-2023-0572
David Martin Herold, Łukasz Marzantowicz
{"title":"Neo-institutionalism in supply chain management: from supply chain susceptibility to supply chain resilience","authors":"David Martin Herold, Łukasz Marzantowicz","doi":"10.1108/mrr-08-2023-0572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>Neo-institutional theories and their constructs have so far only received limited attention in supply chain management literature. As recent supply chain disruptions and their ripple effects affect actors on a broader institutional level, supply chains are confronted with multiple new and emerging, often conflicting, institutional demands. This study aims to unpack the notion of institutional complexity behind supply chain disruptions and present a novel institutional framework to lower supply chain susceptibility and increase supply chain resilience.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>The authors identify the patterns of complexity that shape the supply chain susceptibility, namely, distance, diversity and ambiguity, and present three institutional responses to susceptibility to increase supply chain resilience, namely, institutional entrepreneurship, institutional alignment and institutional layering.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>This paper analyses the current situational relevance to better understand the various and patterned ways how logics influence both supply chain susceptibility and the supply chain resilience. The authors derive six propositions on how complexity can be reduced for supply chain susceptibility and can be increased for supply chain resilience.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>By expanding and extending research on institutional complexity to supply chains, the authors broaden how researchers in supply chain management view supply chain susceptibility, thereby providing managers with theory to think differently about supply chains and its resilience.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":47769,"journal":{"name":"Management Research Review","volume":"90 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Management Research Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/mrr-08-2023-0572","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Neo-institutional theories and their constructs have so far only received limited attention in supply chain management literature. As recent supply chain disruptions and their ripple effects affect actors on a broader institutional level, supply chains are confronted with multiple new and emerging, often conflicting, institutional demands. This study aims to unpack the notion of institutional complexity behind supply chain disruptions and present a novel institutional framework to lower supply chain susceptibility and increase supply chain resilience.

Design/methodology/approach

The authors identify the patterns of complexity that shape the supply chain susceptibility, namely, distance, diversity and ambiguity, and present three institutional responses to susceptibility to increase supply chain resilience, namely, institutional entrepreneurship, institutional alignment and institutional layering.

Findings

This paper analyses the current situational relevance to better understand the various and patterned ways how logics influence both supply chain susceptibility and the supply chain resilience. The authors derive six propositions on how complexity can be reduced for supply chain susceptibility and can be increased for supply chain resilience.

Originality/value

By expanding and extending research on institutional complexity to supply chains, the authors broaden how researchers in supply chain management view supply chain susceptibility, thereby providing managers with theory to think differently about supply chains and its resilience.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
供应链管理中的新制度主义:从供应链易受影响性到供应链复原力
目的迄今为止,新制度理论及其构建在供应链管理文献中只得到了有限的关注。由于最近的供应链中断及其连锁反应在更广泛的制度层面上影响着参与者,供应链面临着多种新出现的、往往相互冲突的制度需求。本研究旨在解读供应链中断背后的制度复杂性概念,并提出一个新颖的制度框架,以降低供应链的易受影响程度,提高供应链的复原力。研究结果本文分析了当前情境的相关性,以更好地理解各种逻辑如何以各种模式影响供应链易受影响程度和供应链恢复能力。通过将制度复杂性的研究扩展和延伸到供应链,作者拓宽了供应链管理研究人员对供应链易受影响性的看法,从而为管理者提供了以不同方式思考供应链及其恢复力的理论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
7.70%
发文量
71
期刊介绍: Management Research Review publishes a wide variety of articles outlining the latest management research. We emphasize management implication from multiple disciplines. We welcome high quality empirical and theoretical studies, literature reviews, and articles with important tactical implications. Published 12 times a year, the journal prides itself on quick publication of the very latest research in general management. The key issues featured include: Business Ethics and Sustainability Corporate Finance Entrepreneurship and Small Business Management Industrial Relations Information and Knowledge Management International Business Human Resource Management Organizational Theory and Behaviour Production and Operations Management Strategic Management and Leadership
期刊最新文献
Unlocking the relationship between authentic leadership and organizational citizenship behavior: the key roles of organizational support and identification Fostering employee autonomy through rewards: a self-determination theory perspective The cascading role of leader-induced defensive cognitions and citizenship pressures in navigating employee silence Bankruptcy as a planned business strategy? Evidence from the stock market Agility in virtual environments: the socio-technical approach of distributed agile teams
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1