The Brief Evaluation of Adolescents and Children Online (BEACON): Psychometric development of a mental health screening measure for school students

IF 2.5 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Journal of Clinical Psychology Pub Date : 2024-02-29 DOI:10.1002/jclp.23673
Ronald M. Rapee, Rebecca Kuhnert, Susan H. Spence, Ian Bowsher, John Burns, Jennifer Coen, Julie Dixon, Pauline Kotselas, Catherine Lourey, Lauren F. McLellan, Cathrine Mihalopoulos, Lorna Peters, Traci Prendergast, Tiffany Roos, Danielle Thomas, Viviana Wuthrich
{"title":"The Brief Evaluation of Adolescents and Children Online (BEACON): Psychometric development of a mental health screening measure for school students","authors":"Ronald M. Rapee,&nbsp;Rebecca Kuhnert,&nbsp;Susan H. Spence,&nbsp;Ian Bowsher,&nbsp;John Burns,&nbsp;Jennifer Coen,&nbsp;Julie Dixon,&nbsp;Pauline Kotselas,&nbsp;Catherine Lourey,&nbsp;Lauren F. McLellan,&nbsp;Cathrine Mihalopoulos,&nbsp;Lorna Peters,&nbsp;Traci Prendergast,&nbsp;Tiffany Roos,&nbsp;Danielle Thomas,&nbsp;Viviana Wuthrich","doi":"10.1002/jclp.23673","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper describes the development and psychometric evaluation of a brief self-report measure (BEACON) to inform universal mental health screening in schools. Items assess symptoms and impairment associated with anxiety and attention/hyperactivity problems (grades 4–11) as well as depression and eating difficulties (grades 6–11), with optional items for suicidality and self-harm (grades 7–11). Initial item examination based on Item Response Theory (IRT) and classical test theory involved 3844 students in grades 4 through 11 (Study 1) and identified 18 items for grades 4–5 and 31 items for grades 6–11 that fulfilled pre-set criteria. Study 2 extended testing with 10,479 students in grades 4–11 and added an additional four items assessing impairment associated with eating difficulties for older students (grades 6–11) creating a total of 35 items for grades 6–11. All items, for both grade-level versions, met the pre-set criteria for IRT and classical test theory analysis supporting their strength in the measurement of the dimensions of concern. The measure showed good reliability (subscale alphas .87 to .95). Validity was also demonstrated against standard symptom measures, school grades, school absenteeism, and help-seeking. The BEACON appears to be a psychometrically sound measure to use in the first stage of school-based screening for mental health problems.</p>","PeriodicalId":15395,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jclp.23673","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jclp.23673","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper describes the development and psychometric evaluation of a brief self-report measure (BEACON) to inform universal mental health screening in schools. Items assess symptoms and impairment associated with anxiety and attention/hyperactivity problems (grades 4–11) as well as depression and eating difficulties (grades 6–11), with optional items for suicidality and self-harm (grades 7–11). Initial item examination based on Item Response Theory (IRT) and classical test theory involved 3844 students in grades 4 through 11 (Study 1) and identified 18 items for grades 4–5 and 31 items for grades 6–11 that fulfilled pre-set criteria. Study 2 extended testing with 10,479 students in grades 4–11 and added an additional four items assessing impairment associated with eating difficulties for older students (grades 6–11) creating a total of 35 items for grades 6–11. All items, for both grade-level versions, met the pre-set criteria for IRT and classical test theory analysis supporting their strength in the measurement of the dimensions of concern. The measure showed good reliability (subscale alphas .87 to .95). Validity was also demonstrated against standard symptom measures, school grades, school absenteeism, and help-seeking. The BEACON appears to be a psychometrically sound measure to use in the first stage of school-based screening for mental health problems.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
青少年和儿童在线简要评估(BEACON):针对在校学生的心理健康筛查量表的心理计量学开发。
本文介绍了一种简短的自我报告测量方法(BEACON)的开发和心理测量评估,为在学校普及心理健康筛查提供参考。项目评估与焦虑和注意力/多动问题(4-11 年级)以及抑郁和进食困难(6-11 年级)相关的症状和障碍,并可选择自杀和自残项目(7-11 年级)。以项目反应理论(IRT)和经典测验理论为基础,对 3844 名四年级至十一年级的学生进行了初步的项目检查(研究 1),发现四至五年级有 18 个项目、六至十一年级有 31 个项目符合预设标准。研究 2 对 10,479 名 4-11 年级的学生进行了扩展测试,并为高年级学生(6-11 年级)增加了 4 个评估与进食困难相关的障碍的项目,从而为 6-11 年级增加了总共 35 个项目。两个年级版本的所有项目均符合 IRT 和经典测验理论分析的预设标准,支持其在测量关注维度方面的优势。测量结果显示了良好的信度(子量表信度为 0.87 至 0.95)。此外,它还与标准症状测量、学校成绩、旷课情况和求助情况进行了比对,证明了其有效性。BEACON 似乎是一种心理测量方法,可用于学校心理健康问题筛查的第一阶段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Psychology
Journal of Clinical Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.30%
发文量
177
期刊介绍: Founded in 1945, the Journal of Clinical Psychology is a peer-reviewed forum devoted to research, assessment, and practice. Published eight times a year, the Journal includes research studies; articles on contemporary professional issues, single case research; brief reports (including dissertations in brief); notes from the field; and news and notes. In addition to papers on psychopathology, psychodiagnostics, and the psychotherapeutic process, the journal welcomes articles focusing on psychotherapy effectiveness research, psychological assessment and treatment matching, clinical outcomes, clinical health psychology, and behavioral medicine.
期刊最新文献
Moving beyond vulnerability and focusing on resilience: An intersectional posttraumatic growth model for LGBTQ+ people of color. Introduction to In Session special issue: Psychotherapy for complex PTSD Associations between avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder profiles and trauma exposure in veteran men and women Issue Information Clinical psychology, social identities and societal challenges: Implications for diversity-sensitive practice and training.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1