Scale issues in runoff and sediment delivery (SIRSD): A systematic review and bibliometric analysis

IF 10.8 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Earth-Science Reviews Pub Date : 2024-02-27 DOI:10.1016/j.earscirev.2024.104729
Qihua Ke, Keli Zhang
{"title":"Scale issues in runoff and sediment delivery (SIRSD): A systematic review and bibliometric analysis","authors":"Qihua Ke,&nbsp;Keli Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.earscirev.2024.104729","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Water erosion, a notorious major threat to food security and ecosystem sustainability, is strongly conditioned by spatial and temporal scale effects. This paper systematically reviews the scale issues in runoff and sediment delivery (SIRSD) as a research field by integrating the traditional review approach and bibliometric analysis. This review summarises SIRSD's roots and the scale effect on runoff and sediment delivery. Then, we provide quantitative insights into the SIRSD domain's development history, thematic structure, geographic distribution, international cooperation, and methodologies. Findings show that: i) SIRSD arises from the gap between the non-linearity of runoff and sediment delivery across scales and our ability to measure it. Point-based and short-term measurements cannot capture the non-linearities from the spatio-temporal heterogeneities and cross-scale interactions of factors or processes. ii) Previous literature provides evidence that the spatial scaling of specific runoff (<em>r</em>), soil erosion (<em>SE</em>), sediment yield (<em>SSY</em>), or sediment delivery ratio (<em>SDR</em>) with drainage area (<em>A</em>) or slope length (<em>L</em>) exhibits contrasting patterns due to distinct mechanisms. Infiltration-excess and saturation-excess processes account for inverse and positive <em>r</em>-<em>A</em> relations, respectively. Interrill-erosion and rill-erosion cause inverse and positive <em>SE-L</em> relations. Hillslope-erosion and channel/bank-erosion explain inverse and positive <em>SSY-A</em> relations. Downstream increasing deposition and additional sediment inputs drive inverse and positive <em>SDR-A</em> relations. These scaling relationships can be nonlinear or complex due to spatial heterogeneities in land use, vegetation, topography, climate, lithology, and soil characteristics. Hence, applying an empirical scaling equation developed from the region with distinct environmental contexts is not recommended. Furthermore, the existing scaling patterns or equations may require updating given global climate and land use change. iii) SIRSD is a complex and multidisciplinary issue investigated by scientists from 93 countries since 1928. International research has substantially facilitated the understanding of SIRSD; still, more collaboration should focus on less-developed countries with high soil and water loss risks and urgent conservation needs, such as those in Africa and South America under cropland expansion. iv) Scale mismatch and scale break have discredited large-scale erosion and sediment assessments. Incorporating gully and bank erosion into modelling, extending the scale range of the <em>L</em> factor, and expanding the sediment scaling scope from watershed to slope may make a difference. Therefore, more research with nested design incorporating multiple scales is necessary for cross-scale analysis and scalable modelling. Addressing global climate change requires improving real-time urban flood forecasting and integrating downscaled climate models with hydrology, erosion, and sediment transport models.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11483,"journal":{"name":"Earth-Science Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":10.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth-Science Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0012825224000564","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Water erosion, a notorious major threat to food security and ecosystem sustainability, is strongly conditioned by spatial and temporal scale effects. This paper systematically reviews the scale issues in runoff and sediment delivery (SIRSD) as a research field by integrating the traditional review approach and bibliometric analysis. This review summarises SIRSD's roots and the scale effect on runoff and sediment delivery. Then, we provide quantitative insights into the SIRSD domain's development history, thematic structure, geographic