The (dis)connection between R&D and productivity in China: Policy implications of R&D tax credits

IF 2.8 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Journal of Comparative Economics Pub Date : 2023-11-22 DOI:10.1016/j.jce.2023.11.004
Qing Liu , Larry D. Qiu , Xing Wei , Chaoqun Zhan
{"title":"The (dis)connection between R&D and productivity in China: Policy implications of R&D tax credits","authors":"Qing Liu ,&nbsp;Larry D. Qiu ,&nbsp;Xing Wei ,&nbsp;Chaoqun Zhan","doi":"10.1016/j.jce.2023.11.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We use Chinese firm-level data from 2001 to 2007 to estimate the (dis)connection between firms’ R&amp;D and productivity and find that the productivity effect of R&amp;D investment is very low. We conjecture that firms conduct/report unproductive R&amp;D in order to obtain policy benefits. To explore this plausible misconduct, we investigate the effects of China's 2003 R&amp;D tax reform on firms’ R&amp;D investment. The reform generates exogenous treatment variations across firm ownerships for causal identification. We find that the reform has statistically significant and positive effects on firms’ R&amp;D investments. Quantitatively, the reform raises firms’ R&amp;D investments by 6.68 % and the estimated R&amp;D elasticity of tax deduction for private firms is 0.9147, which is comparable to other countries. However, our further empirical results indicate that the policy-induced R&amp;D is less efficient in promoting firms’ productivity than the spontaneous R&amp;D. We provide evidence of firms’ relabeling non-R&amp;D expenses to R&amp;D expenses, which partly explains the inefficiency of R&amp;D investment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48183,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Comparative Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Comparative Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0147596723000999","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We use Chinese firm-level data from 2001 to 2007 to estimate the (dis)connection between firms’ R&D and productivity and find that the productivity effect of R&D investment is very low. We conjecture that firms conduct/report unproductive R&D in order to obtain policy benefits. To explore this plausible misconduct, we investigate the effects of China's 2003 R&D tax reform on firms’ R&D investment. The reform generates exogenous treatment variations across firm ownerships for causal identification. We find that the reform has statistically significant and positive effects on firms’ R&D investments. Quantitatively, the reform raises firms’ R&D investments by 6.68 % and the estimated R&D elasticity of tax deduction for private firms is 0.9147, which is comparable to other countries. However, our further empirical results indicate that the policy-induced R&D is less efficient in promoting firms’ productivity than the spontaneous R&D. We provide evidence of firms’ relabeling non-R&D expenses to R&D expenses, which partly explains the inefficiency of R&D investment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国研发与生产力之间的(非)联系:研发税收抵免的政策影响
我们利用 2001 年至 2007 年中国企业层面的数据,估算了企业研发与生产率之间的(非)关联,发现研发投资对生产率的影响非常低。我们推测,企业进行/报告非生产性研发是为了获得政策优惠。为了探讨这一似是而非的误解,我们研究了中国 2003 年研发税改革对企业研发投资的影响。改革产生了不同所有制企业的外生待遇差异,以便进行因果识别。我们发现,改革对企业的研发投资产生了显著的积极影响。从数量上看,改革使企业的研发投资增加了 6.68%,民营企业的研发税前扣除弹性估计值为 0.9147,与其他国家相当。然而,我们进一步的实证结果表明,与自发研发相比,政策引导的研发在提高企业生产率方面的效率较低。我们提供了企业将非研发支出重新标记为研发支出的证据,这在一定程度上解释了研发投资效率低下的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
66
审稿时长
45 days
期刊介绍: The mission of the Journal of Comparative Economics is to lead the new orientations of research in comparative economics. Before 1989, the core of comparative economics was the comparison of economic systems with in particular the economic analysis of socialism in its different forms. In the last fifteen years, the main focus of interest of comparative economists has been the transition from socialism to capitalism.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Changes to our editorial board Individualism and the legal status of prostitution Bureaucracy-business relationship, corruption and the implications for marketization Closing the digital divide: The impact of teachers’ ICT use on student achievement in China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1