首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Asthma and Allergy最新文献

英文 中文
Disease Modification in Asthma: Are We on the Right Way? A Multidisciplinary Expert Delphi Consensus (MODIASTHMA Consensus). 哮喘的疾病调整:我们走对路了吗?多学科专家德尔菲共识》(MODIASTHMA Consensus)。
IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 ALLERGY Pub Date : 2024-11-14 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.2147/JAA.S488764
Juan Carlos Miralles-López, Francisco J Alvarez-Gutiérrez, Julio Delgado-Romero, Santiago Quirce, Jose Gregorio Soto-Campos, Ruben Andújar-Espinosa, Sheila Cabrejos-Perotti, Manuel Castilla-Martínez, Isabel Flores-Martín, Manuel José Pajarón-Fernández, José Valverde-Molina

Purpose: With the advent of biological therapies, emerging concepts regarding establishing new targets in asthma management, such as disease modification, have entered the debate among the scientific community. The definitions that form the conceptual basis of this goal need to be agreed upon.

Methods: A multidisciplinary expert group was assembled as the steering committee. A systematic literature review was conducted to identify the scientific background for constructing appropriate definitions. Based on the literature review and the clinical experience of the experts, the committee built a list of statements that could be applied to establish the definition of disease modification in asthma. After that, a Delphi validation was performed to assess the appropriateness of the list of statements. The questionnaire included a total of 22 statements, divided into "Essential criteria for disease modification in asthma" (5 statements) and "Disease modification indicators and other considerations" (17 statements). Panelists used a 9-point Likert scale to measure agreement on each statement. The cut-off point for high consensus was defined as a minimum score of 7 and had to be reached by at least two-thirds of the experts.

Results: A total of 192 asthma experts voted on statements anonymously. Of those, 104 (54%) were Pneumologists, 65 (34%) were allergologists, and 23 (12%) were Pediatricians. An interim analysis of round 1 data was performed. All statements reached consensus on the first round, with a median score above 7 in all cases.

Conclusion: In conclusion, in this Delphi study, a large number of experts in the management of severe asthma from different specialties agreed on the clinical-functional and pathophysiological aspects to be considered in order to try to achieve disease modification.

目的:随着生物疗法的出现,有关在哮喘治疗中建立新目标(如疾病改变)的新概念在科学界引起了争论。需要就构成这一目标概念基础的定义达成一致:方法:组建了一个多学科专家小组作为指导委员会。方法:组建了一个多学科专家小组作为指导委员会,并进行了系统的文献回顾,以确定构建适当定义的科学背景。根据文献综述和专家们的临床经验,委员会列出了一份可用于确定哮喘疾病改变定义的声明清单。之后,委员会进行了德尔菲验证,以评估声明列表的适当性。问卷共包括 22 项陈述,分为 "哮喘疾病调整的基本标准"(5 项陈述)和 "疾病调整指标及其他考虑因素"(17 项陈述)。专家小组成员使用 9 点李克特量表来衡量对每项陈述的共识度。高度共识的临界点被定义为至少三分之二的专家达到 7 分:共有 192 位哮喘专家对声明进行了匿名投票。结果:共有 192 位哮喘专家对声明进行了匿名投票,其中 104 位(54%)为肺病专家,65 位(34%)为过敏学专家,23 位(12%)为儿科医生。对第一轮数据进行了中期分析。在第一轮中,所有声明都达成了共识,所有声明的中位数都超过了 7 分:总之,在这项德尔菲研究中,来自不同专业的众多重症哮喘治疗专家就临床功能和病理生理学方面达成了共识,以便努力实现疾病的缓解。
{"title":"Disease Modification in Asthma: Are We on the Right Way? A Multidisciplinary Expert Delphi Consensus (MODIASTHMA Consensus).","authors":"Juan Carlos Miralles-López, Francisco J Alvarez-Gutiérrez, Julio Delgado-Romero, Santiago Quirce, Jose Gregorio Soto-Campos, Ruben Andújar-Espinosa, Sheila Cabrejos-Perotti, Manuel Castilla-Martínez, Isabel Flores-Martín, Manuel José Pajarón-Fernández, José Valverde-Molina","doi":"10.2147/JAA.S488764","DOIUrl":"10.2147/JAA.S488764","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>With the advent of biological therapies, emerging concepts regarding establishing new targets in asthma management, such as disease modification, have entered the debate among the scientific community. The definitions that form the conceptual basis of this goal need to be agreed upon.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multidisciplinary expert group was assembled as the steering committee. A systematic literature review was conducted to identify the scientific background for constructing appropriate definitions. Based on the literature review and the clinical experience of the experts, the committee built a list of statements that could be applied to establish the definition of disease modification in asthma. After that, a Delphi validation was performed to assess the appropriateness of the list of statements. The questionnaire included a total of 22 statements, divided into \"Essential criteria for disease modification in asthma\" (5 statements) and \"Disease modification indicators and other considerations\" (17 statements). Panelists used a 9-point Likert scale to measure agreement on each statement. The cut-off point for high consensus was defined as a minimum score of 7 and had to be reached by at least two-thirds of the experts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 192 asthma experts voted on statements anonymously. Of those, 104 (54%) were Pneumologists, 65 (34%) were allergologists, and 23 (12%) were Pediatricians. An interim analysis of round 1 data was performed. All statements reached consensus on the first round, with a median score above 7 in all cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In conclusion, in this Delphi study, a large number of experts in the management of severe asthma from different specialties agreed on the clinical-functional and pathophysiological aspects to be considered in order to try to achieve disease modification.</p>","PeriodicalId":15079,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Asthma and Allergy","volume":"17 ","pages":"1163-1171"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11571985/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142667964","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Japanese Patients with Severe Asthma Identified as Responders to Omalizumab Treatment at 2 Years Based on the GETE Score Continued Treatment for an Extended Period. 根据 GETE 评分确定为奥马珠单抗治疗 2 年应答者的日本重症哮喘患者继续延长治疗时间
IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 ALLERGY Pub Date : 2024-11-14 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.2147/JAA.S423256
Ai Goto, Sonoko Harada, Hitoshi Sasano, Yuuki Sandhu, Yuki Tanabe, Sumiko Abe, Shoko Ueda, Tomohito Takeshige, Kei Matsuno, Tetsutaro Nagaoka, Jun Ito, Ryo Atsuta, Kazuhisa Takahashi, Norihiro Harada

Purpose: Omalizumab, the anti-IgE monoclonal antibody used to treat severe asthma, reduces asthma exacerbations, hospitalizations, and corticosteroid use. Although allergic asthma is a therapeutic target of omalizumab, omalizumab is not effective in all patients with severe allergic asthma and is not always available for long-term use. We retrospectively investigated factors related to long-term (≥2 years) use of omalizumab for severe asthma.

Patients and methods: Of the 116 patients treated with omalizumab for severe asthma at our hospital between 2009 and 2017, 82 were included in this retrospective analysis. Thirty-four were excluded because of adverse events, financial difficulties, or hospital transfers. The number of asthma exacerbations, unscheduled visits, corticosteroid doses, asthma control test scores, pulmonary function test results, and fractional exhaled nitric oxide levels were evaluated.

