Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders最新文献

Background: Among the currently approved antiobesity medications, the glucagon-like-peptide-1 receptor-agonists (GLP-1 RAs) liraglutide and semaglutide, and the dual glucose-dependent-insulinotropic-polypeptide (GIP)/GLP-1 RA tirzepatide have been suggested to reduce cardiovascular-risk in overweight or obesity without diabetes.

Objectives: The objective of this study was to evaluate the cardio- and neuroprotective potential of these novel agents in the nondiabetic overweight/obese adult population.

Data sources and methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized-controlled clinical trials (RCTs) was performed to estimate the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in overweight or obese adults without diabetes treated with GLP-1 or GIP/GLP-1 RAs (vs placebo). Secondary outcomes included the risk of myocardial infarction (MI) and stroke.

Results: Sixteen RCTs (13 and 3 on GLP-1 RAs and tirzepatide, respectively) comprising 28,168 participants were included. GLP-1 or GIP/GLP-1 RAs reduced MACE (odds ratio (OR): 0.79; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.71-0.89; p < 0.01; I ² = 0) and all-cause mortality (OR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.70-0.92; p < 0.01; I ² = 0), while there was a trend toward lower cardiovascular-mortality (OR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.71-1.01; p = 0.06; I ² = 0%) compared to placebo. Additionally, GLP-1 or GIP/GLP-1 RAs reduced the odds of MI (OR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.61-0.86; p < 0.01; I ² = 0%) and nonfatal-MI (OR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.61-0.85; p < 0.01; I ² = 0%); while no associations between antiobesity treatment and fatal-MI, stroke, nonfatal, or fatal stroke were uncovered.

Conclusion: GLP-1 and GIP/GLP-1 RAs reduce cardiovascular-risk and all-cause mortality in overweight or obese adults without diabetes. Additionally, GLP-1 RAs and GIP/GLP-1 RAs attenuate the risk of MI. Since data on stroke are still limited, future RCTs are warranted to evaluate the neuroprotective potential of these novel antiobesity agents.

Trial registration: PROSPERO CRD42024515966.

Background: The inpatient Parkinson's Disease Multimodal Complex Treatment (PD-MCT) is an important therapeutical approach to improving gait and activities of daily living (ADL) of people with PD (PwP). Wearable device-based parameters (DBP) are new options for specific gait analyses toward individualized treatments.

Objectives: We sought to identify predictors of perceived ADL benefit taking clinical scores and DBP into account. Additionally, we analyzed DBP and clinical scores before and after PD-MCT.

Design: Exploratory observational cohort study.

Methods: Clinical scores and DBP of 56 PwP (mean age: 66.3 years, median Hoehn and Yahr (H&Y) stage: 2.5) were examined at the start and the end of a 14-day inpatient PD-MCT in a German University Medical Center. Participants performed four straight walking tasks under single- and dual-task conditions for gait analyses. Additionally, clinical scores of motor and nonmotor functions and quality of life (QoL) were assessed. Using dichotomized data of change in Movement Disorders Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part II (MDS-UPDRS II) as a dependent variable and clinical and DBP as independent variables, a binomial logistic regression model was implemented.

Results: Young age, high perceived ADL impairment at baseline, high dexterity skills, and a steady gait were significant predictors of ADL benefit after PD-MCT. DBP like gait speed, number of steps, step time, stance time, and double limb support time were improved after PD-MCT. In addition, motor functions (e.g., MDS-UPDRS III and IV), QoL, perceived ADL (MDS-UPDRS II), and experience of nonmotor functions (MDS-UPDRS I) improved significantly.

Conclusion: The logistic regression model identified a group of PwP who had the most probable perceived ADL benefit after PD-MCT. Additionally, gait improved toward a faster and more dynamic gait. Using wearable technology in context of PD-MCT is promising to offer more personalized therapeutical concepts.

Trial registration: German Clinical Trial Register, https://drks.de; DRKS00020948 number, 30 March 2020, retrospectively registered.

Background: Clinical efficacy of zilucoplan has been demonstrated in a 12-week, placebo-controlled, phase III study in patients with acetylcholine receptor autoantibody-positive generalised myasthenia gravis (gMG). However, placebo-controlled zilucoplan data past 12 weeks are not available.

Objectives: Predict the treatment effect of zilucoplan versus control (placebo or standard of care) in patients with gMG up to 24 weeks.

Design: A model-informed analysis (MIA) within a Bayesian framework.

Methods: Part 1 of the MIA comprised a control meta-regression using aggregate data on control response over time from randomised studies and a national myasthenia gravis (MG) registry. In Part 2, a combined Bayesian analysis of individual patient-level data from the phase II (NCT03315130), RAISE (NCT04115293) and RAISE-XT (NCT04225871) studies of zilucoplan was conducted using posterior distributions from Part 1 as informative priors. Population mean treatment effect in the change from baseline (CFB) at week 24 in MG-Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) and quantitative MG (QMG) scores for zilucoplan versus control were assessed.

Results: At week 24, the predicted mean CFB in MG-ADL score was -4.55 (95% credible interval: -6.04, -3.13) with zilucoplan versus -2.00 (-3.35, -0.64) with control (difference: -2.55 [-3.76, -1.40]). The probability of a favourable treatment effect as measured by MG-ADL score at week 24 with zilucoplan versus control was >99.9%. There was an 82.8% probability that the difference in the predicted mean CFB in MG-ADL score at week 24 was greater than the clinically meaningful threshold (⩾2.0-point improvement). Comparable results were observed with QMG.

Conclusion: This MIA demonstrates the maintenance of efficacy with zilucoplan versus control up to 24 weeks. Through combining real-world evidence with data from randomised studies, this novel method to estimate long-term treatment efficacy facilitated reduced exposure to placebo in the phase III RAISE study. This methodology could be used to reduce the length of future placebo-controlled studies.

