Risk of vaccine preventable diseases in UK migrants: A serosurvey and concordance analysis

IF 3.9 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Migration and Health Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jmh.2024.100217
Mayuri Gogoi , Christopher A. Martin , Paul W. Bird , Martin J. Wiselka , Judi Gardener , Kate Ellis , Valerie Renals , Adam J. Lewszuk , Sally Hargreaves , Manish Pareek
{"title":"Risk of vaccine preventable diseases in UK migrants: A serosurvey and concordance analysis","authors":"Mayuri Gogoi ,&nbsp;Christopher A. Martin ,&nbsp;Paul W. Bird ,&nbsp;Martin J. Wiselka ,&nbsp;Judi Gardener ,&nbsp;Kate Ellis ,&nbsp;Valerie Renals ,&nbsp;Adam J. Lewszuk ,&nbsp;Sally Hargreaves ,&nbsp;Manish Pareek","doi":"10.1016/j.jmh.2024.100217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Vaccine preventable diseases (VPDs) such as measles and rubella cause significant morbidity and mortality globally every year. The World Health Organization (WHO), reported vaccine coverage for both measles and rubella to be 71 % in 2019, indicating an immunity gap. Migrants in the EU/EEA may be at high risk of VPDs due to under-immunisation and poor living conditions. However, there are limited data on VPD seroprotection rates amongst migrants living in the United Kingdom (UK).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted an exploratory cross-sectional serosurvey amongst a sample of adult migrants living in Leicester, UK to: (a) determine seroprotection rates for measles, varicella zoster, and rubella in this group; (b) identify risk factors associated with seronegativity and, (c) understand if self-reported vaccine or diseases history is an effective measure of seroprotection. Participants gave a blood sample and completed a questionnaire asking basic demographic details and vaccine and disease history for the three VPDs. We summarised the data using median and interquartile range (IQR) for non-parametric continuous variables and count and percentage for categorical variables. We used logistic regression to establish predictors of seroprotection against these diseases. We examined the reliability of self-reported vaccination/disease history for prediction of seroprotection through a concordance analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>149 migrants were included in the analysis. Seroprotection rates were: varicella zoster 98 %, rubella 92.6 % and measles 89.3 %. Increasing age was associated with seroprotection (OR 1.07 95 % CI 1.01–1.13 for each year increase in age). Migrants from Africa and the Middle East (aOR 15.16 95 % CI 1.31 - 175.06) and South/East Asia and Pacific regions (aOR 15.43 95 %CI 2.38 - 100.00) are significantly more likely to be seroprotected against measles as compared to migrants from Europe and Central Asia. The proportions of migrants unsure about their vaccination and disease history combined were 53.0 % for measles; 57.7 % for rubella; 43.0 % for varicella. There was no agreement between self-reported vaccination/disease history and serostatus.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our findings suggest lower levels of seroprotection against measles in migrants living in Leicester, UK, with younger migrants and those from Europe and Central Asia more likely to lack seroprotection. A high proportion of surveyed migrants were unaware of their vaccination/disease history and self-reported vaccine/disease was a poor predictor of seroprotection against VPDs which is important for clinical decision-making regarding catch-up vaccination in this population. Our results, although derived from a small sample, suggest that there may be gaps in seroimmunity for certain VPDs in particular migrant populations. These findings should inform future qualitative studies investigating barriers to vaccine uptake in migrants and population-level seroprevalence studies aimed at determining individualised risk profiles based on demographic and migration factors.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34448,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Migration and Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666623524000072/pdfft?md5=af99e35884ca593e5840986a4b7e97c0&pid=1-s2.0-S2666623524000072-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Migration and Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666623524000072","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Vaccine preventable diseases (VPDs) such as measles and rubella cause significant morbidity and mortality globally every year. The World Health Organization (WHO), reported vaccine coverage for both measles and rubella to be 71 % in 2019, indicating an immunity gap. Migrants in the EU/EEA may be at high risk of VPDs due to under-immunisation and poor living conditions. However, there are limited data on VPD seroprotection rates amongst migrants living in the United Kingdom (UK).

Methods

We conducted an exploratory cross-sectional serosurvey amongst a sample of adult migrants living in Leicester, UK to: (a) determine seroprotection rates for measles, varicella zoster, and rubella in this group; (b) identify risk factors associated with seronegativity and, (c) understand if self-reported vaccine or diseases history is an effective measure of seroprotection. Participants gave a blood sample and completed a questionnaire asking basic demographic details and vaccine and disease history for the three VPDs. We summarised the data using median and interquartile range (IQR) for non-parametric continuous variables and count and percentage for categorical variables. We used logistic regression to establish predictors of seroprotection against these diseases. We examined the reliability of self-reported vaccination/disease history for prediction of seroprotection through a concordance analysis.

