Comparison of histological delineations of medial temporal lobe cortices by four independent neuroanatomy laboratories

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES Hippocampus Pub Date : 2024-02-28 DOI:10.1002/hipo.23602
Anika Wuestefeld, Hannah Baumeister, Jenna N. Adams, Robin de Flores, Carl J. Hodgetts, Negar Mazloum-Farzaghi, Rosanna K. Olsen, Vyash Puliyadi, Tammy T. Tran, Arnold Bakker, Kelsey L. Canada, Marshall A. Dalton, Ana M. Daugherty, Renaud La Joie, Lei Wang, Madigan L. Bedard, Esther Buendia, Eunice Chung, Amanda Denning, María del Mar Arroyo-Jiménez, Emilio Artacho-Pérula, David J. Irwin, Ranjit Ittyerah, Edward B. Lee, Sydney Lim, María del Pilar Marcos-Rabal, Maria Mercedes Iñiguez de Onzoño Martin, Monica Munoz Lopez, Carlos de la Rosa Prieto, Theresa Schuck, Winifred Trotman, Alicia Vela, Paul Yushkevich, Katrin Amunts, Jean C. Augustinack, Song-Lin Ding, Ricardo Insausti, Olga Kedo, David Berron, Laura E. M. Wisse
{"title":"Comparison of histological delineations of medial temporal lobe cortices by four independent neuroanatomy laboratories","authors":"Anika Wuestefeld,&nbsp;Hannah Baumeister,&nbsp;Jenna N. Adams,&nbsp;Robin de Flores,&nbsp;Carl J. Hodgetts,&nbsp;Negar Mazloum-Farzaghi,&nbsp;Rosanna K. Olsen,&nbsp;Vyash Puliyadi,&nbsp;Tammy T. Tran,&nbsp;Arnold Bakker,&nbsp;Kelsey L. Canada,&nbsp;Marshall A. Dalton,&nbsp;Ana M. Daugherty,&nbsp;Renaud La Joie,&nbsp;Lei Wang,&nbsp;Madigan L. Bedard,&nbsp;Esther Buendia,&nbsp;Eunice Chung,&nbsp;Amanda Denning,&nbsp;María del Mar Arroyo-Jiménez,&nbsp;Emilio Artacho-Pérula,&nbsp;David J. Irwin,&nbsp;Ranjit Ittyerah,&nbsp;Edward B. Lee,&nbsp;Sydney Lim,&nbsp;María del Pilar Marcos-Rabal,&nbsp;Maria Mercedes Iñiguez de Onzoño Martin,&nbsp;Monica Munoz Lopez,&nbsp;Carlos de la Rosa Prieto,&nbsp;Theresa Schuck,&nbsp;Winifred Trotman,&nbsp;Alicia Vela,&nbsp;Paul Yushkevich,&nbsp;Katrin Amunts,&nbsp;Jean C. Augustinack,&nbsp;Song-Lin Ding,&nbsp;Ricardo Insausti,&nbsp;Olga Kedo,&nbsp;David Berron,&nbsp;Laura E. M. Wisse","doi":"10.1002/hipo.23602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The medial temporal lobe (MTL) cortex, located adjacent to the hippocampus, is crucial for memory and prone to the accumulation of certain neuropathologies such as Alzheimer's disease neurofibrillary tau tangles. The MTL cortex is composed of several subregions which differ in their functional and cytoarchitectonic features. As neuroanatomical schools rely on different cytoarchitectonic definitions of these subregions, it is unclear to what extent their delineations of MTL cortex subregions overlap. Here, we provide an overview of cytoarchitectonic definitions of the entorhinal and parahippocampal cortices as well as Brodmann areas (BA) 35 and 36, as provided by four neuroanatomists from different laboratories, aiming to identify the rationale for overlapping and diverging delineations. Nissl-stained series were acquired from the temporal lobes of three human specimens (two right and one left hemisphere). Slices (50 μm thick) were prepared perpendicular to the long axis of the hippocampus spanning the entire longitudinal extent of the MTL cortex. Four neuroanatomists annotated MTL cortex subregions on digitized slices spaced 5 mm apart (pixel size 0.4 μm at 20× magnification). Parcellations, terminology, and border placement were compared among neuroanatomists. Cytoarchitectonic features of each subregion are described in detail. Qualitative analysis of the annotations showed higher agreement in the definitions of the entorhinal cortex and BA35, while the definitions of BA36 and the parahippocampal cortex exhibited less overlap among neuroanatomists. The degree of overlap of cytoarchitectonic definitions was partially reflected in the neuroanatomists' agreement on the respective delineations. Lower agreement in annotations was observed in transitional zones between structures where seminal cytoarchitectonic features are expressed less saliently. The results highlight that definitions and parcellations of the MTL cortex differ among neuroanatomical schools and thereby increase understanding of why these differences may arise. This work sets a crucial foundation to further advance anatomically-informed neuroimaging research on the human MTL cortex.