Pub Date : 2025-03-04DOI: 10.1007/s11523-025-01133-9
David B Miklos, Peter A Riedell, Alex Bokun, Julio C Chavez, Stephen J Schuster
Standard treatment options for B cell malignancies include immunochemotherapies and/or targeted therapies, which often provide temporary disease remission. However, many patients do not achieve complete remission with these treatments, develop resistance, and eventually experience disease relapse. New immunomodulatory treatments, such as T cell-based therapies, show promise in treating various types of blood cancers, including B cell malignancies. However, their effectiveness is often limited by the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment and altered function of patient-derived T cells. Ibrutinib, a Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has been shown to restore immune balance and function in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Ibrutinib is being studied as adjuvant or combinatorial therapy with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells or T cell-engaging bispecific antibodies for the treatment of B cell malignancies. Current evidence suggests that ibrutinib could be beneficial when used before, during, or after CAR T cell administration, potentially providing higher complete response rates and reduced toxicity. In conclusion, existing evidence strongly supports the combined use of ibrutinib and T cell therapies. However, additional clinical trials are needed to further validate the effectiveness of this treatment strategy in patients with various B cell malignancies.
{"title":"Leveraging the Immunomodulatory Potential of Ibrutinib for Improved Outcomes of T Cell-Mediated Therapies of B Cell Malignancies: A Narrative Review.","authors":"David B Miklos, Peter A Riedell, Alex Bokun, Julio C Chavez, Stephen J Schuster","doi":"10.1007/s11523-025-01133-9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11523-025-01133-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Standard treatment options for B cell malignancies include immunochemotherapies and/or targeted therapies, which often provide temporary disease remission. However, many patients do not achieve complete remission with these treatments, develop resistance, and eventually experience disease relapse. New immunomodulatory treatments, such as T cell-based therapies, show promise in treating various types of blood cancers, including B cell malignancies. However, their effectiveness is often limited by the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment and altered function of patient-derived T cells. Ibrutinib, a Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has been shown to restore immune balance and function in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Ibrutinib is being studied as adjuvant or combinatorial therapy with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells or T cell-engaging bispecific antibodies for the treatment of B cell malignancies. Current evidence suggests that ibrutinib could be beneficial when used before, during, or after CAR T cell administration, potentially providing higher complete response rates and reduced toxicity. In conclusion, existing evidence strongly supports the combined use of ibrutinib and T cell therapies. However, additional clinical trials are needed to further validate the effectiveness of this treatment strategy in patients with various B cell malignancies.</p>","PeriodicalId":22195,"journal":{"name":"Targeted Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143543480","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-03-04DOI: 10.1007/s11523-025-01135-7
Malek Shatila, Farzin Eshaghi, Carolina Colli Cruz, Antonio Pizuorno Machado, Antony Mathew, Dan Zhao, Bilal A Siddiqui, Anusha Shirwaikar Thomas, Suresh T Chari, Yinghong Wang
Background: Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) enhance the immune response against cancer but can cause immune-related adverse events, with immune-mediated colitis (IMC) being among the most common.
Objective: We investigated variations in gastrointestinal disease behavior and outcomes among patients receiving different ICI regimens.
Methods: This retrospective chart review included patients who received ICIs and developed IMC. Groups were categorized by their last ICI regimen before IMC onset into either programmed cell death protein-1/ligand-1 monotherapy or cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) monotherapy/combination immunotherapy. Demographic and IMC-related clinical information was collected.
Results: There were 414 patients included in this study: 169 treated with programmed cell death protein-1/ligand-1 monotherapy and 245 treated with CTLA-4 mono/combination therapy. Patients treated with CTLA-4 therapy had an earlier onset of IMC (median 46 days vs 123 days, p < 0.001). They were more likely to present with fever (p = 0.02), abdominal pain (p = 0.049), or hematochezia (p < 0.001). They also had more severe colitis with 47.3% of patients in the CTLA-4 group presenting with grade ≥3 colitis versus 20.2% in the programmed cell death protein-1/ligand-1 group (p < 0.05). On endoscopy, CTLA-4 mono/combination therapy was associated with increased ulcerative findings (24.4 vs 8.4%, p = 0.002). On histology, the programmed cell death protein-1/ligand-1 group was more likely to have microscopic colitis (13.9 vs 5.8%, p < 0.045).