Results: The median age of the study population was 58 years, with 66% female and 26% taking regular oral corticosteroids. After 2 years of treatment, 52 responders were identified using the global evaluation of treatment effectiveness (GETE) score. Improvements in asthma control test scores, airflow limitation, exacerbations, and oral corticosteroid use were observed in the responders. Multivariate analysis revealed that a peripheral blood eosinophil count of ≥200 or a perennial antigen-specific IgE antibody positivity of ≥2 predicted a response at the 2-year mark. However, Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that neither high eosinophil counts nor perennial antigen-specific IgE positivity influenced the prolongation of treatment beyond 2 years, and responders at 2 years underwent omalizumab treatment for a significantly longer period than non-responders (HR = 9.89, p < 0.001), with GETE at 2 years being the only predictor of long-term omalizumab use.

Conclusion: In this retrospective study the GETE after 2 years of omalizumab therapy emerged as the most meaningful predictor of the long-term effectiveness of omalizumab treatment in patients with severe asthma, highlighting the benefits of prolonged therapy in certain populations. These findings may guide future therapeutic strategies for severe asthma.

目的:用于治疗严重哮喘的抗 IgE 单克隆抗体奥马珠单抗可减少哮喘加重、住院和皮质类固醇的使用。虽然过敏性哮喘是奥马珠单抗的治疗目标,但奥马珠单抗并非对所有严重过敏性哮喘患者都有效,而且并不总是可以长期使用。我们对长期(≥2 年)使用奥马珠单抗治疗严重哮喘的相关因素进行了回顾性调查:2009年至2017年期间,我院使用奥马珠单抗治疗重症哮喘的116名患者中,有82人纳入了此次回顾性分析。34例患者因不良事件、经济困难或转院而被排除在外。对哮喘加重次数、计划外就诊次数、皮质类固醇剂量、哮喘控制测试评分、肺功能测试结果和呼出一氧化氮分数水平进行了评估:研究对象的中位年龄为 58 岁,66% 为女性,26% 定期口服皮质类固醇。经过 2 年的治疗,使用治疗效果总体评价(GETE)评分确定了 52 名应答者。观察发现,应答者的哮喘控制测试评分、气流受限、病情加重和口服皮质类固醇的使用情况均有所改善。多变量分析表明,外周血嗜酸性粒细胞计数≥200或常年抗原特异性IgE抗体阳性率≥2可预测两年后的反应。然而,卡普兰-梅耶尔分析表明,嗜酸性粒细胞计数高或常年抗原特异性 IgE 阳性均不影响 2 年后治疗时间的延长,2 年后有反应者接受奥马珠单抗治疗的时间明显长于无反应者(HR = 9.89,p < 0.001),2 年后的 GETE 是长期使用奥马珠单抗的唯一预测因素:在这项回顾性研究中,奥马珠单抗治疗 2 年后的 GETE 是预测奥马珠单抗对重症哮喘患者长期疗效的最有意义的指标,凸显了延长治疗对某些人群的益处。这些发现可为未来重症哮喘的治疗策略提供指导。
{"title":"Japanese Patients with Severe Asthma Identified as Responders to Omalizumab Treatment at 2 Years Based on the GETE Score Continued Treatment for an Extended Period.","authors":"Ai Goto, Sonoko Harada, Hitoshi Sasano, Yuuki Sandhu, Yuki Tanabe, Sumiko Abe, Shoko Ueda, Tomohito Takeshige, Kei Matsuno, Tetsutaro Nagaoka, Jun Ito, Ryo Atsuta, Kazuhisa Takahashi, Norihiro Harada","doi":"10.2147/JAA.S423256","DOIUrl":"10.2147/JAA.S423256","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Omalizumab, the anti-IgE monoclonal antibody used to treat severe asthma, reduces asthma exacerbations, hospitalizations, and corticosteroid use. Although allergic asthma is a therapeutic target of omalizumab, omalizumab is not effective in all patients with severe allergic asthma and is not always available for long-term use. We retrospectively investigated factors related to long-term (≥2 years) use of omalizumab for severe asthma.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Of the 116 patients treated with omalizumab for severe asthma at our hospital between 2009 and 2017, 82 were included in this retrospective analysis. Thirty-four were excluded because of adverse events, financial difficulties, or hospital transfers. The number of asthma exacerbations, unscheduled visits, corticosteroid doses, asthma control test scores, pulmonary function test results, and fractional exhaled nitric oxide levels were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median age of the study population was 58 years, with 66% female and 26% taking regular oral corticosteroids. After 2 years of treatment, 52 responders were identified using the global evaluation of treatment effectiveness (GETE) score. Improvements in asthma control test scores, airflow limitation, exacerbations, and oral corticosteroid use were observed in the responders. Multivariate analysis revealed that a peripheral blood eosinophil count of ≥200 or a perennial antigen-specific IgE antibody positivity of ≥2 predicted a response at the 2-year mark. However, Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that neither high eosinophil counts nor perennial antigen-specific IgE positivity influenced the prolongation of treatment beyond 2 years, and responders at 2 years underwent omalizumab treatment for a significantly longer period than non-responders (HR = 9.89, p < 0.001), with GETE at 2 years being the only predictor of long-term omalizumab use.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this retrospective study the GETE after 2 years of omalizumab therapy emerged as the most meaningful predictor of the long-term effectiveness of omalizumab treatment in patients with severe asthma, highlighting the benefits of prolonged therapy in certain populations. These findings may guide future therapeutic strategies for severe asthma.</p>","PeriodicalId":15079,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Asthma and Allergy","volume":"17 ","pages":"1173-1186"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11572441/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142667967","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Differential Clinical Significance of FENO200 and CANO in Asthma, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), and Asthma-COPD Overlap (ACO). FENO200 和 CANO 在哮喘、慢性阻塞性肺病 (COPD) 和哮喘-慢性阻塞性肺病重叠 (ACO) 中的临床意义差异。
IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 ALLERGY Pub Date : 2024-11-12 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.2147/JAA.S486324
Guansheng Zeng, Jian Xu, Huadong Zeng, Cuilan Wang, Lichang Chen, Huapeng Yu

Purpose: To investigate the differential clinical significance of fractional concentration of exhaled nitric oxide measured at a flow rate of 200 mL/s (FENO200) and concentration of nitric oxide in alveolar (CANO) in asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or asthma-COPD Overlap (ACO).

Methods: A total of 178 patients were included, with 82 patients in asthma group, 47 patients in COPD group and 49 patients in ACO group. Data for demographic data, spirometry and exhaled nitric oxide were collected for comparative analysis, correlation analysis and discriminant canonical analysis.

Results: The values of FENO200 in asthma, COPD and ACO groups were 11.0(7.0-22.3), 8.0(6.0-11.0) and 9.0(6.5-19.5) ppb, respectively. In the asthma group, FENO200 exhibited negative correlations with FEV1/FVC, MMEF and MEF50. No significant correlation was observed between CANO and pulmonary function parameters. In the COPD group, both FENO200 and CANO showed negative correlation with pulmonary function parameters including FVC, FEV1, PEF, MMEF, MEF75, MEF50. In the ACO group, FENO200 demonstrated no significant correlation with pulmonary function parameters, while CANO was correlated with FEV1, PEF, MMEF and MEF50. In COPD group, ΔFEV1 in the bronchodilator test was correlated with FENO200. As for the ACO group, ΔFEV1 was correlated with CANO. In the discriminant canonical analysis, four parameters including gender, age, MEF75 and FENO50 discriminated between the three groups of asthma, COPD and ACO.

