Segmentation, feature extraction and classification of leukocytes leveraging neural networks, a comparative study

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-02-29 DOI:10.1002/cyto.a.24832
Tingxuan Fang, Xukun Huang, Xiao Chen, Deyong Chen, Junbo Wang, Jian Chen
{"title":"Segmentation, feature extraction and classification of leukocytes leveraging neural networks, a comparative study","authors":"Tingxuan Fang,&nbsp;Xukun Huang,&nbsp;Xiao Chen,&nbsp;Deyong Chen,&nbsp;Junbo Wang,&nbsp;Jian Chen","doi":"10.1002/cyto.a.24832","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The gold standard of leukocyte differentiation is a manual examination of blood smears, which is not only time and labor intensive but also susceptible to human error. As to automatic classification, there is still no comparative study of cell segmentation, feature extraction, and cell classification, where a variety of machine and deep learning models are compared with home-developed approaches. In this study, both traditional machine learning of K-means clustering versus deep learning of U-Net, U-Net + ResNet18, and U-Net + ResNet34 were used for cell segmentation, producing segmentation accuracies of 94.36% versus 99.17% for the dataset of CellaVision and 93.20% versus 98.75% for the dataset of BCCD, confirming that deep learning produces higher performance than traditional machine learning in leukocyte classification. In addition, a series of deep-learning approaches, including AlexNet, VGG16, and ResNet18, was adopted to conduct feature extraction and cell classification of leukocytes, producing classification accuracies of 91.31%, 97.83%, and 100% of CellaVision as well as 81.18%, 91.64% and 97.82% of BCCD, confirming the capability of the increased deepness of neural networks in leukocyte classification. As to the demonstrations, this study further conducted cell-type classification of ALL-IDB2 and PCB-HBC datasets, producing high accuracies of 100% and 98.49% among all literature, validating the deep learning model used in this study.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cyto.a.24832","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The gold standard of leukocyte differentiation is a manual examination of blood smears, which is not only time and labor intensive but also susceptible to human error. As to automatic classification, there is still no comparative study of cell segmentation, feature extraction, and cell classification, where a variety of machine and deep learning models are compared with home-developed approaches. In this study, both traditional machine learning of K-means clustering versus deep learning of U-Net, U-Net + ResNet18, and U-Net + ResNet34 were used for cell segmentation, producing segmentation accuracies of 94.36% versus 99.17% for the dataset of CellaVision and 93.20% versus 98.75% for the dataset of BCCD, confirming that deep learning produces higher performance than traditional machine learning in leukocyte classification. In addition, a series of deep-learning approaches, including AlexNet, VGG16, and ResNet18, was adopted to conduct feature extraction and cell classification of leukocytes, producing classification accuracies of 91.31%, 97.83%, and 100% of CellaVision as well as 81.18%, 91.64% and 97.82% of BCCD, confirming the capability of the increased deepness of neural networks in leukocyte classification. As to the demonstrations, this study further conducted cell-type classification of ALL-IDB2 and PCB-HBC datasets, producing high accuracies of 100% and 98.49% among all literature, validating the deep learning model used in this study.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用神经网络对白细胞进行分割、特征提取和分类的比较研究。
白细胞分化的金标准是对血液涂片进行人工检查,这不仅耗时耗力,而且容易出现人为错误。至于自动分类,目前还没有关于细胞分割、特征提取和细胞分类的比较研究,将各种机器学习和深度学习模型与自主开发的方法进行比较。在本研究中,传统机器学习的 K-means 聚类与深度学习的 U-Net、U-Net + ResNet18 和 U-Net + ResNet34 都被用于细胞分割,在 CellaVision 的数据集上,分割准确率分别为 94.36% 和 99.17%,在 BCCD 的数据集上,分割准确率分别为 93.20% 和 98.75%,证实了深度学习在白细胞分类方面的性能高于传统机器学习。此外,本研究还采用了一系列深度学习方法,包括 AlexNet、VGG16 和 ResNet18,对白细胞进行特征提取和细胞分类,结果显示,CellaVision 的分类准确率分别为 91.31%、97.83% 和 100%,BCCD 的分类准确率分别为 81.18%、91.64% 和 97.82%,证实了深度神经网络在白细胞分类中的能力。在演示方面,本研究进一步对ALL-IDB2和PCB-HBC数据集进行了细胞类型分类,在所有文献中获得了100%和98.49%的高准确率,验证了本研究中使用的深度学习模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1