The subiculum is highly interconnected with the hippocampus, sub-regions of the thalamus, and the entorhinal and retrosplenial cortices. Together, these regions form a distributed network that plays critical roles in spatial cognition and learning and memory. Despite recent discoveries detailing subiculum's circuitry and neural dynamics, a unique role for subiculum in this system has yet to be determined. Traditionally, the subiculum has been considered the "fourth leg" and output region of the trisynaptic pathway. However, recent evidence highlights the subiculum as a site of integration, receiving and redistributing outputs from the hippocampus, anterior thalamus, retrosplenial cortex, and entorhinal cortex. We review how these afferents may explain the diverse forms of spatial and directional tuning observed in the subiculum, including location coding, boundary-related signals, axis of travel, and head orientation. We also discuss more recently identified "non-canonical" connections that suggest additional roles for the subiculum in refining hippocampal processing. Together, these findings call for a reconceptualization of the subiculum's role in spatial cognition, memory, and integration across thalamic, cortical, and hippocampal networks.
{"title":"Non-Canonical Subiculum Circuit Organization and Function.","authors":"Pan Gao, Wenhao Cao, Douglas A Nitz, Xiangmin Xu","doi":"10.1002/hipo.70087","DOIUrl":"10.1002/hipo.70087","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The subiculum is highly interconnected with the hippocampus, sub-regions of the thalamus, and the entorhinal and retrosplenial cortices. Together, these regions form a distributed network that plays critical roles in spatial cognition and learning and memory. Despite recent discoveries detailing subiculum's circuitry and neural dynamics, a unique role for subiculum in this system has yet to be determined. Traditionally, the subiculum has been considered the \"fourth leg\" and output region of the trisynaptic pathway. However, recent evidence highlights the subiculum as a site of integration, receiving and redistributing outputs from the hippocampus, anterior thalamus, retrosplenial cortex, and entorhinal cortex. We review how these afferents may explain the diverse forms of spatial and directional tuning observed in the subiculum, including location coding, boundary-related signals, axis of travel, and head orientation. We also discuss more recently identified \"non-canonical\" connections that suggest additional roles for the subiculum in refining hippocampal processing. Together, these findings call for a reconceptualization of the subiculum's role in spatial cognition, memory, and integration across thalamic, cortical, and hippocampal networks.</p>","PeriodicalId":13171,"journal":{"name":"Hippocampus","volume":"36 2","pages":"e70087"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12947615/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147305113","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
In the classical view of hippocampal function, the subiculum is assigned the role of the output layer. In spatial paradigms, some subiculum neurons manifest as so-called boundary vector cells (BVCs), firing in response to boundaries at specific allocentric directions and distances. More recently, it has been shown that some subiculum BVCs can be classified as vector trace cells (VTCs), which exhibit traces of activity after a boundary/object has been removed. Here, we propose a model of processing within subiculum that accounts for VTCs, taking into account proximodistal differences in subiculum (pSub vs. dSub) and CA1. dSub neurons receive feedforward input, either in the form of perceptual information (from BVCs in pSub) or mnemonic information (from place cells in CA1). Mismatch between these two inputs updates associative memory encoded in the synapses between CA1 and dSub. With a range of learning rates, the model captures the majority of experimental findings, including the distribution of VTCs along the proximodistal axis, the percentage of VTCs across different cue types, and the hours-long persistence of the vector trace. Incorporating experimentally reported effects of inserted objects/rewards on place cells (place field shift), we also explain why VTCs have longer tuning distances after cue removal. This adds predictive character to subiculum traces and suggests the online use of mnemonic content during navigation. Our model suggests that mismatch detection for updating spatial memory content provides a mechanistic explanation for findings in the CA1-subiculum pathway. This work constitutes the first dedicated circuit-level model of computation within the subiculum, consistent with known effects in CA1, and provides a potential framework to extend the canonical model of hippocampal function with a subiculum component.
