The environmental impact of energy consumption and carbon emissions in radiology departments: a systematic review.

IF 3.7 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING European Radiology Experimental Pub Date : 2024-02-29 DOI:10.1186/s41747-024-00424-6
Andrea Roletto, Moreno Zanardo, Giuseppe Roberto Bonfitto, Diego Catania, Francesco Sardanelli, Simone Zanoni
{"title":"The environmental impact of energy consumption and carbon emissions in radiology departments: a systematic review.","authors":"Andrea Roletto, Moreno Zanardo, Giuseppe Roberto Bonfitto, Diego Catania, Francesco Sardanelli, Simone Zanoni","doi":"10.1186/s41747-024-00424-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Energy consumption and carbon emissions from medical equipment like CT/MRI scanners and workstations contribute to the environmental impact of healthcare facilities. The aim of this systematic review was to identify all strategies to reduce energy use and carbon emissions in radiology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In June 2023, a systematic review (Medline/Embase/Web of Science) was performed to search original articles on environmental sustainability in radiology. The extracted data include environmental sustainability topics (e.g., energy consumption, carbon footprint) and radiological devices involved. Sustainable actions and environmental impact in radiology settings were analyzed. Study quality was assessed using the QualSyst tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 918 retrieved articles, 16 met the inclusion criteria. Among them, main topics were energy consumption (10/16, 62.5%), life-cycle assessment (4/16, 25.0%), and carbon footprint (2/16, 12.5%). Eleven studies reported that 40-91% of the energy consumed by radiological devices can be defined as \"nonproductive\" (devices \"on\" but not working). Turning-off devices during idle periods 9/16 (56.2%) and implementing workflow informatic tools (2/16, 12.5%) were the sustainable actions identified. Energy-saving strategies were reported in 8/16 articles (50%), estimating annual savings of thousand kilowatt-hours (14,180-171,000 kWh). Cost-savings were identified in 7/16 (43.7%) articles, ranging from US $9,225 to 14,328 per device. Study quality was over or equal the 80% of high-quality level in 14/16 (87.5%) articles.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Energy consumption and environmental sustainability in radiology received attention in literature. Sustainable actions include turning-off radiological devices during idle periods, favoring the most energy-efficient imaging devices, and educating radiological staff on energy-saving practices, without compromising service quality.</p><p><strong>Relevance statement: </strong>A non-negligible number of articles - mainly coming from North America and Europe - highlighted the need for energy-saving strategies, attention to equipment life-cycle assessment, and carbon footprint reduction in radiology, with a potential for cost-saving outcome.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>• Energy consumption and environmental sustainability in radiology received attention in the literature (16 articles published from 2010 to 2023). • A substantial portion (40-91%) of the energy consumed by radiological devices was classified as \"non-productive\" (devices \"on\" but not working). • Sustainable action such as shutting down devices during idle periods was identified, with potential annual energy savings ranging from 14,180 to 171,000 kWh.</p>","PeriodicalId":36926,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology Experimental","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10902235/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Radiology Experimental","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41747-024-00424-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Energy consumption and carbon emissions from medical equipment like CT/MRI scanners and workstations contribute to the environmental impact of healthcare facilities. The aim of this systematic review was to identify all strategies to reduce energy use and carbon emissions in radiology.

Methods: In June 2023, a systematic review (Medline/Embase/Web of Science) was performed to search original articles on environmental sustainability in radiology. The extracted data include environmental sustainability topics (e.g., energy consumption, carbon footprint) and radiological devices involved. Sustainable actions and environmental impact in radiology settings were analyzed. Study quality was assessed using the QualSyst tool.

Results: From 918 retrieved articles, 16 met the inclusion criteria. Among them, main topics were energy consumption (10/16, 62.5%), life-cycle assessment (4/16, 25.0%), and carbon footprint (2/16, 12.5%). Eleven studies reported that 40-91% of the energy consumed by radiological devices can be defined as "nonproductive" (devices "on" but not working). Turning-off devices during idle periods 9/16 (56.2%) and implementing workflow informatic tools (2/16, 12.5%) were the sustainable actions identified. Energy-saving strategies were reported in 8/16 articles (50%), estimating annual savings of thousand kilowatt-hours (14,180-171,000 kWh). Cost-savings were identified in 7/16 (43.7%) articles, ranging from US $9,225 to 14,328 per device. Study quality was over or equal the 80% of high-quality level in 14/16 (87.5%) articles.

