Chapitre 1. Essais cliniques et bioéthique en Inde.

Philippe Frouté
{"title":"Chapitre 1. Essais cliniques et bioéthique en Inde.","authors":"Philippe Frouté","doi":"10.3917/jibes.343.0011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Since the 1990s, the pharmaceutical industry has been a major contributor to the economic growth of India. India is the world&#8217;s largest vaccines producer, and it attracts foreign direct investors who are relocating production capacities and research activities to develop new drugs in India. India, however, suffers from a lack of trust due to repeated scandals over clinical trials. Some of these scandals have led to economic sanctions, such as the withdrawal of hundreds of generic drugs from consumption in Europe in 2015. These measures followed irregularities detected in clinical trials carried out on volunteers. While India has taken steps to reform the bioethical institutions responsible for the control of clinical trials, we show in this contribution that loopholes persist. Two periods can be distinguished. The first period, between the early 2000s and 2013, gathers a significant growth in the number of clinical trials with a growth in bioethical scandals. It led the Indian government, under pressure from the civil society and the Supreme Court, to take action to curb clinical trials and to reform bioethical institutions. The second period, from 2013 to 2021, is characterised by an increase in the number of clinical trials in a context of strengthening the efficiency of bioethical institutions. We show that the increase in clinical trials is mainly due to the implementation of the TRIPs agreements on generic drugs. This development put another pressure on national vigilance authorities which remain undersized with respect to the magnitude of the Indian clinical trials market. It also highlights again the structural frailties of the Indian Federal System.</p>","PeriodicalId":73577,"journal":{"name":"Journal international de bioethique et d'ethique des sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal international de bioethique et d'ethique des sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3917/jibes.343.0011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since the 1990s, the pharmaceutical industry has been a major contributor to the economic growth of India. India is the world’s largest vaccines producer, and it attracts foreign direct investors who are relocating production capacities and research activities to develop new drugs in India. India, however, suffers from a lack of trust due to repeated scandals over clinical trials. Some of these scandals have led to economic sanctions, such as the withdrawal of hundreds of generic drugs from consumption in Europe in 2015. These measures followed irregularities detected in clinical trials carried out on volunteers. While India has taken steps to reform the bioethical institutions responsible for the control of clinical trials, we show in this contribution that loopholes persist. Two periods can be distinguished. The first period, between the early 2000s and 2013, gathers a significant growth in the number of clinical trials with a growth in bioethical scandals. It led the Indian government, under pressure from the civil society and the Supreme Court, to take action to curb clinical trials and to reform bioethical institutions. The second period, from 2013 to 2021, is characterised by an increase in the number of clinical trials in a context of strengthening the efficiency of bioethical institutions. We show that the increase in clinical trials is mainly due to the implementation of the TRIPs agreements on generic drugs. This development put another pressure on national vigilance authorities which remain undersized with respect to the magnitude of the Indian clinical trials market. It also highlights again the structural frailties of the Indian Federal System.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
第 1 章:印度的临床试验与生物伦理。
自 20 世纪 90 年代以来,制药业一直是印度经济增长的主要贡献者。印度是世界上最大的疫苗生产国,吸引着外国直接投资者将生产能力和研究活动转移到印度开发新药。然而,由于临床试验丑闻不断,印度缺乏信任。其中一些丑闻导致了经济制裁,如2015年欧洲撤消了数百种仿制药的消费。这些措施是在对志愿者进行的临床试验中发现违规行为后采取的。虽然印度已采取措施改革负责控制临床试验的生物伦理机构,但我们在这篇论文中指出,漏洞依然存在。可以分为两个时期。第一个时期是 2000 年代初至 2013 年,临床试验数量大幅增长,生物伦理丑闻也随之增加。这促使印度政府在民间社会和最高法院的压力下采取行动,遏制临床试验并改革生物伦理机构。第二阶段(2013 年至 2021 年)的特点是,在加强生物伦理机构效率的背景下,临床试验的数量有所增加。我们的研究表明,临床试验数量的增加主要是由于《与贸易有关的知识产权协议》(TRIPs)中关于非专利药协议的实施。与印度临床试验市场的规模相比,国家警戒机构的规模仍然不足。这也再次凸显了印度联邦制度的结构性缺陷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
C. Castets-Renard, J. Eynard, Un droit de l’intelligence artificielle, Bruylant, Bruxelles, 2023. Centre de recherche de l’Académie militaire de Saint-Cyr Coëtquidan et la Croix-Rouge française, Les enjeux de l’autonomie des systèmes d’armes létaux, Pédone, Paris, 2022. Chapitre 1. Essais cliniques et bioéthique en Inde. Chapitre 2. L’autonomisation des comités nationaux d’éthique de la recherche en Afrique : perspective historique et enjeux actuels. Chapitre 3. Inégalités dans le dépistage et la prévention du VIH/SIDA.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1