Long-term clinical outcomes in patients with multiple sclerosis who are initiating disease-modifying therapy with natalizumab compared with BRACETD first-line therapies.

IF 5.4 3区 材料科学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL ACS Applied Energy Materials Pub Date : 2024-02-26 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/17562864231221331
Helmut Butzkueven, Tomas Kalincik, Francesco Patti, Mark Slee, Bianca Weinstock-Guttman, Katherine Buzzard, Olga Skibina, Raed Alroughani, Alexandre Prat, Marc Girard, Dana Horakova, Eva Kubala Havrdova, Anneke Van der Walt, Sara Eichau, Robert Hyde, Nolan Campbell, Karthik Bodhinathan, Tim Spelman
{"title":"Long-term clinical outcomes in patients with multiple sclerosis who are initiating disease-modifying therapy with natalizumab compared with BRACETD first-line therapies.","authors":"Helmut Butzkueven, Tomas Kalincik, Francesco Patti, Mark Slee, Bianca Weinstock-Guttman, Katherine Buzzard, Olga Skibina, Raed Alroughani, Alexandre Prat, Marc Girard, Dana Horakova, Eva Kubala Havrdova, Anneke Van der Walt, Sara Eichau, Robert Hyde, Nolan Campbell, Karthik Bodhinathan, Tim Spelman","doi":"10.1177/17562864231221331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Aggressive disease control soon after multiple sclerosis (MS) diagnosis may prevent irreversible neurological damage, and therefore early initiation of a high-efficacy disease-modifying therapy (DMT) is of clinical relevance.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Evaluate long-term clinical outcomes in patients with MS who initiated treatment with either natalizumab or a BRACETD therapy (interferon beta, glatiramer acetate, teriflunomide, or dimethyl fumarate).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This retrospective analysis utilized data from MSBase to create a matched population allowing comparison of first-line natalizumab to first-line BRACETD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included patients who initiated treatment either with natalizumab or a BRACETD DMT within 1 year of MS diagnosis and continued treatment for ⩾6 months, after which patients could switch DMTs or discontinue treatment. Patients had a minimum follow-up time of ⩾60 months from initiation. A subgroup analysis compared the natalizumab group to patients in the BRACETD group who escalated therapy after 6 months. Outcomes included unadjusted annualized relapse rates (ARRs), time-to-first relapse, time-to-first confirmed disability improvement (CDI), and time-to-first confirmed disability worsening (CDW).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After 1:1 propensity score matching, 355 BRACETD patients were matched to 355 natalizumab patients. Patients initiating natalizumab were less likely to experience a relapse over the duration of follow-up, with ARRs [95% confidence interval (CI)] of 0.080 (0.070-0.092) for natalizumab patients and 0.191 (0.178-0.205) for BRACETD patients (<i>p</i> < 0.0001). A Cox regression model of time-to-first relapse showed a reduced risk of relapse for natalizumab patients [hazard ratio (95% CI) of 0.52 (0.42-0.65); <i>p</i> < 0.001] and a more favorable time-to-first CDI. The risk of CDW was similar between groups. The subgroup analysis showed an increased relapse risk as well as a significantly higher risk of CDW for BRACETD patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Early initiation of natalizumab produced long-term benefits in relapse outcomes in comparison with BRACETD, regardless of a subsequent escalation in therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":4,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Energy Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10898303/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Energy Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17562864231221331","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Aggressive disease control soon after multiple sclerosis (MS) diagnosis may prevent irreversible neurological damage, and therefore early initiation of a high-efficacy disease-modifying therapy (DMT) is of clinical relevance.

Objectives: Evaluate long-term clinical outcomes in patients with MS who initiated treatment with either natalizumab or a BRACETD therapy (interferon beta, glatiramer acetate, teriflunomide, or dimethyl fumarate).

Design: This retrospective analysis utilized data from MSBase to create a matched population allowing comparison of first-line natalizumab to first-line BRACETD.