distribution, international cooperation, and methodologies. Findings show that: i) SIRSD arises from the gap between the non-linearity of runoff and sediment delivery across scales and our ability to measure it. Point-based and short-term measurements cannot capture the non-linearities from the spatio-temporal heterogeneities and cross-scale interactions of factors or processes. ii) Previous literature provides evidence that the spatial scaling of specific runoff (r), soil erosion (SE), sediment yield (SSY), or sediment delivery ratio (SDR) with drainage area (A) or slope length (L) exhibits contrasting patterns due to distinct mechanisms. Infiltration-excess and saturation-excess processes account for inverse and positive r-A relations, respectively. Interrill-erosion and rill-erosion cause inverse and positive SE-L relations. Hillslope-erosion and channel/bank-erosion explain inverse and positive SSY-A relations. Downstream increasing deposition and additional sediment inputs drive inverse and positive SDR-A relations. These scaling relationships can be nonlinear or complex due to spatial heterogeneities in land use, vegetation, topography, climate, lithology, and soil characteristics. Hence, applying an empirical scaling equation developed from the region with distinct environmental contexts is not recommended. Furthermore, the existing scaling patterns or equations may require updating given global climate and land use change. iii) SIRSD is a complex and multidisciplinary issue investigated by scientists from 93 countries since 1928. International research has substantially facilitated the understanding of SIRSD; still, more collaboration should focus on less-developed countries with high soil and water loss risks and urgent conservation needs, such as those in Africa and South America under cropland expansion. iv) Scale mismatch and scale break have discredited large-scale erosion and sediment assessments. Incorporating gully and bank erosion into modelling, extending the scale range of the L factor, and expanding the sediment scaling scope from watershed to slope may make a difference. Therefore, more research with nested design incorporating multiple scales is necessary for cross-scale analysis and scalable modelling. Addressing global climate change requires improving real-time urban flood forecasting and integrating downscaled climate models with hydrology, erosion, and sediment transport models.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
径流和沉积物输送(SIRSD)的规模问题:系统综述和文献计量分析
水土流失是对粮食安全和生态系统可持续性的一个众所周知的主要威胁,它受到空间和时间尺度效应的强烈制约。本文结合传统的综述方法和文献计量分析,对径流与泥沙输移(SIRSD)这一研究领域的尺度问题进行了系统综述。本综述总结了 SIRSD 的起源以及径流和泥沙输送的尺度效应。然后,我们对 SIRSD 领域的发展历史、主题结构、地理分布、国际合作和方法论进行了定量分析。研究结果表明:i) SIRSD 的产生源于不同尺度的径流和泥沙输送的非线性与我们的测量能力之间的差距。ii) 以前的文献提供的证据表明,特定径流(r)、土壤侵蚀(SE)、沉积物产 量(SSY)或沉积物输运比(SDR)与排水面积(A)或坡长(L)的空间比例 表现出截然不同的模式,这是由于不同的机制造成的。渗透-过度和饱和-过度过程分别导致了反向和正向的 r-A 关系。间歇侵蚀和碾压侵蚀造成了反向和正向的 SE-L 关系。山坡侵蚀和河道/堤坝侵蚀可解释反向和正向的 SSY-A 关系。下游不断增加的沉积和额外的沉积物输入会导致反比和正比的 SDR-A 关系。由于土地利用、植被、地形、气候、岩性和土壤特性的空间异质性,这些比例关系可能是非线性或复杂的。因此,不建议使用从具有不同环境背景的地区开发的经验缩放方程。iii) 自 1928 年以来,93 个国家的科学家对 SIRSD 这一复杂的多学科问题进行了研究。国际研究极大地促进了对 SIRSD 的理解;但更多的合作仍应集中在水土流失风险高、保护需求迫切的欠发达国家,如耕地扩张中的非洲和南美国家。将沟谷和河岸侵蚀纳入建模、扩大 L 因子的尺度范围以及将沉积物尺度范围从流域扩大到斜坡可能会有所改观。因此,有必要开展更多包含多种尺度的嵌套设计研究,以进行跨尺度分析和可扩展建模。应对全球气候变化需要改进实时城市洪水预报,并将缩小尺度的气候模型与水文、侵蚀和泥沙输运模型相结合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Earth-Science Reviews
Earth-Science Reviews 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
21.70
自引率
5.80%
发文量
294
审稿时长
15.1 weeks
期刊介绍: Covering a much wider field than the usual specialist journals, Earth Science Reviews publishes review articles dealing with all aspects of Earth Sciences, and is an important vehicle for allowing readers to see their particular interest related to the Earth Sciences as a whole.
期刊最新文献
Peat fires and legacy toxic metal release: An integrative biogeochemical and ecohydrological conceptual framework Microplastics Aloft: A comprehensive exploration of sources, transport, variations, interactions and their implications on human health in the atmospheric realm Degradation and local growth of “Xing'an-Baikal” permafrost responding to climate warming and the consequences Deposition and termination of Neoproterozoic iron formations (NIFs): New insights from NIFs in China Mantle-rooted fluid pathways and world-class gold mineralization in the giant Jiaodong gold province: Insights from integrated deep seismic reflection and tectonics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1