Strengths intervention imparted through a blended learning approach to advance personal growth initiative among Pakistan’s university students during COVID-19

IF 2.6 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Studies in Educational Evaluation Pub Date : 2024-02-28 DOI:10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101343
Zane Asher Green
{"title":"Strengths intervention imparted through a blended learning approach to advance personal growth initiative among Pakistan’s university students during COVID-19","authors":"Zane Asher Green","doi":"10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>To enhance the teaching-learning process and protect all concerned during COVID-19, a blended learning approach—comprising online learning as well as offline personal and collaborative learning—was used to impart a strengths intervention to foster personal growth initiative (PGI) among Pakistan’s university students. The sample comprised 176 students randomly allocated to a treatment (<em>n</em> = 88) and a wait-list control (<em>n</em> = 88) group. Growth curve modeling analyzed the developmental changes in participants’ PGI scores over time. PGI increased to a greater extent in the treatment group than in the control group immediately after the intervention as well as four and eight months later. There were also significant changes in students’ initial status (intercepts) and rates of changes over time (slopes). Moreover, students with high initial PGI scores had a slower linear increase, whereas those with low initial PGI scores had a faster increase in linear growth over time.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47539,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Educational Evaluation","volume":"81 ","pages":"Article 101343"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Educational Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191491X24000221","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To enhance the teaching-learning process and protect all concerned during COVID-19, a blended learning approach—comprising online learning as well as offline personal and collaborative learning—was used to impart a strengths intervention to foster personal growth initiative (PGI) among Pakistan’s university students. The sample comprised 176 students randomly allocated to a treatment (n = 88) and a wait-list control (n = 88) group. Growth curve modeling analyzed the developmental changes in participants’ PGI scores over time. PGI increased to a greater extent in the treatment group than in the control group immediately after the intervention as well as four and eight months later. There were also significant changes in students’ initial status (intercepts) and rates of changes over time (slopes). Moreover, students with high initial PGI scores had a slower linear increase, whereas those with low initial PGI scores had a faster increase in linear growth over time.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在 COVID-19 期间,通过混合学习方法在巴基斯坦大学生中传授优势干预措施,以推进个人成长倡议
为了在 COVID-19 期间加强教学过程并保护所有相关人员,我们采用了一种混合学习方法--包括在线学习以及线下个人和协作学习--在巴基斯坦大学生中传授促进个人成长倡议(PGI)的优势干预措施。样本包括随机分配到治疗组(88 人)和等待对照组(88 人)的 176 名学生。成长曲线模型分析了参与者的 PGI 分数随时间的发展变化。治疗组的 PGI 在干预后立即以及 4 个月和 8 个月后比对照组有更大程度的提高。学生的初始状态(截距)和随时间推移的变化率(斜率)也有明显变化。此外,初始 PGI 分数高的学生线性增长速度较慢,而初始 PGI 分数低的学生随着时间的推移线性增长速度较快。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
90
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: Studies in Educational Evaluation publishes original reports of evaluation studies. Four types of articles are published by the journal: (a) Empirical evaluation studies representing evaluation practice in educational systems around the world; (b) Theoretical reflections and empirical studies related to issues involved in the evaluation of educational programs, educational institutions, educational personnel and student assessment; (c) Articles summarizing the state-of-the-art concerning specific topics in evaluation in general or in a particular country or group of countries; (d) Book reviews and brief abstracts of evaluation studies.
期刊最新文献
Teaching quality and student achievement inequalities in low- and middle-income countries: A hierarchical linear model analysis Do children speaking indigenous and regional languages benefit equally from updated curricula? A report on a longitudinal quasi-experimental pilot study in Central Asia Exploring the impact of student perceptions of Assessment for Learning on intrinsic motivation How are pre-service physical education teachers’ perceptions of educator-created (dis)empowering climates associated with their motivational processes and teaching intention? Online peer feedback training based on self-regulated learning in english as a foreign language writing: Perceived usefulness and students’ engagement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1