Associations between transdiagnostic traits of psychopathology and hybrid posttraumatic stress disorder factors in a trauma-exposed community sample

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Journal of traumatic stress Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.1002/jts.23023
Joel G. Sprunger, Jeffrey M. Girard, Kathleen M. Chard
{"title":"Associations between transdiagnostic traits of psychopathology and hybrid posttraumatic stress disorder factors in a trauma-exposed community sample","authors":"Joel G. Sprunger,&nbsp;Jeffrey M. Girard,&nbsp;Kathleen M. Chard","doi":"10.1002/jts.23023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Dimensional conceptualizations of psychopathology hold promise for understanding the high rates of comorbidity with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Linking PTSD symptoms to transdiagnostic dimensions of psychopathology may enable researchers and clinicians to understand the patterns and breadth of behavioral sequelae following traumatic experiences that may be shared with other psychiatric disorders. To explore this premise, we recruited a trauma-exposed online community sample (<i>N</i> = 462) and measured dimensional transdiagnostic traits of psychopathology using parceled facets derived from the Personality Inventory for <i>DSM-5</i> Faceted–Short Form. PTSD symptom factors were measured using the PTSD Checklist for <i>DSM-5</i> and derived using confirmatory factor analysis according to the seven-factor hybrid model (i.e., Intrusions, Avoidance, Negative Affect, Anhedonia, Externalizing Behaviors, Anxious Arousal, And Dysphoric Arousal). We observed hypothesized associations between PTSD factors and transdiagnostic traits indicating that some transdiagnostic dimensions were associated with nearly all PTSD symptom factors (e.g., emotional lability: <i>r</i><sub>mean</sub> = .35), whereas others showed more unique relationships (e.g., hostility–Externalizing Behavior: <i>r</i> = .60; hostility with other PTSD factors: <i>r</i>s = .12–.31). All PTSD factors were correlated with traits beyond those that would appear to be construct-relevant, suggesting the possibility of indirect associations that should be explicated in future research. The results indicate the breadth of trait-like consequences associated with PTSD symptom exacerbation, with implications for case conceptualization and treatment planning. Although PTSD is not a personality disorder, the findings indicate that increased PTSD factor severity is moderately associated with different patterns of trait-like disruptions in many areas of functioning.</p>","PeriodicalId":17519,"journal":{"name":"Journal of traumatic stress","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jts.23023","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of traumatic stress","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jts.23023","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dimensional conceptualizations of psychopathology hold promise for understanding the high rates of comorbidity with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Linking PTSD symptoms to transdiagnostic dimensions of psychopathology may enable researchers and clinicians to understand the patterns and breadth of behavioral sequelae following traumatic experiences that may be shared with other psychiatric disorders. To explore this premise, we recruited a trauma-exposed online community sample (N = 462) and measured dimensional transdiagnostic traits of psychopathology using parceled facets derived from the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Faceted–Short Form. PTSD symptom factors were measured using the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 and derived using confirmatory factor analysis according to the seven-factor hybrid model (i.e., Intrusions, Avoidance, Negative Affect, Anhedonia, Externalizing Behaviors, Anxious Arousal, And Dysphoric Arousal). We observed hypothesized associations between PTSD factors and transdiagnostic traits indicating that some transdiagnostic dimensions were associated with nearly all PTSD symptom factors (e.g., emotional lability: rmean = .35), whereas others showed more unique relationships (e.g., hostility–Externalizing Behavior: r = .60; hostility with other PTSD factors: rs = .12–.31). All PTSD factors were correlated with traits beyond those that would appear to be construct-relevant, suggesting the possibility of indirect associations that should be explicated in future research. The results indicate the breadth of trait-like consequences associated with PTSD symptom exacerbation, with implications for case conceptualization and treatment planning. Although PTSD is not a personality disorder, the findings indicate that increased PTSD factor severity is moderately associated with different patterns of trait-like disruptions in many areas of functioning.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
创伤暴露社区样本中精神病理学跨诊断特征与创伤后应激障碍混合因素之间的关联。
精神病理学的维度概念有望理解创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的高合并率。将创伤后应激障碍的症状与精神病理学的跨诊断维度联系起来,可以使研究人员和临床医生了解创伤经历后行为后遗症的模式和广度,这些后遗症可能与其他精神障碍具有共性。为了探索这一前提,我们招募了一个暴露于创伤的在线社区样本(N = 462),并使用从 DSM-5 面状短表人格问卷中提取的包裹面测量了精神病理学的跨诊断维度特征。创伤后应激障碍症状因子使用 DSM-5 的创伤后应激障碍核对表进行测量,并根据七因子混合模型(即侵扰、回避、负性情感、失乐症、外化行为、焦虑性唤醒和不安性唤醒)通过确证因子分析得出。我们观察到创伤后应激障碍因子与跨诊断特质之间的假设关联,表明某些跨诊断维度几乎与所有创伤后应激障碍症状因子相关(如情绪易变性:rmean = .35),而其他维度则表现出更为独特的关系(如敌意-外化行为:r = .60;敌意与其他创伤后应激障碍因子:rs = .12-.31)。所有创伤后应激障碍因子与特质的相关性都超出了那些似乎与构建相关的特质,这表明可能存在间接关联,应在今后的研究中加以解释。研究结果表明了与创伤后应激障碍症状加重相关的特质类后果的广泛性,并对病例概念化和治疗规划产生了影响。虽然创伤后应激障碍不是一种人格障碍,但研究结果表明,创伤后应激障碍因素严重程度的增加与许多功能领域的不同特质样破坏模式有中度关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
6.10%
发文量
125
期刊介绍: Journal of Traumatic Stress (JTS) is published for the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies. Journal of Traumatic Stress , the official publication for the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies, is an interdisciplinary forum for the publication of peer-reviewed original papers on biopsychosocial aspects of trauma. Papers focus on theoretical formulations, research, treatment, prevention education/training, and legal and policy concerns. Journal of Traumatic Stress serves as a primary reference for professionals who study and treat people exposed to highly stressful and traumatic events (directly or through their occupational roles), such as war, disaster, accident, violence or abuse (criminal or familial), hostage-taking, or life-threatening illness. The journal publishes original articles, brief reports, review papers, commentaries, and, from time to time, special issues devoted to a single topic.
期刊最新文献
The three axioms of resilience. A functional approach to defining and repairing moral injury: Evidence, change agents, clinical strategies, and lessons learned. Walking the line between fidelity and flexibility: A conceptual review of personalized approaches to manualized treatments for posttraumatic stress disorder. Medical traumatic stress: Integrating evidence-based clinical applications from health and trauma psychology. Conceptualizing disparities and differences in the psychobiology of traumatic stress.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1