Pub Date : 2024-11-14eCollection Date: 2024-01-01DOI: 10.2147/JAA.S488764
Juan Carlos Miralles-López, Francisco J Alvarez-Gutiérrez, Julio Delgado-Romero, Santiago Quirce, Jose Gregorio Soto-Campos, Ruben Andújar-Espinosa, Sheila Cabrejos-Perotti, Manuel Castilla-Martínez, Isabel Flores-Martín, Manuel José Pajarón-Fernández, José Valverde-Molina
Purpose: With the advent of biological therapies, emerging concepts regarding establishing new targets in asthma management, such as disease modification, have entered the debate among the scientific community. The definitions that form the conceptual basis of this goal need to be agreed upon.
Methods: A multidisciplinary expert group was assembled as the steering committee. A systematic literature review was conducted to identify the scientific background for constructing appropriate definitions. Based on the literature review and the clinical experience of the experts, the committee built a list of statements that could be applied to establish the definition of disease modification in asthma. After that, a Delphi validation was performed to assess the appropriateness of the list of statements. The questionnaire included a total of 22 statements, divided into "Essential criteria for disease modification in asthma" (5 statements) and "Disease modification indicators and other considerations" (17 statements). Panelists used a 9-point Likert scale to measure agreement on each statement. The cut-off point for high consensus was defined as a minimum score of 7 and had to be reached by at least two-thirds of the experts.
Results: A total of 192 asthma experts voted on statements anonymously. Of those, 104 (54%) were Pneumologists, 65 (34%) were allergologists, and 23 (12%) were Pediatricians. An interim analysis of round 1 data was performed. All statements reached consensus on the first round, with a median score above 7 in all cases.
Conclusion: In conclusion, in this Delphi study, a large number of experts in the management of severe asthma from different specialties agreed on the clinical-functional and pathophysiological aspects to be considered in order to try to achieve disease modification.
{"title":"Disease Modification in Asthma: Are We on the Right Way? A Multidisciplinary Expert Delphi Consensus (MODIASTHMA Consensus).","authors":"Juan Carlos Miralles-López, Francisco J Alvarez-Gutiérrez, Julio Delgado-Romero, Santiago Quirce, Jose Gregorio Soto-Campos, Ruben Andújar-Espinosa, Sheila Cabrejos-Perotti, Manuel Castilla-Martínez, Isabel Flores-Martín, Manuel José Pajarón-Fernández, José Valverde-Molina","doi":"10.2147/JAA.S488764","DOIUrl":"10.2147/JAA.S488764","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>With the advent of biological therapies, emerging concepts regarding establishing new targets in asthma management, such as disease modification, have entered the debate among the scientific community. The definitions that form the conceptual basis of this goal need to be agreed upon.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multidisciplinary expert group was assembled as the steering committee. A systematic literature review was conducted to identify the scientific background for constructing appropriate definitions. Based on the literature review and the clinical experience of the experts, the committee built a list of statements that could be applied to establish the definition of disease modification in asthma. After that, a Delphi validation was performed to assess the appropriateness of the list of statements. The questionnaire included a total of 22 statements, divided into \"Essential criteria for disease modification in asthma\" (5 statements) and \"Disease modification indicators and other considerations\" (17 statements). Panelists used a 9-point Likert scale to measure agreement on each statement. The cut-off point for high consensus was defined as a minimum score of 7 and had to be reached by at least two-thirds of the experts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 192 asthma experts voted on statements anonymously. Of those, 104 (54%) were Pneumologists, 65 (34%) were allergologists, and 23 (12%) were Pediatricians. An interim analysis of round 1 data was performed. All statements reached consensus on the first round, with a median score above 7 in all cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In conclusion, in this Delphi study, a large number of experts in the management of severe asthma from different specialties agreed on the clinical-functional and pathophysiological aspects to be considered in order to try to achieve disease modification.</p>","PeriodicalId":15079,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Asthma and Allergy","volume":"17 ","pages":"1163-1171"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11571985/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142667964","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Purpose: Omalizumab, the anti-IgE monoclonal antibody used to treat severe asthma, reduces asthma exacerbations, hospitalizations, and corticosteroid use. Although allergic asthma is a therapeutic target of omalizumab, omalizumab is not effective in all patients with severe allergic asthma and is not always available for long-term use. We retrospectively investigated factors related to long-term (≥2 years) use of omalizumab for severe asthma.
Patients and methods: Of the 116 patients treated with omalizumab for severe asthma at our hospital between 2009 and 2017, 82 were included in this retrospective analysis. Thirty-four were excluded because of adverse events, financial difficulties, or hospital transfers. The number of asthma exacerbations, unscheduled visits, corticosteroid doses, asthma control test scores, pulmonary function test results, and fractional exhaled nitric oxide levels were evaluated.