Results

149 migrants were included in the analysis. Seroprotection rates were: varicella zoster 98 %, rubella 92.6 % and measles 89.3 %. Increasing age was associated with seroprotection (OR 1.07 95 % CI 1.01–1.13 for each year increase in age). Migrants from Africa and the Middle East (aOR 15.16 95 % CI 1.31 - 175.06) and South/East Asia and Pacific regions (aOR 15.43 95 %CI 2.38 - 100.00) are significantly more likely to be seroprotected against measles as compared to migrants from Europe and Central Asia. The proportions of migrants unsure about their vaccination and disease history combined were 53.0 % for measles; 57.7 % for rubella; 43.0 % for varicella. There was no agreement between self-reported vaccination/disease history and serostatus.

Conclusion

Our findings suggest lower levels of seroprotection against measles in migrants living in Leicester, UK, with younger migrants and those from Europe and Central Asia more likely to lack seroprotection. A high proportion of surveyed migrants were unaware of their vaccination/disease history and self-reported vaccine/disease was a poor predictor of seroprotection against VPDs which is important for clinical decision-making regarding catch-up vaccination in this population. Our results, although derived from a small sample, suggest that there may be gaps in seroimmunity for certain VPDs in particular migrant populations. These findings should inform future qualitative studies investigating barriers to vaccine uptake in migrants and population-level seroprevalence studies aimed at determining individualised risk profiles based on demographic and migration factors.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
英国移民患疫苗可预防疾病的风险:血清调查和一致性分析
背景麻疹和风疹等疫苗可预防疾病(VPDs)每年在全球范围内造成严重的发病率和死亡率。据世界卫生组织(WHO)报告,2019 年麻疹和风疹的疫苗接种率为 71%,这表明存在免疫空白。欧盟/欧洲经济区的移民可能因免疫接种不足和生活条件恶劣而面临罹患 VPD 的高风险。我们对居住在英国莱斯特的成年移民样本进行了一次探索性横断面血清调查,目的是:(a) 确定血清保护率;(b) 对血清保护率进行评估;(c) 对血清保护率进行评估;(d) 对血清保护率进行评估:(a) 确定该群体的麻疹、水痘带状疱疹和风疹血清保护率;(b) 确定与血清阴性相关的风险因素;(c) 了解自我报告的疫苗接种史或疾病史是否是衡量血清保护率的有效方法。参与者提供了一份血样,并填写了一份问卷,其中询问了基本的人口统计学细节以及三种流行性腮腺炎的疫苗接种史和疾病史。对于非参数连续变量,我们使用中位数和四分位数间距(IQR)对数据进行总结;对于分类变量,我们使用计数和百分比对数据进行总结。我们使用逻辑回归法来确定这些疾病的血清保护预测因子。通过一致性分析,我们检验了自我报告的疫苗接种/疾病史在预测血清保护率方面的可靠性。血清保护率分别为:水痘带状疱疹 98%、风疹 92.6% 和麻疹 89.3%。年龄的增加与血清保护率有关(年龄每增加一岁,OR 1.07 95 % CI 1.01-1.13)。与来自欧洲和中亚的移民相比,来自非洲和中东地区(aOR 15.16 95 %CI 1.31 - 175.06)以及南亚/东南亚和太平洋地区(aOR 15.43 95 %CI 2.38 - 100.00)的移民更有可能获得麻疹血清保护。不确定接种疫苗和疾病史的移民比例分别为:麻疹 53.0%;风疹 57.7%;水痘 43.0%。我们的研究结果表明,居住在英国莱斯特的移民对麻疹的血清保护水平较低,年轻移民以及来自欧洲和中亚的移民更有可能缺乏血清保护。接受调查的移民中有很大一部分人不知道自己的疫苗接种/疾病史,而自我报告的疫苗接种/疾病史并不能很好地预测对VPDs的血清保护水平,这对该人群补种疫苗的临床决策非常重要。我们的研究结果虽然来自于一个小样本,但表明在特定的流动人口中,对某些 VPDs 的血清免疫可能存在差距。这些发现应为今后调查移民接种疫苗障碍的定性研究和旨在根据人口和移民因素确定个性化风险概况的人群血清流行率研究提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Migration and Health
Journal of Migration and Health Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
8.70%
发文量
65
审稿时长
153 days
期刊最新文献
Violence Against Women and its Effects on Mental Health and Quality of Life: A Study of Myanmar Migrant Workers in Central Thailand Everyday discrimination, co-ethnic social support and mood changes in young adult immigrants in Germany–Evidence from an ecological momentary assessment study Factors contributing to the mental wellbeing of Afghan migrants in Iran during the COVID-19 pandemic Exploring the impact of preconception care and unintended pregnancy on access to antenatal healthcare services among Rohingya women: Insights from a cross-sectional survey Sexual and reproductive health and rights of migrant women attending primary care in England: A population-based cohort study of 1.2 million individuals of reproductive age (2009–2018)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1