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a debilitating condition affecting an increasing number of cancer survivors worldwide. However, insights into its pathophysiology and availability of effective therapies remain lacking. Dorsal root ganglia (DRG) have been studied as a key component of chemotherapeutic drug toxicity and a potential therapeutic target for CIPN treatment. This comprehensive review aims to synthesize, summarize, and correlate the results of both preclinical and clinical studies relevant to the pathophysiology and management of CIPN in relation to the DRG. Design: Review. A thorough literature search was conducted using the terms 'dorsal root ganglion' and 'chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy', along with appropriate variations. Searched databases included PubMed, EMBASE, Medline, Cochrane Library, Wiley Library, and Web of Science. Inclusion criteria targeted all English language, peer-reviewed original research from the inception of these databases to the present year. Review articles, book chapters, and other nonoriginal publications were excluded. Of 134 relevant studies identified, the majority were preclinical studies elucidating how various chemotherapeutic agents, especially taxanes, disrupt neurotransmission, inflammatory processes, and apoptotic pathways within sensory neurons of DRG. Not only do these effects correlate with the presentation of CIPN, but their disruption has also been shown to reduce CIPN symptoms in preclinical models. However, clinical studies addressing DRG interventions are very limited in number and scope at this time. These results reveal various pathways within DRG that may be effective targets for CIPN treatment. While limited, clinical studies do offer promise in the utility of DRG neuromodulation in managing painful CIPN. In the future, clinical trials are needed to assess interventions aimed at these neuronal and nonneuronal pathological targets to better treat this complex condition.

Background: The widespread clinical use of lacosamide (LCM) has revealed significant individual differences in clinical response, with various reported influencing factors. However, it remains unclear how genetic factors related to the disposition and clinical response of LCM, as well as drug-drug interactions (DDIs), exert their influence on pediatric patients with epilepsy.

Objectives: To evaluate the impact of genetic variations and DDIs on plasma LCM concentrations and clinical response.

Design: Patients with epilepsy treated with LCM from June 2021 to March 2023 in the Children's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University were included in the analysis.

Methods: The demographic information and laboratory examination data were obtained from the hospital information system. For the pharmacogenetic study, the left-over blood specimens, collected for routine plasma LCM concentration monitoring, were used to perform genotyping analysis for the selected 26 single nucleotide polymorphisms from 14 genes. The trough concentration/daily dose (C ₀/D) ratio and efficacy outcomes were compared.

Results: Patients achieved 90.1% and 68.9% responder rates in LCM mono- and add-on therapy, respectively. The genetic variant in the CYP2C19 *2 (rs4244285) was associated with a better responsive treatment outcome (odds ratio: 1.82; 95% confidence interval: 1.05-3.15; p = 0.031). In monotherapy, 36% of patients were CYP2C19 normal metabolizers (NMs), 49% were intermediate metabolizers (IMs), and 15% were poor metabolizers (PMs) carrying CYP2C19 *2 or *3. Of note, the C ₀/D ratios of IMs and PMs were 9.1% and 39.6% higher than those of NMs, respectively. Similar results were in the add-on therapy group, and we also observed a substantial decrease in the C ₀/D ratio when patients were concomitant with sodium channel blockers (SCBs).

Conclusion: This study was the first to confirm that CYP2C19 *2 or *3 variants impact the disposition and treatment response of LCM in children with epilepsy. Moreover, concomitant with SCBs, particularly oxcarbazepine, also decreased plasma LCM concentration.

Background: Branch atheromatous disease (BAD) is a primary cause of early neurological deterioration (END) in penetrating artery occlusion, leading to poor functional outcomes. While it has been proposed to classify BAD under large artery atherosclerosis, uncertainty exists regarding the optimal treatment strategy, including cholesterol-lowering targets.

Objectives: We aimed to assess the clinical implications and temporal changes of atherosclerotic plaques before and after high-intensity statin treatment.

Design: This is a high-resolution vessel-wall imaging sub-analysis of the trial of Statin and Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Preventing Early Neurological Deterioration in Branch Atheromatous Disease (SATBRAD).

Methods: In this prospective, single-group cohort study, participants in the treatment arm of the SATBRAD trial received early dual antiplatelet therapy and high-intensity statin treatment. The majority of these participants subsequently underwent high-resolution vessel-wall magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Those with atheromatous plaques in the parent artery continued high-intensity statin treatment for 6 months, followed by a repeat MRI to monitor plaque changes.

Results: There were 57 patients who underwent vessel-wall imaging and 24 exhibited contrast-enhanced plaques. Patients with contrast-enhanced plaques showed higher rates of END (29.2% vs 6.1%, p = 0.027), perfusion defects (62.5% vs 24.2%, p = 0.004), and lower rates of good outcomes at 3 months (50.0% vs 81.8%, p = 0.011). After adjusting for confounding factors, contrast-enhanced plaque had a negative impact on achieving a good outcome at 3 months (adjusted odds ratio = 0.04; 95% confidence interval = <0.01-0.60). Following high-intensity statin treatment in 36 patients, there was a notable reduction in stenosis (33.7% vs 29.3%, p = 0.005) and contrast-enhanced plaque volume (16.3 vs 11.6 mm³, p = 0.015).

Conclusion: The study highlighted the association between contrast-enhanced atherosclerotic plaques, END, and poor functional outcomes, with high-intensity treatment leading to plaque volume reduction. These results underscore the shared pathology between BAD and intracranial atherosclerosis, emphasizing the necessity for further research and tailored treatment strategies for BAD.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov; Identifier: NCT04824911 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04824911).