Conclusions: This study provides insight into the effect of ICI type on IMC disease course. Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 inhibition leads to an earlier and more severe IMC onset with distinct endoscopic and histologic features. Further research is needed to refine treatment algorithms and identify the mechanisms underlying the variability in IMC presentation among different ICI regimens.
{"title":"Differential Disease Behavior of Immune-Mediated Colitis Among Different Types of Immune Checkpoint Inhibition.","authors":"Malek Shatila, Farzin Eshaghi, Carolina Colli Cruz, Antonio Pizuorno Machado, Antony Mathew, Dan Zhao, Bilal A Siddiqui, Anusha Shirwaikar Thomas, Suresh T Chari, Yinghong Wang","doi":"10.1007/s11523-025-01135-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11523-025-01135-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) enhance the immune response against cancer but can cause immune-related adverse events, with immune-mediated colitis (IMC) being among the most common.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We investigated variations in gastrointestinal disease behavior and outcomes among patients receiving different ICI regimens.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective chart review included patients who received ICIs and developed IMC. Groups were categorized by their last ICI regimen before IMC onset into either programmed cell death protein-1/ligand-1 monotherapy or cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) monotherapy/combination immunotherapy. Demographic and IMC-related clinical information was collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 414 patients included in this study: 169 treated with programmed cell death protein-1/ligand-1 monotherapy and 245 treated with CTLA-4 mono/combination therapy. Patients treated with CTLA-4 therapy had an earlier onset of IMC (median 46 days vs 123 days, p < 0.001). They were more likely to present with fever (p = 0.02), abdominal pain (p = 0.049), or hematochezia (p < 0.001). They also had more severe colitis with 47.3% of patients in the CTLA-4 group presenting with grade ≥3 colitis versus 20.2% in the programmed cell death protein-1/ligand-1 group (p < 0.05). On endoscopy, CTLA-4 mono/combination therapy was associated with increased ulcerative findings (24.4 vs 8.4%, p = 0.002). On histology, the programmed cell death protein-1/ligand-1 group was more likely to have microscopic colitis (13.9 vs 5.8%, p < 0.045).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides insight into the effect of ICI type on IMC disease course. Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 inhibition leads to an earlier and more severe IMC onset with distinct endoscopic and histologic features. Further research is needed to refine treatment algorithms and identify the mechanisms underlying the variability in IMC presentation among different ICI regimens.</p>","PeriodicalId":22195,"journal":{"name":"Targeted Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143558096","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-03-01DOI: 10.1007/s11523-025-01136-6
Elizabeth A Ampolini, Judit Jimenez-Sainz, David T Long
The ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM) protein kinase plays a critical role in activating the cellular response to DNA double-strand breaks and promoting homology-directed repair. ATM is frequently mutated in cancer, contributing to an accumulation of DNA damage that drives genomic instability. To exploit cancer cells' inherent vulnerability to DNA damage, various small molecule inhibitors have been developed that target ATM. ATM inhibitors have shown great versatility in preclinical studies and increasing use in the clinic. Here, we review the development of ATM inhibitors and their role in cancer therapy. We describe their limitations and the advances that have led to increases in both the number and diversity of active clinical trials targeting ATM. We also discuss ATM's role in personalized medicine and the current challenges to more widespread use of ATM inhibitors in the clinic.
