Structural behaviour of reinforced concrete beams containing recycled polyethylene terephthalate and sugarcane bagasse ash

IF 2.2 Q2 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Applications in engineering science Pub Date : 2024-02-27 DOI:10.1016/j.apples.2024.100178
Chukwuemeka Daniel , Richard Ocharo Onchiri , Benard Otieno Omondi
{"title":"Structural behaviour of reinforced concrete beams containing recycled polyethylene terephthalate and sugarcane bagasse ash","authors":"Chukwuemeka Daniel ,&nbsp;Richard Ocharo Onchiri ,&nbsp;Benard Otieno Omondi","doi":"10.1016/j.apples.2024.100178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Concrete is a widely used construction product. This product is presently concerned with the depleting nature of natural sand. Concrete is also being considered with supplementary materials to enhance its footprints. Hence, this study's goal is to examine the performance of reinforced concrete (RC) beams consisting of sustainable materials. The study seeks to qualify the use of concrete made using Sugarcane Bagasse Ash (SCBA) and Recycled Polyethylene Terephthalate (RPET) as structural elements. Proportionately, 10 % RPET is used to partially substitute sand, and 5 % SCBA is used to partially substitute cement. The innovation of this study is in the dual substitution approach and structural behaviour examination. The research probes how RPET and SCBA affect the RC beams’ flexural and shear capacities. The tests are completed ensuing 28 days of water curing. Three RC beams are made for each of the conventional concrete and SCBA-RPET concrete. A set of beams is made for the shear capacity test, while another set is made to examine flexural capacity. The beam dimensions are 160 × 200 × 1200mm<sup>3</sup>. The findings inform that the beams made with 5 % SCBA and 10 % RPET have a flexural capacity of 11 % less than the conventional beams'. However, the SCBA-RPET beams revealed a shear capacity that is 17.38 % more than the conventional beams'. The crack patterns during and after the shear and flexural strength tests are similar and comparable for the SCBA-RPET beams and the conventional beams. Thus, a sustainable concrete mix suitable for use as a structural beam is derived.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72251,"journal":{"name":"Applications in engineering science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666496824000049/pdfft?md5=0c3c2e5e43cc4a2fcb24bf40cfcb5275&pid=1-s2.0-S2666496824000049-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applications in engineering science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666496824000049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Concrete is a widely used construction product. This product is presently concerned with the depleting nature of natural sand. Concrete is also being considered with supplementary materials to enhance its footprints. Hence, this study's goal is to examine the performance of reinforced concrete (RC) beams consisting of sustainable materials. The study seeks to qualify the use of concrete made using Sugarcane Bagasse Ash (SCBA) and Recycled Polyethylene Terephthalate (RPET) as structural elements. Proportionately, 10 % RPET is used to partially substitute sand, and 5 % SCBA is used to partially substitute cement. The innovation of this study is in the dual substitution approach and structural behaviour examination. The research probes how RPET and SCBA affect the RC beams’ flexural and shear capacities. The tests are completed ensuing 28 days of water curing. Three RC beams are made for each of the conventional concrete and SCBA-RPET concrete. A set of beams is made for the shear capacity test, while another set is made to examine flexural capacity. The beam dimensions are 160 × 200 × 1200mm3. The findings inform that the beams made with 5 % SCBA and 10 % RPET have a flexural capacity of 11 % less than the conventional beams'. However, the SCBA-RPET beams revealed a shear capacity that is 17.38 % more than the conventional beams'. The crack patterns during and after the shear and flexural strength tests are similar and comparable for the SCBA-RPET beams and the conventional beams. Thus, a sustainable concrete mix suitable for use as a structural beam is derived.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
含有回收聚对苯二甲酸乙二醇酯和甘蔗渣灰的钢筋混凝土梁的结构行为
混凝土是一种广泛使用的建筑产品。目前,这种产品正受到天然砂枯竭问题的困扰。此外,人们还考虑使用辅助材料来增加混凝土的使用面积。因此,本研究的目标是考察由可持续材料组成的钢筋混凝土(RC)梁的性能。本研究旨在验证使用甘蔗渣灰(SCBA)和回收聚对苯二甲酸乙二酯(RPET)作为结构元素的混凝土的使用效果。按比例,10% 的 RPET 可部分替代沙子,5% 的 SCBA 可部分替代水泥。这项研究的创新之处在于双重替代方法和结构行为检查。研究探讨了 RPET 和 SCBA 如何影响 RC 梁的抗弯和抗剪能力。测试在水养护 28 天后完成。传统混凝土和 SCBA-RPET 混凝土各制作了三根 RC 梁。一组用于剪切能力测试,另一组用于抗弯能力测试。梁的尺寸为 160 × 200 × 1200mm3。研究结果表明,使用 5% 的 SCBA 和 10% 的 RPET 制作的梁的抗弯能力比传统梁低 11%。然而,SCBA-RPET 梁的抗剪能力比传统梁高 17.38%。SCBA-RPET 梁和传统梁在剪切和抗弯强度测试期间和测试后的裂缝形态相似,具有可比性。因此,我们得出了一种适合用作结构梁的可持续混凝土混合物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Applications in engineering science
Applications in engineering science Mechanical Engineering
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
68 days
期刊最新文献
Numerical simulation of open channel basaltic lava flow through topographical bends An experimental study on heat transfer using electrohydrodynamics (EHD) over a heated vertical plate. Lattice Boltzmann simulations of unsteady Bingham fluid flows Thermo-fluid performance of axially perforated multiple rectangular flow deflector-type baffle plate in an tubular heat exchanger H(div)-conforming and discontinuous Galerkin approach for Herschel–Bulkley flow with density-dependent viscosity and yield stress
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1