Long-term trajectories of clinical staging in first-episode psychosis and their associated cognitive outcome: A 21-year follow-up study.

Manuel J Cuesta, Ana M Sánchez-Torres, Lucia Moreno-Izco, Elena García de Jalón, Gustavo J Gil-Berrozpe, Victor Peralta, Alejandro Ballesteros, Lourdes Fañanás, Lucia Janda, Sergi Papiol, David Peralta, María Ribeiro, Ángela Rosero, Amalia Zarzuela, Eloi Giné, Esther Rosado
{"title":"Long-term trajectories of clinical staging in first-episode psychosis and their associated cognitive outcome: A 21-year follow-up study.","authors":"Manuel J Cuesta, Ana M Sánchez-Torres, Lucia Moreno-Izco, Elena García de Jalón, Gustavo J Gil-Berrozpe, Victor Peralta, Alejandro Ballesteros, Lourdes Fañanás, Lucia Janda, Sergi Papiol, David Peralta, María Ribeiro, Ángela Rosero, Amalia Zarzuela, Eloi Giné, Esther Rosado","doi":"10.1016/j.sjpmh.2024.02.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cognitive deficits are already present before psychosis onset but are a key feature of first-episode psychosis (FEP). The objective of this study was to investigate the cognitive outcomes of a cohort of FEP patients who were diagnosed using the clinical staging approach and were followed for up to 21 years. We analyzed data from 173 participants with first-admission psychosis who were followed-up for a mean of 20.9 years. The clinical staging assessment was adapted from the clinical staging framework developed by McGorry et al.<sup>1</sup> Cognitive assessment was performed using the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MMCB) at the end of follow-up. FEP patients who were longitudinally diagnosed in the lowest clinical stages (stages 2A and 2B) showed better performance in attention, processing speed, and MCCB overall composite score than those in the highest clinical stages (stages 4A and 4B). There was a significant linear trend association between worsening of all MCCB cognitive functions and MCCB overall composite score and progression in clinical staging. Furthermore, the interval between two and five years of follow-up appears to be associated with deficits in processing speed as a cognitive marker. Our results support the validation of the clinical staging model over a long-term course of FEP based on neuropsychological performance. A decline in some cognitive functions, such as processing speed, may facilitate the transition of patients to an advanced stage during the critical period of first-episode psychosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":101179,"journal":{"name":"Spanish Journal of Psychiatry and Mental Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spanish Journal of Psychiatry and Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjpmh.2024.02.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cognitive deficits are already present before psychosis onset but are a key feature of first-episode psychosis (FEP). The objective of this study was to investigate the cognitive outcomes of a cohort of FEP patients who were diagnosed using the clinical staging approach and were followed for up to 21 years. We analyzed data from 173 participants with first-admission psychosis who were followed-up for a mean of 20.9 years. The clinical staging assessment was adapted from the clinical staging framework developed by McGorry et al.1 Cognitive assessment was performed using the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MMCB) at the end of follow-up. FEP patients who were longitudinally diagnosed in the lowest clinical stages (stages 2A and 2B) showed better performance in attention, processing speed, and MCCB overall composite score than those in the highest clinical stages (stages 4A and 4B). There was a significant linear trend association between worsening of all MCCB cognitive functions and MCCB overall composite score and progression in clinical staging. Furthermore, the interval between two and five years of follow-up appears to be associated with deficits in processing speed as a cognitive marker. Our results support the validation of the clinical staging model over a long-term course of FEP based on neuropsychological performance. A decline in some cognitive functions, such as processing speed, may facilitate the transition of patients to an advanced stage during the critical period of first-episode psychosis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
首发精神病临床分期的长期轨迹及其相关认知结果:一项为期 21 年的随访研究。
认知缺陷在精神病发病前就已经存在,但却是首发精神病(FEP)的一个主要特征。本研究的目的是调查一组使用临床分期法诊断并随访长达 21 年的 FEP 患者的认知结果。我们分析了 173 名首次入院的精神病患者的数据,这些患者平均接受了 20.9 年的随访。临床分期评估改编自 McGorry 等人1 开发的临床分期框架。认知评估是在随访结束时使用 MATRICS 共识认知电池(MMCB)进行的。与临床分期最高的患者(4A和4B期)相比,被纵向诊断为临床分期最低的FEP患者(2A和2B期)在注意力、处理速度和MCCB总体综合得分方面表现更好。所有 MCCB 认知功能和 MCCB 综合评分的恶化与临床分期的进展之间存在明显的线性趋势关联。此外,两到五年的随访间隔似乎与作为认知标志的处理速度缺陷有关。我们的研究结果支持根据神经心理学表现对 FEP 长期病程的临床分期模型进行验证。某些认知功能(如处理速度)的下降可能会促使患者在首发精神病的关键时期过渡到晚期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Climate change and mental health: The urgent warning of Brazil and Spain's 2024 catastrophic floods. Prediction of pharmacological response in OCD using machine learning techniques and clinical and neuropsychological variables. Luis Martín-Santos: A multidimensional psychiatrist. Meta-analysis of the effects of adjuvant drugs in co-occurring bipolar and substance use disorder Validation study of the Spanish brief version of TEMPS-A
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1