Conclusion: In asthma, COPD and ACO, FENO200 has demonstrated a robust correlation with CANO. Elevated FENO200 levels are predominantly indicative of pulmonary function impairment in asthma and COPD, whereas elevated CANO levels are mainly correlated with pulmonary function impairment in COPD and ACO. Compared with FENO200 and CANO, FENO50 may have a better discriminatory ability in distinguishing asthma, COPD and ACO.

目的:探讨在哮喘、慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)或哮喘-COPD 重叠(ACO)患者中,以 200 mL/s 流速测量的呼出一氧化氮分数浓度(FENO200)和肺泡中一氧化氮浓度(CANO)的不同临床意义:共纳入 178 例患者,其中哮喘组 82 例,慢性阻塞性肺疾病组 47 例,ACO 组 49 例。收集人口统计学数据、肺活量和呼出一氧化氮数据,进行比较分析、相关分析和判别卡农分析:结果:哮喘组、慢性阻塞性肺病组和 ACO 组的 FENO200 值分别为 11.0(7.0-22.3)、8.0(6.0-11.0)和 9.0(6.5-19.5)ppb。在哮喘组,FENO200 与 FEV1/FVC、MMEF 和 MEF50 呈负相关。在 CANO 和肺功能参数之间没有观察到明显的相关性。在慢性阻塞性肺病组,FENO200 和 CANO 均与肺功能参数(包括 FVC、FEV1、PEF、MMEF、MEF75 和 MEF50)呈负相关。在 ACO 组,FENO200 与肺功能参数无明显相关性,而 CANO 与 FEV1、PEF、MMEF 和 MEF50 相关。在慢性阻塞性肺病组中,支气管扩张剂测试中的ΔFEV1 与 FENO200 相关。至于 ACO 组,ΔFEV1 与 CANO 相关。在判别标准分析中,性别、年龄、MEF75 和 FENO50 这四个参数区分了哮喘、慢性阻塞性肺病和 ACO 这三个组别:结论:在哮喘、慢性阻塞性肺病和 ACO 患者中,FENO200 与 CANO 有很强的相关性。在哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺病中,FENO200 水平升高主要表明肺功能受损,而 CANO 水平升高主要与慢性阻塞性肺病和 ACO 的肺功能受损相关。与 FENO200 和 CANO 相比,FENO50 在区分哮喘、慢性阻塞性肺病和 ACO 方面可能具有更好的鉴别能力。
{"title":"Differential Clinical Significance of FENO<sub>200</sub> and CANO in Asthma, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), and Asthma-COPD Overlap (ACO).","authors":"Guansheng Zeng, Jian Xu, Huadong Zeng, Cuilan Wang, Lichang Chen, Huapeng Yu","doi":"10.2147/JAA.S486324","DOIUrl":"10.2147/JAA.S486324","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the differential clinical significance of fractional concentration of exhaled nitric oxide measured at a flow rate of 200 mL/s (FENO<sub>200</sub>) and concentration of nitric oxide in alveolar (CANO) in asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or asthma-COPD Overlap (ACO).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 178 patients were included, with 82 patients in asthma group, 47 patients in COPD group and 49 patients in ACO group. Data for demographic data, spirometry and exhaled nitric oxide were collected for comparative analysis, correlation analysis and discriminant canonical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The values of FENO<sub>200</sub> in asthma, COPD and ACO groups were 11.0(7.0-22.3), 8.0(6.0-11.0) and 9.0(6.5-19.5) ppb, respectively. In the asthma group, FENO<sub>200</sub> exhibited negative correlations with FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC, MMEF and MEF50. No significant correlation was observed between CANO and pulmonary function parameters. In the COPD group, both FENO<sub>200</sub> and CANO showed negative correlation with pulmonary function parameters including FVC, FEV<sub>1</sub>, PEF, MMEF, MEF75, MEF50. In the ACO group, FENO<sub>200</sub> demonstrated no significant correlation with pulmonary function parameters, while CANO was correlated with FEV<sub>1</sub>, PEF, MMEF and MEF50. In COPD group, ΔFEV<sub>1</sub> in the bronchodilator test was correlated with FENO<sub>200</sub>. As for the ACO group, ΔFEV<sub>1</sub> was correlated with CANO. In the discriminant canonical analysis, four parameters including gender, age, MEF75 and FENO<sub>50</sub> discriminated between the three groups of asthma, COPD and ACO.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In asthma, COPD and ACO, FENO<sub>200</sub> has demonstrated a robust correlation with CANO. Elevated FENO<sub>200</sub> levels are predominantly indicative of pulmonary function impairment in asthma and COPD, whereas elevated CANO levels are mainly correlated with pulmonary function impairment in COPD and ACO. Compared with FENO<sub>200</sub> and CANO, FENO<sub>50</sub> may have a better discriminatory ability in distinguishing asthma, COPD and ACO.</p>","PeriodicalId":15079,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Asthma and Allergy","volume":"17 ","pages":"1151-1161"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11570527/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142667956","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Benralizumab: Effectiveness in Patients with Uncontrolled Severe Eosinophilic Asthma at 6 and 12 Months at a Third-Level Care Hospital. Capacity for ICS-LABA Therapy Reduction. 本拉珠单抗贝诺利珠单抗:在一家三级医院治疗 6 个月和 12 个月未控制的严重嗜酸性粒细胞性哮喘患者的疗效。减少 ICS-LABA 治疗的能力。
IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 ALLERGY Pub Date : 2024-11-09 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.2147/JAA.S472490
Yair Humberto González-Tuyub, Karla Daniela González-Iñiguez, Paula Catalina Lizarazo-Guiza, Sergio Ricardo García-García

Background: Asthma is a health condition with worldwide relevance, evaluated based on the necessary treatment to control symptoms and exacerbations. Severe asthma is uncontrolled despite high doses of ICS-LABA and treatment for triggering factors. Severe eosinophilic asthma is characterized by an increase in eosinophils in the peripheral circulation, walls, and passages of the respiratory tract. Biologic treatments such as benralizumab have demonstrated effectiveness as aids in decreasing respiratory tract inflammation and improving the management of symptoms in patients living with asthma.

Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of benralizumab as an add-on therapy for patients with severe, uncontrolled asthma and elevated blood eosinophil counts.

Methods: Observational, analytic and ambispective study in 21 patients diagnosed with severe eosinophilic asthma treated with benralizumab, to determine the treatment's effectiveness through the change in estimated respiratory function by spirometry through the forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) value, reduction in second controlling treatment, serum eosinophil reduction, change in the Asthma Control Test score and the Asthma Control Questionnaire test at 6 and 16 months of treatment.