{"title":"The Development of ATM Inhibitors in Cancer Therapy.","authors":"Elizabeth A Ampolini, Judit Jimenez-Sainz, David T Long","doi":"10.1007/s11523-025-01136-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11523-025-01136-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM) protein kinase plays a critical role in activating the cellular response to DNA double-strand breaks and promoting homology-directed repair. ATM is frequently mutated in cancer, contributing to an accumulation of DNA damage that drives genomic instability. To exploit cancer cells' inherent vulnerability to DNA damage, various small molecule inhibitors have been developed that target ATM. ATM inhibitors have shown great versatility in preclinical studies and increasing use in the clinic. Here, we review the development of ATM inhibitors and their role in cancer therapy. We describe their limitations and the advances that have led to increases in both the number and diversity of active clinical trials targeting ATM. We also discuss ATM's role in personalized medicine and the current challenges to more widespread use of ATM inhibitors in the clinic.</p>","PeriodicalId":22195,"journal":{"name":"Targeted Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143537543","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-25DOI: 10.1007/s11523-025-01134-8
Mohamed Elmeliegy, Andrea Viqueira, Erik Vandendries, Anne Hickman, Umberto Conte, Donald Irby, Jennifer Hibma, Hoi-Kei Lon, Joseph Piscitelli, Pooneh Soltantabar, Athanasia Skoura, Sibo Jiang, Diane Wang
Background: Elranatamab is a BCMA-CD3 bispecific antibody approved for the treatment of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Cytokine release syndrome is one of the most common adverse events associated with bispecific antibodies.
Objective: We aimed to determine the optimal elranatamab dosing regimen for mitigating cytokine release syndrome.
Patients and methods: Safety, pharmacokinetics, and exposure-response were analyzed across four clinical studies (MagnetisMM-1, MagnetisMM-2, MagnetisMM-3, and MagnetisMM-9). Different priming regimens evaluated across these studies included a one-step-up dose priming regimen of 44 mg with or without premedication, a two-step-up dose priming regimen of 12 mg on day 1 and 32 mg on day 4 with premedication, and a two-step-up dose priming regimen of 4 mg on day 1 and 20 mg on day 4 with premedication.
Results: The maximum elranatamab serum concentration on day 1 was positively associated with any-grade and grade ≥ 2 cytokine release syndrome. A slower time to maximum serum concentration and a lower dose-normalized maximum serum concentration were observed with subcutaneous versus intravenous administration, supporting subcutaneous dosing to help mitigate cytokine release syndrome.
Conclusions: Based on the incidence, severity, and predictable profile of cytokine release syndrome, the 12/32-mg priming-dose regimen with premedication was determined to be the optimal regimen before the first full dose of 76 mg on day 8.
Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT03269136, NCT04798586, NCT04649359, and NCT05014412.
{"title":"Dose Optimization of Elranatamab to Mitigate the Risk of Cytokine Release Syndrome in Patients with Multiple Myeloma.","authors":"Mohamed Elmeliegy, Andrea Viqueira, Erik Vandendries, Anne Hickman, Umberto Conte, Donald Irby, Jennifer Hibma, Hoi-Kei Lon, Joseph Piscitelli, Pooneh Soltantabar, Athanasia Skoura, Sibo Jiang, Diane Wang","doi":"10.1007/s11523-025-01134-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11523-025-01134-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Elranatamab is a BCMA-CD3 bispecific antibody approved for the treatment of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Cytokine release syndrome is one of the most common adverse events associated with bispecific antibodies.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to determine the optimal elranatamab dosing regimen for mitigating cytokine release syndrome.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Safety, pharmacokinetics, and exposure-response were analyzed across four clinical studies (MagnetisMM-1, MagnetisMM-2, MagnetisMM-3, and MagnetisMM-9). Different priming regimens evaluated across these studies included a one-step-up dose priming regimen of 44 mg with or without premedication, a two-step-up dose priming regimen of 12 mg on day 1 and 32 mg on day 4 with premedication, and a two-step-up dose priming regimen of 4 mg on day 1 and 20 mg on day 4 with premedication.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The maximum elranatamab serum concentration on day 1 was positively associated with any-grade and grade ≥ 2 cytokine release syndrome. A slower time to maximum serum concentration and a lower dose-normalized maximum serum concentration were observed with subcutaneous versus intravenous administration, supporting subcutaneous dosing to help mitigate cytokine release syndrome.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on the incidence, severity, and predictable profile of cytokine release syndrome, the 12/32-mg priming-dose regimen with premedication was determined to be the optimal regimen before the first full dose of 76 mg on day 8.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT03269136, NCT04798586, NCT04649359, and NCT05014412.</p>","PeriodicalId":22195,"journal":{"name":"Targeted Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143503728","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-22DOI: 10.1007/s11523-025-01132-w