在海马体功能的经典观点中,下托被赋予了输出层的角色。在空间范式中,一些耻骨下神经元表现为所谓的边界向量细胞(BVCs),在特定的异中心方向和距离上对边界作出反应。最近的研究表明,一些耻骨下的bvc可以被归类为载体痕迹细胞(vector trace cells, VTCs),它们在边界/物体被移除后表现出活动的痕迹。在这里,我们提出了一个考虑到耻骨下近端差异(pSub vs. dSub)和CA1的耻骨下加工模型,该模型可以解释VTCs。dSub神经元接收前馈输入,要么以感知信息(来自pSub中的BVCs)的形式,要么以记忆信息(来自CA1中的位置细胞)的形式。这两个输入的不匹配更新了编码在CA1和dSub之间的突触中的联想记忆。在一定的学习率范围内,该模型捕获了大多数实验结果,包括VTCs沿近端远端轴的分布,VTCs在不同线索类型中的百分比,以及矢量轨迹的持续时间。结合实验报道的插入物体/奖励对位置细胞的影响(位置场移位),我们还解释了为什么VTCs在删除线索后具有更长的调谐距离。这增加了对耻骨下痕迹的预测特征,并建议在导航过程中在线使用助记内容。我们的模型表明,更新空间记忆内容的错配检测为ca1 -托下通路的发现提供了机制解释。这项工作构成了第一个专门的神经回路水平的计算模型,与已知的CA1效应一致,并提供了一个潜在的框架,以扩展具有耻骨下成分的海马功能规范模型。
{"title":"Dynamic Updating of Cognitive Maps via Traces of Experience in the Subiculum.","authors":"Fei Wang, Andrej Bicanski","doi":"10.1002/hipo.70078","DOIUrl":"10.1002/hipo.70078","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the classical view of hippocampal function, the subiculum is assigned the role of the output layer. In spatial paradigms, some subiculum neurons manifest as so-called boundary vector cells (BVCs), firing in response to boundaries at specific allocentric directions and distances. More recently, it has been shown that some subiculum BVCs can be classified as vector trace cells (VTCs), which exhibit traces of activity after a boundary/object has been removed. Here, we propose a model of processing within subiculum that accounts for VTCs, taking into account proximodistal differences in subiculum (pSub vs. dSub) and CA1. dSub neurons receive feedforward input, either in the form of perceptual information (from BVCs in pSub) or mnemonic information (from place cells in CA1). Mismatch between these two inputs updates associative memory encoded in the synapses between CA1 and dSub. With a range of learning rates, the model captures the majority of experimental findings, including the distribution of VTCs along the proximodistal axis, the percentage of VTCs across different cue types, and the hours-long persistence of the vector trace. Incorporating experimentally reported effects of inserted objects/rewards on place cells (place field shift), we also explain why VTCs have longer tuning distances after cue removal. This adds predictive character to subiculum traces and suggests the online use of mnemonic content during navigation. Our model suggests that mismatch detection for updating spatial memory content provides a mechanistic explanation for findings in the CA1-subiculum pathway. This work constitutes the first dedicated circuit-level model of computation within the subiculum, consistent with known effects in CA1, and provides a potential framework to extend the canonical model of hippocampal function with a subiculum component.</p>","PeriodicalId":13171,"journal":{"name":"Hippocampus","volume":"36 2","pages":"e70078"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12953219/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147343402","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Grid cells in medial entorhinal cortex (MEC) support spatial navigation by responding to multiple variables, including position, speed, and head direction. While tuning curves for each of these variables have been examined individually at the level of single cells, less is known about the conjunctive coding of grid cells for these properties. To investigate this, we analyzed neural recordings of freely foraging rats and constructed four-dimensional (4D) tuning curves across 2D position and 2D velocity. In order to combat the sparse sampling of such a large behavioral space, we applied Gaussian Process (GP) methods to estimate firing rates at un-sampled points. Comparing GP model-derived tuning curves to those predicted by a fully separable model revealed that some cells exhibited significant non-separability of position and velocity tuning, and suggested a data coverage threshold necessary to observe this non-separability. In summary, our use of GPs allowed us to distinguish interactions in position-velocity tuning across a 4D behavioral space that have not been apparent in 2D analyses.
