Atterberg limits of baseball infield soils containing over-size particles, Part II: effects of sand angularity and uniformity

IF 1.2 4区 农林科学 Q4 SOIL SCIENCE Soil Research Pub Date : 2024-02-26 DOI:10.1071/sr23030
Evan Christopher Mascitti, Andrew Scott McNitt, Patrick J. Drohan
{"title":"Atterberg limits of baseball infield soils containing over-size particles, Part II: effects of sand angularity and uniformity","authors":"Evan Christopher Mascitti, Andrew Scott McNitt, Patrick J. Drohan","doi":"10.1071/sr23030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<strong> Context</strong><p>Atterberg limit tests may be useful for evaluating baseball infield soils because these tests directly link soil behaviour to water content. Prior research has demonstrated that the liquid and plastic limits (LL and PL) of sand-clay mixtures are affected by sand properties. However, these studies have used sand exclusively &lt;425 μm and little attention has been devoted to sand angularity or sand-size uniformity.</p><strong> Aims</strong><p>This research tested the effects of sand angularity and sand-size uniformity on the Atterberg limits of infield mixes containing 0–80% sand with much of the sand 425–2000 μm.</p><strong> Methods</strong><p>Experiment 1 compared the effect of mixing angular or round sand of equivalent size with a kaolinitic clay. Experiment 2 compared the effect of mixing one of two sands having a similar average particle size but varying uniformity with an illitic clay.</p><strong> Key results</strong><p>For mixes having equivalent sand content and sand size, the shape of the sand particles did not affect LL (<i>P</i> = 0.47) or PL (<i>P</i> = 0.80). Mixtures with non-uniform sand yielded higher LL than those with uniform sand (mean difference ~0.6% water content g g<sup>−1</sup>). The mixtures with non-uniform sand also remained plastic at higher sand content (~72.5%) than mixtures with uniform sand (~67.5%). Calculated threshold sand contents for the two sets of mixtures agreed closely with the experiments.</p><strong> Conclusions</strong><p>Sand angularity was shown to be unimportant in this context. When average particle size was held constant, sand uniformity affected the LL water content and the sand content corresponding to a transition between plastic and non-plastic behaviour.</p><strong> Implications</strong><p>This research suggests that baseball field managers need not consider the angularity of sand in an infield mix but should be aware of the uniformity of the sand used to produce the mix as this may influence the mixture’s plasticity.</p>","PeriodicalId":21818,"journal":{"name":"Soil Research","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/sr23030","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context

Atterberg limit tests may be useful for evaluating baseball infield soils because these tests directly link soil behaviour to water content. Prior research has demonstrated that the liquid and plastic limits (LL and PL) of sand-clay mixtures are affected by sand properties. However, these studies have used sand exclusively <425 μm and little attention has been devoted to sand angularity or sand-size uniformity.

Aims

This research tested the effects of sand angularity and sand-size uniformity on the Atterberg limits of infield mixes containing 0–80% sand with much of the sand 425–2000 μm.

Methods

Experiment 1 compared the effect of mixing angular or round sand of equivalent size with a kaolinitic clay. Experiment 2 compared the effect of mixing one of two sands having a similar average particle size but varying uniformity with an illitic clay.

Key results

For mixes having equivalent sand content and sand size, the shape of the sand particles did not affect LL (P = 0.47) or PL (P = 0.80). Mixtures with non-uniform sand yielded higher LL than those with uniform sand (mean difference ~0.6% water content g g−1). The mixtures with non-uniform sand also remained plastic at higher sand content (~72.5%) than mixtures with uniform sand (~67.5%). Calculated threshold sand contents for the two sets of mixtures agreed closely with the experiments.

Conclusions

Sand angularity was shown to be unimportant in this context. When average particle size was held constant, sand uniformity affected the LL water content and the sand content corresponding to a transition between plastic and non-plastic behaviour.

Implications

This research suggests that baseball field managers need not consider the angularity of sand in an infield mix but should be aware of the uniformity of the sand used to produce the mix as this may influence the mixture’s plasticity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
含有过大颗粒的棒球内场土壤的阿特伯极限,第二部分:砂的棱角和均匀性的影响
背景阿特伯格极限测试可用于评估棒球内场土壤,因为这些测试将土壤性质与含水量直接联系起来。先前的研究表明,砂粘土混合物的液限和塑限(LL 和 PL)会受到砂特性的影响。然而,这些研究仅使用了 425 μm 的砂,很少关注砂的棱角或砂粒大小的均匀性。目的本研究测试了砂的角度和砂粒大小均匀性对内场混合料阿特伯极限的影响,内场混合料含有 0-80% 的砂,其中大部分砂的粒径为 425-2000 μm。方法实验 1 比较了等粒度的角砂或圆砂与高岭土混合的效果。实验 2 比较了将平均粒径相似但均匀度不同的两种砂中的一种与伊利石粘土混合的效果。主要结果对于具有相同含沙量和沙粒大小的混合物,沙粒的形状不会影响 LL(P = 0.47)或 PL(P = 0.80)。砂粒不均匀的混合物的沥青含量高于砂粒均匀的混合物(平均相差约 0.6% 含水量 g-1)。与均匀砂混合物(约 67.5%)相比,非均匀砂混合物在较高含沙量(约 72.5%)时仍具有可塑性。两组混合物的计算阈值含沙量与实验结果非常吻合。结论在这种情况下,砂的棱角并不重要。在平均粒径保持不变的情况下,砂的均匀性会影响 LL 含水量和砂含量,从而导致塑性和非塑性行为之间的过渡。意义这项研究表明,棒球场管理人员无需考虑内场混合料中沙子的棱角,但应注意用于生产混合料的沙子的均匀性,因为这可能会影响混合料的可塑性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Soil Research
Soil Research SOIL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
6.20%
发文量
35
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Soil Research (formerly known as Australian Journal of Soil Research) is an international journal that aims to rapidly publish high-quality, novel research about fundamental and applied aspects of soil science. As well as publishing in traditional aspects of soil biology, soil physics and soil chemistry across terrestrial ecosystems, the journal welcomes manuscripts dealing with wider interactions of soils with the environment. Soil Research is published with the endorsement of the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) and the Australian Academy of Science.
期刊最新文献
Gypsum form and rate can affect soil physicochemical properties and crop productivity in soils of low electrical conductivity that have been enriched by sodium due to supplementary irrigation Analysis of soil erosion dynamics and its driving factors in the Qilian Mountains of Qingdong Modified fungal diversity in dense clay subsoils after deep-banding organic substrate Effects of wetting and drying alternation on the shear properties of root-loess composites Spatial and temporal distribution and environmental determinants of freeze-thaw erosion intensity in Qiangtang grasslands, China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1