Silence Practice Modulates the Resting State Functional Connectivity of Language Network with Default Mode and Dorsal Attention Networks in Long-Term Meditators

IF 3.1 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Mindfulness Pub Date : 2024-02-29 DOI:10.1007/s12671-024-02316-7
Vaibhav Tripathi, Kathryn J. Devaney, Sara W. Lazar, David C. Somers
{"title":"Silence Practice Modulates the Resting State Functional Connectivity of Language Network with Default Mode and Dorsal Attention Networks in Long-Term Meditators","authors":"Vaibhav Tripathi, Kathryn J. Devaney, Sara W. Lazar, David C. Somers","doi":"10.1007/s12671-024-02316-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Objectives</h3><p>The practice of silence is integral to some meditation traditions. Research is lacking on how silence practice affects brain connectivity. We hypothesized that silent, retreat-based meditation practice would reduce the connection between the language network from core cognitive networks such as the dorsal attention network (DAN) and default mode network (DMN).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Method</h3><p>In a retrospective study, we analyzed resting state functional MRI (rsfMRI) data in 13 long-term Vipassana meditators (LTM) (~ 11,000 average hours of lifetime meditation experience) and healthy controls (<i>n</i> = 34) with no experience in meditation. We also compared our results with a large-scale dataset—Human Connectome Project (<i>n</i> = 169) (HCP). We compared the within and across functional connectivity among the three networks and correlated meditation experience and days spent in silence with the network connectivities.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>We found that the meditators have decoupled functional connectivity strengths (<i>F</i><sub>(2,204)</sub> = 10.27, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01) between the DMN and language network (<i>M</i> = − 0.05, <i>SD</i> = 0.19) as compared to HCP controls (<i>M</i> = 0.14, <i>SD</i> = 0.14). The DAN had a negatively correlated connectivity strength with the language network in meditators (<i>r</i> = − 0.20) as compared to both control groups (<i>r</i> = 0.02) and a strong inverse relation (<i>r</i> = − 0.54) was found between DAN-language connectivity and the number of days spent in silent retreat.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>Our study finds a potential role of silence training in changing the connectivities of three cognitive networks, DMN, DAN, and language network, resulting in reduced thoughts during meditation and a deeper experience of meditation.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Preregistration</h3><p>This study is not preregistered.</p>","PeriodicalId":18523,"journal":{"name":"Mindfulness","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mindfulness","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-024-02316-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

The practice of silence is integral to some meditation traditions. Research is lacking on how silence practice affects brain connectivity. We hypothesized that silent, retreat-based meditation practice would reduce the connection between the language network from core cognitive networks such as the dorsal attention network (DAN) and default mode network (DMN).

Method

In a retrospective study, we analyzed resting state functional MRI (rsfMRI) data in 13 long-term Vipassana meditators (LTM) (~ 11,000 average hours of lifetime meditation experience) and healthy controls (n = 34) with no experience in meditation. We also compared our results with a large-scale dataset—Human Connectome Project (n = 169) (HCP). We compared the within and across functional connectivity among the three networks and correlated meditation experience and days spent in silence with the network connectivities.

Results

We found that the meditators have decoupled functional connectivity strengths (F(2,204) = 10.27, p < 0.01) between the DMN and language network (M = − 0.05, SD = 0.19) as compared to HCP controls (M = 0.14, SD = 0.14). The DAN had a negatively correlated connectivity strength with the language network in meditators (r = − 0.20) as compared to both control groups (r = 0.02) and a strong inverse relation (r = − 0.54) was found between DAN-language connectivity and the number of days spent in silent retreat.

Conclusions

Our study finds a potential role of silence training in changing the connectivities of three cognitive networks, DMN, DAN, and language network, resulting in reduced thoughts during meditation and a deeper experience of meditation.

Preregistration

This study is not preregistered.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
静默练习调节长期冥想者语言网络与默认模式和背侧注意网络的静息状态功能连接性
目标静默练习是某些冥想传统中不可或缺的一部分。关于静默练习如何影响大脑连通性的研究还很缺乏。方法在一项回顾性研究中,我们分析了 13 名长期唯识禅修者(LTM)(一生平均禅修时间约为 11,000 小时)和无禅修经验的健康对照组(n = 34)的静息状态功能磁共振成像(rsfMRI)数据。我们还将我们的结果与大规模数据集--人类连接组计划(n = 169)(HCP)进行了比较。结果我们发现,与 HCP 对照组(M = 0.14,SD = 0.14)相比,冥想者的 DMN 和语言网络(M = - 0.05,SD = 0.19)之间的功能连接强度脱钩(F(2,204) = 10.27,p <0.01)。与两个对照组(r = 0.02)相比,冥想者的DAN与语言网络的连接强度呈负相关(r = - 0.20),并且在DAN-语言连接与静坐天数之间发现了强烈的反向关系(r = - 0.54)。结论我们的研究发现,静默训练在改变三个认知网络(DMN、DAN 和语言网络)的连通性方面具有潜在作用,从而减少了冥想时的想法,并加深了冥想体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Mindfulness
Mindfulness Multiple-
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
19.40%
发文量
224
期刊介绍: Mindfulness seeks to advance research, clinical practice, and theory on mindfulness. It is interested in manuscripts from diverse viewpoints, including psychology, psychiatry, medicine, neurobiology, psychoneuroendocrinology, cognitive, behavioral, cultural, philosophy, spirituality, and wisdom traditions. Mindfulness encourages research submissions on the reliability and validity of assessment of mindfulness; clinical uses of mindfulness in psychological distress, psychiatric disorders, and medical conditions; alleviation of personal and societal suffering; the nature and foundations of mindfulness; mechanisms of action; and the use of mindfulness across cultures. The Journal also seeks to promote the use of mindfulness by publishing scholarly papers on the training of clinicians, institutional staff, teachers, parents, and industry personnel in mindful provision of services. Examples of topics include: Mindfulness-based psycho-educational interventions for children with learning, emotional, and behavioral disorders Treating depression and clinical symptoms in patients with chronic heart failure Yoga and mindfulness Cognitive-behavioral mindfulness group therapy interventions Mindfulnessness and emotional regulation difficulties in children Loving-kindness meditation to increase social connectedness Training for parents and children with ADHD Recovery from substance abuse Changing parents’ mindfulness Child management skills Treating childhood anxiety and depression
期刊最新文献
Exploring the Facilitating Environment for Mindfulness Meditation: Establishing a Framework through Analysis of Means and Exploratory Factor Analysis A Systematic Review on the State of the Art of Culturally Adapted Mindfulness-Based Interventions for First Nations Peoples: Cultural Adaptation, Effectiveness, and Feasibility Mindfulness Training Has Long-Term Therapeutic Benefits in Women With Irritable Bowel Syndrome Brain–Heart Interactions in Novice Meditation Practitioners During Breath Focus and an Arithmetic Task Temporal Dynamics and Long-Term Effects of a Mindfulness-Based Intervention for Young Adults With Adverse Childhood Experiences
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1