Discrete choice experiments with eye-tracking: How far we have come and ways forward

IF 2.8 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Journal of Choice Modelling Pub Date : 2024-02-26 DOI:10.1016/j.jocm.2024.100478
Prateek Bansal , Eui-Jin Kim , Semra Ozdemir
{"title":"Discrete choice experiments with eye-tracking: How far we have come and ways forward","authors":"Prateek Bansal ,&nbsp;Eui-Jin Kim ,&nbsp;Semra Ozdemir","doi":"10.1016/j.jocm.2024.100478","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>With the increased affordability of eye-tracking technology, its applications in discrete choice experiments (DCEs) are rapidly increasing. It is critical to understand the current state of research, challenges, and potential value of this technology for future studies. This article provides an interdisciplinary perspective on three main themes of this literature – (i) utilizing visual attention measures to identify the effect of top-down and bottom-up processing on information search and preferences, (ii) modelling advancements to incorporate visual attention measures into the discrete choice models, (iii) examining the effect of the DCE design on the consumer's information search processes. Then, we highlight four areas of improvement in these themes. First, visual attention measures alone might not be sufficient proxies for representing information processing. We lay out a research agenda to precisely measure information processing by integrating eye-tracking and electroencephalogram (EEG) data. Second, traditional static behaviour models do not effectively leverage the dynamic nature of eye-tracking data. We propose to adapt dynamic behavioural models from cognitive psychology where the mathematical representation of the decision-making process is consistent with the eye-tracking data. Third, existing studies provide descriptive (instead of prescriptive) insights about the effect of DCE design on information search. Thus, instead of DCE design, eye-tracking data can be used ex-post to select behavioural models aligned with observed search patterns. Fourth, convenience sampling protocols in eye-tracking studies raise questions about the internal validity of findings. Future DCEs with eye-tracking should adopt protocols used in randomised control trial studies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46863,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Choice Modelling","volume":"51 ","pages":"Article 100478"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755534524000101/pdfft?md5=43438cb1d7428ebd3fa123ef9ed9cca0&pid=1-s2.0-S1755534524000101-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Choice Modelling","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755534524000101","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the increased affordability of eye-tracking technology, its applications in discrete choice experiments (DCEs) are rapidly increasing. It is critical to understand the current state of research, challenges, and potential value of this technology for future studies. This article provides an interdisciplinary perspective on three main themes of this literature – (i) utilizing visual attention measures to identify the effect of top-down and bottom-up processing on information search and preferences, (ii) modelling advancements to incorporate visual attention measures into the discrete choice models, (iii) examining the effect of the DCE design on the consumer's information search processes. Then, we highlight four areas of improvement in these themes. First, visual attention measures alone might not be sufficient proxies for representing information processing. We lay out a research agenda to precisely measure information processing by integrating eye-tracking and electroencephalogram (EEG) data. Second, traditional static behaviour models do not effectively leverage the dynamic nature of eye-tracking data. We propose to adapt dynamic behavioural models from cognitive psychology where the mathematical representation of the decision-making process is consistent with the eye-tracking data. Third, existing studies provide descriptive (instead of prescriptive) insights about the effect of DCE design on information search. Thus, instead of DCE design, eye-tracking data can be used ex-post to select behavioural models aligned with observed search patterns. Fourth, convenience sampling protocols in eye-tracking studies raise questions about the internal validity of findings. Future DCEs with eye-tracking should adopt protocols used in randomised control trial studies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用眼动跟踪技术进行离散选择实验:我们取得的成就和前进的方向
随着眼动跟踪技术的价格越来越低,其在离散选择实验(DCE)中的应用也在迅速增加。了解该技术的研究现状、挑战以及对未来研究的潜在价值至关重要。本文从跨学科的角度阐述了这一文献的三大主题--(i) 利用视觉注意力测量方法来确定自上而下和自下而上的处理过程对信息搜索和偏好的影响;(ii) 将视觉注意力测量方法纳入离散选择模型的建模进展;(iii) 研究 DCE 设计对消费者信息搜索过程的影响。然后,我们强调了这些主题中需要改进的四个方面。首先,视觉注意力测量本身可能不足以代表信息处理过程。我们提出了通过整合眼动跟踪和脑电图(EEG)数据来精确测量信息处理的研究议程。其次,传统的静态行为模型无法有效利用眼动跟踪数据的动态特性。我们建议调整认知心理学的动态行为模型,使决策过程的数学表示与眼动跟踪数据保持一致。第三,现有研究提供了关于 DCE 设计对信息搜索影响的描述性(而非描述性)见解。因此,眼动跟踪数据可以代替 DCE 设计,用于事后选择与观察到的搜索模式相一致的行为模型。第四,眼动跟踪研究中的方便抽样方案会引起研究结果内部有效性的问题。未来使用眼动追踪进行的 DCE 研究应采用随机对照试验研究中使用的方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
31
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Latent class choice models with an error structure: Investigating potential unobserved associations between latent segmentation and behavior generation Model choice and framing effects: Do discrete choice modeling decisions affect loss aversion estimates? A consistent moment equations for binary probit models with endogenous variables using instrumental variables Transformation-based flexible error structures for choice modeling
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1