The role of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in enhancing medication adherence among patients with newly diagnosed hypertension: an analysis of the National Health Insurance cohort database.

IF 3.6 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Clinical Hypertension Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.1186/s40885-024-00264-x
Hack-Lyoung Kim, So-Jeong Park, Yoon-Jong Bae, Sang Hyum Ihm, Jinho Shin, Kwang-Il Kim
{"title":"The role of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in enhancing medication adherence among patients with newly diagnosed hypertension: an analysis of the National Health Insurance cohort database.","authors":"Hack-Lyoung Kim, So-Jeong Park, Yoon-Jong Bae, Sang Hyum Ihm, Jinho Shin, Kwang-Il Kim","doi":"10.1186/s40885-024-00264-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Improving adherence to antihypertensive medication (AHM) is a key challenge in hypertension management. This study aimed to assess the impact of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) on AHM adherence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We utilized the Korean National Health Insurance Service database. Among patients newly diagnosed with hypertension who started AHM between July 2010 and December 2013, we compared clinical characteristics and adherence between 28,116 patients who underwent ABPM prior to starting AHM and 118,594 patients who did not undergo ABPM. Good adherence was defined as a proportion of days covered (PDC) of 0.8 or higher.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The total study population was 146,710, with a mean age of 50.5 ± 6.4 years; 44.3% were female. Co-morbidities were noted in 4.2%. About a third of patients (33.1%) showed good adherence. The ABPM group had a notably higher PDC (total PDC: 0.64 ± 0.35 vs. 0.45 ± 0.39; P < 0.001), irrespective of the number of medications, dosing frequency, or prescription duration. After adjusting for significant clinical variables, ABPM was still closely linked with good adherence (odds ratio, 2.35; 95% confidence interval, 2.28-2.41; P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In newly diagnosed hypertension, undergoing ABPM prior to AHM prescription appears to enhance adherence to AHM. The exact mechanisms driving this association warrant further exploration.</p>","PeriodicalId":10480,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Hypertension","volume":"30 1","pages":"6"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10905829/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40885-024-00264-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Improving adherence to antihypertensive medication (AHM) is a key challenge in hypertension management. This study aimed to assess the impact of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) on AHM adherence.

Methods: We utilized the Korean National Health Insurance Service database. Among patients newly diagnosed with hypertension who started AHM between July 2010 and December 2013, we compared clinical characteristics and adherence between 28,116 patients who underwent ABPM prior to starting AHM and 118,594 patients who did not undergo ABPM. Good adherence was defined as a proportion of days covered (PDC) of 0.8 or higher.

Results: The total study population was 146,710, with a mean age of 50.5 ± 6.4 years; 44.3% were female. Co-morbidities were noted in 4.2%. About a third of patients (33.1%) showed good adherence. The ABPM group had a notably higher PDC (total PDC: 0.64 ± 0.35 vs. 0.45 ± 0.39; P < 0.001), irrespective of the number of medications, dosing frequency, or prescription duration. After adjusting for significant clinical variables, ABPM was still closely linked with good adherence (odds ratio, 2.35; 95% confidence interval, 2.28-2.41; P < 0.001).

Conclusions: In newly diagnosed hypertension, undergoing ABPM prior to AHM prescription appears to enhance adherence to AHM. The exact mechanisms driving this association warrant further exploration.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
流动血压监测在提高新确诊高血压患者坚持服药方面的作用:全国健康保险队列数据库分析。
背景:提高抗高血压药物治疗(AHM)的依从性是高血压管理的一项关键挑战。本研究旨在评估非卧床血压监测(ABPM)对坚持服用高血压药物的影响:我们利用了韩国国民健康保险服务数据库。在 2010 年 7 月至 2013 年 12 月期间开始接受动态血压监测的新诊断高血压患者中,我们比较了 28116 名在开始接受动态血压监测前接受 ABPM 的患者和 118594 名未接受 ABPM 的患者的临床特征和依从性。良好依从性的定义是覆盖天数比例(PDC)达到或超过 0.8:研究总人数为 146,710 人,平均年龄为 50.5 ± 6.4 岁;44.3% 为女性。4.2%的患者患有并发症。约三分之一的患者(33.1%)表现出良好的依从性。ABPM 组的 PDC 明显更高(总 PDC:0.64 ± 0.35 vs. 0.45 ± 0.39;P 结论:ABPM 组的 PDC 明显更高(总 PDC:0.64 ± 0.35 vs. 0.45 ± 0.39):对于新诊断的高血压患者,在开 AHM 处方之前进行 ABPM 似乎能提高 AHM 的依从性。这种关联的确切机制值得进一步探讨。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Hypertension
Clinical Hypertension PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
4.80%
发文量
34
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Blood pressure variability and the risk of post-stroke cognitive impairment following atrial fibrillation related acute ischemic stroke. Cardiac magnetic resonance assessment of left ventricular phenotypes and prognostic implications in hypertensive heart disease. Current perspectives and challenges of digital hypertension: artificial intelligence in the management of hypertension. Chronic hypertension diagnosed in a previous pregnancy is associated with recurrent preeclampsia. Arterial stiffness index and blood pressure phenotypes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: prognostic implications for ischemic and bleeding events.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1