Inefficacious drugs against covid-19: analysis of sales, tweets, and search engines.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Revista de saude publica Pub Date : 2024-02-26 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.11606/s1518-8787.2024058005413
Irineu de Brito Junior, Flaviane Azevedo Saraiva, Nathan de Campos Bruno, Roberto Fray da Silva, Celso Mitsuo Hino, Hugo Tsugunobu Yoshida Yoshizaki
{"title":"Inefficacious drugs against covid-19: analysis of sales, tweets, and search engines.","authors":"Irineu de Brito Junior, Flaviane Azevedo Saraiva, Nathan de Campos Bruno, Roberto Fray da Silva, Celso Mitsuo Hino, Hugo Tsugunobu Yoshida Yoshizaki","doi":"10.11606/s1518-8787.2024058005413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Assess the correlation between the sales of two drugs with no proven efficacy against covid-19, ivermectin and chloroquine, and other relevant variables, such as Google® searches, number of tweets related to these drugs, number of cases and deaths resulting from covid-19.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The methodology adopted in this study has four stages: data collection, data processing, exploratory data analysis, and correlation analysis. Spearman's method was used to obtain cross-correlations between each pair of variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results show similar behaviors between variables. Peaks occurred in the same or near periods. The exploratory data analysis showed shortage of chloroquine in the period corresponding to the beginning of advertising for the application of these drugs against covid-19. Both drugs showed a high and statistically significant correlation with the other variables. Also, some of them showed a higher correlation with drug sales when we employed a one-month lag. In the case of chloroquine, this was observed for the number of deaths. In the case of ivermectin, this was observed for the number of tweets, cases, and deaths.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results contribute to decision making in crisis management by governments, industries, and stores. In times of crisis, as observed during the covid-19 pandemic, some variables can help sales forecasting, especially Google® and tweets, which provide a real-time analysis of the situation. Monitoring social media platforms and search engines would allow the determination of drug use by the population and better prediction of potential peaks in the demand for these drugs.</p>","PeriodicalId":21230,"journal":{"name":"Revista de saude publica","volume":"58 ","pages":"06"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10926985/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de saude publica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2024058005413","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Assess the correlation between the sales of two drugs with no proven efficacy against covid-19, ivermectin and chloroquine, and other relevant variables, such as Google® searches, number of tweets related to these drugs, number of cases and deaths resulting from covid-19.

Methods: The methodology adopted in this study has four stages: data collection, data processing, exploratory data analysis, and correlation analysis. Spearman's method was used to obtain cross-correlations between each pair of variables.

Results: The results show similar behaviors between variables. Peaks occurred in the same or near periods. The exploratory data analysis showed shortage of chloroquine in the period corresponding to the beginning of advertising for the application of these drugs against covid-19. Both drugs showed a high and statistically significant correlation with the other variables. Also, some of them showed a higher correlation with drug sales when we employed a one-month lag. In the case of chloroquine, this was observed for the number of deaths. In the case of ivermectin, this was observed for the number of tweets, cases, and deaths.

Conclusions: The results contribute to decision making in crisis management by governments, industries, and stores. In times of crisis, as observed during the covid-19 pandemic, some variables can help sales forecasting, especially Google® and tweets, which provide a real-time analysis of the situation. Monitoring social media platforms and search engines would allow the determination of drug use by the population and better prediction of potential peaks in the demand for these drugs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
针对covid-19的无效药物:对销售、推特和搜索引擎的分析。
目的评估伊维菌素和氯喹这两种未经证实对柯维-19 有疗效的药物的销售额与其他相关变量(如 Google® 搜索、与这些药物相关的推文数量、柯维-19 导致的病例和死亡人数)之间的相关性:本研究采用的方法分为四个阶段:数据收集、数据处理、探索性数据分析和相关性分析。使用斯皮尔曼方法获得每对变量之间的交叉相关性:结果显示,变量之间的行为相似。峰值出现在同一时期或相近时期。探索性数据分析显示,氯喹短缺的时期与开始宣传应用这些药物防治 covid-19 的时期相对应。这两种药物与其他变量的相关性很高,在统计上也很显著。此外,当我们采用一个月的滞后期时,其中一些变量与药品销售额的相关性更高。就氯喹而言,在死亡人数方面就出现了这种情况。就伊维菌素而言,在推文、病例和死亡人数方面都出现了这种情况:这些结果有助于政府、行业和商店在危机管理中做出决策。在危机时期,如科维德-19 大流行期间,一些变量有助于销售预测,尤其是 Google® 和推文,它们提供了对形势的实时分析。通过监控社交媒体平台和搜索引擎,可以确定人群的药物使用情况,更好地预测这些药物的潜在需求高峰。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Revista de saude publica
Revista de saude publica PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.60%
发文量
93
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Revista de Saúde Pública has the purpose of publishing original scientific contributions on topics of relevance to public health in general.
期刊最新文献
ERRATUM. Public resources on the Brazilian Food and Nutrition Security agenda from 2000 to 2022. Burden of leptospirosis in Brazil in the last decade. Frailty and social network among older Brazilian adults: evidence from ELSI-Brazil. Patterns of self-rated health trajectories and associated factors in ELSA-Brasil.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1