Some effects of domain size and boundary conditions on the accuracy of airfoil simulations

IF 2.9 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL Advances in Aerodynamics Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.1186/s42774-023-00163-z
Narges Golmirzaee, David H. Wood
{"title":"Some effects of domain size and boundary conditions on the accuracy of airfoil simulations","authors":"Narges Golmirzaee, David H. Wood","doi":"10.1186/s42774-023-00163-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper investigates a specific case of one of the most popular fluid dynamic simulations, the incompressible flow around an airfoil (NACA 0012 here) at a high Reynolds number ( $$6 \\times 10^6$$ ). OpenFOAM software was used to study the effect of domain size and four common choices of boundary conditions on airfoil lift, drag, surface friction, and pressure. We also examine the relation between boundary conditions and the velocity, pressure, and vorticity distributions throughout the domain. In addition to the common boundary conditions, we implement the “point vortex” boundary condition that was introduced many years ago but is now rarely used. We also applied the point vortex condition for the outlet pressure instead of using the traditional Neumann condition. With the airfoil generating significant lift at incidence angles of $$5^\\circ , 10^\\circ$$ , and $$14^\\circ$$ , we confirm a previous finding that the boundary conditions combine with domain size to produce an induced (pressure) drag. The change in the pressure drag with domain size is significant for the commonly-used boundary conditions but is much smaller for the point vortex alternative. The point vortex boundary condition increases the execution time, but this is more than offset by the reduction in domain size needed to achieve a specified accuracy in the lift and drag. This study also estimates the error in total drag and lift due to domain size and shows it can be almost eliminated using the point vortex boundary condition. We also used the impulse form of the momentum equations to study the relation between drag and lift and spurious vorticity, which is generated as a result of using non-exact boundary conditions. These equations reveal that the spurious vorticity throughout the domain is associated with cancelling circulation around the domain boundaries.","PeriodicalId":33737,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Aerodynamics","volume":"101 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Aerodynamics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42774-023-00163-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper investigates a specific case of one of the most popular fluid dynamic simulations, the incompressible flow around an airfoil (NACA 0012 here) at a high Reynolds number ( $$6 \times 10^6$$ ). OpenFOAM software was used to study the effect of domain size and four common choices of boundary conditions on airfoil lift, drag, surface friction, and pressure. We also examine the relation between boundary conditions and the velocity, pressure, and vorticity distributions throughout the domain. In addition to the common boundary conditions, we implement the “point vortex” boundary condition that was introduced many years ago but is now rarely used. We also applied the point vortex condition for the outlet pressure instead of using the traditional Neumann condition. With the airfoil generating significant lift at incidence angles of $$5^\circ , 10^\circ$$ , and $$14^\circ$$ , we confirm a previous finding that the boundary conditions combine with domain size to produce an induced (pressure) drag. The change in the pressure drag with domain size is significant for the commonly-used boundary conditions but is much smaller for the point vortex alternative. The point vortex boundary condition increases the execution time, but this is more than offset by the reduction in domain size needed to achieve a specified accuracy in the lift and drag. This study also estimates the error in total drag and lift due to domain size and shows it can be almost eliminated using the point vortex boundary condition. We also used the impulse form of the momentum equations to study the relation between drag and lift and spurious vorticity, which is generated as a result of using non-exact boundary conditions. These equations reveal that the spurious vorticity throughout the domain is associated with cancelling circulation around the domain boundaries.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
域尺寸和边界条件对机翼模拟精度的一些影响
本文研究了最流行的流体动力学模拟之一的一个具体案例,即高雷诺数($$6 \times 10^6$$)下机翼(此处为 NACA 0012)周围的不可压缩流动。我们使用 OpenFOAM 软件研究了领域大小和四种常见边界条件对机翼升力、阻力、表面摩擦力和压力的影响。我们还研究了边界条件与整个域的速度、压力和涡度分布之间的关系。除了常见的边界条件外,我们还实施了 "点涡流 "边界条件,该条件多年前就已提出,但现在已很少使用。我们还对出口压力采用了点涡流条件,而不是传统的诺依曼条件。机翼在入射角为 $$5^\circ$ 、10^\circ$$ 和 $$14^\circ$ 时会产生很大的升力,我们证实了之前的一个发现,即边界条件与域尺寸相结合会产生诱导(压力)阻力。对于常用的边界条件来说,压力阻力随领域大小的变化是显著的,但对于点涡旋替代方案来说,这种变化要小得多。点涡流边界条件增加了执行时间,但为了达到指定的升力和阻力精度,减少了所需的域尺寸,因此抵消了增加的执行时间。本研究还估算了由于域大小造成的总阻力和升力误差,结果表明使用点涡流边界条件几乎可以消除这种误差。我们还利用动量方程的脉冲形式研究了阻力和升力与虚假涡度之间的关系,虚假涡度是由于使用非精确边界条件而产生的。这些方程显示,整个域内的虚假涡度与域边界周围的抵消环流有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
35
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Multiscale simulation of rarefied gas dynamics via direct intermittent GSIS-DSMC coupling On the effects of non-zero yaw on leading-edge tubercled wings Wind-resistant design theory and safety guarantee for large oil and gas storage tanks in coastal areas Open-jet facility for bio-inspired micro-air-vehicle flight experiment at low speed and high turbulence intensity Numerical simulation and analysis of a ducted-fan drone hovering in confined environments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1