Results: An average difference of 241.43 mL (±461.43) in FEV1 at 6 months was found, as well as an average FeNO reduction of 49.8 ppm and eosinophil reduction of 612.78 cells at 12 months of treatment, additionally, CSI requirements were reduced in 95% of patients.

Conclusion: Benralizumab improved respiratory function as well as key biomarkers such as eosinophil count, exhaled nitric oxide fraction (FeNO), which reflected in a decreased requirement of inhaled corticosteroids and improved symptom control.

背景:哮喘是一种世界性的健康问题,其评估依据是控制症状和病情恶化所需的治疗。重症哮喘在使用大剂量 ICS-LABA 和治疗诱发因素后仍无法控制。重度嗜酸性粒细胞性哮喘的特点是外周循环、呼吸道壁和通道中的嗜酸性粒细胞增多。苯拉利珠单抗等生物治疗方法已被证明可有效减轻呼吸道炎症,改善哮喘患者的症状控制:目的:评估苯拉利珠单抗作为一种附加疗法,对患有严重、未得到控制的哮喘且血液中嗜酸性粒细胞计数升高的患者的有效性和安全性:对21名确诊为严重嗜酸性粒细胞性哮喘的患者使用苯拉利珠单抗进行观察、分析和前瞻性研究,在治疗6个月和16个月时,通过肺活量测定的一秒钟用力呼气容积(FEV1)值估计呼吸功能的变化、第二次控制治疗的减少、血清嗜酸性粒细胞的减少、哮喘控制测试评分和哮喘控制问卷测试的变化来确定治疗效果:结果:治疗6个月时,FEV1平均相差241.43毫升(±461.43),治疗12个月时,FeNO平均减少49.8 ppm,嗜酸性粒细胞平均减少612.78个,此外,95%的患者对CSI的需求减少:本拉珠单抗改善了呼吸功能以及嗜酸性粒细胞计数、呼出一氧化氮分数(FeNO)等关键生物标志物,从而减少了对吸入皮质类固醇的需求,改善了症状控制。
{"title":"Benralizumab: Effectiveness in Patients with Uncontrolled Severe Eosinophilic Asthma at 6 and 12 Months at a Third-Level Care Hospital. Capacity for ICS-LABA Therapy Reduction.","authors":"Yair Humberto González-Tuyub, Karla Daniela González-Iñiguez, Paula Catalina Lizarazo-Guiza, Sergio Ricardo García-García","doi":"10.2147/JAA.S472490","DOIUrl":"10.2147/JAA.S472490","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Asthma is a health condition with worldwide relevance, evaluated based on the necessary treatment to control symptoms and exacerbations. Severe asthma is uncontrolled despite high doses of ICS-LABA and treatment for triggering factors. Severe eosinophilic asthma is characterized by an increase in eosinophils in the peripheral circulation, walls, and passages of the respiratory tract. Biologic treatments such as benralizumab have demonstrated effectiveness as aids in decreasing respiratory tract inflammation and improving the management of symptoms in patients living with asthma.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the efficacy and safety of benralizumab as an add-on therapy for patients with severe, uncontrolled asthma and elevated blood eosinophil counts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Observational, analytic and ambispective study in 21 patients diagnosed with severe eosinophilic asthma treated with benralizumab, to determine the treatment's effectiveness through the change in estimated respiratory function by spirometry through the forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) value, reduction in second controlling treatment, serum eosinophil reduction, change in the Asthma Control Test score and the Asthma Control Questionnaire test at 6 and 16 months of treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>An average difference of 241.43 mL (±461.43) in FEV1 at 6 months was found, as well as an average FeNO reduction of 49.8 ppm and eosinophil reduction of 612.78 cells at 12 months of treatment, additionally, CSI requirements were reduced in 95% of patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Benralizumab improved respiratory function as well as key biomarkers such as eosinophil count, exhaled nitric oxide fraction (FeNO), which reflected in a decreased requirement of inhaled corticosteroids and improved symptom control.</p>","PeriodicalId":15079,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Asthma and Allergy","volume":"17 ","pages":"1141-1149"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11559237/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142621059","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Response to Disease Burden and Access to Biologic Therapy in Patients with Severe Asthma, 2017-2022: An Analysis of the International Severe Asthma Registry [Letter]. 2017-2022 年重症哮喘患者的疾病负担和生物疗法使用情况:对国际重症哮喘登记处的分析 [信函]。
IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 ALLERGY Pub Date : 2024-11-08 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.2147/JAA.S503590
Agussalim
{"title":"Response to Disease Burden and Access to Biologic Therapy in Patients with Severe Asthma, 2017-2022: An Analysis of the International Severe Asthma Registry [Letter].","authors":"Agussalim","doi":"10.2147/JAA.S503590","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JAA.S503590","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15079,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Asthma and Allergy","volume":"17 ","pages":"1127-1128"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11556244/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142621062","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Influence of Emphysema on Treatment Response to Biologic Therapy in Severe Asthma. 肺气肿对重症哮喘生物疗法治疗反应的影响。
IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 ALLERGY Pub Date : 2024-11-08 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.2147/JAA.S474306
Leonie Biener, Hussein Morobeid, Carmen Pizarro, Daniel Kuetting, Georg Nickenig, Dirk Skowasch

Background: Patients with severe asthma (SA) benefit from biologic therapy substantially. However, the impact of smoking-related comorbidities remains unclear due to the exclusion of patients with ≥10 pack-years from asthma studies. Our aim was to examine the effects of emphysema on biologic treatment response in SA in this retrospective cohort study.

Methods: Pulmonary emphysema was examined using computed tomography. Patients with SA were included and divided into two groups based on emphysema quantity (≥5% or <5%). They received either anti-IgE (22.1%), anti-IL-5-(receptor) (52.3%), or anti-IL-4/IL-13 (25.6%) biologic therapy. Treatment response was assessed after 7.8 ± 2.5 months based on acute exacerbations (AE), oral corticosteroid (OCS) therapy, Asthma Control Test (ACT), forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and using the Biologics Asthma Response Score (BARS).

Results: This study comprised 86 patients (mean age 56.1 ± 12.8 years; 54% female). Half (43, 50.0%) were never-smokers, half ex-smokers with an average of 26.9 ± 18.2 pack-years. Patients with ≥5% emphysema were more often ex-smokers (80% vs 41%, p=0.002), had poorer lung function (FEV1 median 1.3 [interquartile range: 1.0;1.6] vs 1.8[1-2;2.4] L, p=0.037), and more comorbid COPD (50% vs 21%, p=0.012). However, no significant differences were noted in treatment response regarding annualized AE rate (-2.5[-5;-1] vs -3.0[-5;-2] n/year, p=0.295) and OCS reduction (-4[-10;0] vs -5[-10;0] mg, p=0.691), ACT score (5[3;9] vs 4[0;9] points, p=0.579) or FEV1 improvement (0.03[-0.15;0.25] vs 0.23[-0.5;0.49] L, p=0.052), BARS (p=0.312), and remission rates (15.0% vs 19.7%, p=0.753).

Conclusion: In patients with severe asthma, those with comorbid emphysema show similar treatment response to biologic therapy. Therefore, suitable patients should not be denied biologics due to the presence of emphysema.

