{"title":"Relevance of forest fragments and synanthropic habitats for the maintenance of non-phyllostomid bats in an anthropogenic matrix","authors":"Jeanneson Sales, Patrício Adriano da Rocha","doi":"10.1007/s11252-024-01523-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Impacts of urbanization can affect bat species differently, some bat assemblages demonstrated differences in their activity and richness between forest environments and urban areas. Bats species can seek refuge in green areas (urban forest remnants, parks and groves) or in buildings within the urban landscape. Using bioacoustics, we examined habitat use of by non-phyllostomid bats in a large Metropolitan Region of João Pessoa-PB, northeastern Brazil, comparing the activity and species/sonotypes composition of bat assemblages documented in Atlantic Forest remnants (FF) with those in the urbanized matrix areas (UM). Fifteen species belonging to four families were recorded. Out of these records, 11 were documented in both UM and FF, while <i>Neoplatymops mattogrossensis</i>, <i>Myotis</i> cf. <i>riparius</i>, and <i>Rhynchonycteris naso</i> were exclusively found in FF, and <i>Promops nasutus</i> (first record for the state) was only found in UM. The richness and activity of bats differed between FF and UM. <i>Molossops temminckii</i> and <i>Promops nasutus</i> were observed solely in arboreal habitats, whether in the forest fragments or in the UM areas. Only <i>Cynomops planirostris</i>, <i>Eumops</i> sp., M<i>olossus molossus</i>, <i>Molossus rufus</i>, and <i>Promops centralis</i> were recorded in strictly urban habitats, and they did not show differences in activities between FF and UM. These results indicate the ability of these bats to adapt to structural habitat changes within an urban matrix, reaching the highest levels of synanthropy. Our results demonstrate that the impact of urbanization on bat assemblages can be mitigated by maintaining green areas within an urban matrix.</p>","PeriodicalId":48869,"journal":{"name":"Urban Ecosystems","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Ecosystems","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-024-01523-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Impacts of urbanization can affect bat species differently, some bat assemblages demonstrated differences in their activity and richness between forest environments and urban areas. Bats species can seek refuge in green areas (urban forest remnants, parks and groves) or in buildings within the urban landscape. Using bioacoustics, we examined habitat use of by non-phyllostomid bats in a large Metropolitan Region of João Pessoa-PB, northeastern Brazil, comparing the activity and species/sonotypes composition of bat assemblages documented in Atlantic Forest remnants (FF) with those in the urbanized matrix areas (UM). Fifteen species belonging to four families were recorded. Out of these records, 11 were documented in both UM and FF, while Neoplatymops mattogrossensis, Myotis cf. riparius, and Rhynchonycteris naso were exclusively found in FF, and Promops nasutus (first record for the state) was only found in UM. The richness and activity of bats differed between FF and UM. Molossops temminckii and Promops nasutus were observed solely in arboreal habitats, whether in the forest fragments or in the UM areas. Only Cynomops planirostris, Eumops sp., Molossus molossus, Molossus rufus, and Promops centralis were recorded in strictly urban habitats, and they did not show differences in activities between FF and UM. These results indicate the ability of these bats to adapt to structural habitat changes within an urban matrix, reaching the highest levels of synanthropy. Our results demonstrate that the impact of urbanization on bat assemblages can be mitigated by maintaining green areas within an urban matrix.
期刊介绍:
Urban Ecosystems is an international journal devoted to scientific investigations of urban environments and the relationships between socioeconomic and ecological structures and processes in urban environments. The scope of the journal is broad, including interactions between urban ecosystems and associated suburban and rural environments. Contributions may span a range of specific subject areas as they may apply to urban environments: biodiversity, biogeochemistry, conservation biology, wildlife and fisheries management, ecosystem ecology, ecosystem services, environmental chemistry, hydrology, landscape architecture, meteorology and climate, policy, population biology, social and human ecology, soil science, and urban planning.