Durvalumab Plus Gemcitabine and Cisplatin in Patients with Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer: An Exploratory Analysis of Real-World Data.

IF 4.4 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Targeted Oncology Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-28 DOI:10.1007/s11523-024-01044-1
Alexander Olkus, Aurelie Tomczak, Anne Katrin Berger, Conrad Rauber, Philip Puchas, Cyrill Wehling, Thomas Longerich, Arianeb Mehrabi, De-Hua Chang, Jakob Liermann, Sophia Schäfer, Jan Pfeiffenberger, Dirk Jäger, Patrick Michl, Christoph Springfeld, Michael T Dill
{"title":"Durvalumab Plus Gemcitabine and Cisplatin in Patients with Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer: An Exploratory Analysis of Real-World Data.","authors":"Alexander Olkus, Aurelie Tomczak, Anne Katrin Berger, Conrad Rauber, Philip Puchas, Cyrill Wehling, Thomas Longerich, Arianeb Mehrabi, De-Hua Chang, Jakob Liermann, Sophia Schäfer, Jan Pfeiffenberger, Dirk Jäger, Patrick Michl, Christoph Springfeld, Michael T Dill","doi":"10.1007/s11523-024-01044-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin (gem/cis) with the anti-PD-L1-antibody durvalumab was recently approved as first line therapy for biliary tract cancer (BTC) based on the results of the TOPAZ-1 trial.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aim to analyse the feasibility and efficacy of the triple combination therapy in patients with BTC in a real-world setting and in correspondence with the genetic alterations of the cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this single-centre retrospective analysis, all patients with BTC and treated with durvalumab plus gem/cis from April 2022 to September 2023 were included. Survival and treatment response were investigated, within the context of the inclusion and exclusion criteria of TOPAZ-1 and in correspondence with genetic alterations of the cancer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 35 patients, of which 51% met the inclusion criteria of the TOPAZ-1 trial, were analysed. Patients treated within TOPAZ-1 criteria did not have a significantly different median overall survival and progression free survival than the rest of the patients (10.3 versus 9.7 months and 5.3 versus 5 months, respectively). The disease control rate of patients within the TOPAZ-1 criteria was 61.1%, in comparison to 58.8% in the rest of patients. A total of 51 grade 3 and 4 adverse events were observed without significant differences in the subgroups. No specific correlating patterns of genetic alterations with survival and response were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The treatment of advanced patients with BTC with durvalumab and gem/cis, even beyond the inclusion criteria of the TOPAZ-1 trial, shows promising safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":22195,"journal":{"name":"Targeted Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10963573/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Targeted Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11523-024-01044-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin (gem/cis) with the anti-PD-L1-antibody durvalumab was recently approved as first line therapy for biliary tract cancer (BTC) based on the results of the TOPAZ-1 trial.

Objective: We aim to analyse the feasibility and efficacy of the triple combination therapy in patients with BTC in a real-world setting and in correspondence with the genetic alterations of the cancer.

Methods: In this single-centre retrospective analysis, all patients with BTC and treated with durvalumab plus gem/cis from April 2022 to September 2023 were included. Survival and treatment response were investigated, within the context of the inclusion and exclusion criteria of TOPAZ-1 and in correspondence with genetic alterations of the cancer.

Results: In total, 35 patients, of which 51% met the inclusion criteria of the TOPAZ-1 trial, were analysed. Patients treated within TOPAZ-1 criteria did not have a significantly different median overall survival and progression free survival than the rest of the patients (10.3 versus 9.7 months and 5.3 versus 5 months, respectively). The disease control rate of patients within the TOPAZ-1 criteria was 61.1%, in comparison to 58.8% in the rest of patients. A total of 51 grade 3 and 4 adverse events were observed without significant differences in the subgroups. No specific correlating patterns of genetic alterations with survival and response were observed.

Conclusions: The treatment of advanced patients with BTC with durvalumab and gem/cis, even beyond the inclusion criteria of the TOPAZ-1 trial, shows promising safety.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Durvalumab联合吉西他滨和顺铂治疗晚期胆管癌患者:真实世界数据的探索性分析。
背景:根据TOPAZ-1试验的结果,吉西他滨和顺铂(gem/cis)与抗PD-L1-抗体durvalumab的联合疗法最近被批准作为胆道癌(BTC)的一线疗法:我们旨在分析三联疗法在真实世界中对胆道癌患者的可行性和疗效,并与胆道癌的基因改变相对应:在这项单中心回顾性分析中,纳入了2022年4月至2023年9月期间接受过durvalumab加gem/cis治疗的所有BTC患者。根据TOPAZ-1的纳入和排除标准,并结合癌症的基因改变,对患者的生存期和治疗反应进行了调查:共分析了 35 例患者,其中 51% 符合 TOPAZ-1 试验的纳入标准。根据TOPAZ-1标准接受治疗的患者的中位总生存期和无进展生存期与其他患者相比没有明显差异(分别为10.3个月对9.7个月和5.3个月对5个月)。符合TOPAZ-1标准的患者疾病控制率为61.1%,而其他患者为58.8%。共观察到51例3级和4级不良反应,各亚组间无明显差异。没有观察到基因改变与生存期和反应之间存在特定的相关模式:结论:使用durvalumab和gem/cis治疗晚期BTC患者,即使超出了TOPAZ-1试验的纳入标准,也显示出良好的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Targeted Oncology
Targeted Oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
64
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Targeted Oncology addresses physicians and scientists committed to oncology and cancer research by providing a programme of articles on molecularly targeted pharmacotherapy in oncology. The journal includes: Original Research Articles on all aspects of molecularly targeted agents for the treatment of cancer, including immune checkpoint inhibitors and related approaches. Comprehensive narrative Review Articles and shorter Leading Articles discussing relevant clinically established as well as emerging agents and pathways. Current Opinion articles that place interesting areas in perspective. Therapy in Practice articles that provide a guide to the optimum management of a condition and highlight practical, clinically relevant considerations and recommendations. Systematic Reviews that use explicit, systematic methods as outlined by the PRISMA statement. Adis Drug Reviews of the properties and place in therapy of both newer and established targeted drugs in oncology.
期刊最新文献
Physician Perspectives on the Management of Patients with Resected High-Risk Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck Who Are Ineligible to Receive Cisplatin: A Podcast. Pancreatitis in Patients with Cancer Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Taiwan Nationwide Study of First-Line ALK-TKI Therapy in ALK-Positive Lung Adenocarcinoma. Single-Hit and Multi-hit PIK3CA Short Variant Genomic Alterations in Clinically Advanced Prostate Cancer: A Genomic Landscape Study. Impact of Etiology on Efficacy Outcomes with Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab in Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Multinational Retrospective Analysis in Asia-Pacific.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1