Conclusion: Energy consumption and environmental sustainability in radiology received attention in literature. Sustainable actions include turning-off radiological devices during idle periods, favoring the most energy-efficient imaging devices, and educating radiological staff on energy-saving practices, without compromising service quality.

Relevance statement: A non-negligible number of articles - mainly coming from North America and Europe - highlighted the need for energy-saving strategies, attention to equipment life-cycle assessment, and carbon footprint reduction in radiology, with a potential for cost-saving outcome.

Key points: • Energy consumption and environmental sustainability in radiology received attention in the literature (16 articles published from 2010 to 2023). • A substantial portion (40-91%) of the energy consumed by radiological devices was classified as "non-productive" (devices "on" but not working). • Sustainable action such as shutting down devices during idle periods was identified, with potential annual energy savings ranging from 14,180 to 171,000 kWh.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
放射科能源消耗和碳排放对环境的影响:系统综述。
目标:CT/MRI 扫描仪和工作站等医疗设备的能耗和碳排放会对医疗机构的环境造成影响。本系统综述旨在确定放射科减少能源消耗和碳排放的所有策略:2023 年 6 月,我们进行了一次系统性回顾(Medline/Embase/Web of Science),搜索有关放射科环境可持续性的原创文章。提取的数据包括环境可持续性主题(如能源消耗、碳足迹)和所涉及的放射设备。对放射学环境中的可持续行动和环境影响进行了分析。研究质量采用 QualSyst 工具进行评估:在检索到的 918 篇文章中,有 16 篇符合纳入标准。其中,主要议题为能源消耗(10/16,62.5%)、生命周期评估(4/16,25.0%)和碳足迹(2/16,12.5%)。有 11 项研究报告称,放射设备消耗的能源中有 40%-91% 可定义为 "非生产性 "能源(设备 "开启 "但不工作)。9/16(56.2%)项研究指出在设备闲置期间关闭设备,2/16(12.5%)项研究指出实施工作流程信息化工具。8/16 篇文章(50%)报告了节能策略,估计每年可节约千瓦时(14,180-171,000 千瓦时)。7/16(43.7%)篇文章确定了成本节约,每台设备的成本从 9,225 美元到 14,328 美元不等。14/16(87.5%)篇文章的研究质量超过或等于 80% 的高质量水平:结论:放射科的能源消耗和环境可持续性受到了文献的关注。可持续行动包括在不影响服务质量的前提下,在闲置期间关闭放射设备、优先使用能效最高的成像设备以及对放射工作人员进行节能教育:有相当数量的文章--主要来自北美和欧洲--强调了放射科需要节能策略、关注设备生命周期评估和减少碳足迹,从而有可能节约成本:- 放射科的能源消耗和环境可持续发展受到了文献的关注(2010 年至 2023 年共发表 16 篇文章)。- 放射设备消耗的能源中有很大一部分(40%-91%)被归类为 "非生产性 "能源(设备 "开启 "但不工作)。- 在闲置期间关闭设备等可持续行动被确定为每年可节约 14 180 至 171 000 千瓦时的潜在能源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Radiology Experimental
European Radiology Experimental Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
56
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
Dark-field radiography for the detection of bone microstructure changes in osteoporotic human lumbar spine specimens. Amide proton transfer-weighted CEST MRI for radiotherapy target delineation of glioblastoma: a prospective pilot study. Deep learning-based segmentation of kidneys and renal cysts on T2-weighted MRI from patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. Probing clarity: AI-generated simplified breast imaging reports for enhanced patient comprehension powered by ChatGPT-4o. Transfer learning classification of suspicious lesions on breast ultrasound: is there room to avoid biopsies of benign lesions?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1