Results: The median age of the study population was 58 years, with 66% female and 26% taking regular oral corticosteroids. After 2 years of treatment, 52 responders were identified using the global evaluation of treatment effectiveness (GETE) score. Improvements in asthma control test scores, airflow limitation, exacerbations, and oral corticosteroid use were observed in the responders. Multivariate analysis revealed that a peripheral blood eosinophil count of ≥200 or a perennial antigen-specific IgE antibody positivity of ≥2 predicted a response at the 2-year mark. However, Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that neither high eosinophil counts nor perennial antigen-specific IgE positivity influenced the prolongation of treatment beyond 2 years, and responders at 2 years underwent omalizumab treatment for a significantly longer period than non-responders (HR = 9.89, p < 0.001), with GETE at 2 years being the only predictor of long-term omalizumab use.
Conclusion: In this retrospective study the GETE after 2 years of omalizumab therapy emerged as the most meaningful predictor of the long-term effectiveness of omalizumab treatment in patients with severe asthma, highlighting the benefits of prolonged therapy in certain populations. These findings may guide future therapeutic strategies for severe asthma.
{"title":"Japanese Patients with Severe Asthma Identified as Responders to Omalizumab Treatment at 2 Years Based on the GETE Score Continued Treatment for an Extended Period.","authors":"Ai Goto, Sonoko Harada, Hitoshi Sasano, Yuuki Sandhu, Yuki Tanabe, Sumiko Abe, Shoko Ueda, Tomohito Takeshige, Kei Matsuno, Tetsutaro Nagaoka, Jun Ito, Ryo Atsuta, Kazuhisa Takahashi, Norihiro Harada","doi":"10.2147/JAA.S423256","DOIUrl":"10.2147/JAA.S423256","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Omalizumab, the anti-IgE monoclonal antibody used to treat severe asthma, reduces asthma exacerbations, hospitalizations, and corticosteroid use. Although allergic asthma is a therapeutic target of omalizumab, omalizumab is not effective in all patients with severe allergic asthma and is not always available for long-term use. We retrospectively investigated factors related to long-term (≥2 years) use of omalizumab for severe asthma.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Of the 116 patients treated with omalizumab for severe asthma at our hospital between 2009 and 2017, 82 were included in this retrospective analysis. Thirty-four were excluded because of adverse events, financial difficulties, or hospital transfers. The number of asthma exacerbations, unscheduled visits, corticosteroid doses, asthma control test scores, pulmonary function test results, and fractional exhaled nitric oxide levels were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median age of the study population was 58 years, with 66% female and 26% taking regular oral corticosteroids. After 2 years of treatment, 52 responders were identified using the global evaluation of treatment effectiveness (GETE) score. Improvements in asthma control test scores, airflow limitation, exacerbations, and oral corticosteroid use were observed in the responders. Multivariate analysis revealed that a peripheral blood eosinophil count of ≥200 or a perennial antigen-specific IgE antibody positivity of ≥2 predicted a response at the 2-year mark. However, Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that neither high eosinophil counts nor perennial antigen-specific IgE positivity influenced the prolongation of treatment beyond 2 years, and responders at 2 years underwent omalizumab treatment for a significantly longer period than non-responders (HR = 9.89, p < 0.001), with GETE at 2 years being the only predictor of long-term omalizumab use.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this retrospective study the GETE after 2 years of omalizumab therapy emerged as the most meaningful predictor of the long-term effectiveness of omalizumab treatment in patients with severe asthma, highlighting the benefits of prolonged therapy in certain populations. These findings may guide future therapeutic strategies for severe asthma.</p>","PeriodicalId":15079,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Asthma and Allergy","volume":"17 ","pages":"1173-1186"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11572441/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142667967","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Purpose: To investigate the differential clinical significance of fractional concentration of exhaled nitric oxide measured at a flow rate of 200 mL/s (FENO200) and concentration of nitric oxide in alveolar (CANO) in asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or asthma-COPD Overlap (ACO).
Methods: A total of 178 patients were included, with 82 patients in asthma group, 47 patients in COPD group and 49 patients in ACO group. Data for demographic data, spirometry and exhaled nitric oxide were collected for comparative analysis, correlation analysis and discriminant canonical analysis.
Results: The values of FENO200 in asthma, COPD and ACO groups were 11.0(7.0-22.3), 8.0(6.0-11.0) and 9.0(6.5-19.5) ppb, respectively. In the asthma group, FENO200 exhibited negative correlations with FEV1/FVC, MMEF and MEF50. No significant correlation was observed between CANO and pulmonary function parameters. In the COPD group, both FENO200 and CANO showed negative correlation with pulmonary function parameters including FVC, FEV1, PEF, MMEF, MEF75, MEF50. In the ACO group, FENO200 demonstrated no significant correlation with pulmonary function parameters, while CANO was correlated with FEV1, PEF, MMEF and MEF50. In COPD group, ΔFEV1 in the bronchodilator test was correlated with FENO200. As for the ACO group, ΔFEV1 was correlated with CANO. In the discriminant canonical analysis, four parameters including gender, age, MEF75 and FENO50 discriminated between the three groups of asthma, COPD and ACO.
Conclusion: In asthma, COPD and ACO, FENO200 has demonstrated a robust correlation with CANO. Elevated FENO200 levels are predominantly indicative of pulmonary function impairment in asthma and COPD, whereas elevated CANO levels are mainly correlated with pulmonary function impairment in COPD and ACO. Compared with FENO200 and CANO, FENO50 may have a better discriminatory ability in distinguishing asthma, COPD and ACO.
