Perceptions of the COVID-19 Vaccination Within a Convenience Sample of Sudanese Americans.

IF 3 Q1 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE Journal of Primary Care and Community Health Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/21501319241234868
Jonathan Freese, Fatima Abuzaid, Harlan Sayles, Mujtaba Abdellatif, Nada Fadul
{"title":"Perceptions of the COVID-19 Vaccination Within a Convenience Sample of Sudanese Americans.","authors":"Jonathan Freese, Fatima Abuzaid, Harlan Sayles, Mujtaba Abdellatif, Nada Fadul","doi":"10.1177/21501319241234868","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Sudanese American and other immigrant and refugee communities are at greater risk for exposure to COVID-19. This survey sought to better characterize COVID-19 vaccination practices, motivators, and drivers for hesitancy among Sudanese Americans.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed an online, cross-sectional survey in English and Arabic distributed by Sudanese American community leaders in April 2022 with data stored anonymously in REDCap. Inclusion criteria were self-reporting being born within Sudan and living in the US within the last 2 years. Descriptive analysis tested survey responses for possible associations between the primary outcome, self-reported vaccination status, and questions regarding vaccination history, perspectives on vaccination, and demographic characteristics using Fishers Exact and Chi Squared Tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 111 survey responses received, 107 met inclusion criteria. 93% of respondents reported COVID-19 vaccine uptake with the primary motivation to protect oneself from disease. The most cited reason for vaccine hesitancy was belief it had not been studied enough. The group that reported vaccination had higher levels of education (.032) and were more likely to perceive that COVID-19 vaccinations were able to reduce spread (.001), decrease severe outcomes (.004), and benefits outweighing their risks (.004).</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusions: </strong>This survey population of Sudanese Americans demonstrated high levels of vaccine uptake (93%), far greater than either the corresponding US (78%) or Sudanese population (15%). It is likely that high levels of educational attainment moderated vaccine uptake, though our survey may not have had the power to fully evaluate vaccine hesitancy.</p>","PeriodicalId":46723,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Primary Care and Community Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10900865/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Primary Care and Community Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21501319241234868","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Sudanese American and other immigrant and refugee communities are at greater risk for exposure to COVID-19. This survey sought to better characterize COVID-19 vaccination practices, motivators, and drivers for hesitancy among Sudanese Americans.

Methods: We developed an online, cross-sectional survey in English and Arabic distributed by Sudanese American community leaders in April 2022 with data stored anonymously in REDCap. Inclusion criteria were self-reporting being born within Sudan and living in the US within the last 2 years. Descriptive analysis tested survey responses for possible associations between the primary outcome, self-reported vaccination status, and questions regarding vaccination history, perspectives on vaccination, and demographic characteristics using Fishers Exact and Chi Squared Tests.

Results: Of 111 survey responses received, 107 met inclusion criteria. 93% of respondents reported COVID-19 vaccine uptake with the primary motivation to protect oneself from disease. The most cited reason for vaccine hesitancy was belief it had not been studied enough. The group that reported vaccination had higher levels of education (.032) and were more likely to perceive that COVID-19 vaccinations were able to reduce spread (.001), decrease severe outcomes (.004), and benefits outweighing their risks (.004).

Discussion and conclusions: This survey population of Sudanese Americans demonstrated high levels of vaccine uptake (93%), far greater than either the corresponding US (78%) or Sudanese population (15%). It is likely that high levels of educational attainment moderated vaccine uptake, though our survey may not have had the power to fully evaluate vaccine hesitancy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
方便抽样调查的美国苏丹人对 COVID-19 疫苗接种的看法。
导言:苏丹裔美国人及其他移民和难民群体暴露于 COVID-19 的风险更大。这项调查旨在更好地了解美籍苏丹人的 COVID-19 疫苗接种习惯、动机和犹豫不决的原因:我们用英语和阿拉伯语开发了一项在线横断面调查,由美籍苏丹人社区领袖于 2022 年 4 月分发,数据以匿名方式存储在 REDCap 中。纳入标准是自我报告出生在苏丹并在过去两年内居住在美国。描述性分析使用菲舍尔精确检验(Fishers Exact)和卡方检验(Chi Squared Tests)测试了调查回复的主要结果、自我报告的疫苗接种情况与疫苗接种史、疫苗接种观点和人口统计学特征等问题之间可能存在的关联:在收到的 111 份调查回复中,107 份符合纳入标准。93%的受访者表示接种 COVID-19 疫苗的主要动机是保护自己免受疾病侵害。对疫苗犹豫不决的最主要原因是认为没有进行足够的研究。报告接种疫苗的人群受教育程度较高(0.032),并且更有可能认为接种 COVID-19 疫苗能够减少传播(0.001)、降低严重后果(0.004),并且收益大于风险(0.004):此次调查的美籍苏丹人的疫苗接种率很高(93%),远高于美国(78%)或苏丹人(15%)。尽管我们的调查可能无法全面评估疫苗接种犹豫不决的情况,但教育程度高可能会调节疫苗接种率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
2.80%
发文量
183
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Prevalence and Predictors of Post-Acute COVID-19 Symptoms in Italian Primary Care Patients. Lessons Learned From a Community-Based Men's Health Fair. A Real-World Precision Medicine Program Including the KidneyIntelX Test Effectively Changes Management Decisions and Outcomes for Patients With Early-Stage Diabetic Kidney Disease. Emergency Department and Dental Clinic Perceptions of Appropriate, and Preventable, Use of the ED for Non-Traumatic Dental Conditions in Hot-Spot Counties: A Mixed Methods Study. Community Activities in Primary Care: A Literature Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1