Silvia Camera, Federico Rossari, Silvia Foti, Francesco Vitiello, Mara Persano, Federica Lo Prinzi, Francesco De Cobelli, Luca Aldrighetti, Stefano Cascinu, Margherita Rimini, Andrea Casadei-Gardini
Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) are a wide class of malignancies with dismal prognosis. The therapeutic scenario of metastatic BTCs has profoundly changed during recent years. The combination of cisplatin-gemcitabine plus immunotherapy is currently the gold standard in the first line. The more extensive comprehension of the mechanisms at the basis of BTCs and the identification of several molecular alterations has led to the introduction of target-directed therapies in the second line and beyond that have expanded the therapeutic armamentarium alongside the standard FOLFOX regimen, and for the near future, the results of some trials with targeted therapies in first line are expected. HER2 represents a promising therapeutic target detected in BTCs, being overexpressed in approximately 15-20% of cases, with a strong predilection for gallbladder carcinoma and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, although a small proportion of HER2 overexpression can be detected even in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. The efficacy and safety of different HER2 inhibitors have been investigated in several studies in the second line and beyond with encouraging results. This comprehensive review is intended to provide a summary of existing evidence and future perspectives on HER2 altered BTCs.
{"title":"HER2 Pathway in Biliary Tract Cancer: A Snapshot of the Current Understanding and Future Directions.","authors":"Silvia Camera, Federico Rossari, Silvia Foti, Francesco Vitiello, Mara Persano, Federica Lo Prinzi, Francesco De Cobelli, Luca Aldrighetti, Stefano Cascinu, Margherita Rimini, Andrea Casadei-Gardini","doi":"10.1007/s11523-025-01132-w","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11523-025-01132-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) are a wide class of malignancies with dismal prognosis. The therapeutic scenario of metastatic BTCs has profoundly changed during recent years. The combination of cisplatin-gemcitabine plus immunotherapy is currently the gold standard in the first line. The more extensive comprehension of the mechanisms at the basis of BTCs and the identification of several molecular alterations has led to the introduction of target-directed therapies in the second line and beyond that have expanded the therapeutic armamentarium alongside the standard FOLFOX regimen, and for the near future, the results of some trials with targeted therapies in first line are expected. HER2 represents a promising therapeutic target detected in BTCs, being overexpressed in approximately 15-20% of cases, with a strong predilection for gallbladder carcinoma and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, although a small proportion of HER2 overexpression can be detected even in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. The efficacy and safety of different HER2 inhibitors have been investigated in several studies in the second line and beyond with encouraging results. This comprehensive review is intended to provide a summary of existing evidence and future perspectives on HER2 altered BTCs.</p>","PeriodicalId":22195,"journal":{"name":"Targeted Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2025-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143477122","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Targeted therapies have revolutionized treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon20ins mutations are resistant to tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Amivantamab utilizes multiple mechanisms of action to bypass the altered binding site conformation and recruits immune cells for anti-cancer activity. Amivantamab is approved in the frontline setting of EGFR exon20ins-mutated NSCLC in combination with carboplatin plus pemetrexed. Single-agent amivantamab is approved in second line or later for EGFR exon20ins. Furthermore, amivantamab with lazertinib for first line as well as amivantamab in combination with carboplatin and pemetrexed for second line after osimertinib have both been approved in the treatment of NSCLC harboring EGFR-sensitizing mutations. Now with multiple indications, we must learn how to manage the unique side effects of amivantamab to maximize treatment benefit for the patients. Side effects of amivantamab can be associated with inhibition of the EGFR and/or mesenchymal epithelial transcription factor (MET) signaling pathways. This work reviews the mechanism of action, pharmacology, clinical trial data, and covers management of toxicities. This guide is designed as a practical reference tool for clinicians, pharmacists, and basic science researchers.