Methods: This study included patients who initiated treatment either with natalizumab or a BRACETD DMT within 1 year of MS diagnosis and continued treatment for ⩾6 months, after which patients could switch DMTs or discontinue treatment. Patients had a minimum follow-up time of ⩾60 months from initiation. A subgroup analysis compared the natalizumab group to patients in the BRACETD group who escalated therapy after 6 months. Outcomes included unadjusted annualized relapse rates (ARRs), time-to-first relapse, time-to-first confirmed disability improvement (CDI), and time-to-first confirmed disability worsening (CDW).

Results: After 1:1 propensity score matching, 355 BRACETD patients were matched to 355 natalizumab patients. Patients initiating natalizumab were less likely to experience a relapse over the duration of follow-up, with ARRs [95% confidence interval (CI)] of 0.080 (0.070-0.092) for natalizumab patients and 0.191 (0.178-0.205) for BRACETD patients (p < 0.0001). A Cox regression model of time-to-first relapse showed a reduced risk of relapse for natalizumab patients [hazard ratio (95% CI) of 0.52 (0.42-0.65); p < 0.001] and a more favorable time-to-first CDI. The risk of CDW was similar between groups. The subgroup analysis showed an increased relapse risk as well as a significantly higher risk of CDW for BRACETD patients.

Conclusion: Early initiation of natalizumab produced long-term benefits in relapse outcomes in comparison with BRACETD, regardless of a subsequent escalation in therapy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与 BRACETD 一线疗法相比,多发性硬化症患者开始使用纳他珠单抗进行疾病修饰疗法的长期临床疗效。
背景:多发性硬化症(MS)确诊后不久,积极控制疾病可防止不可逆的神经损伤,因此尽早开始高效的疾病修饰疗法(DMT)具有临床意义:评估开始接受纳他珠单抗或BRACETD疗法(β干扰素、醋酸格拉替雷、特利氟胺或富马酸二甲酯)治疗的多发性硬化症患者的长期临床疗效:这项回顾性分析利用 MSBase 的数据创建了一个匹配人群,可对一线纳他珠单抗和一线 BRACETD 进行比较:本研究纳入了在确诊多发性硬化症后 1 年内开始接受纳他珠单抗或 BRACETD DMT 治疗并持续治疗 6 个月的患者,之后患者可以更换 DMT 或中断治疗。自开始治疗起,患者的随访时间至少为⩾60 个月。一项亚组分析比较了纳他珠单抗组和6个月后升级治疗的BRACETD组患者。结果包括未经调整的年复发率(ARR)、首次复发时间、首次确诊残疾改善时间(CDI)和首次确诊残疾恶化时间(CDW):经过1:1倾向评分匹配,355名BRACETD患者与355名纳他珠单抗患者匹配。在随访期间,开始使用纳他珠单抗的患者复发的可能性较低,纳他珠单抗患者的ARRs[95%置信区间(CI)]为0.080(0.070-0.092),BRACETD患者的ARRs为0.191(0.178-0.205)(P 结论:纳他珠单抗是一种有效的抗癫痫药物:与BRACETD相比,无论随后的治疗是否升级,早期启动纳他珠单抗都能为复发结果带来长期益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Energy Materials
ACS Applied Energy Materials Materials Science-Materials Chemistry
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
1368
期刊介绍: ACS Applied Energy Materials is an interdisciplinary journal publishing original research covering all aspects of materials, engineering, chemistry, physics and biology relevant to energy conversion and storage. The journal is devoted to reports of new and original experimental and theoretical research of an applied nature that integrate knowledge in the areas of materials, engineering, physics, bioscience, and chemistry into important energy applications.
期刊最新文献
Red ginseng polysaccharide promotes ferroptosis in gastric cancer cells by inhibiting PI3K/Akt pathway through down-regulation of AQP3. Diagnostic value of 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT for predicting the pathological grade of prostate cancer. Correction. Wilms' tumor 1 -targeting cancer vaccine: Recent advancements and future perspectives. Toll-like receptor agonists as cancer vaccine adjuvants.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1