背景:重症哮喘(SA)患者从生物制剂治疗中获益良多。然而,由于哮喘研究排除了吸烟≥10包年的患者,与吸烟相关的合并症的影响仍不清楚。我们的目的是在这项回顾性队列研究中考察肺气肿对哮喘生物治疗反应的影响:方法:使用计算机断层扫描检查肺气肿。方法:使用计算机断层扫描检查肺气肿,并根据肺气肿的数量(≥5% 或 结果)将 SA 患者分为两组:本研究包括 86 名患者(平均年龄 56.1 ± 12.8 岁;54% 为女性)。半数(43,50.0%)患者从不吸烟,半数为戒烟者,平均吸烟 26.9 ± 18.2 包年。肺气肿≥5%的患者多为前吸烟者(80% vs 41%,P=0.002),肺功能较差(FEV1 中位数为 1.3 [四分位数范围:1.0;1.6] vs 1.8[1-2;2.4] L,P=0.037),合并慢性阻塞性肺病的患者较多(50% vs 21%,P=0.012)。然而,在治疗反应方面,年化 AE 率(-2.5[-5;-1] vs -3.0[-5;-2] n/年,p=0.295)和 OCS 减少率(-4[-10;0] vs -5[-10;0] mg,p=0.691)、ACT 评分(-4[-10;0] vs -5[-10;0] mg,p=0.691)无明显差异。691)、ACT评分(5[3;9] vs 4[0;9]分,p=0.579)或FEV1改善(0.03[-0.15;0.25] vs 0.23[-0.5;0.49] L,p=0.052)、BARS(p=0.312)和缓解率(15.0% vs 19.7%,p=0.753):结论:在重症哮喘患者中,合并肺气肿的患者对生物制剂治疗的反应相似。结论:在重症哮喘患者中,合并肺气肿的患者对生物制剂治疗的反应相似,因此,合适的患者不应因合并肺气肿而拒绝接受生物制剂治疗。
{"title":"The Influence of Emphysema on Treatment Response to Biologic Therapy in Severe Asthma.","authors":"Leonie Biener, Hussein Morobeid, Carmen Pizarro, Daniel Kuetting, Georg Nickenig, Dirk Skowasch","doi":"10.2147/JAA.S474306","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JAA.S474306","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with severe asthma (SA) benefit from biologic therapy substantially. However, the impact of smoking-related comorbidities remains unclear due to the exclusion of patients with ≥10 pack-years from asthma studies. Our aim was to examine the effects of emphysema on biologic treatment response in SA in this retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Pulmonary emphysema was examined using computed tomography. Patients with SA were included and divided into two groups based on emphysema quantity (≥5% or <5%). They received either anti-IgE (22.1%), anti-IL-5-(receptor) (52.3%), or anti-IL-4/IL-13 (25.6%) biologic therapy. Treatment response was assessed after 7.8 ± 2.5 months based on acute exacerbations (AE), oral corticosteroid (OCS) therapy, Asthma Control Test (ACT), forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and using the Biologics Asthma Response Score (BARS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study comprised 86 patients (mean age 56.1 ± 12.8 years; 54% female). Half (43, 50.0%) were never-smokers, half ex-smokers with an average of 26.9 ± 18.2 pack-years. Patients with ≥5% emphysema were more often ex-smokers (80% vs 41%, p=0.002), had poorer lung function (FEV1 median 1.3 [interquartile range: 1.0;1.6] vs 1.8[1-2;2.4] L, p=0.037), and more comorbid COPD (50% vs 21%, p=0.012). However, no significant differences were noted in treatment response regarding annualized AE rate (-2.5[-5;-1] vs -3.0[-5;-2] n/year, p=0.295) and OCS reduction (-4[-10;0] vs -5[-10;0] mg, p=0.691), ACT score (5[3;9] vs 4[0;9] points, p=0.579) or FEV1 improvement (0.03[-0.15;0.25] vs 0.23[-0.5;0.49] L, p=0.052), BARS (p=0.312), and remission rates (15.0% vs 19.7%, p=0.753).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with severe asthma, those with comorbid emphysema show similar treatment response to biologic therapy. Therefore, suitable patients should not be denied biologics due to the presence of emphysema.</p>","PeriodicalId":15079,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Asthma and Allergy","volume":"17 ","pages":"1129-1140"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11556239/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142621067","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Allergen Immunotherapy for a Year Can Effectively Reduce the Risk of Postoperative Recurrence of Adenoid Hypertrophy in Children with Concurrent Allergic Rhinitis (IMPROVEII). 过敏原免疫治疗一年可有效降低并发过敏性鼻炎患儿腺样体肥大术后复发的风险(IMPROVEII)。
IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 ALLERGY Pub Date : 2024-11-07 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.2147/JAA.S477376
Hong-Li Hua, Yu-Qin Deng, Yu-Chen Tang, Yan Wang, Ze-Zhang Tao

Background: Adenoid hypertrophy (AH) and allergic rhinitis (AR) are common pediatric diseases, seriously affecting the quality of life and growth of children. The recurrence rate of AH is higher for patients with than for those without concurrent AR. Allergen specific immunotherapy (AIT) is the only effective therapy for modifying the course of allergic diseases. This study sought to investigate the efficacy of AIT in preventing AH recurrence in patients with AR who underwent adenoidectomy.

Methods: This study included 134 children aged 5-12 years with concurrent AH and AR. They were separated into the subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) group treated with a double-mite allergen preparation or the non-AIT group treated symptomatically with only medications. The adenoid/nasopharyngeal ratio at one year after adenoidectomy was used to assess AH recurrence. The Obstructive Sleep Apnoea Questionnaire (OSA-18), Paediatric Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (PRQLQ), and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) were used to assess the severity of the sleep disorders and AR.

Results: This study included 62 and 72 children with concurrent AH and AR in the SCIT and non-AIT groups, respectively. The rate of recurrence in the SCIT group was significantly lower than that in the non-AIT group (4.84% vs.16.67%; P=0.030). The OSA-18, PRQLQ, and VAS scores were significantly lower for the SCIT than (P<0.001) for the non-AIT group after one year of treatment.

Conclusion: The findings suggest that AIT should be considered the preferred therapy for reducing postoperative recurrence of AH in children with concurrent AR following adenoidectomy, but further research is needed to confirm these findings in a larger population.