{"title":"The User's Guide to Amivantamab.","authors":"Danielle Brazel, Janellen Smith, Sai-Hong Ignatius Ou, Misako Nagasaka","doi":"10.1007/s11523-025-01128-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11523-025-01128-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Targeted therapies have revolutionized treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon20ins mutations are resistant to tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Amivantamab utilizes multiple mechanisms of action to bypass the altered binding site conformation and recruits immune cells for anti-cancer activity. Amivantamab is approved in the frontline setting of EGFR exon20ins-mutated NSCLC in combination with carboplatin plus pemetrexed. Single-agent amivantamab is approved in second line or later for EGFR exon20ins. Furthermore, amivantamab with lazertinib for first line as well as amivantamab in combination with carboplatin and pemetrexed for second line after osimertinib have both been approved in the treatment of NSCLC harboring EGFR-sensitizing mutations. Now with multiple indications, we must learn how to manage the unique side effects of amivantamab to maximize treatment benefit for the patients. Side effects of amivantamab can be associated with inhibition of the EGFR and/or mesenchymal epithelial transcription factor (MET) signaling pathways. This work reviews the mechanism of action, pharmacology, clinical trial data, and covers management of toxicities. This guide is designed as a practical reference tool for clinicians, pharmacists, and basic science researchers.</p>","PeriodicalId":22195,"journal":{"name":"Targeted Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143190709","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-04DOI: 10.1007/s11523-025-01127-7
Malek Shatila, Antonio Pizuorno Machado, Jay Shah, Andres Urias Rivera, Sidra Naz, Stephen Glombicki, Sharada Wali, Eric Lu, Nicholas Short, Anusha Thomas, Hao Chi Zhang, Yinghong Wang
Background: Stem cell transplantation (SCT) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are both used in the treatment of hematological malignancies. There may be an overlap in patient exposure to both treatments. Theoretically, ICIs potentiate the graft-versus-tumor effect following SCT but may increase the risk of inflammatory adverse events (AEs). Conversely, immunosuppression following SCT may decrease the risk of immune-mediated AEs.
Objectives: We aimed to explore the effect of immunotherapy on the risk and severity of inflammatory AEs following SCT.
Patients and methods: We performed a single-center, retrospective chart review that included all patients with a hematological malignancy treated with immunotherapy and who received SCT. Patients who did not receive immunosuppressive regimens after their transplant (e.g., autologous transplants) were excluded. Patients were divided into two groups based on ICI timing: pre-SCT ICI (group 1) and post-SCT ICI (group 2).
Results: A total of 63 patients were included. Around 82% of patients in group 1 experienced a post-transplant AE compared with 50% in group 2 (p = 0.014). These AEs occurred earlier in group 1 patients (median 57 days in group 1 versus 195 in group 2; p = 0.007). Roughly 80% of the inflammatory conditions involved the gastrointestinal system. Severity and complication rates did not differ between groups, but gastrointestinal inflammation in group 1 was more likely to require immunosuppressive medication (75.7% and 37.8% requiring corticosteroids and selective immunosuppressive therapy, respectively, in group 1 patients versus 33.3% and 0% in group 2 patients; p < 0.05).
Conclusion: To our knowledge, our study is one of few exploring the impact of ICI timing in relation to SCT on the risk of post-SCT inflammatory AEs. Administration of immunotherapy prior to SCT may predispose patients to inflammatory AEs after SCT, which may occur earlier and last longer than if ICIs are started after SCT. Future studies are needed to further explore this phenomenon.
