{"title":"Assessing factors that increase dusky gopher frog larval performance in open-canopy wetlands","authors":"C. Myles Lance, Joseph H. K. Pechmann","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22559","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Amphibians are declining worldwide, and research on their habitats and ecology is important for their conservation. The endangered dusky gopher frog (<i>Rana sevosa</i>) breeds exclusively in isolated, open canopy wetlands, usually with extensive herbaceous growth. Larvae of the dusky gopher frog have higher growth and survival under open canopy than under closed canopy conditions. The mechanisms whereby this occurs are poorly understood, however. In the summer of 2021 in Harrison County, Mississippi, USA, we conducted a complete factorial experiment in mesocosms to compare the relative influence of factors differing between open and closed canopy ponds on larvae. A heat and light treatment consisted of one third of tanks being exposed to full sunlight, one third of tanks being shaded with 70% shadecloth, and the final third being shaded with 70% shadecloth but heated to mimic the temperature of the full sun tanks. In addition, tanks received a closed canopy tree leaf litter mixture or an open canopy herbaceous vegetation mixture, and vertical vegetation-like structure made of polypropylene rope or not. Cool shaded tanks and heated shaded tanks had identical survival to metamorphosis at 74.7% and produced frogs with an average mass of 2.21 g and 2.09 g, respectively, while tanks in full sunlight achieved significantly higher 93.4% survival to metamorphosis and an average mass of 2.64 g. The open canopy vegetation mixture yielded an average tank survival of 88.3% and mass of 2.94 g, compared to closed canopy vegetation tanks with a significantly lower survival of 73.5% and average mass of 1.61 g. Added structure had no effect on survival or mass. These results indicate that sunlight (not heat alone) and herbaceous plants are important in increasing dusky gopher frog survival and mass in open canopy conditions and suggest that management for these characteristics receive priority in captive-rearing programs and habitat restoration.</p>","PeriodicalId":17504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wildlife Management","volume":"88 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jwmg.22559","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Wildlife Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jwmg.22559","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Amphibians are declining worldwide, and research on their habitats and ecology is important for their conservation. The endangered dusky gopher frog (Rana sevosa) breeds exclusively in isolated, open canopy wetlands, usually with extensive herbaceous growth. Larvae of the dusky gopher frog have higher growth and survival under open canopy than under closed canopy conditions. The mechanisms whereby this occurs are poorly understood, however. In the summer of 2021 in Harrison County, Mississippi, USA, we conducted a complete factorial experiment in mesocosms to compare the relative influence of factors differing between open and closed canopy ponds on larvae. A heat and light treatment consisted of one third of tanks being exposed to full sunlight, one third of tanks being shaded with 70% shadecloth, and the final third being shaded with 70% shadecloth but heated to mimic the temperature of the full sun tanks. In addition, tanks received a closed canopy tree leaf litter mixture or an open canopy herbaceous vegetation mixture, and vertical vegetation-like structure made of polypropylene rope or not. Cool shaded tanks and heated shaded tanks had identical survival to metamorphosis at 74.7% and produced frogs with an average mass of 2.21 g and 2.09 g, respectively, while tanks in full sunlight achieved significantly higher 93.4% survival to metamorphosis and an average mass of 2.64 g. The open canopy vegetation mixture yielded an average tank survival of 88.3% and mass of 2.94 g, compared to closed canopy vegetation tanks with a significantly lower survival of 73.5% and average mass of 1.61 g. Added structure had no effect on survival or mass. These results indicate that sunlight (not heat alone) and herbaceous plants are important in increasing dusky gopher frog survival and mass in open canopy conditions and suggest that management for these characteristics receive priority in captive-rearing programs and habitat restoration.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Wildlife Management publishes manuscripts containing information from original research that contributes to basic wildlife science. Suitable topics include investigations into the biology and ecology of wildlife and their habitats that has direct or indirect implications for wildlife management and conservation. This includes basic information on wildlife habitat use, reproduction, genetics, demographics, viability, predator-prey relationships, space-use, movements, behavior, and physiology; but within the context of contemporary management and conservation issues such that the knowledge may ultimately be useful to wildlife practitioners. Also considered are theoretical and conceptual aspects of wildlife science, including development of new approaches to quantitative analyses, modeling of wildlife populations and habitats, and other topics that are germane to advancing wildlife science. Limited reviews or meta analyses will be considered if they provide a meaningful new synthesis or perspective on an appropriate subject. Direct evaluation of management practices or policies should be sent to the Wildlife Society Bulletin, as should papers reporting new tools or techniques. However, papers that report new tools or techniques, or effects of management practices, within the context of a broader study investigating basic wildlife biology and ecology will be considered by The Journal of Wildlife Management. Book reviews of relevant topics in basic wildlife research and biology.