{"title":"Gaussian Process Inference Reveals Non-Separability of Position and Velocity Tuning in Grid Cells.","authors":"Linnie J Warton, Surya Ganguli, Lisa M Giocomo","doi":"10.1002/hipo.70083","DOIUrl":"10.1002/hipo.70083","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Grid cells in medial entorhinal cortex (MEC) support spatial navigation by responding to multiple variables, including position, speed, and head direction. While tuning curves for each of these variables have been examined individually at the level of single cells, less is known about the conjunctive coding of grid cells for these properties. To investigate this, we analyzed neural recordings of freely foraging rats and constructed four-dimensional (4D) tuning curves across 2D position and 2D velocity. In order to combat the sparse sampling of such a large behavioral space, we applied Gaussian Process (GP) methods to estimate firing rates at un-sampled points. Comparing GP model-derived tuning curves to those predicted by a fully separable model revealed that some cells exhibited significant non-separability of position and velocity tuning, and suggested a data coverage threshold necessary to observe this non-separability. In summary, our use of GPs allowed us to distinguish interactions in position-velocity tuning across a 4D behavioral space that have not been apparent in 2D analyses.</p>","PeriodicalId":13171,"journal":{"name":"Hippocampus","volume":"36 2","pages":"e70083"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147283474","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Ernest Simons, Caswell Barry, Caroline Whyatt, Rebecca Knight
Grid cells have been identified in the entorhinal cortex of rodents and humans, as well as other mammals. In rodents, these "distance computing" neurons exhibit altered firing fields in response to environmental manipulations, including changes to geometry or specific contextual cues (e.g., color). The current study investigated whether these neurophysiological observations in rodents could predict human behavior in a distance judgment task under various environmental manipulations. Participants (n = 51) completed 22 trials involving distance traversal, memorisation, and distance replication across five experimental conditions: control (no manipulation), contextual manipulation (novel environment), and geometric manipulations (local expansion and contraction; global expansion and contraction). Results demonstrated that environmental expansions led to significant overestimations in distance judgments, consistent with rodent grid cell data. Global geometric manipulations yielded significant overestimations compared to the control condition. For the local manipulations, judgments were least accurate when made in the vicinity of the local manipulation. These behavioral patterns are consistent with localized deformations in spatial representations, as would be predicted from rodent grid cell studies. As hypothesized, changes to the environmental context (the novel environment condition) also resulted in significant distance overestimations. In conclusion, environmental manipulations influenced the accuracy of human distance judgments in a manner paralleling the firing field changes observed in rodent grid cells under similar environmental alterations. These findings demonstrate behavioral parallels between human distance estimation and rodent grid cell responses to environmental manipulations, suggesting possible commonalities in spatial processing across species.
{"title":"Rescaling of Distance Judgments With Geometric and Contextual Changes.","authors":"Ernest Simons, Caswell Barry, Caroline Whyatt, Rebecca Knight","doi":"10.1002/hipo.70088","DOIUrl":"10.1002/hipo.70088","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Grid cells have been identified in the entorhinal cortex of rodents and humans, as well as other mammals. In rodents, these \"distance computing\" neurons exhibit altered firing fields in response to environmental manipulations, including changes to geometry or specific contextual cues (e.g., color). The current study investigated whether these neurophysiological observations in rodents could predict human behavior in a distance judgment task under various environmental manipulations. Participants (n = 51) completed 22 trials involving distance traversal, memorisation, and distance replication across five experimental conditions: control (no manipulation), contextual manipulation (novel environment), and geometric manipulations (local expansion and contraction; global expansion and contraction). Results demonstrated that environmental expansions led to significant overestimations in distance judgments, consistent with rodent grid cell data. Global geometric manipulations yielded significant overestimations compared to the control condition. For the local manipulations, judgments were least accurate when made in the vicinity of the local manipulation. These behavioral patterns are consistent with localized deformations in spatial representations, as would be predicted from rodent grid cell studies. As hypothesized, changes to the environmental context (the novel environment condition) also resulted in significant distance overestimations. In conclusion, environmental manipulations influenced the accuracy of human distance judgments in a manner paralleling the firing field changes observed in rodent grid cells under similar environmental alterations. These findings demonstrate behavioral parallels between human distance estimation and rodent grid cell responses to environmental manipulations, suggesting possible commonalities in spatial processing across species.</p>","PeriodicalId":13171,"journal":{"name":"Hippocampus","volume":"36 2","pages":"e70088"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12975663/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147432649","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}