{"title":"Differential Clinical Significance of FENO<sub>200</sub> and CANO in Asthma, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), and Asthma-COPD Overlap (ACO).","authors":"Guansheng Zeng, Jian Xu, Huadong Zeng, Cuilan Wang, Lichang Chen, Huapeng Yu","doi":"10.2147/JAA.S486324","DOIUrl":"10.2147/JAA.S486324","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the differential clinical significance of fractional concentration of exhaled nitric oxide measured at a flow rate of 200 mL/s (FENO<sub>200</sub>) and concentration of nitric oxide in alveolar (CANO) in asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or asthma-COPD Overlap (ACO).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 178 patients were included, with 82 patients in asthma group, 47 patients in COPD group and 49 patients in ACO group. Data for demographic data, spirometry and exhaled nitric oxide were collected for comparative analysis, correlation analysis and discriminant canonical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The values of FENO<sub>200</sub> in asthma, COPD and ACO groups were 11.0(7.0-22.3), 8.0(6.0-11.0) and 9.0(6.5-19.5) ppb, respectively. In the asthma group, FENO<sub>200</sub> exhibited negative correlations with FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC, MMEF and MEF50. No significant correlation was observed between CANO and pulmonary function parameters. In the COPD group, both FENO<sub>200</sub> and CANO showed negative correlation with pulmonary function parameters including FVC, FEV<sub>1</sub>, PEF, MMEF, MEF75, MEF50. In the ACO group, FENO<sub>200</sub> demonstrated no significant correlation with pulmonary function parameters, while CANO was correlated with FEV<sub>1</sub>, PEF, MMEF and MEF50. In COPD group, ΔFEV<sub>1</sub> in the bronchodilator test was correlated with FENO<sub>200</sub>. As for the ACO group, ΔFEV<sub>1</sub> was correlated with CANO. In the discriminant canonical analysis, four parameters including gender, age, MEF75 and FENO<sub>50</sub> discriminated between the three groups of asthma, COPD and ACO.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In asthma, COPD and ACO, FENO<sub>200</sub> has demonstrated a robust correlation with CANO. Elevated FENO<sub>200</sub> levels are predominantly indicative of pulmonary function impairment in asthma and COPD, whereas elevated CANO levels are mainly correlated with pulmonary function impairment in COPD and ACO. Compared with FENO<sub>200</sub> and CANO, FENO<sub>50</sub> may have a better discriminatory ability in distinguishing asthma, COPD and ACO.</p>","PeriodicalId":15079,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Asthma and Allergy","volume":"17 ","pages":"1151-1161"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11570527/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142667956","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-09eCollection Date: 2024-01-01DOI: 10.2147/JAA.S472490
Yair Humberto González-Tuyub, Karla Daniela González-Iñiguez, Paula Catalina Lizarazo-Guiza, Sergio Ricardo García-García
Background: Asthma is a health condition with worldwide relevance, evaluated based on the necessary treatment to control symptoms and exacerbations. Severe asthma is uncontrolled despite high doses of ICS-LABA and treatment for triggering factors. Severe eosinophilic asthma is characterized by an increase in eosinophils in the peripheral circulation, walls, and passages of the respiratory tract. Biologic treatments such as benralizumab have demonstrated effectiveness as aids in decreasing respiratory tract inflammation and improving the management of symptoms in patients living with asthma.
Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of benralizumab as an add-on therapy for patients with severe, uncontrolled asthma and elevated blood eosinophil counts.
Methods: Observational, analytic and ambispective study in 21 patients diagnosed with severe eosinophilic asthma treated with benralizumab, to determine the treatment's effectiveness through the change in estimated respiratory function by spirometry through the forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) value, reduction in second controlling treatment, serum eosinophil reduction, change in the Asthma Control Test score and the Asthma Control Questionnaire test at 6 and 16 months of treatment.
Results: An average difference of 241.43 mL (±461.43) in FEV1 at 6 months was found, as well as an average FeNO reduction of 49.8 ppm and eosinophil reduction of 612.78 cells at 12 months of treatment, additionally, CSI requirements were reduced in 95% of patients.
Conclusion: Benralizumab improved respiratory function as well as key biomarkers such as eosinophil count, exhaled nitric oxide fraction (FeNO), which reflected in a decreased requirement of inhaled corticosteroids and improved symptom control.
