Analysis of the Construction of a Predictive Model for Eosinophilic Chronic Rhinosinusitis

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 ALLERGY Journal of Asthma and Allergy Pub Date : 2024-02-28 DOI:10.2147/jaa.s450514
Shuo Wu, Jiahong Lao, Feitong Jian
{"title":"Analysis of the Construction of a Predictive Model for Eosinophilic Chronic Rhinosinusitis","authors":"Shuo Wu, Jiahong Lao, Feitong Jian","doi":"10.2147/jaa.s450514","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<strong>Purpose:</strong> This study aimed to determine indices to diagnose and predict eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis (ECRS) during the initial clinic visit.<br/><strong>Patients and Methods:</strong> We retrospectively analyzed 116 patients with chronic rhinosinusitis who underwent endoscopic sinus surgery and were classified according to the postoperative pathological diagnosis. General data and various clinical indicators were analyzed, and indicators with statistically significant differences between groups were further incorporated into a multivariate logistic regression to establish a comprehensive prediction model. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to compare the two significant valuable single factors from previous studies, the difference in CT scores between the ethmoid sinus and the sum difference of the maxillary sinus (EM difference) and the absolute value of peripheral blood eosinophil (bEOS), with a comprehensive prediction model.<br/><strong>Results:</strong> There were significant differences in history of allergic asthma (p &lt; 0.001), visual analog scale (VAS) score (p=0.005), sino-nasal outcome test-22(SNOT-22) scale score (p=0.004), Lund-Mackay scale score (p=0.017), EM difference (p=0.002), percentage of bEOS (%)(p=0.001), and absolute value of bEOS (× 109/L) (p=0.000) between the two groups (p&lt; 0.05). The history of allergic disease, VAS and bEOS were screened out and included in the comprehensive prediction model. The area under the curve (AUC) of the comprehensive prediction model (0.804)&gt; the AUC of the absolute value of the bEOS (0.764)&gt;the AUC of the EM difference (0.655). The AUC of the EM difference and the comprehensive prediction model were statistically different (P=0.025). There was no statistical difference between the absolute value of bEOS and the AUC of the comprehensive prediction model.<br/><strong>Conclusion:</strong> The comprehensive prediction model covering the three aspects of allergic asthma history, VAS score, and bEOS count had the highest AUC compared to the other predictors and had good predictive power for the diagnosis of ECRS.<br/><br/><strong>Keywords:</strong> eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis, non-eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis, prediction model, the difference of the CT scores between the ethmoid sinus and maxillary sinus, European position paper on rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps 2020<br/>","PeriodicalId":15079,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Asthma and Allergy","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Asthma and Allergy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/jaa.s450514","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to determine indices to diagnose and predict eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis (ECRS) during the initial clinic visit.
Patients and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 116 patients with chronic rhinosinusitis who underwent endoscopic sinus surgery and were classified according to the postoperative pathological diagnosis. General data and various clinical indicators were analyzed, and indicators with statistically significant differences between groups were further incorporated into a multivariate logistic regression to establish a comprehensive prediction model. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to compare the two significant valuable single factors from previous studies, the difference in CT scores between the ethmoid sinus and the sum difference of the maxillary sinus (EM difference) and the absolute value of peripheral blood eosinophil (bEOS), with a comprehensive prediction model.
Results: There were significant differences in history of allergic asthma (p < 0.001), visual analog scale (VAS) score (p=0.005), sino-nasal outcome test-22(SNOT-22) scale score (p=0.004), Lund-Mackay scale score (p=0.017), EM difference (p=0.002), percentage of bEOS (%)(p=0.001), and absolute value of bEOS (× 109/L) (p=0.000) between the two groups (p< 0.05). The history of allergic disease, VAS and bEOS were screened out and included in the comprehensive prediction model. The area under the curve (AUC) of the comprehensive prediction model (0.804)> the AUC of the absolute value of the bEOS (0.764)>the AUC of the EM difference (0.655). The AUC of the EM difference and the comprehensive prediction model were statistically different (P=0.025). There was no statistical difference between the absolute value of bEOS and the AUC of the comprehensive prediction model.
Conclusion: The comprehensive prediction model covering the three aspects of allergic asthma history, VAS score, and bEOS count had the highest AUC compared to the other predictors and had good predictive power for the diagnosis of ECRS.

Keywords: eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis, non-eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis, prediction model, the difference of the CT scores between the ethmoid sinus and maxillary sinus, European position paper on rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps 2020
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
嗜酸性粒细胞慢性鼻炎预测模型构建分析
目的:本研究旨在确定在初诊时诊断和预测嗜酸性粒细胞性慢性鼻炎(ECRS)的指标:我们回顾性分析了116例接受内窥镜鼻窦手术的慢性鼻炎患者,并根据术后病理诊断进行了分类。对一般资料和各种临床指标进行分析,并将组间差异有统计学意义的指标进一步纳入多变量逻辑回归,以建立综合预测模型。利用接收器操作特征曲线(ROC)将以往研究中两个有价值的重要单因素,即乙状窦与上颌窦CT评分总和差值(EM差值)和外周血嗜酸性粒细胞绝对值(bEOS)与综合预测模型进行比较:结果:过敏性哮喘病史(p <0.001)、视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分(p=0.005)、窦鼻结局测试-22(SNOT-22)量表评分(p=0.004)、Lund-Mackay 量表评分(P=0.017)、EM 差值(P=0.002)、bEOS 百分比(%)(P=0.001)、两组间 bEOS 绝对值(×109/L)(P=0.000)(P< 0.05)。筛选出过敏性疾病史、VAS 和 bEOS,并将其纳入综合预测模型。综合预测模型的曲线下面积(AUC)(0.804)>bEOS 绝对值的 AUC(0.764)>EM 差值的 AUC(0.655)。EM 差值和综合预测模型的 AUC 有统计学差异(P=0.025)。bEOS的绝对值与综合预测模型的AUC无统计学差异:关键词:嗜酸性粒细胞慢性鼻炎;非嗜酸性粒细胞慢性鼻炎;预测模型;乙状窦与上颌窦CT评分差值;欧洲鼻炎与鼻息肉立场文件 2020年
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Asthma and Allergy
Journal of Asthma and Allergy Medicine-Immunology and Allergy
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
185
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: An international, peer-reviewed journal publishing original research, reports, editorials and commentaries on the following topics: Asthma; Pulmonary physiology; Asthma related clinical health; Clinical immunology and the immunological basis of disease; Pharmacological interventions and new therapies. Although the main focus of the journal will be to publish research and clinical results in humans, preclinical, animal and in vitro studies will be published where they shed light on disease processes and potential new therapies.
期刊最新文献
Epidemiology of Childhood Asthma in the UK. Correlations of Nasal Microbiome with Allergic Rhinitis and Its Symptoms Severity in Children Progression. Disease Modification in Asthma: Are We on the Right Way? A Multidisciplinary Expert Delphi Consensus (MODIASTHMA Consensus). Japanese Patients with Severe Asthma Identified as Responders to Omalizumab Treatment at 2 Years Based on the GETE Score Continued Treatment for an Extended Period. Differential Clinical Significance of FENO200 and CANO in Asthma, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), and Asthma-COPD Overlap (ACO).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1