Uncovering how Black and Latinx Communities perceive environmental justice: Integrating a public deliberation quasi-experiment and computational methods

IF 4.1 3区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS Public Relations Review Pub Date : 2024-02-28 DOI:10.1016/j.pubrev.2024.102436
Kaiping Chen , Isabel I. Villanueva , Amanda L. Molder
{"title":"Uncovering how Black and Latinx Communities perceive environmental justice: Integrating a public deliberation quasi-experiment and computational methods","authors":"Kaiping Chen ,&nbsp;Isabel I. Villanueva ,&nbsp;Amanda L. Molder","doi":"10.1016/j.pubrev.2024.102436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This research aims to address gaps in the knowledge and practice of engaging underrepresented communities in public communication and policymaking on environmental justice issues. Through a quasi-field experiment conducted in Madison, Wisconsin, we investigate how Black and Latinx communities perceive environmental justice issues and how these perceptions are associated with intersectional identities such as education level, income, and gender. Additionally, we explore the impact of different information material designs on fostering inclusive and diverse discussions. Our results highlight the nuances of environmental justice perspectives within communities and underscore the importance of tailored approaches in community engagement and public relations. Furthermore, the study reveals the effectiveness of visual information materials in stimulating diverse discussions, emphasizing the significance of audience accessibility and comprehension in communication design. These findings provide both theoretical implications for the field of public relations and practical applications for science communicators, public relations professionals, and community-engaged scholars to promote more inclusive and personalized strategies in community engagement.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48263,"journal":{"name":"Public Relations Review","volume":"50 2","pages":"Article 102436"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Relations Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0363811124000158","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research aims to address gaps in the knowledge and practice of engaging underrepresented communities in public communication and policymaking on environmental justice issues. Through a quasi-field experiment conducted in Madison, Wisconsin, we investigate how Black and Latinx communities perceive environmental justice issues and how these perceptions are associated with intersectional identities such as education level, income, and gender. Additionally, we explore the impact of different information material designs on fostering inclusive and diverse discussions. Our results highlight the nuances of environmental justice perspectives within communities and underscore the importance of tailored approaches in community engagement and public relations. Furthermore, the study reveals the effectiveness of visual information materials in stimulating diverse discussions, emphasizing the significance of audience accessibility and comprehension in communication design. These findings provide both theoretical implications for the field of public relations and practical applications for science communicators, public relations professionals, and community-engaged scholars to promote more inclusive and personalized strategies in community engagement.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
揭示黑人和拉美裔社区如何看待环境正义:将公共审议准实验与计算方法相结合
本研究旨在解决让代表人数不足的社区参与环境正义问题的公共沟通和政策制定方面的知识和实践差距。通过在威斯康星州麦迪逊市进行的准实地实验,我们调查了黑人和拉美裔社区如何看待环境正义问题,以及这些看法与教育水平、收入和性别等交叉身份的关联。此外,我们还探讨了不同的信息资料设计对促进包容性和多样性讨论的影响。我们的研究结果凸显了社区内环境正义观点的细微差别,并强调了在社区参与和公共关系中采用量身定制方法的重要性。此外,研究还揭示了视觉信息材料在激发多样化讨论方面的有效性,强调了受众的可及性和理解能力在传播设计中的重要性。这些发现既为公共关系领域提供了理论意义,也为科学传播者、公共关系专业人士和社区参与学者提供了实际应用,以促进社区参与中更具包容性和个性化的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
19.00%
发文量
90
期刊介绍: The Public Relations Review is the oldest journal devoted to articles that examine public relations in depth, and commentaries by specialists in the field. Most of the articles are based on empirical research undertaken by professionals and academics in the field. In addition to research articles and commentaries, The Review publishes invited research in brief, and book reviews in the fields of public relations, mass communications, organizational communications, public opinion formations, social science research and evaluation, marketing, management and public policy formation.
期刊最新文献
“Being a Burson Person is something special”: Burson-Marsteller’s influence in the Americanization of the public relations industry in Latin America (1980s – 2010s) The effects of crisis type and CSR fit on organizational outcomes: The moderating role of authentic leadership in shaping organizational reputation, word-of-mouth, and purchase intentions Artificial intelligence for internal communication: Strategies, challenges, and implications Communicating strategic CEO activism to promote employee prosocial behaviors: Understanding the mediating role of employee prosocial sensemaking Optimizing organizational corrective communication: The effects of correction placement timing, refutation detail level, and corrective narrative type on combating crisis misinformation narratives
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1