Systematic Review of Instruments for the Assessment of Patient-Reported Outcomes and Quality of Life in Patients with Childhood Glaucoma

IF 2.8 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY Ophthalmology. Glaucoma Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ogla.2024.02.009
{"title":"Systematic Review of Instruments for the Assessment of Patient-Reported Outcomes and Quality of Life in Patients with Childhood Glaucoma","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ogla.2024.02.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Topic</h3><p>To identify patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) that have been used in children and adolescents with glaucoma and to evaluate their methodologic quality.</p></div><div><h3>Clinical relevance</h3><p>Childhood glaucoma impairs vision and quality of life (QoL) throughout all stages of life. Thus, a PROM needs to cover many different age groups and topics. Various instruments have been used to evaluate patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients with childhood glaucoma, however, it is unclear which PROM has the highest methodologic quality and complies best with the needs of patients with childhood glaucoma.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A systematic literature review was performed searching MEDLINE (PubMed), the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and PsycINFO (EBSCO). We included peer-reviewed full-text articles of the past 10 years in English, German, or Spanish language that reported PROMs in children with glaucoma. The study selection and methodologic quality assessment of the identified PROMs was performed by 2 independent reviewers using a 7-point checklist. The content was mapped onto the World Health Organization International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. The systematic review was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (ID CRD42022353936).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The search strategy retrieved 3295 matches. A total of 2901 studies were screened, and 11 relevant articles were identified using 10 different instruments. The instruments addressed functional visual ability, vision-related QoL, health-related QoL, and life satisfaction. Six instruments were applicable for the use in children. Seven of the questionnaires received the highest number of positive ratings (5/7). None of the instruments considered the views of patients with childhood glaucoma during their development.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This systematic review provides a descriptive catalog of vision-specific and generic health PRO instruments that have been used in childhood glaucoma cohorts. An instrument specifically developed for childhood glaucoma is lacking which might result in missing important factors, such as permanent treatment with eye drops, repeated surgeries, and heritability of the disease, when investigating the QoL in children with glaucoma.</p></div><div><h3>Financial Disclosure(s)</h3><p>Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19519,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmology. Glaucoma","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S258941962400036X/pdfft?md5=480f6cc723a0d2f9151c94bb010be6c1&pid=1-s2.0-S258941962400036X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmology. Glaucoma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S258941962400036X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Topic

To identify patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) that have been used in children and adolescents with glaucoma and to evaluate their methodologic quality.

Clinical relevance

Childhood glaucoma impairs vision and quality of life (QoL) throughout all stages of life. Thus, a PROM needs to cover many different age groups and topics. Various instruments have been used to evaluate patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients with childhood glaucoma, however, it is unclear which PROM has the highest methodologic quality and complies best with the needs of patients with childhood glaucoma.

Methods

A systematic literature review was performed searching MEDLINE (PubMed), the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and PsycINFO (EBSCO). We included peer-reviewed full-text articles of the past 10 years in English, German, or Spanish language that reported PROMs in children with glaucoma. The study selection and methodologic quality assessment of the identified PROMs was performed by 2 independent reviewers using a 7-point checklist. The content was mapped onto the World Health Organization International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. The systematic review was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (ID CRD42022353936).

Results

The search strategy retrieved 3295 matches. A total of 2901 studies were screened, and 11 relevant articles were identified using 10 different instruments. The instruments addressed functional visual ability, vision-related QoL, health-related QoL, and life satisfaction. Six instruments were applicable for the use in children. Seven of the questionnaires received the highest number of positive ratings (5/7). None of the instruments considered the views of patients with childhood glaucoma during their development.

Conclusion

This systematic review provides a descriptive catalog of vision-specific and generic health PRO instruments that have been used in childhood glaucoma cohorts. An instrument specifically developed for childhood glaucoma is lacking which might result in missing important factors, such as permanent treatment with eye drops, repeated surgeries, and heritability of the disease, when investigating the QoL in children with glaucoma.

Financial Disclosure(s)

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对评估儿童青光眼患者报告结果和生活质量的工具进行系统回顾。
主题:确定用于儿童和青少年青光眼患者的患者报告结果测量法(PROMs),并评估其方法学质量:临床相关性:儿童青光眼会损害视力和生活质量,并贯穿生命的各个阶段。因此,PROM 需要涵盖许多不同的年龄组和主题。已有多种工具用于评估儿童青光眼患者的患者报告结果,但目前还不清楚哪种 PROM 方法质量最高,最符合儿童青光眼患者的需求:我们检索了 MEDLINE (PubMed)、Cochrane 图书馆、Web of Science 和 PsycINFO (EBSCO),进行了系统性文献综述。我们收录了过去十年中报道青光眼患儿 PROMs 的英文、德文或西班牙文同行评审全文。两名独立审稿人使用七点核对表对已确定的 PROMs 进行了研究选择和方法学质量评估。研究内容被映射到世界卫生组织的《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》中。该系统性综述在 PROSPERO(ID CRD42022353936)上进行了前瞻性注册:结果:搜索策略检索到 3295 条匹配信息。筛选出 2901 项研究,并使用 10 种不同的工具确定了 11 篇相关文章。这些工具涉及视觉功能能力 (FVA)、视觉相关生活质量 (VRQoL)、健康相关生活质量 (HRQoL) 和生活满意度 (LS)。其中六种问卷适用于儿童。其中 7 份问卷获得了最多的好评(5/7)。这些工具在开发过程中均未考虑儿童青光眼患者的意见:本系统综述提供了在儿童青光眼群体中使用的视力特异性和通用健康PRO工具的描述性目录。目前还没有专门针对儿童青光眼开发的工具,这可能会导致在调查儿童青光眼患者的生活质量时遗漏一些重要因素,如长期滴眼药水、反复手术和疾病的遗传性等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ophthalmology. Glaucoma
Ophthalmology. Glaucoma OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
6.90%
发文量
140
审稿时长
46 days
期刊最新文献
Contents Editorial Board Advanced Imaging in Traumatic Glaucoma: Detection of Intralenticular Foreign Body Starstruck Lens: Iatrogenic Rosette Cataract and Its Spontaneous Resolution Unusual Posterior Capsular Pigmentation in Axenfeld–Rieger Anomaly
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1