Bird population changes in urban green spaces explained by regional population trends

IF 2.5 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Urban Ecosystems Pub Date : 2024-02-27 DOI:10.1007/s11252-024-01527-z
Carmen Emilie Skjelvik, Svein Dale
{"title":"Bird population changes in urban green spaces explained by regional population trends","authors":"Carmen Emilie Skjelvik, Svein Dale","doi":"10.1007/s11252-024-01527-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Urban bird species represent a subset of the regional species pool, consisting of species that have been able to survive in, or colonise, urban areas. Urban birds are typically resident non-forest species with a broad diet and nesting high in trees or in cavities, and some studies have also claimed that they are large-brained. However, little is known about how urban bird communities change over time. Does the urban environment impose specific selective pressures favouring particular species or ecological groups, or do birds in urban areas simply have population changes reflecting population trends at larger scales? We assessed population changes of 45 breeding land bird species in Oslo, the capital of Norway, based on surveys conducted ca. 15 years apart. Population changes within Oslo most closely matched changes occurring at the regional level (national population trends from Norway and Sweden). Thus, species increasing in Oslo were those that also increased at the regional level. We found no evidence that relative brain size, diet or habitat preferences influenced population trends. However, controlling for regional population trends, there were additional residual effects of nest site and migration: species nesting on the ground or low in bushes had more positive changes than species nesting high in trees or in cavities, and resident species did better than long- or short-distance migrants. These results indicate that urban environments are not isolated islands only influenced by own selection pressures, but are connected with regional population dynamics, most likely through immigration.</p>","PeriodicalId":48869,"journal":{"name":"Urban Ecosystems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Ecosystems","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-024-01527-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Urban bird species represent a subset of the regional species pool, consisting of species that have been able to survive in, or colonise, urban areas. Urban birds are typically resident non-forest species with a broad diet and nesting high in trees or in cavities, and some studies have also claimed that they are large-brained. However, little is known about how urban bird communities change over time. Does the urban environment impose specific selective pressures favouring particular species or ecological groups, or do birds in urban areas simply have population changes reflecting population trends at larger scales? We assessed population changes of 45 breeding land bird species in Oslo, the capital of Norway, based on surveys conducted ca. 15 years apart. Population changes within Oslo most closely matched changes occurring at the regional level (national population trends from Norway and Sweden). Thus, species increasing in Oslo were those that also increased at the regional level. We found no evidence that relative brain size, diet or habitat preferences influenced population trends. However, controlling for regional population trends, there were additional residual effects of nest site and migration: species nesting on the ground or low in bushes had more positive changes than species nesting high in trees or in cavities, and resident species did better than long- or short-distance migrants. These results indicate that urban environments are not isolated islands only influenced by own selection pressures, but are connected with regional population dynamics, most likely through immigration.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用区域人口趋势解释城市绿地鸟类数量变化
城市鸟类物种是区域物种库的一个子集,由能够在城市地区生存或定居的物种组成。城市鸟类是典型的非森林留鸟,食性广泛,筑巢于树木高处或洞穴中,一些研究还发现它们的大脑较大。然而,人们对城市鸟类群落如何随时间变化知之甚少。是城市环境施加了有利于特定物种或生态群落的特定选择性压力,还是城市地区鸟类的种群变化仅仅反映了更大范围内的种群趋势?我们根据相隔约 15 年的调查,评估了挪威首都奥斯陆 45 种陆地繁殖鸟类的种群变化。奥斯陆地区的种群变化与地区层面的变化(挪威和瑞典的全国种群趋势)最为接近。因此,在奥斯陆增加的物种也是那些在地区范围内增加的物种。我们没有发现相对脑容量、饮食或栖息地偏好影响种群趋势的证据。然而,在控制了地区种群趋势后,筑巢地点和迁徙也产生了额外的残余影响:在地面或低矮灌木丛中筑巢的物种比在高处或树洞中筑巢的物种有更多的积极变化,留鸟的表现要好于远距离或近距离迁徙的物种。这些结果表明,城市环境并不是只受自身选择压力影响的孤立岛屿,而是与区域种群动态相关联的,很可能是通过移民产生的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Urban Ecosystems
Urban Ecosystems BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION-ECOLOGY
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
6.90%
发文量
113
期刊介绍: Urban Ecosystems is an international journal devoted to scientific investigations of urban environments and the relationships between socioeconomic and ecological structures and processes in urban environments. The scope of the journal is broad, including interactions between urban ecosystems and associated suburban and rural environments. Contributions may span a range of specific subject areas as they may apply to urban environments: biodiversity, biogeochemistry, conservation biology, wildlife and fisheries management, ecosystem ecology, ecosystem services, environmental chemistry, hydrology, landscape architecture, meteorology and climate, policy, population biology, social and human ecology, soil science, and urban planning.
期刊最新文献
Bee community response to multiple stressors along a tropical urban-peri urban gradient Urban scavenging: vertebrates display greater sensitivity to land-cover and garden vegetation cover than invertebrates Soil unsealing in Mediterranean schoolyards: what factors drive ant communities? Wildlife resilience in an urban landscape: understanding land-use impacts in Cape Town The urban in ecology: a quantitative textual analysis of the scientific literature over a century
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1