{"title":"Checkpoint Inhibition Prior to Stem Cell Transplantation Increases the Risk of Inflammatory Adverse Events.","authors":"Malek Shatila, Antonio Pizuorno Machado, Jay Shah, Andres Urias Rivera, Sidra Naz, Stephen Glombicki, Sharada Wali, Eric Lu, Nicholas Short, Anusha Thomas, Hao Chi Zhang, Yinghong Wang","doi":"10.1007/s11523-025-01127-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11523-025-01127-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stem cell transplantation (SCT) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are both used in the treatment of hematological malignancies. There may be an overlap in patient exposure to both treatments. Theoretically, ICIs potentiate the graft-versus-tumor effect following SCT but may increase the risk of inflammatory adverse events (AEs). Conversely, immunosuppression following SCT may decrease the risk of immune-mediated AEs.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to explore the effect of immunotherapy on the risk and severity of inflammatory AEs following SCT.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We performed a single-center, retrospective chart review that included all patients with a hematological malignancy treated with immunotherapy and who received SCT. Patients who did not receive immunosuppressive regimens after their transplant (e.g., autologous transplants) were excluded. Patients were divided into two groups based on ICI timing: pre-SCT ICI (group 1) and post-SCT ICI (group 2).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 63 patients were included. Around 82% of patients in group 1 experienced a post-transplant AE compared with 50% in group 2 (p = 0.014). These AEs occurred earlier in group 1 patients (median 57 days in group 1 versus 195 in group 2; p = 0.007). Roughly 80% of the inflammatory conditions involved the gastrointestinal system. Severity and complication rates did not differ between groups, but gastrointestinal inflammation in group 1 was more likely to require immunosuppressive medication (75.7% and 37.8% requiring corticosteroids and selective immunosuppressive therapy, respectively, in group 1 patients versus 33.3% and 0% in group 2 patients; p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>To our knowledge, our study is one of few exploring the impact of ICI timing in relation to SCT on the risk of post-SCT inflammatory AEs. Administration of immunotherapy prior to SCT may predispose patients to inflammatory AEs after SCT, which may occur earlier and last longer than if ICIs are started after SCT. Future studies are needed to further explore this phenomenon.</p>","PeriodicalId":22195,"journal":{"name":"Targeted Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143190591","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-29DOI: 10.1007/s11523-024-01122-4
Sarah Mettias, Adam ElSayed, Jonathan Moore, James R Berenson
Multiple myeloma (MM) is a bone-marrow-based cancer of plasma cells. Over the last 2 decades, marked treatment advances have led to improvements in the overall survival (OS) of patients with this disease. Key developments include the use of chemotherapy, immunomodulatory drugs, proteasome inhibitors, and monoclonal antibodies. MM remains incurable, with outcomes influenced by many factors, including age, sex, genetics, and treatment response. This review summarizes recent studies regarding monitoring and treatment of MM, emphasizing the efficacy of new therapies, the impact of maintenance treatments, and approaches for managing relapsed or refractory MM. The role of specific drug classes used to treat MM, including immunomodulatory drugs, proteasome inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, and newer treatments such as chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies and bispecific antibodies are discussed. Combination therapies have significantly improved outcomes. Maintenance therapies, particularly with lenalidomide, have been effective in extending OS but lead to an increased risk of secondary cancers. Venetoclax, selinexor, and ruxolitinib have shown potential as new therapeutic options for patients with relapsed or refractory MM. Immune-based treatments, such as chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy and bispecific antibodies, mark a major advancement for heavily pretreated patients, although challenges remain related to cost, availability, and side effects. The treatment landscape for patients with MM has seen significant progress, with current therapies providing a longer OS and better quality of life. Future research should focus on optimizing these strategies, personalizing therapies, and exploring new therapeutic targets.