{"title":"Benralizumab: Effectiveness in Patients with Uncontrolled Severe Eosinophilic Asthma at 6 and 12 Months at a Third-Level Care Hospital. Capacity for ICS-LABA Therapy Reduction.","authors":"Yair Humberto González-Tuyub, Karla Daniela González-Iñiguez, Paula Catalina Lizarazo-Guiza, Sergio Ricardo García-García","doi":"10.2147/JAA.S472490","DOIUrl":"10.2147/JAA.S472490","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Asthma is a health condition with worldwide relevance, evaluated based on the necessary treatment to control symptoms and exacerbations. Severe asthma is uncontrolled despite high doses of ICS-LABA and treatment for triggering factors. Severe eosinophilic asthma is characterized by an increase in eosinophils in the peripheral circulation, walls, and passages of the respiratory tract. Biologic treatments such as benralizumab have demonstrated effectiveness as aids in decreasing respiratory tract inflammation and improving the management of symptoms in patients living with asthma.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the efficacy and safety of benralizumab as an add-on therapy for patients with severe, uncontrolled asthma and elevated blood eosinophil counts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Observational, analytic and ambispective study in 21 patients diagnosed with severe eosinophilic asthma treated with benralizumab, to determine the treatment's effectiveness through the change in estimated respiratory function by spirometry through the forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) value, reduction in second controlling treatment, serum eosinophil reduction, change in the Asthma Control Test score and the Asthma Control Questionnaire test at 6 and 16 months of treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>An average difference of 241.43 mL (±461.43) in FEV1 at 6 months was found, as well as an average FeNO reduction of 49.8 ppm and eosinophil reduction of 612.78 cells at 12 months of treatment, additionally, CSI requirements were reduced in 95% of patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Benralizumab improved respiratory function as well as key biomarkers such as eosinophil count, exhaled nitric oxide fraction (FeNO), which reflected in a decreased requirement of inhaled corticosteroids and improved symptom control.</p>","PeriodicalId":15079,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Asthma and Allergy","volume":"17 ","pages":"1141-1149"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11559237/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142621059","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-08eCollection Date: 2024-01-01DOI: 10.2147/JAA.S503590
Agussalim
{"title":"Response to Disease Burden and Access to Biologic Therapy in Patients with Severe Asthma, 2017-2022: An Analysis of the International Severe Asthma Registry [Letter].","authors":"Agussalim","doi":"10.2147/JAA.S503590","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JAA.S503590","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15079,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Asthma and Allergy","volume":"17 ","pages":"1127-1128"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11556244/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142621062","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-08eCollection Date: 2024-01-01DOI: 10.2147/JAA.S474306
Leonie Biener, Hussein Morobeid, Carmen Pizarro, Daniel Kuetting, Georg Nickenig, Dirk Skowasch
Background: Patients with severe asthma (SA) benefit from biologic therapy substantially. However, the impact of smoking-related comorbidities remains unclear due to the exclusion of patients with ≥10 pack-years from asthma studies. Our aim was to examine the effects of emphysema on biologic treatment response in SA in this retrospective cohort study.
Methods: Pulmonary emphysema was examined using computed tomography. Patients with SA were included and divided into two groups based on emphysema quantity (≥5% or <5%). They received either anti-IgE (22.1%), anti-IL-5-(receptor) (52.3%), or anti-IL-4/IL-13 (25.6%) biologic therapy. Treatment response was assessed after 7.8 ± 2.5 months based on acute exacerbations (AE), oral corticosteroid (OCS) therapy, Asthma Control Test (ACT), forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and using the Biologics Asthma Response Score (BARS).
Results: This study comprised 86 patients (mean age 56.1 ± 12.8 years; 54% female). Half (43, 50.0%) were never-smokers, half ex-smokers with an average of 26.9 ± 18.2 pack-years. Patients with ≥5% emphysema were more often ex-smokers (80% vs 41%, p=0.002), had poorer lung function (FEV1 median 1.3 [interquartile range: 1.0;1.6] vs 1.8[1-2;2.4] L, p=0.037), and more comorbid COPD (50% vs 21%, p=0.012). However, no significant differences were noted in treatment response regarding annualized AE rate (-2.5[-5;-1] vs -3.0[-5;-2] n/year, p=0.295) and OCS reduction (-4[-10;0] vs -5[-10;0] mg, p=0.691), ACT score (5[3;9] vs 4[0;9] points, p=0.579) or FEV1 improvement (0.03[-0.15;0.25] vs 0.23[-0.5;0.49] L, p=0.052), BARS (p=0.312), and remission rates (15.0% vs 19.7%, p=0.753).
Conclusion: In patients with severe asthma, those with comorbid emphysema show similar treatment response to biologic therapy. Therefore, suitable patients should not be denied biologics due to the presence of emphysema.