背景:腺样体肥大(AH)和过敏性鼻炎(AR)是儿科常见病,严重影响儿童的生活质量和生长发育。腺样体肥大患者的复发率高于未并发 AR 的患者。过敏原特异性免疫疗法(AIT)是改变过敏性疾病病程的唯一有效疗法。本研究旨在探讨 AIT 在预防接受腺样体切除术的 AR 患者 AH 复发方面的疗效:本研究纳入了 134 名同时患有 AH 和 AR 的 5-12 岁儿童。他们被分为使用双螨过敏原制剂的皮下免疫疗法(SCIT)组和仅使用药物对症治疗的非 AIT 组。腺样体切除术后一年的腺样体/鼻咽比例用于评估AH复发情况。阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停问卷(OSA-18)、儿童鼻结膜炎生活质量问卷(PRQLQ)和视觉模拟量表(VAS)用于评估睡眠障碍和AR的严重程度:本研究的 SCIT 组和非 SCIT 组分别有 62 和 72 名儿童同时患有 AH 和 AR。SCIT组的复发率明显低于非AIT组(4.84% vs.16.67%; P=0.030)。治疗一年后,SCIT 组的 OSA-18、PRQLQ 和 VAS 评分明显低于非 AIT 组(P):研究结果表明,对于腺样体切除术后并发 AR 的儿童,AIT 应被视为减少 AH 术后复发的首选疗法,但还需要进一步研究,以便在更大的人群中证实这些研究结果。
{"title":"Allergen Immunotherapy for a Year Can Effectively Reduce the Risk of Postoperative Recurrence of Adenoid Hypertrophy in Children with Concurrent Allergic Rhinitis (IMPROVEII).","authors":"Hong-Li Hua, Yu-Qin Deng, Yu-Chen Tang, Yan Wang, Ze-Zhang Tao","doi":"10.2147/JAA.S477376","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JAA.S477376","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adenoid hypertrophy (AH) and allergic rhinitis (AR) are common pediatric diseases, seriously affecting the quality of life and growth of children. The recurrence rate of AH is higher for patients with than for those without concurrent AR. Allergen specific immunotherapy (AIT) is the only effective therapy for modifying the course of allergic diseases. This study sought to investigate the efficacy of AIT in preventing AH recurrence in patients with AR who underwent adenoidectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 134 children aged 5-12 years with concurrent AH and AR. They were separated into the subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) group treated with a double-mite allergen preparation or the non-AIT group treated symptomatically with only medications. The adenoid/nasopharyngeal ratio at one year after adenoidectomy was used to assess AH recurrence. The Obstructive Sleep Apnoea Questionnaire (OSA-18), Paediatric Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (PRQLQ), and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) were used to assess the severity of the sleep disorders and AR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 62 and 72 children with concurrent AH and AR in the SCIT and non-AIT groups, respectively. The rate of recurrence in the SCIT group was significantly lower than that in the non-AIT group (4.84% vs.16.67%; <i>P</i>=0.030). The OSA-18, PRQLQ, and VAS scores were significantly lower for the SCIT than (<i>P<0.001</i>) for the non-AIT group after one year of treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings suggest that AIT should be considered the preferred therapy for reducing postoperative recurrence of AH in children with concurrent AR following adenoidectomy, but further research is needed to confirm these findings in a larger population.</p>","PeriodicalId":15079,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Asthma and Allergy","volume":"17 ","pages":"1115-1125"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11552393/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142621056","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Skin Surface Lipid-RNA Profile Obtained from Patients with Severe Asthma After Benralizumab Treatment. 重症哮喘患者接受苯拉利珠单抗治疗后的皮肤表面脂质-RNA图谱
IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 ALLERGY Pub Date : 2024-11-06 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.2147/JAA.S490832
Sonoko Harada, Hitoshi Sasano, Shoko Ueda, Yuuki Sandhu, Sumiko Abe, Yuki Tanabe, Kyoko Shima, Tetsuya Kuwano, Yuya Uehara, Takayoshi Inoue, Ko Okumura, Kazuhisa Takahashi, Norihiro Harada

Background: Examining human coding and non-coding RNAs present in skin surface lipids (SSL-RNAs) offers a promising approach to understanding the physiological state of the skin. Benralizumab treatment can reduce exacerbations and improve symptom control and quality of life in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma. Although this treatment effectively depletes peripheral blood eosinophils, the impact of benralizumab on SSL-RNA remains completely unknown.

Objective: To investigate the effects of benralizumab treatment on SSL-RNA profiles in patients with severe asthma.

Methods: Skin samples were non-invasively collected from patients before and after one year of benralizumab treatment. Sixteen patients were enrolled, but the SSL-RNA analysis was only feasible for five patients due to collection challenges, mainly in female participants.

Results: Following benralizumab treatment, asthma symptoms, exacerbation rates, and lung function parameters improved. Peripheral blood eosinophils were completely depleted and serum eotaxin-1 levels increased. SSL-RNA analysis revealed differential expression of 134 genes, with significant downregulation of immune-related pathways and genes associated with neutrophilic inflammation.

Conclusion: These findings suggest a suppression of both type 2 and non-type 2 inflammation in response to benralizumab treatment, with potential implications for asthma management. However, the limitations of the study include a small sample size and challenges in sebum collection, particularly among female participants. Although the noninvasive nature of this sampling method makes it attractive for both research and clinical applications, additional studies are needed to fully investigate the potential of SSL-RNA analysis as a noninvasive biomarker to assess treatment response in asthma.

背景:研究存在于皮肤表面脂质(SSL-RNAs)中的人类编码和非编码 RNAs 为了解皮肤的生理状态提供了一种很有前景的方法。苯拉利珠单抗治疗可减少严重嗜酸性粒细胞性哮喘患者的病情加重,改善症状控制和生活质量。虽然这种治疗方法能有效消耗外周血嗜酸性粒细胞,但 Benralizumab 对 SSL-RNA 的影响仍完全未知:研究苯拉利珠单抗治疗对重症哮喘患者 SSL-RNA 图谱的影响:方法:在苯拉珠单抗治疗一年前后,对患者的皮肤样本进行非侵入性采集。共有 16 名患者入选,但由于采集困难,仅对 5 名患者进行了 SSL-RNA 分析,主要是女性患者:结果:苯拉珠单抗治疗后,哮喘症状、恶化率和肺功能参数均有所改善。外周血嗜酸性粒细胞被完全清除,血清中 eotaxin-1 水平升高。SSL-RNA 分析显示,134 个基因的表达存在差异,免疫相关通路和中性粒细胞炎症相关基因的表达显著下调:这些研究结果表明,苯拉利珠单抗治疗可抑制2型和非2型炎症,对哮喘的治疗具有潜在意义。然而,这项研究的局限性包括样本量较小,皮脂收集困难,尤其是女性参与者。虽然这种采样方法的无创性质使其在研究和临床应用中都很有吸引力,但还需要进行更多的研究,以充分了解 SSL-RNA 分析作为一种无创生物标记物评估哮喘治疗反应的潜力。
{"title":"Skin Surface Lipid-RNA Profile Obtained from Patients with Severe Asthma After Benralizumab Treatment.","authors":"Sonoko Harada, Hitoshi Sasano, Shoko Ueda, Yuuki Sandhu, Sumiko Abe, Yuki Tanabe, Kyoko Shima, Tetsuya Kuwano, Yuya Uehara, Takayoshi Inoue, Ko Okumura, Kazuhisa Takahashi, Norihiro Harada","doi":"10.2147/JAA.S490832","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JAA.S490832","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Examining human coding and non-coding RNAs present in skin surface lipids (SSL-RNAs) offers a promising approach to understanding the physiological state of the skin. Benralizumab treatment can reduce exacerbations and improve symptom control and quality of life in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma. Although this treatment effectively depletes peripheral blood eosinophils, the impact of benralizumab on SSL-RNA remains completely unknown.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the effects of benralizumab treatment on SSL-RNA profiles in patients with severe asthma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Skin samples were non-invasively collected from patients before and after one year of benralizumab treatment. Sixteen patients were enrolled, but the SSL-RNA analysis was only feasible for five patients due to collection challenges, mainly in female participants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following benralizumab treatment, asthma symptoms, exacerbation rates, and lung function parameters improved. Peripheral blood eosinophils were completely depleted and serum eotaxin-1 levels increased. SSL-RNA analysis revealed differential expression of 134 genes, with significant downregulation of immune-related pathways and genes associated with neutrophilic inflammation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings suggest a suppression of both type 2 and non-type 2 inflammation in response to benralizumab treatment, with potential implications for asthma management. However, the limitations of the study include a small sample size and challenges in sebum collection, particularly among female participants. Although the noninvasive nature of this sampling method makes it attractive for both research and clinical applications, additional studies are needed to fully investigate the potential of SSL-RNA analysis as a noninvasive biomarker to assess treatment response in asthma.</p>","PeriodicalId":15079,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Asthma and Allergy","volume":"17 ","pages":"1103-1113"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11550681/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142621065","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Maintenance OCS Were Used More Frequently Than Biologics in Patients with Uncontrolled GINA 4/5 Asthma in Germany in 2019. 2019年,德国未受控制的GINA 4/5哮喘患者使用维持性OCS的频率高于生物制剂。
IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 ALLERGY Pub Date : 2024-11-01 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.2147/JAA.S480380
Katrin Milger, Dirk Koschel, Dirk Skowasch, Hartmut Timmermann, Olaf Schmidt, Karl-Christian Bergmann, Claus Neurohr, Robert Lindner, Sebastian Heck, Johann Christian Virchow