{"title":"Multiple Myeloma: Improved Outcomes Resulting from a Rapidly Expanding Number of Therapeutic Options.","authors":"Sarah Mettias, Adam ElSayed, Jonathan Moore, James R Berenson","doi":"10.1007/s11523-024-01122-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11523-024-01122-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Multiple myeloma (MM) is a bone-marrow-based cancer of plasma cells. Over the last 2 decades, marked treatment advances have led to improvements in the overall survival (OS) of patients with this disease. Key developments include the use of chemotherapy, immunomodulatory drugs, proteasome inhibitors, and monoclonal antibodies. MM remains incurable, with outcomes influenced by many factors, including age, sex, genetics, and treatment response. This review summarizes recent studies regarding monitoring and treatment of MM, emphasizing the efficacy of new therapies, the impact of maintenance treatments, and approaches for managing relapsed or refractory MM. The role of specific drug classes used to treat MM, including immunomodulatory drugs, proteasome inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, and newer treatments such as chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies and bispecific antibodies are discussed. Combination therapies have significantly improved outcomes. Maintenance therapies, particularly with lenalidomide, have been effective in extending OS but lead to an increased risk of secondary cancers. Venetoclax, selinexor, and ruxolitinib have shown potential as new therapeutic options for patients with relapsed or refractory MM. Immune-based treatments, such as chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy and bispecific antibodies, mark a major advancement for heavily pretreated patients, although challenges remain related to cost, availability, and side effects. The treatment landscape for patients with MM has seen significant progress, with current therapies providing a longer OS and better quality of life. Future research should focus on optimizing these strategies, personalizing therapies, and exploring new therapeutic targets.</p>","PeriodicalId":22195,"journal":{"name":"Targeted Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143060695","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-24DOI: 10.1007/s11523-024-01121-5
Miguel Angel Rodríguez Sagrado, Javier Alvarez Criado, Ainhoa Elisa Arenaza Peña, Vicente Escudero-Vilaplana, Carlos Folguera Olias, Marta Herrero Fernandez, Concepción Martinez Nieto, Ana Rosa Rubio Salvador, Patricia Sanmartin Fenollera, Maria José Vazquez Castillo
Background: The reported benefit of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor (PARPi) maintenance in patients with newly diagnosed and platinum (Pt)-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer (OC) included in randomized clinical trials needs to be corroborated in a less selected population.
Objective: The aim is to increase the evidence on niraparib in a real-world setting.
Methods: This is a retrospective observational study including women with platinum-sensitive relapsed high-grade serous OC who started niraparib maintenance between August 2019 (marketing data, Spain) and May 2022. Patients received ≥ 2 previous lines of therapy with complete or partial response to prior chemotherapy. Patient characteristics, niraparib dose, adequacy of dose individualization, effectiveness (progression-free survival [PFS] and overall survival), safety, and economic savings with an individualized starting dose (ISD) strategy were assessed.
Results: The study included 217 patients with a median of 8.9 months of niraparib duration: breast cancer gene (BRCA) wild-type OC, 70%; two prior treatment lines, 49%; Research on Adverse Drug Events and Reports (RADAR) criteria, 82% (receiving mainly 200 mg of niraparib, 79%). Median PFS was 10.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.4-14.8) without statistically significant differences based on starting dose strategy, contrary to what was observed on the basis of prior lines, response to prior chemotherapy, BRCA mutational status, and International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage at diagnosis. The last three variables also showed a statistically significant predictive prognostic value for effectiveness. Dose interruptions due to toxicity were required in 7% of patients, and dose adjustments in 56% were mainly due to hematologic toxicities. The actual dose of niraparib reveals economic savings versus the theoretical cost.
Conclusion: This large real-world analysis corroborates the tolerability and activity of niraparib maintenance for platinum-sensitive recurrent OC and economic savings.