背景:重症哮喘(SA)患者从生物制剂治疗中获益良多。然而,由于哮喘研究排除了吸烟≥10包年的患者,与吸烟相关的合并症的影响仍不清楚。我们的目的是在这项回顾性队列研究中考察肺气肿对哮喘生物治疗反应的影响:方法:使用计算机断层扫描检查肺气肿。方法:使用计算机断层扫描检查肺气肿,并根据肺气肿的数量(≥5% 或 结果)将 SA 患者分为两组:本研究包括 86 名患者(平均年龄 56.1 ± 12.8 岁;54% 为女性)。半数(43,50.0%)患者从不吸烟,半数为戒烟者,平均吸烟 26.9 ± 18.2 包年。肺气肿≥5%的患者多为前吸烟者(80% vs 41%,P=0.002),肺功能较差(FEV1 中位数为 1.3 [四分位数范围:1.0;1.6] vs 1.8[1-2;2.4] L,P=0.037),合并慢性阻塞性肺病的患者较多(50% vs 21%,P=0.012)。然而,在治疗反应方面,年化 AE 率(-2.5[-5;-1] vs -3.0[-5;-2] n/年,p=0.295)和 OCS 减少率(-4[-10;0] vs -5[-10;0] mg,p=0.691)、ACT 评分(-4[-10;0] vs -5[-10;0] mg,p=0.691)无明显差异。691)、ACT评分(5[3;9] vs 4[0;9]分,p=0.579)或FEV1改善(0.03[-0.15;0.25] vs 0.23[-0.5;0.49] L,p=0.052)、BARS(p=0.312)和缓解率(15.0% vs 19.7%,p=0.753):结论:在重症哮喘患者中,合并肺气肿的患者对生物制剂治疗的反应相似。结论:在重症哮喘患者中,合并肺气肿的患者对生物制剂治疗的反应相似,因此,合适的患者不应因合并肺气肿而拒绝接受生物制剂治疗。
{"title":"The Influence of Emphysema on Treatment Response to Biologic Therapy in Severe Asthma.","authors":"Leonie Biener, Hussein Morobeid, Carmen Pizarro, Daniel Kuetting, Georg Nickenig, Dirk Skowasch","doi":"10.2147/JAA.S474306","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JAA.S474306","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with severe asthma (SA) benefit from biologic therapy substantially. However, the impact of smoking-related comorbidities remains unclear due to the exclusion of patients with ≥10 pack-years from asthma studies. Our aim was to examine the effects of emphysema on biologic treatment response in SA in this retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Pulmonary emphysema was examined using computed tomography. Patients with SA were included and divided into two groups based on emphysema quantity (≥5% or <5%). They received either anti-IgE (22.1%), anti-IL-5-(receptor) (52.3%), or anti-IL-4/IL-13 (25.6%) biologic therapy. Treatment response was assessed after 7.8 ± 2.5 months based on acute exacerbations (AE), oral corticosteroid (OCS) therapy, Asthma Control Test (ACT), forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and using the Biologics Asthma Response Score (BARS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study comprised 86 patients (mean age 56.1 ± 12.8 years; 54% female). Half (43, 50.0%) were never-smokers, half ex-smokers with an average of 26.9 ± 18.2 pack-years. Patients with ≥5% emphysema were more often ex-smokers (80% vs 41%, p=0.002), had poorer lung function (FEV1 median 1.3 [interquartile range: 1.0;1.6] vs 1.8[1-2;2.4] L, p=0.037), and more comorbid COPD (50% vs 21%, p=0.012). However, no significant differences were noted in treatment response regarding annualized AE rate (-2.5[-5;-1] vs -3.0[-5;-2] n/year, p=0.295) and OCS reduction (-4[-10;0] vs -5[-10;0] mg, p=0.691), ACT score (5[3;9] vs 4[0;9] points, p=0.579) or FEV1 improvement (0.03[-0.15;0.25] vs 0.23[-0.5;0.49] L, p=0.052), BARS (p=0.312), and remission rates (15.0% vs 19.7%, p=0.753).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with severe asthma, those with comorbid emphysema show similar treatment response to biologic therapy. Therefore, suitable patients should not be denied biologics due to the presence of emphysema.</p>","PeriodicalId":15079,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Asthma and Allergy","volume":"17 ","pages":"1129-1140"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11556239/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142621067","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-07eCollection Date: 2024-01-01DOI: 10.2147/JAA.S477376
Hong-Li Hua, Yu-Qin Deng, Yu-Chen Tang, Yan Wang, Ze-Zhang Tao
Background: Adenoid hypertrophy (AH) and allergic rhinitis (AR) are common pediatric diseases, seriously affecting the quality of life and growth of children. The recurrence rate of AH is higher for patients with than for those without concurrent AR. Allergen specific immunotherapy (AIT) is the only effective therapy for modifying the course of allergic diseases. This study sought to investigate the efficacy of AIT in preventing AH recurrence in patients with AR who underwent adenoidectomy.
Methods: This study included 134 children aged 5-12 years with concurrent AH and AR. They were separated into the subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) group treated with a double-mite allergen preparation or the non-AIT group treated symptomatically with only medications. The adenoid/nasopharyngeal ratio at one year after adenoidectomy was used to assess AH recurrence. The Obstructive Sleep Apnoea Questionnaire (OSA-18), Paediatric Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (PRQLQ), and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) were used to assess the severity of the sleep disorders and AR.
Results: This study included 62 and 72 children with concurrent AH and AR in the SCIT and non-AIT groups, respectively. The rate of recurrence in the SCIT group was significantly lower than that in the non-AIT group (4.84% vs.16.67%; P=0.030). The OSA-18, PRQLQ, and VAS scores were significantly lower for the SCIT than (P<0.001) for the non-AIT group after one year of treatment.
Conclusion: The findings suggest that AIT should be considered the preferred therapy for reducing postoperative recurrence of AH in children with concurrent AR following adenoidectomy, but further research is needed to confirm these findings in a larger population.
