False recall is associated with larger caudate in males but not in females.

IF 2.2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Memory Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-28 DOI:10.1080/09658211.2024.2319314
Xuhao Shao, Ao Li, Zehua Wang, Gui Xue, Bi Zhu
{"title":"False recall is associated with larger caudate in males but not in females.","authors":"Xuhao Shao, Ao Li, Zehua Wang, Gui Xue, Bi Zhu","doi":"10.1080/09658211.2024.2319314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>After learning semantically related words, some people are more likely than others to incorrectly recall unstudied but semantically related lures (i.e., Deese-Roediger-McDermott [DRM] false recall). Previous studies have suggested that neural activity in subcortical regions (e.g., the caudate) is involved in false memory, and that there may be sex differences in the neural basis of false memory. However, sex-specific associations between subcortical volumes and false memory are not well understood. This study investigated whether sex modulates the associations between subcortical volumes and DRM false recall in 400 healthy college students. Volumes of subcortical regions including the caudate, accumbens, amygdala, hippocampus, pallidum, putamen and thalamus were obtained from structural magnetic resonance images and measured using FreeSurfer. The results showed that males had lower true and false recall but larger subcortical volumes than females. Interestingly, higher false recall was associated with a larger caudate in males, but not in females. This association was significant after controlling for age and intracranial volume. This study provides new evidence on the neural basis of false recall. It suggests that the caudate plays a role in false recall in young men, and that future studies of the neural correlates of false memory should consider sex differences.</p>","PeriodicalId":18569,"journal":{"name":"Memory","volume":" ","pages":"1341-1348"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Memory","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2024.2319314","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

After learning semantically related words, some people are more likely than others to incorrectly recall unstudied but semantically related lures (i.e., Deese-Roediger-McDermott [DRM] false recall). Previous studies have suggested that neural activity in subcortical regions (e.g., the caudate) is involved in false memory, and that there may be sex differences in the neural basis of false memory. However, sex-specific associations between subcortical volumes and false memory are not well understood. This study investigated whether sex modulates the associations between subcortical volumes and DRM false recall in 400 healthy college students. Volumes of subcortical regions including the caudate, accumbens, amygdala, hippocampus, pallidum, putamen and thalamus were obtained from structural magnetic resonance images and measured using FreeSurfer. The results showed that males had lower true and false recall but larger subcortical volumes than females. Interestingly, higher false recall was associated with a larger caudate in males, but not in females. This association was significant after controlling for age and intracranial volume. This study provides new evidence on the neural basis of false recall. It suggests that the caudate plays a role in false recall in young men, and that future studies of the neural correlates of false memory should consider sex differences.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
男性的错误回忆与较大的尾状核有关,而女性则不然。
在学习了语义相关的单词后,有些人比其他人更容易错误地回忆起未学习过但语义相关的诱饵(即 Deese-Roediger-McDermott [DRM] 假忆)。以往的研究表明,皮层下区域(如尾状核)的神经活动与错误记忆有关,错误记忆的神经基础可能存在性别差异。然而,皮层下体积与虚假记忆之间的性别特异性关联并不十分清楚。本研究调查了 400 名健康大学生的皮层下体积与 DRM 虚假记忆之间的关联是否受性别影响。研究人员从结构磁共振图像中获取了包括尾状核、延脑、杏仁核、海马、苍白球、丘脑和丘脑在内的皮层下区域的体积,并使用 FreeSurfer 进行了测量。结果显示,与女性相比,男性的真实回忆和错误回忆率较低,但皮层下体积较大。有趣的是,男性较高的错误回忆与较大的尾状体有关,而女性则不然。在控制了年龄和颅内容积后,这种关联仍然显著。这项研究为错误回忆的神经基础提供了新的证据。它表明尾状核在年轻男性的错误记忆中起着一定的作用,未来对错误记忆神经相关因素的研究应考虑性别差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Memory
Memory PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
9.50%
发文量
79
期刊介绍: Memory publishes high quality papers in all areas of memory research. This includes experimental studies of memory (including laboratory-based research, everyday memory studies, and applied memory research), developmental, educational, neuropsychological, clinical and social research on memory. By representing all significant areas of memory research, the journal cuts across the traditional distinctions of psychological research. Memory therefore provides a unique venue for memory researchers to communicate their findings and ideas both to peers within their own research tradition in the study of memory, and also to the wider range of research communities with direct interest in human memory.
期刊最新文献
Cultural life scripts as schema: recalling schema congruent and incongruent events from a hypothetical life story. Embracing strengths and avoiding weaknesses: a meta-analysis of the mnemic neglect effect. Similar phonemes create interference in the serial recall task. Executive control contributes little to prospective memory function in older age: evidence from more ecologically valid paradigms. The mediating role of impulsivity in the relationship between executive functions (working memory, inhibition) and prospective memory.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1