{"title":"Niraparib Maintenance Therapy in Patients with Platinum-Sensitive Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: Real-World Experience at Hospitals in Spain.","authors":"Miguel Angel Rodríguez Sagrado, Javier Alvarez Criado, Ainhoa Elisa Arenaza Peña, Vicente Escudero-Vilaplana, Carlos Folguera Olias, Marta Herrero Fernandez, Concepción Martinez Nieto, Ana Rosa Rubio Salvador, Patricia Sanmartin Fenollera, Maria José Vazquez Castillo","doi":"10.1007/s11523-024-01121-5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11523-024-01121-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The reported benefit of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor (PARPi) maintenance in patients with newly diagnosed and platinum (Pt)-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer (OC) included in randomized clinical trials needs to be corroborated in a less selected population.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim is to increase the evidence on niraparib in a real-world setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective observational study including women with platinum-sensitive relapsed high-grade serous OC who started niraparib maintenance between August 2019 (marketing data, Spain) and May 2022. Patients received ≥ 2 previous lines of therapy with complete or partial response to prior chemotherapy. Patient characteristics, niraparib dose, adequacy of dose individualization, effectiveness (progression-free survival [PFS] and overall survival), safety, and economic savings with an individualized starting dose (ISD) strategy were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 217 patients with a median of 8.9 months of niraparib duration: breast cancer gene (BRCA) wild-type OC, 70%; two prior treatment lines, 49%; Research on Adverse Drug Events and Reports (RADAR) criteria, 82% (receiving mainly 200 mg of niraparib, 79%). Median PFS was 10.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.4-14.8) without statistically significant differences based on starting dose strategy, contrary to what was observed on the basis of prior lines, response to prior chemotherapy, BRCA mutational status, and International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage at diagnosis. The last three variables also showed a statistically significant predictive prognostic value for effectiveness. Dose interruptions due to toxicity were required in 7% of patients, and dose adjustments in 56% were mainly due to hematologic toxicities. The actual dose of niraparib reveals economic savings versus the theoretical cost.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This large real-world analysis corroborates the tolerability and activity of niraparib maintenance for platinum-sensitive recurrent OC and economic savings.</p>","PeriodicalId":22195,"journal":{"name":"Targeted Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143034212","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-17DOI: 10.1007/s11523-024-01123-3
Jeffrey H Lipton, Jorge E Cortes
Bosutinib is a second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) approved for use in patients with newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)-positive chronic phase (CP) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), as well as Ph-positive CP, accelerated phase, or blast phase (with chemotherapy) CML resistant or intolerant to prior therapy. Clinical trials have shown bosutinib is effective as first-line therapy for patients with CML as well as in later lines of therapy after prior TKI failure. Bosutinib has an established safety profile; however, as with all TKIs approved for the treatment of CML, there are adverse events (AEs) that require management. The safety profile of bosutinib is characterized by gastrointestinal, hematological, hepatic, and skin toxicities. Many of these AEs can be managed with dose adjustment strategies. In this podcast, the authors summarize data from some recent bosutinib publications and discuss implications for optimizing bosutinib treatment of patients with CML. Podcast Video (MP4 210846 KB).
{"title":"Bosutinib for the Treatment of CML-Using it Safely: a Podcast.","authors":"Jeffrey H Lipton, Jorge E Cortes","doi":"10.1007/s11523-024-01123-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11523-024-01123-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Bosutinib is a second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) approved for use in patients with newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)-positive chronic phase (CP) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), as well as Ph-positive CP, accelerated phase, or blast phase (with chemotherapy) CML resistant or intolerant to prior therapy. Clinical trials have shown bosutinib is effective as first-line therapy for patients with CML as well as in later lines of therapy after prior TKI failure. Bosutinib has an established safety profile; however, as with all TKIs approved for the treatment of CML, there are adverse events (AEs) that require management. The safety profile of bosutinib is characterized by gastrointestinal, hematological, hepatic, and skin toxicities. Many of these AEs can be managed with dose adjustment strategies. In this podcast, the authors summarize data from some recent bosutinib publications and discuss implications for optimizing bosutinib treatment of patients with CML. Podcast Video (MP4 210846 KB).</p>","PeriodicalId":22195,"journal":{"name":"Targeted Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143012179","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}