An evaluation of the adequacy of Indian national and state Essential Medicines Lists (EMLs) for palliative care medical needs - a comparative analysis

Disha Agrawal, Divya Shrinivas, Parth Sharma, M R Rajagopal, Arun Ghoshal, Siddhesh Zadey
{"title":"An evaluation of the adequacy of Indian national and state Essential Medicines Lists (EMLs) for palliative care medical needs - a comparative analysis","authors":"Disha Agrawal, Divya Shrinivas, Parth Sharma, M R Rajagopal, Arun Ghoshal, Siddhesh Zadey","doi":"10.1101/2024.08.26.24312600","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: Essential Medicines Lists (EMLs) guide the public sector procurement and supply of medications to impact access to adequate and appropriate palliative care drugs. This study evaluates the adequacy of India's national and sub-national EMLs that can directly impact palliative care for 5.4 million patients. Methods: In this qualitative document review, we compared Indian national, and state EMLs acquired from official government websites with the International Association for Hospice & Palliative Care (IAHPC) EML recommendations. We analysed data on the indication and formulation of drugs under the different categories of formulations present (all, some, and no), and drugs absent. Literature review and inputs from palliative care experts provided alternatives of absent medications to assess the adequacy of lists in managing the symptoms listed by IAPHC. Results: We analysed 3 national and 25 state lists for 33 recommended drugs. The Central Government Health Services list had the maximum availability of all formulations of drugs (16 [48%]) nationally. Among states and union territories, the Delhi EML was the closest to IAHPC with 17 (52%) drugs with all formulations present. Nagaland had the most incomplete EML with only 3 (9%) drugs with all formulations present. No EML had all the recommended formulations of morphine. In one national and sixteen state EMLs, oral morphine was absent. Conclusion: While Indian EMLs lack drugs for palliative care when compared with the IAHPC EML, symptom management is adequate. There is a need for countries with limited resources to modify the IAPHC list for their settings.","PeriodicalId":501412,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Palliative Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Palliative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.26.24312600","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Essential Medicines Lists (EMLs) guide the public sector procurement and supply of medications to impact access to adequate and appropriate palliative care drugs. This study evaluates the adequacy of India's national and sub-national EMLs that can directly impact palliative care for 5.4 million patients. Methods: In this qualitative document review, we compared Indian national, and state EMLs acquired from official government websites with the International Association for Hospice & Palliative Care (IAHPC) EML recommendations. We analysed data on the indication and formulation of drugs under the different categories of formulations present (all, some, and no), and drugs absent. Literature review and inputs from palliative care experts provided alternatives of absent medications to assess the adequacy of lists in managing the symptoms listed by IAPHC. Results: We analysed 3 national and 25 state lists for 33 recommended drugs. The Central Government Health Services list had the maximum availability of all formulations of drugs (16 [48%]) nationally. Among states and union territories, the Delhi EML was the closest to IAHPC with 17 (52%) drugs with all formulations present. Nagaland had the most incomplete EML with only 3 (9%) drugs with all formulations present. No EML had all the recommended formulations of morphine. In one national and sixteen state EMLs, oral morphine was absent. Conclusion: While Indian EMLs lack drugs for palliative care when compared with the IAHPC EML, symptom management is adequate. There is a need for countries with limited resources to modify the IAPHC list for their settings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对印度国家和邦基本药品清单(EML)是否足以满足姑息治疗医疗需求的评估--比较分析
目标:基本药物清单(EMLs)指导公共部门的药物采购和供应,从而影响人们获得充足、适当的姑息关怀药物。本研究评估了印度国家和次国家基本药物清单的充分性,这些清单可直接影响 540 万患者的姑息治疗。方法:在这项定性文件审查中,我们将从政府官方网站获取的印度国家和各邦的 EML 与国际临终关怀与姑息治疗协会 (IAHPC) 的 EML 建议进行了比较。我们分析了存在制剂(全部、部分和无)和不存在药物等不同类别下的药物适应症和制剂数据。文献综述和姑息关怀专家的意见提供了缺失药物的替代品,以评估清单是否足以处理 IAPHC 列出的症状。结果:我们分析了 3 个国家和 25 个州的 33 种推荐药物清单。中央政府卫生服务机构的清单在全国范围内提供了最多的所有药物配方(16 种 [48%])。在各邦和中央直辖区中,德里的 EML 最接近 IAHPC,有 17 种(52%)药物提供了所有配方。那加兰邦的 EML 最不完整,仅有 3 种(9%)药物的配方齐全。没有一个 EML 有所有推荐的吗啡制剂。在 1 个国家和 16 个邦的 EML 中,没有口服吗啡。结论:虽然印度的 EML 与 IAHPC EML 相比缺乏姑息治疗药物,但症状管理是充分的。资源有限的国家有必要根据自身情况修改 IAPHC 清单。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An evaluation of the adequacy of Indian national and state Essential Medicines Lists (EMLs) for palliative care medical needs - a comparative analysis Development and evaluation of an online training program for palliative care in India Cross-Cultural Adaptation of the Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment Form in Greece; a pilot cross-sectional descriptive study Utilising the Palliative Prognostic Index in a mixed non-malignant and malignant patient group to determine prognosis. A general medicine tool for prognostication Pseudoscience in Cancer Services; a survey of National Health Service Trusts in England
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1