背景:腺样体肥大(AH)和过敏性鼻炎(AR)是儿科常见病,严重影响儿童的生活质量和生长发育。腺样体肥大患者的复发率高于未并发 AR 的患者。过敏原特异性免疫疗法(AIT)是改变过敏性疾病病程的唯一有效疗法。本研究旨在探讨 AIT 在预防接受腺样体切除术的 AR 患者 AH 复发方面的疗效:本研究纳入了 134 名同时患有 AH 和 AR 的 5-12 岁儿童。他们被分为使用双螨过敏原制剂的皮下免疫疗法(SCIT)组和仅使用药物对症治疗的非 AIT 组。腺样体切除术后一年的腺样体/鼻咽比例用于评估AH复发情况。阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停问卷(OSA-18)、儿童鼻结膜炎生活质量问卷(PRQLQ)和视觉模拟量表(VAS)用于评估睡眠障碍和AR的严重程度:本研究的 SCIT 组和非 SCIT 组分别有 62 和 72 名儿童同时患有 AH 和 AR。SCIT组的复发率明显低于非AIT组(4.84% vs.16.67%; P=0.030)。治疗一年后,SCIT 组的 OSA-18、PRQLQ 和 VAS 评分明显低于非 AIT 组(P):研究结果表明,对于腺样体切除术后并发 AR 的儿童,AIT 应被视为减少 AH 术后复发的首选疗法,但还需要进一步研究,以便在更大的人群中证实这些研究结果。
{"title":"Allergen Immunotherapy for a Year Can Effectively Reduce the Risk of Postoperative Recurrence of Adenoid Hypertrophy in Children with Concurrent Allergic Rhinitis (IMPROVEII).","authors":"Hong-Li Hua, Yu-Qin Deng, Yu-Chen Tang, Yan Wang, Ze-Zhang Tao","doi":"10.2147/JAA.S477376","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JAA.S477376","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adenoid hypertrophy (AH) and allergic rhinitis (AR) are common pediatric diseases, seriously affecting the quality of life and growth of children. The recurrence rate of AH is higher for patients with than for those without concurrent AR. Allergen specific immunotherapy (AIT) is the only effective therapy for modifying the course of allergic diseases. This study sought to investigate the efficacy of AIT in preventing AH recurrence in patients with AR who underwent adenoidectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 134 children aged 5-12 years with concurrent AH and AR. They were separated into the subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) group treated with a double-mite allergen preparation or the non-AIT group treated symptomatically with only medications. The adenoid/nasopharyngeal ratio at one year after adenoidectomy was used to assess AH recurrence. The Obstructive Sleep Apnoea Questionnaire (OSA-18), Paediatric Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (PRQLQ), and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) were used to assess the severity of the sleep disorders and AR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 62 and 72 children with concurrent AH and AR in the SCIT and non-AIT groups, respectively. The rate of recurrence in the SCIT group was significantly lower than that in the non-AIT group (4.84% vs.16.67%; <i>P</i>=0.030). The OSA-18, PRQLQ, and VAS scores were significantly lower for the SCIT than (<i>P<0.001</i>) for the non-AIT group after one year of treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings suggest that AIT should be considered the preferred therapy for reducing postoperative recurrence of AH in children with concurrent AR following adenoidectomy, but further research is needed to confirm these findings in a larger population.</p>","PeriodicalId":15079,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Asthma and Allergy","volume":"17 ","pages":"1115-1125"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11552393/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142621056","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Examining human coding and non-coding RNAs present in skin surface lipids (SSL-RNAs) offers a promising approach to understanding the physiological state of the skin. Benralizumab treatment can reduce exacerbations and improve symptom control and quality of life in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma. Although this treatment effectively depletes peripheral blood eosinophils, the impact of benralizumab on SSL-RNA remains completely unknown.
Objective: To investigate the effects of benralizumab treatment on SSL-RNA profiles in patients with severe asthma.
Methods: Skin samples were non-invasively collected from patients before and after one year of benralizumab treatment. Sixteen patients were enrolled, but the SSL-RNA analysis was only feasible for five patients due to collection challenges, mainly in female participants.
Results: Following benralizumab treatment, asthma symptoms, exacerbation rates, and lung function parameters improved. Peripheral blood eosinophils were completely depleted and serum eotaxin-1 levels increased. SSL-RNA analysis revealed differential expression of 134 genes, with significant downregulation of immune-related pathways and genes associated with neutrophilic inflammation.
Conclusion: These findings suggest a suppression of both type 2 and non-type 2 inflammation in response to benralizumab treatment, with potential implications for asthma management. However, the limitations of the study include a small sample size and challenges in sebum collection, particularly among female participants. Although the noninvasive nature of this sampling method makes it attractive for both research and clinical applications, additional studies are needed to fully investigate the potential of SSL-RNA analysis as a noninvasive biomarker to assess treatment response in asthma.
