Global Assessment of Palliative Care Need: Serious Health-Related Suffering Measurement Methodology

Xiaoxiao J Kwete, Afsan Bhadelia, Hector Arreola-Ornelas, Osca Mendez, William E. Rosa E. Rosa, Stephen Connor, Julia Downing, Dean Jamison, David Watkins, Renzo Calderon, Jim Cleary, Joe Friedman, Liliana De Lima, Christian Ntizimira, Tania Pastrana, Pedro E. Perez-Cruz, Dingle Spence, M.R. Rajagopal, Valentina Vargas Enciso, Eric L. Krakauer, Lukas Radbruch, Felicia Marie Knaul
{"title":"Global Assessment of Palliative Care Need: Serious Health-Related Suffering Measurement Methodology","authors":"Xiaoxiao J Kwete, Afsan Bhadelia, Hector Arreola-Ornelas, Osca Mendez, William E. Rosa E. Rosa, Stephen Connor, Julia Downing, Dean Jamison, David Watkins, Renzo Calderon, Jim Cleary, Joe Friedman, Liliana De Lima, Christian Ntizimira, Tania Pastrana, Pedro E. Perez-Cruz, Dingle Spence, M.R. Rajagopal, Valentina Vargas Enciso, Eric L. Krakauer, Lukas Radbruch, Felicia Marie Knaul","doi":"10.1101/2024.02.26.24303409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Inequities and gaps in palliative care access are a serious impediment to health systems especially low- and middle-income countries and the accurate measurement of need across health conditions is a critical step to understanding and addressing the issue. Serious Health-related Suffering (SHS) is a novel methodology to measure the palliative care need and was originally developed by The Lancet Commission on Global Access to Palliative Care and Pain Relief. In 2015, the first iteration - SHS 1.0 - was estimated at over 61 million people worldwide experiencing at least 6 billion days of SHS annually as a result of life-limiting and life-threatening conditions. In this paper, we present an updated methodology - SHS2.0 - building on the work of the Lancet Commission and detailing calculations, data requirements, limitations, and assumptions. Our updates to the original methodology focus on measuring the number of people who die with (decedents) or live with (non-decedents) SHS in a given year to assess the number of people in need of palliative care across health conditions and populations. We also share detail on the methodology for measuring the number of days of SHS that was pioneered by the Lancet Commission, as this second measure is essential for determining the health system responses that are necessary to address palliative care need and must be a priority for future methodological work on SHS. We discuss the opportunities for applying SHS to future policy making, assess future research priorities particularly in light of the dearth of data from low- and middle-income countries, and share directions for future work to develop SHS 3.0.","PeriodicalId":501412,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Palliative Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Palliative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.26.24303409","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Inequities and gaps in palliative care access are a serious impediment to health systems especially low- and middle-income countries and the accurate measurement of need across health conditions is a critical step to understanding and addressing the issue. Serious Health-related Suffering (SHS) is a novel methodology to measure the palliative care need and was originally developed by The Lancet Commission on Global Access to Palliative Care and Pain Relief. In 2015, the first iteration - SHS 1.0 - was estimated at over 61 million people worldwide experiencing at least 6 billion days of SHS annually as a result of life-limiting and life-threatening conditions. In this paper, we present an updated methodology - SHS2.0 - building on the work of the Lancet Commission and detailing calculations, data requirements, limitations, and assumptions. Our updates to the original methodology focus on measuring the number of people who die with (decedents) or live with (non-decedents) SHS in a given year to assess the number of people in need of palliative care across health conditions and populations. We also share detail on the methodology for measuring the number of days of SHS that was pioneered by the Lancet Commission, as this second measure is essential for determining the health system responses that are necessary to address palliative care need and must be a priority for future methodological work on SHS. We discuss the opportunities for applying SHS to future policy making, assess future research priorities particularly in light of the dearth of data from low- and middle-income countries, and share directions for future work to develop SHS 3.0.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全球姑息关怀需求评估:与健康相关的严重痛苦测量方法
姑息关怀获取方面的不平等和差距严重阻碍了医疗系统的发展,尤其是在中低收入国家,而准确衡量各种健康状况下的需求是了解和解决这一问题的关键一步。严重健康相关痛苦(SHS)是一种衡量姑息关怀需求的新方法,最初由柳叶刀全球姑息关怀和疼痛缓解委员会开发。2015 年,第一次迭代--SHS 1.0--估计全球有超过 6100 万人每年因局限生命和危及生命的病症而经历至少 60 亿天的严重痛苦。在本文中,我们以柳叶刀委员会的工作为基础,详细介绍了计算方法、数据要求、局限性和假设,并提出了更新的方法--SHS2.0。我们对原始方法论的更新侧重于测量特定年份中因(死亡者)SHS 而死亡或因(非死亡者)SHS 而存活的人数,以评估不同健康状况和人群中需要姑息关怀的人数。我们还分享了由柳叶刀委员会首创的SHS天数测量方法的细节,因为这第二种测量方法对于确定满足姑息关怀需求所需的医疗系统应对措施至关重要,必须成为未来SHS方法学工作的优先事项。我们讨论了将社会健康服务应用于未来政策制定的机会,评估了未来的研究重点,特别是考虑到中低收入国家数据的匮乏,并分享了未来开发社会健康服务 3.0 的工作方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An evaluation of the adequacy of Indian national and state Essential Medicines Lists (EMLs) for palliative care medical needs - a comparative analysis Development and evaluation of an online training program for palliative care in India Cross-Cultural Adaptation of the Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment Form in Greece; a pilot cross-sectional descriptive study Utilising the Palliative Prognostic Index in a mixed non-malignant and malignant patient group to determine prognosis. A general medicine tool for prognostication Pseudoscience in Cancer Services; a survey of National Health Service Trusts in England
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1