</p>","PeriodicalId":13171,"journal":{"name":"Hippocampus","volume":"34 5","pages":"241-260"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hipo.23602","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hippocampus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hipo.23602","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The medial temporal lobe (MTL) cortex, located adjacent to the hippocampus, is crucial for memory and prone to the accumulation of certain neuropathologies such as Alzheimer's disease neurofibrillary tau tangles. The MTL cortex is composed of several subregions which differ in their functional and cytoarchitectonic features. As neuroanatomical schools rely on different cytoarchitectonic definitions of these subregions, it is unclear to what extent their delineations of MTL cortex subregions overlap. Here, we provide an overview of cytoarchitectonic definitions of the entorhinal and parahippocampal cortices as well as Brodmann areas (BA) 35 and 36, as provided by four neuroanatomists from different laboratories, aiming to identify the rationale for overlapping and diverging delineations. Nissl-stained series were acquired from the temporal lobes of three human specimens (two right and one left hemisphere). Slices (50 μm thick) were prepared perpendicular to the long axis of the hippocampus spanning the entire longitudinal extent of the MTL cortex. Four neuroanatomists annotated MTL cortex subregions on digitized slices spaced 5 mm apart (pixel size 0.4 μm at 20× magnification). Parcellations, terminology, and border placement were compared among neuroanatomists. Cytoarchitectonic features of each subregion are described in detail. Qualitative analysis of the annotations showed higher agreement in the definitions of the entorhinal cortex and BA35, while the definitions of BA36 and the parahippocampal cortex exhibited less overlap among neuroanatomists. The degree of overlap of cytoarchitectonic definitions was partially reflected in the neuroanatomists' agreement on the respective delineations. Lower agreement in annotations was observed in transitional zones between structures where seminal cytoarchitectonic features are expressed less saliently. The results highlight that definitions and parcellations of the MTL cortex differ among neuroanatomical schools and thereby increase understanding of why these differences may arise. This work sets a crucial foundation to further advance anatomically-informed neuroimaging research on the human MTL cortex.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较四个独立神经解剖实验室对颞叶内侧皮层的组织学划分。
内侧颞叶(MTL)皮层毗邻海马体,对记忆至关重要,而且容易积累某些神经病理变化,如阿尔茨海默氏症的神经纤维tau缠结。MTL 皮层由多个亚区组成,这些亚区的功能和细胞结构特征各不相同。由于神经解剖学流派对这些亚区的细胞结构定义各不相同,因此尚不清楚它们对 MTL 皮层亚区的划分在多大程度上存在重叠。在此,我们概述了来自不同实验室的四位神经解剖学家对内侧皮层和海马旁皮层以及布罗德曼区(BA)35 和 36 所做的细胞结构定义,旨在找出划分重叠和分歧的原因。从三个人体标本(两个右半球和一个左半球)的颞叶采集了尼氏染色序列。制备的切片(50 μm厚)垂直于海马长轴,横跨MTL皮层的整个纵向范围。四名神经解剖学家在间隔 5 毫米的数字化切片上标注了 MTL 皮层亚区(像素大小为 0.4 μm,放大倍数为 20 倍)。神经解剖学家之间对划分、术语和边界位置进行了比较。每个亚区的细胞结构特征都有详细描述。对注释的定性分析显示,内侧皮层和 BA35 的定义具有较高的一致性,而 BA36 和海马旁皮层的定义在神经解剖学家之间的重叠程度较低。细胞结构定义的重叠程度在一定程度上反映了神经解剖学家对各自定义的一致性。在结构之间的过渡区,观察到的注释一致性较低,而在这些区域,重要的细胞结构特征表现得不那么突出。研究结果强调了不同神经解剖学流派对 MTL 皮层的定义和划分存在差异,从而加深了对这些差异产生原因的理解。这项工作为进一步推动以解剖学为依据的人类MTL皮层神经成像研究奠定了重要基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Hippocampus
Hippocampus 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
5.70%
发文量
79
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Hippocampus provides a forum for the exchange of current information between investigators interested in the neurobiology of the hippocampal formation and related structures. While the relationships of submitted papers to the hippocampal formation will be evaluated liberally, the substance of appropriate papers should deal with the hippocampal formation per se or with the interaction between the hippocampal formation and other brain regions. The scope of Hippocampus is wide: single and multidisciplinary experimental studies from all fields of basic science, theoretical papers, papers dealing with hippocampal preparations as models for understanding the central nervous system, and clinical studies will be considered for publication. The Editor especially encourages the submission of papers that contribute to a functional understanding of the hippocampal formation.
期刊最新文献
Flexible and Adaptive Behavioral Strategies: A Personal Journey Linking Anxiolytic Action to Hippocampal “Theta”—A Personal History The Discovery of Head Direction Cells: A Personal Account From Inhibition to Exciting Science Unweaving the Cognitive Map: A Personal History
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1