{"title":"Skin Surface Lipid-RNA Profile Obtained from Patients with Severe Asthma After Benralizumab Treatment.","authors":"Sonoko Harada, Hitoshi Sasano, Shoko Ueda, Yuuki Sandhu, Sumiko Abe, Yuki Tanabe, Kyoko Shima, Tetsuya Kuwano, Yuya Uehara, Takayoshi Inoue, Ko Okumura, Kazuhisa Takahashi, Norihiro Harada","doi":"10.2147/JAA.S490832","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JAA.S490832","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Examining human coding and non-coding RNAs present in skin surface lipids (SSL-RNAs) offers a promising approach to understanding the physiological state of the skin. Benralizumab treatment can reduce exacerbations and improve symptom control and quality of life in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma. Although this treatment effectively depletes peripheral blood eosinophils, the impact of benralizumab on SSL-RNA remains completely unknown.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the effects of benralizumab treatment on SSL-RNA profiles in patients with severe asthma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Skin samples were non-invasively collected from patients before and after one year of benralizumab treatment. Sixteen patients were enrolled, but the SSL-RNA analysis was only feasible for five patients due to collection challenges, mainly in female participants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following benralizumab treatment, asthma symptoms, exacerbation rates, and lung function parameters improved. Peripheral blood eosinophils were completely depleted and serum eotaxin-1 levels increased. SSL-RNA analysis revealed differential expression of 134 genes, with significant downregulation of immune-related pathways and genes associated with neutrophilic inflammation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings suggest a suppression of both type 2 and non-type 2 inflammation in response to benralizumab treatment, with potential implications for asthma management. However, the limitations of the study include a small sample size and challenges in sebum collection, particularly among female participants. Although the noninvasive nature of this sampling method makes it attractive for both research and clinical applications, additional studies are needed to fully investigate the potential of SSL-RNA analysis as a noninvasive biomarker to assess treatment response in asthma.</p>","PeriodicalId":15079,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Asthma and Allergy","volume":"17 ","pages":"1103-1113"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11550681/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142621065","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-01eCollection Date: 2024-01-01DOI: 10.2147/JAA.S480380
Katrin Milger, Dirk Koschel, Dirk Skowasch, Hartmut Timmermann, Olaf Schmidt, Karl-Christian Bergmann, Claus Neurohr, Robert Lindner, Sebastian Heck, Johann Christian Virchow
Purpose: Asthma is affecting 4-5% of all adults (10% of children) in Germany, ≥ half are inadequately controlled. In 2019 up to 54 thousand patients suffered from severe uncontrolled asthma, 52% were treated/co-treated by pneumonologists. 45% of them had continuous oral corticosteroid (OCS)- and short-acting β2-agonist (SABA) overuse for ≥2 years. The aim of the current study was to analyze the main treatments, escalation schemes and the adherence to the GINA recommendations.
Patients and methods: Retrospective analysis in 2021 based on data from January to December 2019 in Germany, using the IQVIA™ LRx prescription database and the IQVIA™ Disease Analyzer database containing anonymized electronic medical records as the main data sources.
Results: In 2019 25,200 patients with severe, uncontrolled asthma treated in a pneumonologist´s practice in Germany received GINA 3 (0,4%), GINA 4 (76%) or GINA 5 therapy (24%) during the study year compared to 59% GINA 5 therapy in the 5-10% (1,500-3,000) co-treated in a specialized outpatient department. In Pneumonologists` practices the most frequent choice in GINA 5 was OCS in 69% of patients (biologicals 37%, long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) 20%) compared to 66% biologicals, 55% OCS, and 25% LAMA in the outpatient department. 54,958 of 613,000 GINA 4/5 patients were treated with OCS, 9,725 even with doses above the so called "Cushing threshold" for prednisolone of 2700 mg/year. After introduction of a biological treatment, patients reduced their SABA prescriptions by 28%, OCS by 55%, and OCS overall exposure by 40%, one-third did not need OCS anymore.
Conclusion: In 75% of patients with uncontrolled asthma for ≥2 years therapy was not escalated beyond GINA 4 or low dose OCS was used as the most frequent add-on treatment in GINA 5 contradictory to treatment recommendations. Use of biologics reduced on demand rescue medication and OCS use.
{"title":"Maintenance OCS Were Used More Frequently Than Biologics in Patients with Uncontrolled GINA 4/5 Asthma in Germany in 2019.","authors":"Katrin Milger, Dirk Koschel, Dirk Skowasch, Hartmut Timmermann, Olaf Schmidt, Karl-Christian Bergmann, Claus Neurohr, Robert Lindner, Sebastian Heck, Johann Christian Virchow","doi":"10.2147/JAA.S480380","DOIUrl":"10.2147/JAA.S480380","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Asthma is affecting 4-5% of all adults (10% of children) in Germany, ≥ half are inadequately controlled. In 2019 up to 54 thousand patients suffered from severe uncontrolled asthma, 52% were treated/co-treated by pneumonologists. 45% of them had continuous oral corticosteroid (OCS)- and short-acting β2-agonist (SABA) overuse for ≥2 years. The aim of the current study was to analyze the main treatments, escalation schemes and the adherence to the GINA recommendations.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Retrospective analysis in 2021 based on data from January to December 2019 in Germany, using the IQVIA™ LRx prescription database and the IQVIA™ Disease Analyzer database containing anonymized electronic medical records as the main data sources.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 2019 25,200 patients with severe, uncontrolled asthma treated in a pneumonologist´s practice in Germany received GINA 3 (0,4%), GINA 4 (76%) or GINA 5 therapy (24%) during the study year compared to 59% GINA 5 therapy in the 5-10% (1,500-3,000) co-treated in a specialized outpatient department. In Pneumonologists` practices the most frequent choice in GINA 5 was OCS in 69% of patients (biologicals 37%, long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) 20%) compared to 66% biologicals, 55% OCS, and 25% LAMA in the outpatient department. 54,958 of 613,000 GINA 4/5 patients were treated with OCS, 9,725 even with doses above the so called \"Cushing threshold\" for prednisolone of 2700 mg/year. After introduction of a biological treatment, patients reduced their SABA prescriptions by 28%, OCS by 55%, and OCS overall exposure by 40%, one-third did not need OCS anymore.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In 75% of patients with uncontrolled asthma for ≥2 years therapy was not escalated beyond GINA 4 or low dose OCS was used as the most frequent add-on treatment in GINA 5 contradictory to treatment recommendations. Use of biologics reduced on demand rescue medication and OCS use.</p>","PeriodicalId":15079,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Asthma and Allergy","volume":"17 ","pages":"1093-1101"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11536981/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142583295","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-01eCollection Date: 2024-01-01DOI: 10.2147/JAA.S474445
Kai Wang, Qin Gao, Yelong Bai, Rong Yu, Qing Luo
Objective: To study the role of transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGF-β1) and tumor necrosis factor receptor related factor 6 (TRAF6) in the progression of epithelial mesenchymal transformation (EMT) in allergic rhinitis (AR).
