Infants can use temporary or scant categorical information to individuate objects

IF 3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY Cognitive Psychology Pub Date : 2024-02-26 DOI:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2024.101640
Yi Lin , Maayan Stavans , Xia Li , Renée Baillargeon
{"title":"Infants can use temporary or scant categorical information to individuate objects","authors":"Yi Lin ,&nbsp;Maayan Stavans ,&nbsp;Xia Li ,&nbsp;Renée Baillargeon","doi":"10.1016/j.cogpsych.2024.101640","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In a standard individuation task, infants see two different objects emerge in alternation from behind a screen. If they can assign distinct categorical descriptors to the two objects, they expect to see both objects when the screen is lowered; if not, they have no expectation at all about what they will see (i.e., two objects, one object, or no object). Why is contrastive categorical information critical for success at this task? According to the <em>kind</em> account, infants must decide whether they are facing a single object with changing properties or two different objects with stable properties, and access to permanent, intrinsic, kind information for each object resolves this difficulty. According to the <em>two-system</em> account, however, contrastive categorical descriptors simply provide the object-file system with unique tags for individuating the two objects and for communicating about them with the physical-reasoning system. The two-system account thus predicts that <em>any type of contrastive categorical information, however temporary or scant it may be,</em> should induce success at the task. Two experiments examined this prediction. Experiment 1 tested 14-month-olds (<em>N</em> = 96) in a standard task using two objects that differed only in their featural properties. Infants succeeded at the task when the object-file system had access to contrastive <em>temporary</em> categorical descriptors derived from the objects’ distinct causal roles in preceding support events (e.g., formerly a support, formerly a supportee). Experiment 2 tested 9-month-olds (<em>N</em> = 96) in a standard task using two objects infants this age typically encode as merely featurally distinct. Infants succeeded when the object-file system had access to <em>scant</em> categorical descriptors derived from the objects’ prior inclusion in static arrays of similarly shaped objects (e.g., block-shaped objects, cylinder-shaped objects). These and control results support the two-system account’s claim that in a standard task, contrastive categorical descriptors serve to provide the object-file system with unique tags for the two objects.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50669,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Psychology","volume":"149 ","pages":"Article 101640"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010028524000112","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In a standard individuation task, infants see two different objects emerge in alternation from behind a screen. If they can assign distinct categorical descriptors to the two objects, they expect to see both objects when the screen is lowered; if not, they have no expectation at all about what they will see (i.e., two objects, one object, or no object). Why is contrastive categorical information critical for success at this task? According to the kind account, infants must decide whether they are facing a single object with changing properties or two different objects with stable properties, and access to permanent, intrinsic, kind information for each object resolves this difficulty. According to the two-system account, however, contrastive categorical descriptors simply provide the object-file system with unique tags for individuating the two objects and for communicating about them with the physical-reasoning system. The two-system account thus predicts that any type of contrastive categorical information, however temporary or scant it may be, should induce success at the task. Two experiments examined this prediction. Experiment 1 tested 14-month-olds (N = 96) in a standard task using two objects that differed only in their featural properties. Infants succeeded at the task when the object-file system had access to contrastive temporary categorical descriptors derived from the objects’ distinct causal roles in preceding support events (e.g., formerly a support, formerly a supportee). Experiment 2 tested 9-month-olds (N = 96) in a standard task using two objects infants this age typically encode as merely featurally distinct. Infants succeeded when the object-file system had access to scant categorical descriptors derived from the objects’ prior inclusion in static arrays of similarly shaped objects (e.g., block-shaped objects, cylinder-shaped objects). These and control results support the two-system account’s claim that in a standard task, contrastive categorical descriptors serve to provide the object-file system with unique tags for the two objects.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
婴儿可以利用临时或少量的分类信息来识别物体。
在一项标准的个体化任务中,婴儿会看到两个不同的物体从屏幕后面交替出现。如果他们能给这两个物体赋予不同的分类描述,他们就会期望在屏幕降下时同时看到这两个物体;如果不能,他们就根本无法期望会看到什么(即两个物体、一个物体或没有物体)。为什么对比分类信息对这项任务的成功至关重要?根据 "种类说",婴儿必须决定他们面对的是一个属性不断变化的单一物体,还是两个属性稳定的不同物体,而获得每个物体的永久、内在、种类信息就能解决这一难题。然而,根据双系统理论,对比性分类描述只是为物体档案系统提供了独特的标签,用于区分两个物体并与物理推理系统进行交流。因此,双系统理论预测,任何类型的对比性分类信息,无论其多么短暂或稀少,都会诱发任务的成功。有两个实验验证了这一预测。实验 1 测试了 14 个月大的婴儿(N=96)在一项标准任务中使用两个仅在特征属性上不同的物体。当物体-档案系统获得了根据物体在之前的支持事件中的不同因果角色(如以前是支持者,以前是被支持者)而得出的对比性临时分类描述符时,婴儿就能成功完成任务。实验 2 对 9 个月大的婴儿(96 名)进行了一项标准任务测试,使用的是两个在这个年龄段的婴儿通常只将其编码为不同特征的物体。当物体-档案系统可以使用从物体先前被纳入形状相似物体(如块状物体、圆柱状物体)的静态阵列中获得的少量分类描述符时,婴儿就会成功。这些结果和对照组的结果都支持双系统理论的观点,即在标准任务中,对比性的分类描述符可以为物体档案系统提供两个物体的独特标记。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cognitive Psychology
Cognitive Psychology 医学-心理学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.80%
发文量
29
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: Cognitive Psychology is concerned with advances in the study of attention, memory, language processing, perception, problem solving, and thinking. Cognitive Psychology specializes in extensive articles that have a major impact on cognitive theory and provide new theoretical advances. Research Areas include: • Artificial intelligence • Developmental psychology • Linguistics • Neurophysiology • Social psychology.
期刊最新文献
Updating of information in working memory: Time course and consequences. In the United States, children are more likely than adults to condone discrimination. Free time, sharper mind: A computational dive into working memory improvement Editorial Board Building compressed causal models of the world
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1