Purpose: Asthma is affecting 4-5% of all adults (10% of children) in Germany, ≥ half are inadequately controlled. In 2019 up to 54 thousand patients suffered from severe uncontrolled asthma, 52% were treated/co-treated by pneumonologists. 45% of them had continuous oral corticosteroid (OCS)- and short-acting β2-agonist (SABA) overuse for ≥2 years. The aim of the current study was to analyze the main treatments, escalation schemes and the adherence to the GINA recommendations.

Patients and methods: Retrospective analysis in 2021 based on data from January to December 2019 in Germany, using the IQVIA™ LRx prescription database and the IQVIA™ Disease Analyzer database containing anonymized electronic medical records as the main data sources.

Results: In 2019 25,200 patients with severe, uncontrolled asthma treated in a pneumonologist´s practice in Germany received GINA 3 (0,4%), GINA 4 (76%) or GINA 5 therapy (24%) during the study year compared to 59% GINA 5 therapy in the 5-10% (1,500-3,000) co-treated in a specialized outpatient department. In Pneumonologists` practices the most frequent choice in GINA 5 was OCS in 69% of patients (biologicals 37%, long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) 20%) compared to 66% biologicals, 55% OCS, and 25% LAMA in the outpatient department. 54,958 of 613,000 GINA 4/5 patients were treated with OCS, 9,725 even with doses above the so called "Cushing threshold" for prednisolone of 2700 mg/year. After introduction of a biological treatment, patients reduced their SABA prescriptions by 28%, OCS by 55%, and OCS overall exposure by 40%, one-third did not need OCS anymore.

Conclusion: In 75% of patients with uncontrolled asthma for ≥2 years therapy was not escalated beyond GINA 4 or low dose OCS was used as the most frequent add-on treatment in GINA 5 contradictory to treatment recommendations. Use of biologics reduced on demand rescue medication and OCS use.

目的:在德国,4-5%的成年人(10%的儿童)患有哮喘,其中≥一半的患者病情未得到充分控制。2019 年,有多达 5.4 万名患者患有严重失控的哮喘,其中 52% 接受了肺科医生的治疗/联合治疗。其中45%的患者已连续过度使用口服皮质类固醇(OCS)和短效β2-激动剂(SABA)≥2年。本研究旨在分析主要治疗方法、升级方案以及对GINA建议的遵守情况:2021年的回顾性分析基于德国2019年1月至12月的数据,使用IQVIA™ LRx处方数据库和包含匿名电子病历的IQVIA™ Disease Analyzer数据库作为主要数据来源:2019年,德国有2.52万名严重、未得到控制的哮喘患者在肺科医生的诊所接受了GINA 3(0.4%)、GINA 4(76%)或GINA 5(24%)治疗,而在专科门诊接受联合治疗的5%-10%(1500-3000人)患者中,59%接受了GINA 5治疗。在肺科医生的临床实践中,69% 的患者在 GINA 5 治疗中最常选择的是 OCS(生物制剂占 37%,长效毒蕈碱拮抗剂 (LAMA) 占 20%),而在门诊部,生物制剂占 66%,OCS 占 55%,LAMA 占 25%。在 613,000 名 GINA 4/5 患者中,54,958 人接受了 OCS 治疗,9,725 人的剂量甚至超过了泼尼松龙 2700 毫克/年的所谓 "库欣阈值"。在采用生物疗法后,患者的 SABA 处方减少了 28%,OCS 减少了 55%,OCS 的总接触量减少了 40%,三分之一的患者不再需要 OCS:结论:75%的哮喘患者在≥2 年的时间里病情未得到控制,其治疗未超过 GINA 4 级,或者在 GINA 5 级中,小剂量 OCS 被用作最常用的附加治疗,这与治疗建议相悖。生物制剂的使用减少了按需抢救药物和 OCS 的使用。
{"title":"Maintenance OCS Were Used More Frequently Than Biologics in Patients with Uncontrolled GINA 4/5 Asthma in Germany in 2019.","authors":"Katrin Milger, Dirk Koschel, Dirk Skowasch, Hartmut Timmermann, Olaf Schmidt, Karl-Christian Bergmann, Claus Neurohr, Robert Lindner, Sebastian Heck, Johann Christian Virchow","doi":"10.2147/JAA.S480380","DOIUrl":"10.2147/JAA.S480380","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Asthma is affecting 4-5% of all adults (10% of children) in Germany, ≥ half are inadequately controlled. In 2019 up to 54 thousand patients suffered from severe uncontrolled asthma, 52% were treated/co-treated by pneumonologists. 45% of them had continuous oral corticosteroid (OCS)- and short-acting β2-agonist (SABA) overuse for ≥2 years. The aim of the current study was to analyze the main treatments, escalation schemes and the adherence to the GINA recommendations.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Retrospective analysis in 2021 based on data from January to December 2019 in Germany, using the IQVIA™ LRx prescription database and the IQVIA™ Disease Analyzer database containing anonymized electronic medical records as the main data sources.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 2019 25,200 patients with severe, uncontrolled asthma treated in a pneumonologist´s practice in Germany received GINA 3 (0,4%), GINA 4 (76%) or GINA 5 therapy (24%) during the study year compared to 59% GINA 5 therapy in the 5-10% (1,500-3,000) co-treated in a specialized outpatient department. In Pneumonologists` practices the most frequent choice in GINA 5 was OCS in 69% of patients (biologicals 37%, long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) 20%) compared to 66% biologicals, 55% OCS, and 25% LAMA in the outpatient department. 54,958 of 613,000 GINA 4/5 patients were treated with OCS, 9,725 even with doses above the so called \"Cushing threshold\" for prednisolone of 2700 mg/year. After introduction of a biological treatment, patients reduced their SABA prescriptions by 28%, OCS by 55%, and OCS overall exposure by 40%, one-third did not need OCS anymore.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In 75% of patients with uncontrolled asthma for ≥2 years therapy was not escalated beyond GINA 4 or low dose OCS was used as the most frequent add-on treatment in GINA 5 contradictory to treatment recommendations. Use of biologics reduced on demand rescue medication and OCS use.</p>","PeriodicalId":15079,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Asthma and Allergy","volume":"17 ","pages":"1093-1101"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11536981/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142583295","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Expression Levels of Transforming Growth Factor β1 and Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor Associated Factor 6 in Allergic Rhinitis Patients and Their Potential Relationship with Epithelial - Mesenchymal Transition: A Pilot Prospective Observational Study. 过敏性鼻炎患者体内转化生长因子β1和肿瘤坏死因子受体相关因子6的表达水平及其与上皮-间质转化的潜在关系:一项试验性前瞻性观察研究。
IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 ALLERGY Pub Date : 2024-11-01 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.2147/JAA.S474445
Kai Wang, Qin Gao, Yelong Bai, Rong Yu, Qing Luo