Methods: A total of 30 patients underwent nasal endoscopic surgery at our Hospital were selected for 15 patients in each group based on their allergy status. Inferior turbinate mucosa tissue was obtained and analyzed using immunohistochemical (IHC) tests, real-time quantitative PCR (qRT-PCR) detection, and Western blotting (WB) tests to measure TGF-β1, TRAF6, E-cadherin, Vimentin, and α-Smooth Muscle Actin (α-SMA) expression levels.
Results: The expression levels of TGF-β1, TRAF6, Vimentin, and α-SMA were significantly higher in the AR group compared to the control group as shown by IHC, qRT-PCR, and WB (P < 0.05). E-cadherin expression was significantly lower group than in the control group (P < 0.05). Protein expression of TGF-β1 showed significantly positive correlations with TRAF6 (r = 0.8188, P = 0.0002), α-SMA (r = 0.8076, P = 0.0003), and Vimentin (r = 0.6917, P = 0.0043). There was a significantly negative correlation between protein expression of TGF-β1 and E-cadherin (r = -0.8032, P = 0.0003). Protein expression of TRAF6 showed a significantly negative correlation with E-cadherin (r = -0.6405, P = 0.0101) but positive correlations with α-SMA (r = 0.5809, P = 0.0231) and Vimentin (r = 0.555, P = 0.0318).
Conclusion: TGF-β1, TRAF6, and EMT-related markers (Vimentin, α-SMA) were highly expressed in the nasal mucosa of AR patients. TGF-β1 and TRAF6 may be involved in the epithelial-mesenchymal transition in allergic rhinitis.
{"title":"The Expression Levels of Transforming Growth Factor β1 and Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor Associated Factor 6 in Allergic Rhinitis Patients and Their Potential Relationship with Epithelial - Mesenchymal Transition: A Pilot Prospective Observational Study.","authors":"Kai Wang, Qin Gao, Yelong Bai, Rong Yu, Qing Luo","doi":"10.2147/JAA.S474445","DOIUrl":"10.2147/JAA.S474445","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To study the role of transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGF-β1) and tumor necrosis factor receptor related factor 6 (TRAF6) in the progression of epithelial mesenchymal transformation (EMT) in allergic rhinitis (AR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 30 patients underwent nasal endoscopic surgery at our Hospital were selected for 15 patients in each group based on their allergy status. Inferior turbinate mucosa tissue was obtained and analyzed using immunohistochemical (IHC) tests, real-time quantitative PCR (qRT-PCR) detection, and Western blotting (WB) tests to measure TGF-β1, TRAF6, E-cadherin, Vimentin, and α-Smooth Muscle Actin (α-SMA) expression levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The expression levels of TGF-β1, TRAF6, Vimentin, and α-SMA were significantly higher in the AR group compared to the control group as shown by IHC, qRT-PCR, and WB (P < 0.05). E-cadherin expression was significantly lower group than in the control group (P < 0.05). Protein expression of TGF-β1 showed significantly positive correlations with TRAF6 (r = 0.8188, P = 0.0002), α-SMA (r = 0.8076, P = 0.0003), and Vimentin (r = 0.6917, P = 0.0043). There was a significantly negative correlation between protein expression of TGF-β1 and E-cadherin (r = -0.8032, P = 0.0003). Protein expression of TRAF6 showed a significantly negative correlation with E-cadherin (r = -0.6405, P = 0.0101) but positive correlations with α-SMA (r = 0.5809, P = 0.0231) and Vimentin (r = 0.555, P = 0.0318).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TGF-β1, TRAF6, and EMT-related markers (Vimentin, α-SMA) were highly expressed in the nasal mucosa of AR patients. TGF-β1 and TRAF6 may be involved in the epithelial-mesenchymal transition in allergic rhinitis.</p>","PeriodicalId":15079,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Asthma and Allergy","volume":"17 ","pages":"1083-1092"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11537165/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142583297","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}