Chemical oxidation as an alternative for  municipal wastewater secondary treatment: a review

IF 8.6 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology Pub Date : 2024-02-29 DOI:10.1007/s11157-024-09684-5
Alex Booton, Brooke K. Mayer, Daniel H. Zitomer
{"title":"Chemical oxidation as an alternative for  municipal wastewater secondary treatment: a review","authors":"Alex Booton,&nbsp;Brooke K. Mayer,&nbsp;Daniel H. Zitomer","doi":"10.1007/s11157-024-09684-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Activated sludge has been widely adopted as the cornerstone of conventional sewage treatment for over 50 years. This process can reduce biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) in wastewater and protect public health, with many systems able to remove nutrients as well. While activated sludge continues to satisfy many treatment targets, the demands on wastewater treatment are changing. There are concerns that toxic and difficult-to-degrade contaminants are contributing to environmental and human health issues. There is also increasing interest in potable reuse to strengthen water resiliency and the waste-to-resource paradigm; however, when biological secondary treatment is used, additional treatment is needed for reuse. Chemical oxidation may be an effective alternative to activated sludge to destroy difficult-to-degrade contaminants. Compared to biological systems, chemical oxidation may also be easier to operate and maintain, requiring less space for more effective treatment. This article presents a critical review of current activated sludge-based sewage treatment practices and explores the opportunity to replace biological secondary wastewater treatment with chemical oxidation. Some opportunities include the ability of chemical oxidation to degrade contaminants of emerging concern (CECs); rapid start up and shut down; and avoidance of issues associated with biological treatment such as toxic loadings, biomass washout, difficulties settling sludge, and sludge handling and disposal. This review focuses on chemical oxidation as an alternative to biological secondary treatment for municipal wastewater. Most works included in this review are referenced in Google Scholar and the Web of Science, with the majority being published between 2000 and 2023. Trends revealed include a substantial increase in investigations regarding biological treatment, but much less literature focused on chemical oxidation of municipal secondary wastewater. There were reports covering chemical oxidation for industrial wastewater and for tertiary treatment of municipal wastewater, but not for chemical oxidation as a secondary treatment method for municipal wastewater.”</p><h3>Graphical abstract</h3>\n<div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>","PeriodicalId":754,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology","volume":"23 1","pages":"43 - 65"},"PeriodicalIF":8.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11157-024-09684-5","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Activated sludge has been widely adopted as the cornerstone of conventional sewage treatment for over 50 years. This process can reduce biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) in wastewater and protect public health, with many systems able to remove nutrients as well. While activated sludge continues to satisfy many treatment targets, the demands on wastewater treatment are changing. There are concerns that toxic and difficult-to-degrade contaminants are contributing to environmental and human health issues. There is also increasing interest in potable reuse to strengthen water resiliency and the waste-to-resource paradigm; however, when biological secondary treatment is used, additional treatment is needed for reuse. Chemical oxidation may be an effective alternative to activated sludge to destroy difficult-to-degrade contaminants. Compared to biological systems, chemical oxidation may also be easier to operate and maintain, requiring less space for more effective treatment. This article presents a critical review of current activated sludge-based sewage treatment practices and explores the opportunity to replace biological secondary wastewater treatment with chemical oxidation. Some opportunities include the ability of chemical oxidation to degrade contaminants of emerging concern (CECs); rapid start up and shut down; and avoidance of issues associated with biological treatment such as toxic loadings, biomass washout, difficulties settling sludge, and sludge handling and disposal. This review focuses on chemical oxidation as an alternative to biological secondary treatment for municipal wastewater. Most works included in this review are referenced in Google Scholar and the Web of Science, with the majority being published between 2000 and 2023. Trends revealed include a substantial increase in investigations regarding biological treatment, but much less literature focused on chemical oxidation of municipal secondary wastewater. There were reports covering chemical oxidation for industrial wastewater and for tertiary treatment of municipal wastewater, but not for chemical oxidation as a secondary treatment method for municipal wastewater.”

Graphical abstract

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
化学氧化作为城市污水二级处理的一种替代方法:综述
50 多年来,活性污泥作为传统污水处理的基石已被广泛采用。这种工艺可以降低污水中的生化需氧量(BOD),保护公众健康,许多系统还能去除营养物质。虽然活性污泥仍能满足许多处理目标,但对污水处理的要求正在发生变化。人们担心有毒和难以降解的污染物会导致环境和人类健康问题。此外,人们对饮用水回用的兴趣也在不断增加,以加强水的恢复能力和变废物为资源的模式;然而,在使用生物二级处理时,需要对回用进行额外处理。化学氧化可能是活性污泥的一种有效替代方法,可以消灭难以降解的污染物。与生物系统相比,化学氧化法可能更易于操作和维护,所需的空间更小,处理效果更好。本文对目前以活性污泥为基础的污水处理方法进行了严格审查,并探讨了用化学氧化法取代生物二级污水处理的机会。其中一些机会包括化学氧化法降解新关注污染物(CEC)的能力;快速启动和关闭;以及避免与生物处理相关的问题,如有毒负荷、生物质冲刷、污泥沉淀困难以及污泥处理和处置。本综述主要介绍化学氧化法作为城市污水生物二级处理的替代方法。本综述收录的大多数作品都在谷歌学术和科学网(Web of Science)上有所引用,其中大部分发表于 2000 年至 2023 年之间。所揭示的趋势包括:有关生物处理的研究大幅增加,但关注城市二级废水化学氧化的文献却少得多。有报告涉及化学氧化法处理工业废水和城市污水的三级处理,但没有将化学氧化法作为城市污水二级处理方法的报告。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology
Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology Environmental Science-Waste Management and Disposal
CiteScore
25.00
自引率
1.40%
发文量
37
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology is a publication that offers easily comprehensible, reliable, and well-rounded perspectives and evaluations in the realm of environmental science and (bio)technology. It disseminates the most recent progressions and timely compilations of groundbreaking scientific discoveries, technological advancements, practical applications, policy developments, and societal concerns encompassing all facets of environmental science and (bio)technology. Furthermore, it tackles broader aspects beyond the natural sciences, incorporating subjects such as education, funding, policy-making, intellectual property, and societal influence.
期刊最新文献
The potential of biochar incorporation into agricultural soils to promote sustainable agriculture: insights from soil health, crop productivity, greenhouse gas emission mitigation and feasibility perspectives—a critical review Chemical interactions under the bark: bark-, ambrosia-, and wood-boring beetles and their microbial associates Biochar: a potential and green adsorbent for antibiotics removal from aqueous solution Unveiling the evolution of anaerobic membrane bioreactors: applications, fouling issues, and future perspective in wastewater treatment Correction to: Harnessing green tide Ulva biomass for carbon dioxide sequestration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1