Objective: To study the role of transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGF-β1) and tumor necrosis factor receptor related factor 6 (TRAF6) in the progression of epithelial mesenchymal transformation (EMT) in allergic rhinitis (AR).

Methods: A total of 30 patients underwent nasal endoscopic surgery at our Hospital were selected for 15 patients in each group based on their allergy status. Inferior turbinate mucosa tissue was obtained and analyzed using immunohistochemical (IHC) tests, real-time quantitative PCR (qRT-PCR) detection, and Western blotting (WB) tests to measure TGF-β1, TRAF6, E-cadherin, Vimentin, and α-Smooth Muscle Actin (α-SMA) expression levels.

Results: The expression levels of TGF-β1, TRAF6, Vimentin, and α-SMA were significantly higher in the AR group compared to the control group as shown by IHC, qRT-PCR, and WB (P < 0.05). E-cadherin expression was significantly lower group than in the control group (P < 0.05). Protein expression of TGF-β1 showed significantly positive correlations with TRAF6 (r = 0.8188, P = 0.0002), α-SMA (r = 0.8076, P = 0.0003), and Vimentin (r = 0.6917, P = 0.0043). There was a significantly negative correlation between protein expression of TGF-β1 and E-cadherin (r = -0.8032, P = 0.0003). Protein expression of TRAF6 showed a significantly negative correlation with E-cadherin (r = -0.6405, P = 0.0101) but positive correlations with α-SMA (r = 0.5809, P = 0.0231) and Vimentin (r = 0.555, P = 0.0318).

Conclusion: TGF-β1, TRAF6, and EMT-related markers (Vimentin, α-SMA) were highly expressed in the nasal mucosa of AR patients. TGF-β1 and TRAF6 may be involved in the epithelial-mesenchymal transition in allergic rhinitis.

目的研究转化生长因子β1(TGF-β1)和肿瘤坏死因子受体相关因子6(TRAF6)在过敏性鼻炎(AR)上皮间质转化(EMT)过程中的作用:方法:在本院接受鼻内窥镜手术的 30 例患者中,根据过敏状态选择每组 15 例患者。获取下鼻甲粘膜组织,通过免疫组化(IHC)检测、实时定量 PCR(qRT-PCR)检测和 Western 印迹(WB)检测来分析 TGF-β1、TRAF6、E-adherin、Vimentin 和 α-平滑肌肌动蛋白(α-SMA)的表达水平:IHC、qRT-PCR和WB结果显示,与对照组相比,AR组的TGF-β1、TRAF6、Vimentin和α-SMA表达水平明显升高(P < 0.05)。AR组的E-cadherin表达明显低于对照组(P<0.05)。TGF-β1 蛋白表达与 TRAF6(r = 0.8188,P = 0.0002)、α-SMA(r = 0.8076,P = 0.0003)和 Vimentin(r = 0.6917,P = 0.0043)呈显著正相关。TGF-β1 蛋白表达与 E-cadherin 蛋白表达呈明显负相关(r = -0.8032,P = 0.0003)。TRAF6的蛋白表达与E-cadherin呈明显负相关(r = -0.6405,P = 0.0101),但与α-SMA(r = 0.5809,P = 0.0231)和Vimentin(r = 0.555,P = 0.0318)呈正相关:结论:TGF-β1、TRAF6 和 EMT 相关标记物(Vimentin、α-SMA)在 AR 患者的鼻粘膜中高表达。TGF-β1和TRAF6可能参与了过敏性鼻炎的上皮-间质转化过程。
{"title":"The Expression Levels of Transforming Growth Factor β1 and Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor Associated Factor 6 in Allergic Rhinitis Patients and Their Potential Relationship with Epithelial - Mesenchymal Transition: A Pilot Prospective Observational Study.","authors":"Kai Wang, Qin Gao, Yelong Bai, Rong Yu, Qing Luo","doi":"10.2147/JAA.S474445","DOIUrl":"10.2147/JAA.S474445","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To study the role of transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGF-β1) and tumor necrosis factor receptor related factor 6 (TRAF6) in the progression of epithelial mesenchymal transformation (EMT) in allergic rhinitis (AR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 30 patients underwent nasal endoscopic surgery at our Hospital were selected for 15 patients in each group based on their allergy status. Inferior turbinate mucosa tissue was obtained and analyzed using immunohistochemical (IHC) tests, real-time quantitative PCR (qRT-PCR) detection, and Western blotting (WB) tests to measure TGF-β1, TRAF6, E-cadherin, Vimentin, and α-Smooth Muscle Actin (α-SMA) expression levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The expression levels of TGF-β1, TRAF6, Vimentin, and α-SMA were significantly higher in the AR group compared to the control group as shown by IHC, qRT-PCR, and WB (P < 0.05). E-cadherin expression was significantly lower group than in the control group (P < 0.05). Protein expression of TGF-β1 showed significantly positive correlations with TRAF6 (r = 0.8188, P = 0.0002), α-SMA (r = 0.8076, P = 0.0003), and Vimentin (r = 0.6917, P = 0.0043). There was a significantly negative correlation between protein expression of TGF-β1 and E-cadherin (r = -0.8032, P = 0.0003). Protein expression of TRAF6 showed a significantly negative correlation with E-cadherin (r = -0.6405, P = 0.0101) but positive correlations with α-SMA (r = 0.5809, P = 0.0231) and Vimentin (r = 0.555, P = 0.0318).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TGF-β1, TRAF6, and EMT-related markers (Vimentin, α-SMA) were highly expressed in the nasal mucosa of AR patients. TGF-β1 and TRAF6 may be involved in the epithelial-mesenchymal transition in allergic rhinitis.</p>","PeriodicalId":15079,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Asthma and Allergy","volume":"17 ","pages":"1083-1092"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11537165/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142583297","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Asthma and Allergy
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1